User talk:Dencey/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Fortepan
Szia! A Permission= rovatba illeszd be ezt: The image is licensed on the FORTEPAN website under the following terms: " All of the images are licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY-SA-3.0 and can be freely used. If you wish to publish any of them, please give the credit in the following format: FOTO:FORTEPAN / name of donor."
Ennél megtettem: File:Tarján Györgyi fortepan 89090.jpg Üdv. Tambo (talk) 06:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- OK, köszönöm. Megpróbálom a többi képnél is betenni. --Dencey (talk) 14:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Kategória
Szia!
Kérlek, hogy amikor Urbán Tamástól töltesz fel képet akkor legyél szíves a Photographs by Tamás Urbán kategóriába is behelyezni. Köszönöm! Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 07:59, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Igen, igen, köszönöm az értesítést és a segítséget. --Dencey (talk) 08:01, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Biszku Béla arckép.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Norden1990 (talk) 00:28, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Fortepan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
El Grafo (talk) 21:40, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Lássanak graffiti Szeged.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Elisfkc (talk) 19:04, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags
You may not place license review templates on your own uploads, and you cannot review licenses unless you are license reviewer. If you continue to do so you may be blocked from editing. Reventtalk 22:48, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove deletion requests
Reventtalk 23:48, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Was there anything unclear about this warning? —LX (talk, contribs) 17:20, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Again, exactly which part of "Ne távolítsd el ezt a sablont, mielőtt a törlési megbeszélés lezárul" do you not understand? —LX (talk, contribs) 18:09, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Pokémon Go creatures.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Dogad75 (talk) 05:33, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
File:Pokémon Go creatures.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:07, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Flickr uploading
Hi, when uploading from Flickr, please use the COM:FLICKR upload system. It makes it a lot easier on the administrators and bots that patrol the recent flickr uploads. I've tagged the majority of your recent uploads. Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:10, 29 July 2016 (UTC).
- This is worth repeating. In particular, make sure you represent the licensing correctly with respect to terms and versions. Also make sure that you tag the files for license review using {{flickrreview}}. You have uploaded a lot of files with incorrect licensing information, including added or (worse) omitted share-alike requirements. Using one of the recommended methods like Flickr2Commons will ensure you get things right automatically. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:40, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Pokémon Go in hand.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
RJaguar3 (talk) 23:28, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
File:Child draw.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
KDS4444 (talk) 11:44, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Pokemon Go Plus Flickr.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:44, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
NC és ND
Szia, az NC és/vagy ND tagot tartalmazó licencek NEM szabad licencek, ilyet nem szabad ide feltölteni! Ld: Commons:Licencelés, Nemszabad licencek. Ilyen kép a File:Schmitt Pál in European Parliament.jpg is. --Rlevente (talk) 18:46, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Sobrassada Mallorca.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Krdbot 21:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Pekarski krompir.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Krdbot 20:00, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Újra gyurcsány street art plakát.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Teemeah (talk) 06:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Kérlek, ne írd felül a feltöltéseimet!
Ha akarsz, tölts fel új fájlt, de az általam feltöltöttet ne írd felül! Köszönöm. --Rlevente (talk) 11:14, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Rendben, de olyan kevés infót hordoz a képkivágásod, hogy szerintem nem alkalmas semmire. --Dencey (talk) 11:32, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Democratic bullshit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pallerti (talk) 15:15, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Népszabadság.jpg
Szia, ugye tudod, hogy a Népszabadság.jpg újságcímlap licence hibás? Nem Te vagy a szerzője, ahogy a licenc állítja ("Én, e mű szerzője "), de nem is a filckeres Simone Ramella, hanem az újság szerkesztői, illetve a fényképek készítői. Ráadásul a Flickr-en CC-BY 2.0 licenc szerepel (nem jogosan, mert nem ő a szerző), Te pedig CC-BY-SA 4.0-t írtál (szintén nem jogosan), vagyis a kettő sem egyezik. A PD-Textlogo sem korrekt, mert kép is van a címlapon. --Rlevente (talk) 12:02, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
- Szia. Szerinted meg lehet úgy szerkeszteni a létező licencekkel, hogy a lap lefényképezett oldala megmaradhasson? Nincs ilyenre példa valahol? Segíts kérlek. --Dencey (talk) 12:32, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
- például így: File:18La Rep.png vagy File:Makor rishon newspaper front page.jpg vagy File:Mindo july2010.png vagy File:Rc 01.jpg--Dencey (talk) 12:36, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Félek tőle, hogy nem. Ezek mind kamuznak: vagy közkincsnek, vagy saját műnek mondják az újságokat. --Rlevente (talk) 18:15, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
File:Népszabadság.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ww2censor (talk) 20:33, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Nagy László 1972.jpg
Mond csak, te nem tudsz olvasni? Áruld el, szerinted ez mit jelent (kiemelés tőlem): CC-BY-SA-3.0 under following conditions (mentioned in hu:Template:Balla Demeter-engedély) according to the OTRS permission: portrait by Balla Demeter in the poetic anthology Szép Versek, with exact citation (year of publication, picture number), and size under 300 px in both directions. - Segítek. Azt jelenti, hogy a szerző csak legfeljebb 300px méretben engedélyezi a szabad licenc alatti használatot. Erre te feltöltöd nagyobb változatban. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 13:54, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- Rendben, megtanultm ezt is. --Dencey (talk) 14:05, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- "szegény N.L." - Az ilyen átgondolatlan megjegyzéseid azok, amelyek sokaknál kiverik a biztosítékot. Balla Demeter művész úr volt olyan rendes, hogy engedélyezte több tucat képét azzal a megkötéssel, hogy a 300px méretet nem lépjük túl. Örülhetnénk, hogy így engedélyezte, nem kéne az ilyen "szegény N.L." megjegyzésekkel fikázni mások képbeszerzéseit. Ha nem tetszik, akkor máskor szerezz be te engedélyt több tucat képre. Addig meg, legyél szíves, gondolkodj mielőtt megnyilvánulsz. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 19:02, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- Nem volt ebben semmiféle rossz szándék, nyilván mindkét művészt és a feltöltőt is csak a dícséret illeti. Nagy László szabad szelleme és a pitiáner pixelketrec törvényi (üzleti?) terrorjának kontrasztossága miatt zabolázatlan valóm elkövette a megnyilvánulásomat, de neked persze őrködő bürokrataként ezt másképpen kell megítélned. Megértem és megrovó jelzésedet elfogadom. --Dencey (talk) 08:34, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- Elgondolkodhatsz rajta, hogy ha törlik a képet (az értetlenséged és figyelmetlenséged miatt), akkor mennyire lesz "szegény N.L.". Annak ellenére, hogy a magyar törvények megengedik a korlátozott képméretű használatot. Remélem, büszke vagy magadra! Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 16:19, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Nem szeretném, ha engem tennél felelőssé, Nagyon sajnálom, ha így történne és ez az érthetetlen és szövevényes szabálydzsungel elemésztené a fotót. --Dencey (talk) 16:31, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Elkéstél. Téged teszlek felelőssé. Értetlen vagy, és ebből kifolyólag rengeteg galibát okozol. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 16:35, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Megértettem a kontraszton módosítottam és azonnal javítottam, amikor jelezted a problémát, nem igazán értem, hogy ennek ellenére miért törlik.--Dencey (talk) 16:38, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- [1] Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 16:43, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Akkor inkább én voltam az ügyetlen, mert nem láttam be, hogy arra a kérésemre, hogy töröljék a 300 px-nél nagyobb változatokat, olyan Creative Commons licencértelmezéssel jöhetnek elő, hogy az összeset törlik. Oliv0 (talk) 21:38, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oliv0: Úgy látom, amennyire le tudtam fordítani (géppel), hogy egyelőre vannak olyan vélemények is, amelyek azt mondják, maradhat az engedélyezett változat. Amúgy a Cc licencben az van, hogy elfogadható. Sajnos én magamtól nem találom, viszont megkértem valakit, akitől korábban ezt az információt kaptam, hogy mutassa be ezt az információt. Várom a válaszát és a hozzászólását. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 21:44, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Az én véleményemen kívül sajnos eddig nincs olyan a tmb-n, hogy elfogadható a CC-BY-SA-3.0 licenc méretfeltétellel, ti. benne van a CC-BY-SA-3.0 licenc jogi szövegében, hogy a BY (szerző megnevezése) és a SA (más licencet ne adjunk később) feltételeken kívül nem lehet más, és hogy az engedély (licenc) a szerzői jog alatt levő műre vonatkozik, vagyis itt magára a fényképre és nem egy bizonyos méretű szkenre. Így az ő gondolatmenetükben tkp. becsaptuk a fényképészt azzal, hogy elhitettük vele, ilyen módosított CC licenccel meg lehet akadályozni a pontosabb szkeneket, tehát "törlés szívességből" (courtesy deletion) kéne a fényképész érdekében. Ezzel szemben most azt fogom mondani, de nem biztos, hogy meggyőző, hogy még a CC-BY-SA említése miatt ellentmondásos licenc esetében is a fontos a fényképész szándéka, amit be kell tartani a licenc átfogalmazásával és nem a kép törlésével. Oliv0 (talk) 06:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oliv0: Nos, én még várok az aduászomra, akit fentebb említettem. Bízom benne, hogy neki sikerül erősen érvelni. Mindenesetre nem esem teljesen kétségbe. A Hungart szerzői jogi szaktekintélyének véleménye alapján Cc-by-sa licencre is lehet méretkorlátozott engedélyt adni, a szerzőnek joga van meghatároznia, hogy mekkora felbontású képre ad engedélyt szabad licenc alatt. Ha innen törlik, akkor maradnak a magyar wikin. A más nyelvű szócikkekbe meg majd szereznek azok képeket, akiknek majd hiányzik. Mindenesetre köszönet neked a fáradozásodért! Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 08:38, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Nagy László 1972.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 16:04, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Shane Tusup és Hosszú Katinka.jpg
Ww2censor (talk) 23:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Zsa Zsa.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Flickr account is unfortunately used of license laundering. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:04, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Fortepan 110556.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Fortepan 110556.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Sándor Csikar fortepan 110556.jpg
- File:Kéményseprő fortepan 23185.jpg
- File:Pataki Ági fortepan 23255.jpg
- File:Virsliárus fortepan 110974.jpg
- File:Csepel D705 fortepan 111056.jpg
- File:Pataki Ági fortepan 110911.jpg
- File:Pataki Ági fortepan 110909.jpg
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Pataki Ági fortepan 110911.jpg
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Pataki Ági fortepan 110911.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
JuTa 00:02, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Csepel D705 fortepan 111056.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Csepel D705 fortepan 111056.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Csepel D705 fortepan 111056.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
JuTa 00:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Virsliárus fortepan 110974.jpg
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Virsliárus fortepan 110974.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
JuTa 00:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Pataki Ági fortepan 23255.jpg
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Pataki Ági fortepan 23255.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
JuTa 00:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Manökenek fortepan 23253.jpg
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Manökenek fortepan 23253.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
JuTa 00:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Nagy László fortepan 107214.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 13:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Nagy László fortepan 107214.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 13:32, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Deák Kristóf a 89. Oscar gálán.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Deák Kristóf a 89. Oscar gálán.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Deák Kristóf a 89. Oscar gálán.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 15:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Janelle Monae.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Ytoyoda (talk) 16:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
File:TAXIDERMIA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ytoyoda (talk) 16:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Sophie Scholl.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Sophie Scholl.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sophie Scholl.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 14:03, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Kossuth Lajos portréja.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Kossuth Lajos portréja.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 12:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Lassíts
Megkérlek, ne tölts fel mindenhonnan ismeretlen szerző megjelöléssel képeket! Attól, hogy egy borsonline nem veszi magának a fáradságot, hogy megkeresse, hogy ki a szerző, vagy arra, hogy kiírja a szerző nevét, az nem jelenti azt, hogy a szerző ismeretlen. A File:Blaha Lujza portré.jpg Ellinger Ede munkája. Az ilyennél még nincs olyan nagy probléma, mert Ellinger 70 évnél régebben hunyt el, de egy csomó esetben olyan képet töltöttél fel közkincs-ismeretlenként, ahol ismert volt a szerző és az elhunyta óta nem telt el 70 év (pl. Szabó Lőrinc portréja esetében). Ha nem vagy képes utánajárni a dolgoknak, inkább ne töltsél fel képeket. Ne adj plusz munkát másoknak, és ne sérts szerzői jogot lustaságból. A képfeltöltéseken kívül is még sok minden mást is csinálhatsz. Ami nem megy, azt nem kell erőltetni. Köszönöm a figyelmedet! Mielőtt megkérdezed: nem feszültem be. Megkérlek, a hasonló jelzőidet is hanyagold ez alkalommal! Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 14:20, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- Rendben. Értéket gyűjtök, lehet kissé gyakorlatlanul, de igyekszem. Kérésed szerint próbálom --Dencey (talk) 14:27, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
File:LiTraCon.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Elisfkc (talk) 19:52, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Kaviar-Gewinnung.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leoboudv (talk) 09:34, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Aranycsapat fortepan 22946.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 18:31, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Horthy Miklós fortepan 71428.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 02:21, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- Teljesen értelmetlen egy utcai plakát fényképét törölni, letelt a 70 év. Nagyon sajnálom ezt a nyilvánvaló értékpusztítást, hiszen a wikipédia károsult. --Dencey (talk) 09:34, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
File:The chocolate legion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Themightyquill (talk) 12:41, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted content
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:30, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Dísztribün fortepan 67143.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 12:42, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
File:TIME COVER MAN OF THE YEAR 1957.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
(I'm just notifying you because Garchomp2017 failed to follow the instructions in {{delete}}.) —LX (talk, contribs) 08:12, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Tran Anh Phuong.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
El Grafo (talk) 11:11, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
File:Walesi bárdok Zichy Mihály illusztráció.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
– b_jonas 14:04, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
File:Röszke Tranzitállomás.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 17:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Photographer red tulip.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Elisfkc (talk) 00:43, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Morus, Thomas Heiliger.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Morus, Thomas Heiliger.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 05:48, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Macedonia-02787 10905004394 (cropped).jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Macedonia-02787 10905004394 (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Macedonia-02787 10905004394 (cropped).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ruthven (msg) 13:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Grating Soft Cheese.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Grating Soft Cheese.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 16:50, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Myristicaceae -Myristica fragrans.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 09:50, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Toldy Mária fortepan 106336.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 09:58, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Illyés Gyula fortepan 106162.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 09:58, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Nagy Endre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 19:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
File:60th anniversary of Hungarian Revolution 2016 stamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Regasterios (talk) 13:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Fina 2017 stamp of Hungary.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 13:10, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
File:A Seuso-kincs hazahozatalát köszöntő alkalmi bélyegblokk 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 13:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Nagy Endre.jpg
Copyright status: File:Nagy Endre.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Nagy Endre.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 14:40, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
File:COAT OF ARMS OF THE REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY - BLOCK.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 13:37, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Jcb (talk) 17:39, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Krdbot 02:00, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Regasterios ([[User talk:Regasterios|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:08, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Ytoyoda ([[User talk:Ytoyoda|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:43, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Hammersoft ([[User talk:Hammersoft|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:12, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Image without license
This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 12:02, 16 March 2018 (UTC)