User talk:Cvmontuy/Archive/2016
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Image renaming
I saw that you tagged a image for rename but your not on the checkpage for the bot (Commons:MediaMoveBot/CheckPage) Please go to the the talk page and put your name up for approval so that the bot can automatically rename your request instead of waiting for someone else on that list to confirm for you. Betacommand 17:49, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 03:01, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Toltec_bench2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Cvmontuy (talk) 21:11, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Welcome!
![]() |
Welcome to the FPC project, Cvmontuy/Archive! Here, we nominate files to become featured pictures. Please read the image guidelines carefully before reviewing and nominating. If you have any questions, you can take them to the project's talk page. And don't be deterred if your first nominations fail; this is usual. Again, welcome! --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:29, 25 November 2010 (UTC) |
FPX
Hi Cvmontuy, template:FPX is used to quick close nominations which stand no chance of being promoted, due to major technical shortcomings. I think the nomination was on that limit, and was asking other participants if they agree. Sorry for using Wiki slang, did not notice you are a new participant. Some participants are the opinion that the use of FPX should be very limited as it might act discouraging, others argue that receiving dozens of oppose votes might be even more discouraging. I certainly do not wish to discourage you, and my only aim was to suggest quick closure in order to move on. --Elekhh (talk) 21:10, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Dark side
Hi! It means that the image looks a bit underexposed. I would have adjutsed the s-curve, giving it a little more light, because the image is very dark. Hola! Significa que la imagen se ve un poco sub-expuesta. Yo hubiese ajustado los niveles en la curva S, agregando un poco de luz, porque la imagen se ve muy oscura. Regards, --Paolo Costa (talk) 02:54, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cat graywhite 201611.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Library plane 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AF Nikkor 70-300mm G zoom lens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ferrocaril de cuernavaca Mexico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Torre derecha cat metropolitana SLP201612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Acheta domesticus head161217 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Skycrappers reforma1612 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Popocatepetl pasodecortez cut.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Torre izq cat metropolitana slp201612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Regina sphere161224.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Reginas Bear161214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|