User talk:Dodro
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:13, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Helichrysum foetidum (L.) Europe location map.png
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Helichrysum foetidum (L.) Europe location map.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:09, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Helichrysum foetidum (L.). Europe location map.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
79.158.172.190 12:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Compostela na memoria (patrimonio desaparecido).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
PointsofNoReturn (talk) 17:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Lymantria (talk) 06:27, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Castelao. O neno das piñas (1926).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
. HombreDHojalata.talk 22:10, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Mar de Arousa e Ulla.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
. HombreDHojalata.talk 07:37, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Escudo de Padrón (oficial).png
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Escudo de Padrón (oficial).png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
LMLM (talk) 15:30, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Escudo Dodro
[edit]Ola Dodro.
O que da oficialidade ou non a un escudo dun concello é que o brasón (a descrición heráldica) estea aprobado oficialmente (e publicado no DOG) conforme as normas de procedemento establecidas na Lei 7/1985, do 2 de abril, reguladora das bases de réxime local; Lei 5/1997, do 22 de xullo, de Administración local de Galicia; no Decreto 19/2010, do 11 de febreiro, polo que se aproba o Regulamento de símbolos das entidades locais de Galicia, e no Regulamento de organización, funcionamento e réxime xurídico das corporacións locais, aprobado polo Real decreto 2568/1986, do 10 de decembro.
Despois, baseándose nesa descrición heráldica oficial, un artista ou outro poden facer varios deseños.
Que unha páxina web/publicación, ou outra, de quen sea, empreguen un deses deseños ou outro non lle da maior ou menor oficialidade a ese deseño en concreto.
Nalgúns concellos esa circunstancia inda non se da. Por exemplo, o escudo do concello de Redondela foi aprobado recentemente, en outubro de 2014.http://www.xunta.es/dog/Publicados/2014/20141013/AnuncioG0244-061014-0001_gl.pdf
Eu non atopo aprobación do escudo de Padrón (corríxeme se a hai). De non habela non se pode dicir de ningún dos deseños que sea oficial, nin que estea baseado no escudo oficial.
Tes máis información en: http://www.eidolocal.es/portal/serv_concellos/heraldica.html
Un saúdo. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 19:50, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Sobre iso, teño que dicirche que, segundo a lexislación española e internacional, o titular dos dereitos sobre a propiedade intelectual dunha obra artística é o seu autor, é dicir, o deseñador que fixo o debuxo, e por tanto, é a el e a ninguén máis a quen corresponde ceder, ou non, os seus dereitos. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 21:02, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
File:Escudo de Padrón (oficial).png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Elisardojm (talk) 19:13, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Escudo de Padrón (oficial).png
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Escudo de Padrón (oficial).png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 19:38, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Escudo de Padrón
[edit]Boas Dodro, vin que estás tentando facer algunhas cousas co escudo do concello de Padrón, como parece que tes algúns problemas con Commons, se queres podo tentar axudarche e explicarche como funcionan as cousas para tratar de amañar o problema. Xa me contarás. Saúdos, --Elisardojm (talk) 17:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- Ben, alédame que entendas que o ficheiro que subiches non pode estar aquí. Pero temos o outro ficheiro que tiña antes o artigo e que podemos mellorar, se eu non podo coñezo a xente que si ten os coñecementos técnicos para facelo, e ese ten unha licenza libre. Para iso o primeiro que temos que saber é, Padrón ten un escudo oficial? Se non o ten, en que referencias podemos apoiarnos para modificar o escudo que había (ou facer unha nova versión que vexamos máis axeitada)? O escudo ó que me refiro é o que che poño aquí. Eso si, todas as modificacións que se fagan teñen que estar tamén apoiadas nas normas da heráldica, que non todos os escudos que se atopan por aí cumpren, e tentando manter o estilo do resto de escudos que hai nas wikipedias. Se queres que melloremos ese escudo ti vaime contando as cousas que habería que cambiarlle, e imos vendo o que se pode facer...
- E non te desanimes e pide axuda que para iso estamos! :) (Aínda que algunhas veces pareza o contrario, ó noso pesar)Saúdos, --Elisardojm (talk) 18:01, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- He, he, se indica perfectamente que o ficheiro ten unha licenza libre, e esa licenza é compatible coas que se permiten en Commons (as habituais son dominio público, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA), entón non haberá ningún problema. Se usaron o modelo de carta que hai no OTRS non haberá problema, agora hai que esperar a que traten o correo e que revisen que o texto de liberación dos dereitos é correcto. Se teñen algún problema avísame porque teño colegas no sistema OTRS e entre todos poderemos amañar calquera incidencia. Saúdos, --Elisardojm (talk) 10:33, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Escudo de Padrón (oficial).png
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Escudo de Padrón (oficial).png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
LMLM (talk) 15:59, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
re: EScudo de Padrón
[edit]Saludos, Dodro. Si es una obra derivada de un archivo de Commons, la fuente no es el ayuntamiento de Padrón. LMLM (talk) 17:22, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Data
[edit]Ola Dodro.
Cando subas un ficheiro, ponlle a data orixinal, non a de subida (exemplo)
Graciñas, un saúdo. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 16:41, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Bar O'Rincón co mural de Baco.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
. HombreDHojalata.talk 18:31, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- Dodro, non abonda con que estea nun bar. Concretamente a lei di:
|
- Un bar (mesmo un museo de titularidade pública) non entra dentro diso. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 16:18, 16 July 2015 (UTC
File:Bar O'Rincón co mural de Baco.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:37, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Amy Winehouse Statue N. Crump 2014.jpg
[edit]
Ww2censor (talk) 14:27, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
[edit]Ola Dodro, desgraciadamente, a imaxe orixinal ten licenza CC BY-NC-SA 2.0, incompatible co proxecto. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 21:03, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Amy Winehouse van der Walt 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leoboudv (talk) 23:57, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Festa Fantasia - Amy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 20:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Amy Winehouse Mardi Gras krewe d'Etat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 21:05, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Amy Winehouse van der Walt 4.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Leoboudv (talk) 09:02, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Amy Winehouse van der Walt 7.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Leoboudv (talk) 09:02, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Amy Winehouse van der Walt 3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Leoboudv (talk) 09:03, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Amy Winehouse van der Walt 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Leoboudv (talk) 09:03, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Amy Winehouse van der Walt 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leoboudv (talk) 09:04, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit](Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Эlcobbola talk 08:00, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Amy Winehouse st Luke's mural.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
B dash (talk) 14:06, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Amy Winehouse, painted portrait DDC9087.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
B dash (talk) 14:07, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Amy Winehouse by Eduardo Kobra.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:04, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Category:27_Club_graffiti_in_New_York has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:06, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Amy Winehouse Performs "Wake Up Alone" At Shepards Bush (Robert Sullivan).jpg was recently deleted
[edit]I would like to let you know that File:Amy Winehouse Performs "Wake Up Alone" At Shepards Bush (Robert Sullivan).jpg was recently deleted, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests. Please do not make too many problematic un-deletion requests as this can lead to administrative actions.
Deleted by User:JuTa. Reason for deletion : No license since 13 May 2020 . Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 18:28, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Amy Winehouse painted and Brick Lane storefront gate in East London.jpg was recently deleted
[edit]I would like to let you know that File:Amy Winehouse painted and Brick Lane storefront gate in East London.jpg was recently deleted, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests. Please do not make too many problematic un-deletion requests as this can lead to administrative actions.
Deleted by User:JuTa. Reason for deletion : No license since 13 May 2020 . Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 18:28, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Sylvia Young Theatre School - Written Assessment - Amy Winehouse.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Elly (talk) 19:28, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Kurt Cobain by Rose Robin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kigsz (talk) 13:12, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Oldies - Kurt Cobain by Rose Robin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kigsz (talk) 13:16, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Kurt Cobain by w00tdew00t.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kigsz (talk) 13:17, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
File:"Amy, mon amie aux succès damnés" Paris by Miss.Tic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 06:20, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Fortunato Cruces signature.svg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fortunato Cruces signature.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
. HombreDHojalata.talk 11:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Bótalle unha ollada a esta páxina http://consellodacultura.gal/album-de-galicia/detalle.php?persoa=974 . HombreDHojalata.. Levarache pouco tempo. Dodro (talk) 15:54, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, JopkeB (talk) 16:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lavadoiro de Reboiras, Dodro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|