User talk:Damusmedia
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:21, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope
[edit]
--Motopark (talk) 15:21, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Galerie ouest et crucifix de l'ancien couvent des capucins à Céret.Eté 2011.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Krdbot 18:00, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
File:Hommage à Pierre BRUNE.Du 3-12-2016 au 5-3-2017.MAMC..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 17:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Couvent des Capucins à Céret, vers 1880. Vue Est.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Couvent des Capucins à Céret, vers 1880. Vue Est.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Couvent des Capucins à Céret, vers 1880. Vue Est.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 04:27, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Sculpture moderne d'une femme en position foetale devant la fontaine de la Médiathèque.jpg
[edit]File:Sculpture moderne d'une femme en position foetale devant la fontaine de la Médiathèque.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 21:16, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Bienvenue sur la liste des artistes peintres accueillis à Céret, pour leur rendre hommage.jpg
[edit]File:Bienvenue sur la liste des artistes peintres accueillis à Céret, pour leur rendre hommage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Perspective alignée et de niveau de "l'Hommage aux artistes peintres venus à Céret".jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 15:03, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Vue Nord-Ouest de l'ensemble sculptural de l'hommage aux peintres ayant oeuvrés à Céret.jpg
[edit]File:Vue Nord-Ouest de l'ensemble sculptural de l'hommage aux peintres ayant oeuvrés à Céret.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 15:05, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Les 3 éléments composant l'hommage sculptural aux artistes peintres ayant oeuvré à Céret.jpg
[edit]File:Les 3 éléments composant l'hommage sculptural aux artistes peintres ayant oeuvré à Céret.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 15:06, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Le plat recto de l'hommage aux peintres et le haut de l'Avenue Clémenceau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 15:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Vue Sud-Est de l'Hommage aux peintres venus oeuvrer à Céret, et haut de l'Av Clémenceau.jpg
[edit]File:Vue Sud-Est de l'Hommage aux peintres venus oeuvrer à Céret, et haut de l'Av Clémenceau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 15:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Haut de l'Av. Clémenceau et place de l'hommage aux peintres pendant le confinement. Automne 2020.jpg
[edit]File:Haut de l'Av. Clémenceau et place de l'hommage aux peintres pendant le confinement. Automne 2020.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 15:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Cloche de la Chapelle des Capucins Notre Dame des Anges à Céret.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Cloche de la Chapelle des Capucins Notre Dame des Anges à Céret.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Cloche de la Chapelle des Capucins Notre Dame des Anges à Céret.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:06, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Céret.jpg
- OK pour l'effacement dès que possible du fichier File: Cloche de la Chapelle des Capucins Notre Dame des Anges à Céret.jpg. Les précisions données dans le texte ont été formulées en remerciements et en hommage aux 2 personnes nommées pour faciliter l'accès du campanile en permettant la prise du cliché plus aisément, avec eux. Ce rendez-vous était prévu depuis le début du chantier, notamment pour raison de sécurité, une fois la toiture de la chapelle complètement refaite.@AntiCompositeBotDamusmedia Damusmedia (talk) 12:39, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Sculpture de Pat Rowland à Céret.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 13:25, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Média dans la catégorie "Sculptures in Céret", je souhaite attirer votre attention sur la présence d'une photo ayant le même objet, en septième position, prise par Jordi Gili, le 16/08/2021. Pourquoi ce cliché, n'a pas lui aussi été supprimé pour les mêmes motifs? 2 poids, 2 mesures?, parti-pris? Dois-je changer de nationalité pour présenter mon travail? Je compte sur votre logique et votre intelligence et bon sens pour réviser un premier jugement zélé et hâtif. Merci! Damusmedia (talk) 09:30, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Damusmedia: Merci du signalement, j'ai donc demandé la suppression de plusieurs de ces photos que je n'avais pas vues. Culex (talk) 09:55, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Cloche de la Chapelle des Capucins Notre Dame des Anges à Céret.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 13:26, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Voir les 2 réponses déjà formulées à la suite de plusieurs avertissements, et menaces sous entendues de la suppression de ce fichier, ne laissant que peu de place à une réelle discussion impartiale et objective, à moins que je fasse erreur, sous réserve de preuves de bonne volonté. A vous de trouver la formule toute prête de Wikipédia pour une fois de plus me classer dans une mauvaise catégorie de contributeur. Et si un jour je devenais aussi efficace que vous pour demander de nombreuses suppressions de vos fichiers plutôt discutables, qu'en penseriez-vous? Damusmedia (talk) 11:49, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, Etes-vous le photographe ? Si oui, pourriez-vous ajouter une licence à votre photo ? Merci, Yann (talk) 16:58, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Merci d'avoir bien voulu me répondre. Oui, je suis bien le photographe de ce cliché. Mais après avoir tenté de rectifier l'information concernant l'auteur de la photo, je n'ai pas réussi à retrouver la zone de la description où il est demandé s'il s'agit d'un travail personnel ou non. Selon Wikipédia, l'erreur est impardonnable et extrêmement compliquée à réparer, quasiment rédhibitoire dans sa mise en oeuvre. Je suis très (peut-être trop!) motivé dans mes rares contributions, et donc franchement pénalisé dans mon inexpérience, perdant de plus en plus confiance dans la contribution à Wikipédia, me paraissant réservée à une élite dont je ne suis pas. Le patrouilleur de mon village, très performant dans son rôle de censeur, se comporte comme un robot destructeur avant tout, sans réaction de la moindre compréhension, au moins sous la forme d'une réponse lisible et solidaire. Damusmedia (talk) 10:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, Etes-vous le photographe ? Si oui, pourriez-vous ajouter une licence à votre photo ? Merci, Yann (talk) 16:58, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Ok j'ai arrangé le fichier. @Damusmedia: c'est ok? si oui je cloture la demande de suppression. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:03, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour Christian Ferrer, c'est bien OK pour l'arrangement du fichier. J'ai pu avec joie et soulagement l'insérer dans l'article au § présentant cette cloche, véritable relique du site des Capucins. Je vous remercie bien donc de votre bonne volonté dans cette contribution essentielle pour finaliser cet article. Damusmedia (talk) 14:21, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Damusmedia: (cc @Christian Ferrer: ) Je ne suis pas un robot, mais simplement très strict en effet avec le respect du droit d'auteur qui est essentiel pour la bonne marche des projets Wikimedia (et je suis le premier à déplorer de ne pas pouvoir illustrer certains articles). J'agis de la même manière sur Wikipédia (où je suis administrateur en effet) et ici et avec tout le monde. J'ai proposé plusieurs fois depuis plusieurs années de vous rencontrer puisque nous habitons au même endroit pour vous former afin de vous éviter des erreurs, vous avez toujours refusé, et c'est dommage car vous continuez à en commettre régulièrement. Mon offre tient toujours. Note à propos de mes propres photos uploadées ici : si vous trouvez certaines de mes photos "discutables" selon les critères du droit d'auteur, ne vous privez pas pour les signaler, il m'est arrivé de faire des erreurs comme tout le monde et je n'aurai aucun mal à le reconnaître. Culex (talk) 16:15, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:La Maison Aribaud, rte de Maureillas. vers 1910.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:La Maison Aribaud, rte de Maureillas. vers 1910.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:La Maison Aribaud, rte de Maureillas. vers 1910.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 19:20, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Buste de Pierre Brune. Oeuvre de René Carvillani.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 11:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Bonsoir Culex: Lire la réponse suivante relative à Pierre BRUNE (Musée dart moderne, Ceret).jpg. Damusmedia (talk) 16:56, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Pierre BRUNE (Musée d'art moderne, Céret).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 11:05, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour Culex: Vous avez encore des progrès à faire dans le délai de demandes de suppression et même de leur réalisation, votre objectif étant de réduire encore et encore un laps de temps à la seconde près. Wikipédia vous donne tous les moyens en bons et mauvais prétextes très argumentés et rédigés pour se justifier (comment pourrait-il en être autrement?) afin de décourager les contributeurs "canards boiteux", jusqu'à ce qu'ils renoncent à poursuivre leur envie de participer. Grands seigneurs, il est proposé de discuter démocratiquement des décisions qui sont d'avance déjà actées et dont la nature ne surprend que bien rarement. Devant un tel empressement, et étant trop bête et bien loin de toutes les élites qui vous entourent, je préfère retrouver un peu plus de sérénité en évitant de discuter pour rien avec des robots ou leur conducteurs. Je regrette sincèrement de si mal réagir et l'action de réduire d'éventuelles contributions vouées à l'échec ou leur suppression pure et simple, aux yeux d'une communauté mondiale, dont l'élite ignore cependant l'existence de bonnes volontés prêtes à progresser dans un univers positivement plus ouvert et tolérant, de plus en plus dépendante de la robotisation à outrance. En ne changeant pas ce logiciel, Wikipédia disparaitra par manque de contributeurs motivés. Cordialement comme le précise la règlementation de Wikipédia.Damusmedia Damusmedia (talk) 16:50, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Damusmedia: Continuer à m'insulter et penser que je vous harcèle en particulier ne vous aidera malheureusement pas beaucoup à progresser. Je vous ai fait une explication sur le droit d'auteur sur la page de discussion de l'article sur Pierre Brune sur Wikipédia à la suite de votre message. Culex (talk) 23:54, 18 November 2022 (UTC)