User talk:Doctor Architect
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:27, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Please sign your postings
[edit]![Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5f/Signature_button.png)
--SignBot (talk) 22:17, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Please sign your postings
[edit]![Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5f/Signature_button.png)
--SignBot (talk) 22:23, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @Jeff G.: thank you for trying to helping me, I appreciate it. Could you please clarify what you have mean in this message? Thank you in advance. To clarify this name was incorrect and then I have fixed the name and since I don't have delete right yet I have placed a delete template to remove the page with the improper name. Doctor Architect (talk) 13:57, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- The subject page's name did not relate to any actual original page I could find. It is technically impossible to create a successful linked DR page for a DR page, and the page qualified for COM:CSD#G7, so that's the rationale I used. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:09, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I'm sorry I believe I didn't clearly explain my question. I was trying to understand what did you try to write to me in this section? All it had was a reference to my page without any message from you. That page I have created with a wrong name (when I took the comment from here and changed the last number instead of the entire string) and then as soon as I have realized that the file name is incorrect I have nominated my page for a deletion and it was successfully deleted. Could you please kindly explain what is the issue which you have tried to bring to my attention by creating this section? It's still unclear to me. Thank you in advance. Doctor Architect (talk) 14:19, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- I created this section as a standard courtesy notification (using {{Speedynote}}) about my speedy deletion tag on your page. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:23, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Jeff my point is that the typo which I have made on the name of the page I have seen myself a few minutes later and have fixed it by nominating the page for a deletion
. All you have done was changed normal deletion that was initiated by me to a speedy initiated by you. And added this note to my page. Cool, I'll also use speedy deletions in such cases going forward. Doctor Architect (talk) 14:41, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Jeff my point is that the typo which I have made on the name of the page I have seen myself a few minutes later and have fixed it by nominating the page for a deletion
- I created this section as a standard courtesy notification (using {{Speedynote}}) about my speedy deletion tag on your page. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:23, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I'm sorry I believe I didn't clearly explain my question. I was trying to understand what did you try to write to me in this section? All it had was a reference to my page without any message from you. That page I have created with a wrong name (when I took the comment from here and changed the last number instead of the entire string) and then as soon as I have realized that the file name is incorrect I have nominated my page for a deletion and it was successfully deleted. Could you please kindly explain what is the issue which you have tried to bring to my attention by creating this section? It's still unclear to me. Thank you in advance. Doctor Architect (talk) 14:19, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- The subject page's name did not relate to any actual original page I could find. It is technically impossible to create a successful linked DR page for a DR page, and the page qualified for COM:CSD#G7, so that's the rationale I used. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:09, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Warning
[edit]Hi Doctor Architect. I noticed that you've made malformed deletion requests. When you want to delete a file with the {{Delete}} template, you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion. Alternatively, you can click the "Nominate for deletion" link in the left sidebar, under the "tools" section, which does all of the work for you. Please do one of these, otherwise you create a lot of work for other people. If you don't see the "Nominate for deletion" link in the left sidebar, you can use the JavaScript method of enabling AjaxQuickDelete on Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets once and then refresh once. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:23, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @Jeff G.: thank you for trying to helping me, I am well aware of it. What happened is that when copying the deletion request I have accidentally left the old file name and then I have fixed it. Have a great day and thanks again! Doctor Architect (talk) 13:59, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- You're welcome. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Warning 2
[edit]I hope this time it will have a proper decision. Sounds like a personal attack. Take care, because you might be blocked undef if you persist with this attitude. Regards --Ruthven (msg) 13:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Nothing personal. But when there is a copyright violation even by Wikimedia (WLM) and there is no proof of permission to take pictures this needs a better decision than you saying that you assume that there might be no violation. If you have made a mistake it's better to correct it than to warn others when they try to fix that mistake. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- I have glad that there wasn't any intention to attack me personally. The WLM team generally holds the permissions for the monuments. This is basically the sole meaning of the project: to contact the copyright holders and ask them the permission for a monumen whicht usually protected by FoP. Thus, if you have doubts about a permission, please contact the organizers first, so to check the authorizations they have (they are generally public). If there is no permission, then open a DR. Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 16:45, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Where did you read that "WLM team generally holds the permissions for the monuments"? And where can I contact them? Doctor Architect (talk) 16:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- I have glad that there wasn't any intention to attack me personally. The WLM team generally holds the permissions for the monuments. This is basically the sole meaning of the project: to contact the copyright holders and ask them the permission for a monumen whicht usually protected by FoP. Thus, if you have doubts about a permission, please contact the organizers first, so to check the authorizations they have (they are generally public). If there is no permission, then open a DR. Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 16:45, 13 February 2021 (UTC)