User talk:Damiens.rf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
English: Welcome to the Commons, Damiens.rf!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 23:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright Image:Sharif Ali bin al-Hussein.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--mattbuck (Talk) 15:17, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Damiens. The image was deleted because although it was licenced on flickr as CC-BY, the flickr image clearly had the watermark and alt test asserting that the image belonged to the Smithsonian, and so the flickr user did not have the rights to release. Hope this clears things up. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:38, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, my apologies, guess I made a mistake. If you reupload it I'll pass it. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:51, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Afraid not. I'm not an administrator, I can't delete or undelete, I only tagged it for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:31, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rebecca Watson picture?

[edit]

Do you seriously see a problem with a Darwin for President t-shirt? He isn't really running, and if he were he couldn't win because he is an Englishmen, and he has been dead for a very long time. Please try not to be petty --129.19.136.103 09:09, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not the place to promote your friend's "cool funny things". --Damiens.rf 13:16, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I'm reverting your edit for the second time. Please refrain from cropping this photo again. It is not necessary to crop this picture, as the shirt in question is not promoting an actual candidate and is not advertising any trademarked product. Your personal feelings about whether the shirt is funny or not are irrelevant to this discussion. The picture should be left in the original format whenever possible as a courtesy to the photographer. Thanks for taking an interest, as I see you have on all of Miss Watson's articles.MArcane (talk) 23:59, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Courtesy? We ask the images to be freely licensed for a reason. --Damiens.rf 16:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FOP

[edit]

Please see COM:FOP#Australia, different versions of an image should be unloaded under different file names. Only identical images should be uploaded over each other. MBisanz talk 15:54, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Be more careful before you use "no source" template. Read accurately informations shown in the license template there:

This image is in the public domain because its copyright has expired.
This applies to the United States, Canada, the European Union and those countries with a copyright term of life of the author plus 70 years.
Polski: źródło: S. Orgelbranda Encyklopedja Powszechna z ilustracjami i mapami
English: source: Samuel Orgelbrand's Universal Encyclopedia with illustrations and maps
edited in sixteen volumes 1898-1904 (plus two volumes of "suplement", 1911 & 1912)

Julo (talk) 09:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bruna_Ferraz_3.jpg

[edit]

Hello,

I don't think this image is within Commons scope. It ha no educational value whatsoever. If you disagree, please ask on Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests‎. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:38, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Bruna Ferraz 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Yann (talk) 16:06, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Bruna Ferraz 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--R. Engelhardt (talk) 15:52, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Damiens.rf. You have new messages at Multichill's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:31, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:42, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Problem tags

[edit]

Hello, thank you for marking images as "no source" but please always notify the original uploader about such act. It's hard to expect a source from the user if he / she even don't know about the problem. Please remember that many users will get a notification email about talk page change and will be able to react accordantly. Recently there were a dispute about deleted image that you marked as "no source" at Commons:Village_pump#13th_dalai_lama and now administrator who simply did a routine job is accused of some "conspiracy". Thank you --Justass (talk) 18:31, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't the script be notifying the uploaders? --Damiens.rf 20:37, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, if you read carefully message that you left on any "no source" image it says "When applying this tag:....." and message ready to copy/paste to uploaders talk page. Happy New Year. Cheers --Justass (talk) 21:15, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Steve Reeves 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Simonxag (talk) 23:44, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Steve Reeves.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Simonxag (talk) 23:47, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bruna_Ferraz_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Common-Man (talk) 16:44, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

L&B postcard images from 105 years ago

[edit]

Hi, you have recently instigated the removal of three imnage files thathad been moved from en.wikipedia, as the licensing data was incorrect. These were File:L&Bbarnstaple.jpg, File:L&Bbratton.jpg, File:L&Bblackmoor.jpg.

I don't know what licensing data weas included, as it wasn't me who moved them from Wikipedia (I'm not too sure how to go about it!), although following a request for deletion, I had updated the licence information to confirm that they are PD images (first published in the UK in around 1904/5) and this had been acceptable on en.wikipedia, so I was surprised to find they had then been deleted. Please could you advise how I can get these images reinstated - or how I can reload them with the necessary licence details to prevent their subsequent removal.

Similar images still in use are L&Bwoodybay.jpg (which still has my original licensing data, which may be incorrect) and L&Bchelfham.jpg (which is, I believe correctly licensed, but has not yet been moved to wikiCommons)

I have to admit to being a little confused by the image licensing requirements, so any assistance with retaining these images for use on Wikicommons would be much appreciated. Kind regards, Lynbarn (talk) 12:19, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bruna_Ferraz_3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

92.161.48.254 17:55, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bruna_Ferraz_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

92.161.48.254 18:00, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Please remain calm and collegial

[edit]

català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  עברית  +/−


It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!

Yann (talk) 09:19, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This [1] is not acceptable. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:20, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The comment by the closing admin is what is not acceptable on commons: "The public domain rationale in the file description is enough to allow every people reusing the picture make his own idea on copyright status".--Damiens.rf 11:48, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive

[edit]

Time to stop your disruptive series of DRs. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:13, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of pending discussion

[edit]

The issue has been noted at ANI for requesting guidelines. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 01:38, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bruna_Ferraz_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 16:56, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bruna Ferraz 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Krzysiu (talk) 03:05, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alfred Edward Housman.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish 📥 15:45, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

By way of information for the future, when you want to crop an image may I suggest you use the CropTool that can be activated in your commons Preferences, under Gadgets. The CropTool will then appears in the left side of your screen. It saves everyone a lot of time because it transfers all the correct and appropriate information into the cropped image, such as source, license, author, etc. It even leaves a backlink, that I have done manually, to the original and visa versa so long as the original has been positively reviewed. That way all the proper information is there and does not need to be manually reviewed. If you are just cropping a small bit of the image like a frame you can decide to overwrite the original image but for more major crops you should upload the copped version as a separate new image as you did. Try it. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 10:37, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:42, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]