User talk:Daviidos
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- 18:00, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Oderpanorama.jpg was uncategorized on 15 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Opole Winau1934.jpg was uncategorized on 16 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:14, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Mühlgraben2.jpg was uncategorized on 30 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 22:23, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Eishaus Opole.jpg was uncategorized on 30 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 22:23, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Pfennigbrücke Opole.jpg was uncategorized on 27 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:05, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Opole Rathaus.jpg was uncategorized on 27 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:05, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Opole Ring.jpg was uncategorized on 2 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:56, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Collage Oppeln.jpg was uncategorized on 3 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Collage Opole rathaus Ring.jpg was uncategorized on 3 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Collage Oppeln1.jpg was uncategorized on 3 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Piastenturm+Regierung.jpg was uncategorized on 4 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Oppeln Bahnhof Bismarckdenkmal.jpg was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:00, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Neuenhain (Taunus), Batzenhaus 1909.jpg was uncategorized on 28 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:34, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Wójtowa Wieś.jpg was uncategorized on 2 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:19, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Winów Winau bei Oppeln Hochwasser 1997.jpg was uncategorized on 2 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:19, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Bad Soden Taunus Medico Palais.jpg was uncategorized on 20 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Bad Soden Taunus Kurhaus.jpg was uncategorized on 20 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Bad Soden Taunus Übersicht.jpg was uncategorized on 20 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Opole Ceres Brunnen.jpg was uncategorized on 20 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Opole Schlosspark.jpg was uncategorized on 20 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Opole Mühlgraben1.jpg was uncategorized on 20 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Opole Pfennigbrücke.jpg was uncategorized on 20 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Opole Mühlgraben.jpg was uncategorized on 20 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Zdjęcie lodowiska w Opolu
[edit]Cześć! Widzę, że publikujesz zdjecia Opola. Czy moglbys wykonac i opublikowac zdjecie lodowiska Orlika Opole przy ul. Barlickiego 13, ponieważ brakuje go. Pozdrawiam. --Lowdown (talk) 20:35, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
[edit]Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 22:18, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
[edit]Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:04, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
Lizenzen
[edit]Guten Tag. weshalb die Inhalte von Category:Hans Wagner (sculptor) ohne OTRS-Tickets dastehen, verstehe ich nicht. Die urheberrechtliche Schutzfrist ist ja noch längst nicht abgelaufen! Gruss, --Martin Sg. (talk) 14:43, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Bad Soden am Taunus, Old Kurhaus 1927.jpg
- File:Frankfurt-Eschersheim Fotos aus dem Zeppelin.jpg
Yours sincerely, JCP (a.k.a. John Carlo Pagcaliwagan) 22:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Kategoria
[edit]Witaj
Zauważyłem, że usuwasz kategorię category:Cultural heritage monuments in gmina Głuchołazy z Category:Saint Lawrence church in Głuchołazy.
Czy jest jakieś zalecenie/konsensus w sprawie ograniczenia kategorii pomniki historii?
Moim zdaniem istnienie tych kategorii ma ważne znaczenie dla osób szukających wg kategorii zabytki w ...
Stok (talk) 20:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm still working in the Category of Głuchołazy. I want to creat the Category of cultural heritage monuments IN Głuchołazy in next time. Daviidos (talk)
File tagging File:Vater von Hans Wagner Johann Lorenz Wagner.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Vater von Hans Wagner Johann Lorenz Wagner.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vater von Hans Wagner Johann Lorenz Wagner.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 06:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Selbstbildnis Hans Wagner.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Selbstbildnis Hans Wagner.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Selbstbildnis Hans Wagner.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 06:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Bruder Ferdinand Wagner (Hans Wagner).jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Bruder Ferdinand Wagner (Hans Wagner).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bruder Ferdinand Wagner (Hans Wagner).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 06:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Hans Wagner Bildhauer.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Hans Wagner Bildhauer.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hans Wagner Bildhauer.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 06:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Bad Soden am Taunus - Alter Kurpark 1970er.TIF
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Bad Soden am Taunus - Alter Kurpark 1970er.TIF. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bad Soden am Taunus - Alter Kurpark 1970er.TIF]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
WolfD59 (talk) 09:09, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Kathkircheopole1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 20:43, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
File:KathKircheOpole2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 20:44, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
File:KircheOder.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 23:48, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
[edit]Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit]Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
Copyright status: File:1936 Church St. Martin Strzelce.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:1936 Church St. Martin Strzelce.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:1936 Church St. Martin Strzelce.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Alt Cosel Kirche 1921.JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:Alt Cosel Kirche 1921.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Alt Cosel Kirche 1921.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:06, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 22:17, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 22:31, 18 June 2023 (UTC)