User talk:Deadman~commonswiki

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi, images like Image:Mario&Luigi-PartnersinTime.jpg are not free, and will all be deleted from commons. Stan Shebs 13:56, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright Image:Goofy.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Stan Shebs 14:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you think that Disney's copyright on its characters did not extend to people wearing costumes? You didn't discover a loophole that everybody has overlooked - see Commons:Derivative works for lengthy details on what's permissible. Stan Shebs 01:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zelda images

[edit]

Probably they should be deleted. Only way to save would be if they were original artwork that didn't actually have anything to do with Zelda. Stan Shebs 14:40, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright Image:Homer Simpson.GIF has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Redrawn works based on a copyrighted character still infringe on the copyright of the character's creator if they resemble the original work.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:13, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not as far as I know. The original image came from a military website [1] and is in the public domain from the website's privacy section. All I did was remove the background and add a shadow to the belt. I got the idea when I saw the background removed in game console pictures (compare this with this). -- Oakster  Talk   20:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Motorhead images

[edit]

I note that the it: versions of the images make reference to an OTRS ticket, the ticket presumably being some sort of declaration of free license or some such. So it seems likely that the images are legitimate. But at the the very least, the OTRS ticket numbers need to be copied over. Stan Shebs 23:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Video game people

[edit]

Thanks a lot for your job. If you have time, feel free to add this images into the category Category:Electronic Arts (for example, we have a category Category:id Software with peoples). We also have an article Video game people ordered by name (for the moment every thing is merged: game designers, producers, graphists, musicians...). Thanks a lot. ~ bayo or talk 13:22, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another little thing. If you can request the Flick author to see if he own a bigger image for Image:David Perry with Hecker.jpg it will be very nice. Thanks a lot. ~ bayo or talk 13:33, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, but I really don't have the time for that. I'm not very active at Commons to be honest. Deadman (talk) 21:39, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Michaeldsuarez (talk) 00:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

20:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

[edit]

02:35, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Kevin Lima.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sphilbrick (talk) 19:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yoshiaki Koizumi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

czar 17:28, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


File:Tom Waits.jpg have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 04:05, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]