User talk:Doug Coldwell/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:ICTBuilding.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:12, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rodrigolopes (talk) 01:10, 6 October 2015 (UTC)


Pay attention to copyright
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.

We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules.

In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files.

Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions.

Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.

العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  မြန်မာဘာသာ  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  русский  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  বাংলা   +/−

--Fenikals (talk) 12:20, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Bernard H Paul 1939.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Carrom dorm furniture.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:35, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Do you have a LOC url for this image? And, which archives did this image File:D C Smith 1922.jpg come from and what is the url? Ww2censor (talk) 13:52, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

No, do not have a URL. Found it at page 34
of "Plane Talk" by Carl R. Oliver (ISBN 0-395-29743-5)
D C Smith of 1922 is page 31 of Oliver book
Doug Coldwell (talk) 14:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Reventtalk 00:07, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Sweeney Prizery backside.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:44, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Need some advice

Hi Doug. It has been awhile since we talked. You had given me a lot of help on the article I did on the Heritage Park in Muskegon. I have been slowly adding pictures to Wikipedia. I have a bunch of places that have multiple photos that I would like to add.

People use a command |commonscat that brings you to a Category in Commons. When I look at the category, I can see the header, but it never lists the photos. I had asked Andrew Jameson and he referred me to a admin, who gave me instructions that made no sense to me.

I was wondering if you had ever used this feature and if you could give me a step by step process for doing this that I can understand. I am now retired, so I have lots of time on my hands and I would like to add more pictures beside the one that is listed.

If you need a link to a page that has these more image links, let me know.

~~

My Error

Doug: I hit the button before finished signing. Here is my signature.

Wingerham52 (talk) 16:43, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Doug:

A couple of years ago you where of great assistance in helping me get my first page published in Wikipedia. It was on the Michigan Heritage Park in Muskegon. I see that you added and improved it.

Unfortunately, I just read the news that the museum is going to permanently close it because it never generated enough traffic to justify it's existence.

Now the question is, do we modify the page to say it is now closed, or do we just delete it?

Wingerham52 (talk) 17:58, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

@Wingerham52: - I would say to keep the article and just modify the page saying it is closed, giving a reference of course.Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:52, 28 November 2018 (UTC)Doug Caldwell

This must be an accidental amalgamation of two separate images. The top image might possibly be a Crane-Simplex chassis with a special (Demarest?, I don't know but it is special) body and made in 1911 but the bottom image of Peerless and Le Baron and Demarest is circa 1921. Eddaido (talk) 08:10, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Meteor III loc.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Broichmore (talk) 16:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Doug Coldwell,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Doug Coldwell,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

File:W A Burt typographer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Psiĥedelisto (talk) 09:48, 3 October 2020 (UTC)


COM:AN/U

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Doug Coldwell and license laundering. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Psiĥedelisto (talk) 05:45, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Mason County Sculpture Trail photos

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

David Eppstein (talk) 05:06, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States 2020 – Last day to enter!

This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.
Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2020}} to your userpage!
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Hi there! Kevin from Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States here. I know it's been a tough year for everyone, and I hope this message finds you well.

You are receiving this message as a participant in last year's Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in the United States. First, a recap: We concluded with over 5,200 great photos of U.S. historical sites made possible by contributors like you. If you haven't yet seen, last year's U.S. winners are viewable here, and the international winners here (including multiple from the United States!).

Second, as you may have seen from the banner notices on Wikipedia, this year's Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in the United States has been running through October instead of September in consideration of the pandemic and the hectic start of the fall season. Despite the challenges of the year, we're thrilled that the United States has surpassed 5,000 photo contributions so far.

October 31st is the last day to upload photos for the U.S. competition this year. If you've already contributed, thank you so much - and it's great to have you again this year! If you haven't yet contributed but are interested in participating again, you're invited to join us during these last couple days. Check out the United States event page for more information. Remember that you are welcome to upload and submit photos of historic sites that you've taken any time in the past, not just this month.

As always, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 07:20, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Please do not overwrite files

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  polski  português  sicilianu  slovenčina  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  日本語  中文  עברית  فارسی  +/−


I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Austin Cornelius Dunham.jpg. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

----Animalparty (talk) 05:30, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Ditto for File:Owen Skelton.jpg. It is totally okay to have more than one image of a subject, even if some of the images are of lower quality. When you overwrite an image with a completely different file from different sources, you risk conflating or misstating the source, date, descriptions, and other metadata that may only apply to the original image.
In the case of Austin Cornelius Dunham, other photographs are now uploaded, see Category:Austin Cornelius Dunham. Cheers, --Animalparty (talk) 21:26, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Lilly Dache on E 56th St.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Creative Commons licenses should not be used for historic images that long predate Creative Commons, or that have other public domain rationale. Note that simple crops or tone adjustments are generally below the threshold of originality and don't warrant new claims of authorship or relicensing.----Animalparty (talk) 18:32, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Template:PD-Gottscho is the best to use in this case. See more at Commons:Library_of_Congress#Rights. The most generic template is Template:Library of Congress-no known copyright restrictions (only to be used when the Library actually asserts this, it has lots of media still under copyright), which can be supplemented with additional PD templates as appropriate. --Animalparty (talk) 19:04, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Issues on talk page

Hi. There appears to be an error on your User talk page that prevents communication templates from displaying, and also distorting user signatures. The problem seems to begin after the 6 October 2015 comment. This problem might be solved by archiving your talk page (which also avoids cluttering your active page with over 100 threads). For more info see Category:User talk pages where template include size is exceeded (which includes your talk page). I'm not very code savvy, but if you have additional issues or questions please ask at Commons:Help desk. Cheers! --Animalparty (talk) 18:51, 11 June 2021 (UTC)