User talk:Cvmontuy/Archive/2016

Image renaming

I saw that you tagged a image for rename but your not on the checkpage for the bot (Commons:MediaMoveBot/CheckPage) Please go to the the talk page and put your name up for approval so that the bot can automatically rename your request instead of waiting for someone else on that list to confirm for you. Betacommand 17:49, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Serpent templo mayor2009.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 03:01, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Toltec_bench2.jpg

File:Toltec_bench2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cvmontuy (talk) 21:11, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Welcome!

Welcome to the FPC project, Cvmontuy/Archive! Here, we nominate files to become featured pictures. Please read the image guidelines carefully before reviewing and nominating. If you have any questions, you can take them to the project's talk page. And don't be deterred if your first nominations fail; this is usual. Again, welcome! --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:29, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

FPX

Hi Cvmontuy, template:FPX is used to quick close nominations which stand no chance of being promoted, due to major technical shortcomings. I think the nomination was on that limit, and was asking other participants if they agree. Sorry for using Wiki slang, did not notice you are a new participant. Some participants are the opinion that the use of FPX should be very limited as it might act discouraging, others argue that receiving dozens of oppose votes might be even more discouraging. I certainly do not wish to discourage you, and my only aim was to suggest quick closure in order to move on. --Elekhh (talk) 21:10, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Dark side

Hi! It means that the image looks a bit underexposed. I would have adjutsed the s-curve, giving it a little more light, because the image is very dark. Hola! Significa que la imagen se ve un poco sub-expuesta. Yo hubiese ajustado los niveles en la curva S, agregando un poco de luz, porque la imagen se ve muy oscura. Regards, --Paolo Costa (talk) 02:54, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cat graywhite 201611.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 19:23, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Library plane 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 07:00, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AF Nikkor 70-300mm G zoom lens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrocaril de cuernavaca Mexico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:23, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre derecha cat metropolitana SLP201612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:48, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acheta domesticus head161217 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Remarkable and striking. -- Johann Jaritz 03:22, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skycrappers reforma1612 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:47, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Popocatepetl pasodecortez cut.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:23, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre izq cat metropolitana slp201612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Regina sphere161224.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 01:04, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reginas Bear161214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:37, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 27 December 2016 (UTC)