User talk:Dger

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Dger!

Finch image

[edit]

Hi Dger; I see that you are relatively new and have been contributing photographs of animals. One of our bird experts corrected the identification of your image of a house finch that was uploaded as a purple finch. The two species are very similar and difficult for non-experts to distinguish. It has been renamed File:Carpodacus_mexicanus_Ottawa.jpg. Thank you for your contributions. Walter Siegmund (talk) 04:11, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Five striped Palm Squirrel

[edit]

This photo you uploaded is a Northern Palm Squirrel and not the Indian Palm Squirrel. This is just for your information. Prashanthns (talk) 12:48, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Concern over jackal image

[edit]

Hi there

I recently came across your beautiful File:Side-striped Jackal, Sarengeti.jpg. What concerns me is that the specimen shown looks to me like a golden jackal than a side striped jackal. I am not an expert, but please check the golden jackal page. To me, the animals in that article bear much more resemblance to your image than does the one in the SSJ infobox picture. Regards Mariomassone (talk) 21:27, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know you added incomplete {{Delete}} templates to the above two images. Your reason appears to be that you uploaded correctly named duplicate images. If this is the case instead of {{Delete}} you want to add the {{bad name|correctly named image}} template. You should change the {{Delete}} templates on these two images to {{bad name|correctly named image}} templates providing the correctly names images. Then the incorrectly named images can be speedy deleted. Let me know if you have any questions. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's a lovely image -- I just came across it in a random walk, and it's quite striking and clear. Good work! JesseW (talk) 06:39, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dger. I noticed this image you uploaded on the Coppermine River article on Wikipedia and I was wondering if you know the rock in this image is volcanic. The Coppermine River lies in an area where extensive flood basalt volcanism occurred about 1,267 million years ago, but I am also not sure if this part of the river the image was taken lies in the volcanic zone. So it would be nice to know if the rock in this image is volcanic or not. Thanks. Black Tusk (talk) 23:00, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. I am looking for some pics for an article I am expanding on Wikipedia called the Mackenzie Large Igneous Province, but currently I only have maps to add in the article. Something like basalt pics would be nice to add. Black Tusk (talk) 20:54, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

crab

[edit]

Just a brief note to let you know that I've corrected the identification of this. Remaining species from the genus similar, but C. crassum is the only one found in the E. Pacific (remaining are Indo-Pacific or Atlantic). I presume Manuel Antonio Park = Manuel Antonio National Park. Regards, 62.107.237.72 19:13, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Asian longhorn

[edit]

Hi Dger, Are you sure about the ID on your image File:Asian_Long-horned_Beetle.jpg? IMHO it looks nothing like Anoplophora glabripennis (?!) Do you have other, more dorsal images - even "bad" ones? Cheers! Pudding4brains (talk) 20:31, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do have another image of the insect and no I am not certain that it is an en:Asian Longhorned Beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis). I uploaded here:
Can you identify it? Dger 27 jan 2010 04:19 (CET)
Hi Dger, I took the liberty of moving your answer here as the page you found for posting it was a "redirect" (I'll correct the links on my talk page here if those were the cause). Also, it keeps the discussion centralized. I don't have an ID just now, other than that I'm sure it's not A. glabripennis, I'll have a seceond look later today, without promises however as those are truly not my field. Thanks for the second though, cheers :o) Pudding4brains (talk) 10:14, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, would you have any indication of size (head to tail, without the antennae) to go with that? Pudding4brains (talk) 10:27, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Without antennae it was about 2 cm head to tail. Dger (talk) 15:58, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is a Graphisurus fasciatus, a native 'Long-horned Beetle'. Dger (talk) 16:37, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's a much better option :o) I had a quick look, but other than recognizing this was not A.glab. I'd better keep quiet on those "overseas" beasties :o| If you're not 100% certain it may be a good idea to get confirmation from people who know the regional Longhorns better. I for one would not be able to exclude say, Neacanthocinus obsoletus and maybe some others with any certainty. But cheers for picking up the ball! (Pudding4brains [User talk:Pudding4brains|talk]]) 17:21, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching the problem. I have removed images from the affected Wiki pages. Dger (talk) 18:32, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As you note above, the image File:Asian_Long-horned_Beetle.jpg is not Anoplophora glabripennis. It is actually a type of sawyer beetle, Monochamus sp. (Note distinctive white spot at top center of wing covers, also presence on conifer species, typical hosts for the Monochamus beetles). I found this page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Asian_Long-horned_Beetle.jpg) because someone linked to it as an example of an Asian longhorned beetle (http://www.projectnoah.org/spottings/7899716 - see comments at bottom of page) - is there a way for you to change the file name so this mistake does not happen again? Also, can you change the file description from Graphisurus fasciatus since that is incorrect as well? Or maybe delete the whole thing since I see it loaded and linked separately on a Monchamus page (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ontario_Beetle_-_topview.jpg)? Jformanorth (talk) 12:58, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for detecting this problem. I had lost track of this particular image after I discovered its correct species name. I have requested a change in the filename. It usually takes a few days for the change to take effect. Dger (talk) 22:16, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

[edit]

Congratulations Dger! Your image Image:Eastern Pondhawk, female.jpg was the Random Picture of the Day on Wikipedia! Go here to see what it looked like! - Presidentman (talk) 14:27, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. While it is great that you have taken and uploaded a better image of this monument, you should never upload over an existing image unless it is the exact same image (often with some modifications). An image taken (in this case) two months later, even if it is the same subject, should be uploaded separately. I reverted your changes to the Feb 2010 image, and uploaded your improved April 2010 image separately. You will need to update the en-wiki article separately if you want it to use the more recent photograph. Hope that helps. Regards, --Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:54, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I don't agree. These are pictures of a statue. It doesn't change from month to month. I took both pictures and I have elected to remove a poor image and replace it with a better image. I don't see a significant problem here. Cheers. Dger (talk) 22:17, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You're not supposed to upload one image over a different image. It doesn't matter if they are of the same subject. And the April 2010 image has already been uploaded separately. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 00:28, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 02:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

For the last time: {{Bad name}} is a delete template, read the third line: "This file qualifies for speedy deletion."

If you revert my edit just one more time, I'll block you because of Vandalism! axpdeHello! 07:06, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the badname template is states in the first two lines:
This template has an incorrect name.
Error: Please specify the correctly named image.

I have intrepreted this to mean the file should be renamed. I did specify the new name. I have done this before and incorrectly named files were renamed (at least by other editors). I have now tried the rename template. I hope that works. Dger (talk) 03:21, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As you said "Please specify the correctly named image."
It doesn't read "Please specify the correct name."
There's no micrometer tolerance of interpretation left. Especially when taking the third line into consideration. The {{Rename}}-tag does exactly what you want. Little hint: This template should go first in the file description otherwise one might overlook it ... Regards axpdeHello! 15:43, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 01:38, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Grey-breasted Spurfowl

[edit]

Hi Dger - thought you might like to know, your photo here shows a Grey-breasted Spurfowl, not a Red-necked Spurfowl as you'd labelled it; note the black (not red) legs and rufous (not brown) mantle. Quite a lot rarer - Serengeti is one of few places it occurs. I've renamed the file with the new identity. - MPF (talk) 17:46, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Colouring maps

[edit]

I used Adobe Photoshop to color most of the maps (occasionally I used Microsoft Paint). Megan|talkcontribs 18:41, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dger, I went ahead and uploaded another file to commons based on your (excellent) map. All I did was slightly crop northern Canada: it made the image fit a little nicer in the article. Thank you so much!--NYMFan69-86 (talk) 20:36, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've borrowed your image of the Crimson Rosella to be a logo for a new open-source software project I am developing called "Rosella". The webpage is HERE. I've put some attribution at the bottom of the page including your name and a link to the image on commons where I found it. Please let me know if this is okay for you, and if you would like to see your work attributed in any other way.

Thanks,

--Whiteknight (talk) (books) 18:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I've updated the attribution to use your full name. --Whiteknight (talk) (books) 15:26, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the photo

[edit]

Hi there,

I just wanted to let you know that I used a photo of yours on a petition to save freshwater turtles. I tried to link you to it, but my comment got filtered and rejected, but if you google "Lynn Hamilton" and "Save Georgia's freshwater turtles!" you can probably find it.

Could you reupload the file to a new name, I'll revert this one to the old one. Techman224Talk 20:13, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Will do. That's what I intend but a bad keystroke started the upload. Dger (talk) 20:21, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for the Wikipedia Pictures

[edit]

Hello, My name is Duane Hurst and I recently made a free (non-commercial) English web site to share information with people. I added links to your Wikipedia/Wikimedia freeware pictures (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:L%27Anse_aux_Meadows,_recreated_long_house.jpg and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Humpback_Whale,_blowholes.jpg). I also gave credit to you on my web pages for your work. Thank you for sharing with the public. My website is:

http://www.freeenglishsite.com/

I add pictures such as yours to one of the following major sections of my site: 1. World section - contains information and over 10,000 images of every world country and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/index.htm

2. USA section - contains information and images of every USA state and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/usa/index.htm

3. English section - "Mel and Wes" lessons in conversation format. Stories are located in various USA states and world countries such as China, England, Germany, Japan, Mexico and Thailand. Each lesson has many slang terms and idioms, which I link to my Slang Dictionary. This eventually will have over 5,000 terms. Currently, it has about 3,000 slang and idioms. I regularly add new lessons and slang terms. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/lessons/index.htm Slang Dictionary link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/slang/Eslang_a.htm

Prior to retirement, I taught English at several private and public universities in the United States.

Please share this free site with your friends. I hope all will enjoy the pictures and find the English information useful. Sincerely,  Duane Hurst in Utah, USA

Email address: duanerhurst@freeenglishsite.com --75.169.27.34 21:24, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eastern Water Skink (Eulamprus quoyii)2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sarshag7 (talk) 02:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Dave Winter, head shot.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Dave Winter, head shot.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth_O (talk) 13:58, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content

[edit]

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  polski  português  sicilianu  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  한국어  日本語  简体中文  繁體中文  עברית  العربية  +/−


Hello Dger, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Dave Winter, head shot.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:28, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Sphex" photo

[edit]

Hi. I see that you recently changed the ID of a photo you had posted, from Chlorion aerarium, to Sphex pensylvanicus. it is neither of these. It is Chalybion californicum, the "blue mud wasp", a widespread predator on widow spiders. It can be easily told from Sphex by the lack of the tarsal "rake" which Sphex species use to dig in the soil. You might want to rename the file yet again, I'm afraid. Dyanega (talk) 00:26, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

photo / permission request

[edit]

Hi

The Canadian Museum of History is preparing a permanent gallery titled: Canadian History Hall. The exhibition will open, July, 2017.

The Museum has identified the following work(s) in your collection which we are seeking authorization to reproduce in the context of the project:

found https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:American_Beaver,_tree_cutting.jpg

The Museum would like to obtain your permission to reproduce the work(s) mentioned above for the following purposes; in an interactive timeline on computer station(s) in the exhibition and on its Website.

If there is any cost associated with acquiring the high resolution digital file(s) (8 x 10 @ 300dpi) and/or any cost to use the work(s) in the context of the project, please provide us the total fees and, if possible, the detail rate per use.

Best regards,


M. / Mr. Dominique Dufour Agent aux actifs numériques, Salle de l’histoire canadienne Musée canadien de l’histoire Digital Assets Officer, Canadian History Hall Canadian Museum of History 100, rue Laurier Street, Gatineau QC K1A 0M8

T 819-776-8529 --Permission CMH (talk) 15:36, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you are free to use the image. All that I request is the my name be attributed somewhere. Please use D. Gordon E. Robertson. There is no fee required. Dger (talk) 16:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forest Mother-of-pearl on flower

[edit]

If it is known where the File:Forest Mother-of-pearl on flower.jpg and File:Common Mother-of-Pearl.jpg were photographed the subspecies may be determined. JMK (talk) 18:37, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 03:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dger, I just want to inform you that this is not Lachnocnema durbani but a Pieridae, probably a Dixeia. Best regards --LamBoet (talk) 04:52, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment but I don't believe you are correct. This specimen looks to be a little lighter than a pristine specimen but the markings do not resemble any Dixeia I have examined. If you have Steve Woodhall's book, check page 150 4B. The reference is on the article's page. Cheers. Dger (talk) 04:04, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Dger, I don't have this book, but your butterfly clearly has the wing shape and patterns of a Pieridae, I don't understand how you can see a Lachnocnema here. You can also compare the head and the legs.
The reason I mentioned the genus Dixeia is that I found this picture of Dixeia orbona f. abyssinibia. Probably not the same taxon as your butterfly, but still, it seems to me that they could be related. --LamBoet (talk) 06:16, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I have been requested by reviewers to include a picture of hemlock looper in a paper I have written on the risk of the pest to Ireland. I would like to use your image, please. Is there any particular way you would like to be cited as the image owner (e.g. would you like an affiliation included)? I will make sure copies of the paper are open access. M G Tuffen (talk) 10:37, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dger, I just want to inform you that this butterfly, which you labelled as Celastrina serotina, cannot actually be a Celastrina (for instance the black margin doesn't match). Have you seen the underside? A good candidate would be Glaucopsyche lygdamus. --LamBoet (talk) 05:09, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dger. The Vindula butterfly picture you took is very beautiful. Thank you for posting it. I find it quite remarkable. Best wishes! Tavilis (talk) 12:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image of Platycerium bifurcatum

[edit]

Hi there. I just wanted to let you know that the photo you uploaded and identified as Platycerium bifurcatum is actually the very similar species Platycerium hillii. The main differences are:

Feature P. bifurcatum P. hillii
Basal leaves Deeply lobed Entire or shallowly lobed
Sporangia Extends from leaftip to beyond lobes On tips only (like fingernails)

Junglenut (talk) 03:44, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jigsaw puzzle, CP5924.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

wrong id of butterfly

[edit]

Hi. This butterfly is most likely D. glycera https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Juno_Silverspot,_underwing,_Quito,_Ecuador.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:110F:D10:6200:A920:D25:B9ED:95AE (talk) 16:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]