User talk:Cvmontuy

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archives

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Versa2021p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:58, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Versa2021p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. (Nice, with 80% selfie.) --XRay 06:35, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Usumacinta river floaded2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eje8Sur202104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please check your image. It's leaning out and IMO a little too warm. And please improve the categorization. --XRay 05:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC). ✓ Done[reply]
Would you please check again --Cvmontuy 16:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support IMO OK. Thank you. --XRay 09:56, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ParroquiaSanMiguel2019P5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:39, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Battle field with chess board.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:27, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Commons:Valued image candidates/ Taken with Canon EOS 500N

[edit]

A1Cafel (talk) 10:23, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! El Zacatal bridge, Ciudad del Carmen 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good enough quality for me. -- Ikan Kekek 20:27, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Julee and Alebrije 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Autorretrato, París, 1967-1968, Lake de Landero.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 07:16, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Latinoamerica tower, Mexico City 2022 p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Sky could be improved. --XRay 04:38, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xochimilco Isla la Llorona 20220219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good except that there are some weird geometric artifacts on the upper left, middle left and upper right that have to be eliminated. -- Ikan Kekek 05:54, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Thanks for your review, its done! --Cvmontuy 10:33, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Almost. There's still one white one about 2/3 of the way up the trees on the left. -- Ikan Kekek 21:00, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 CommentDone! --Cvmontuy 13:40, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 14:49, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leaves of Liquidambar styraciflua.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:31, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fossil wristwath with white background.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK quality. --PetarM 16:17, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fotos

[edit]

Hola compañero Cvmontuy quisiera pedirte si por favor pudieses subir fotos como estas, pero de esta pandemia actual en México obviamente:

Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 03:56, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cvmontuy&oldid=700264013"