User talk:Copyleft/Archives
Welcome to my archive page !
File:2010_Medef_universite_Alain_Ducasse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
–Tryphon☂ 12:03, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
File:2010_Suresnes_Mediateque_vue_Bois_Boulogne_Paris.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
–Tryphon☂ 12:15, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
File:2010_statue_musee_renoir.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pieter Kuiper (talk) 13:52, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:2010_Mathias_Charles_Mayère_008.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:2010_Mathias_Charles_Mayère_008.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2010_Mathias_Charles_Mayère_008.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Jean-Fred (talk) 22:49, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
File:Bogdanov_universe_mission_Planck_juillet_2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mike Peel (talk) 17:57, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
« Retrait de l'obligation abusive de mention d'un copyright. »
[edit]cf. Au contraire, les licences libres se basent complètement sur le droit d’auteur, et elles stipulent que l’auteur peut être attribué comme il le souhaite.
Jean-Fred (talk) 13:13, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi Copyleft,
did you paint the painting reproduced in File:2002-12-12 Trou noir-Black hole.png by yourself or did you just make a photography of a painting by another painter? --Túrelio (talk) 21:53, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Copyleft,
where is the original "poster" located of which you made this reproduction? --Túrelio (talk) 21:55, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
File:2011_raptor_Museum_histoire_naturelle_expo_dinosaure.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:54, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
File:2011_IBM_100_Club_Alliance_SAAS_Cloud.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 07:46, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:2011 Dimitri Parant SERGE.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:2011 Dimitri Parant SERGE.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2011 Dimitri Parant SERGE.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 14:36, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:2011 Dimitri Parant PATRICE LECONTE.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:2011 Dimitri Parant PATRICE LECONTE.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2011 Dimitri Parant PATRICE LECONTE.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 14:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:2011 Dimitri Parant MARYLINE VOIT.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:2011 Dimitri Parant MARYLINE VOIT.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2011 Dimitri Parant MARYLINE VOIT.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 14:39, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:2011 Dimitri Parant K&G.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:2011 Dimitri Parant K&G.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2011 Dimitri Parant K&G.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 14:39, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:2011 Dimitri Parant DELPHY (numérique).jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:2011 Dimitri Parant DELPHY (numérique).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2011 Dimitri Parant DELPHY (numérique).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 14:40, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:2011 Dimitri Parant CARDIN.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:2011 Dimitri Parant CARDIN.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 14:41, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:2011 Dimitri Parant BOGART.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:2011 Dimitri Parant BOGART.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2011 Dimitri Parant BOGART.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 14:42, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:SYLVANA LORENZ.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:SYLVANA LORENZ.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:SYLVANA LORENZ.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Bapti ✉ 16:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:BONO U2.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:BONO U2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:BONO U2.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Bapti ✉ 16:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
File:75378-TrollFace.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Herr Kriss (talk) 02:29, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Pictogram troll welcome.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Trycatch (talk) 12:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- and File:Forgiven troll interdit.PNG. Trollface is actually not free, the author (whynne from deviantART) didn't release it under a free license. Trycatch (talk) 12:04, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 17:26, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Daniel Tammet.jpg was uncategorized on 29 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:26, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:2011 Helene Xuan Chaire Forum transitions demographiques economiques Fondation du risque.jpg was uncategorized on 24 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
File:2002-12-12_Trou_noir-Black_hole.xcf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Missvain (talk) 02:02, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Facebook credits
[edit]Salut.
Je suis en train de faire le ménage dans Category:Facebook et me demande quel est le lien entre cette image que tu as postée et Facebook. Peux-tu m'éclairer ? Cordialement. Badzil (talk) 22:44, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Affiche Parfum Maison Worth rue Franklin Roosevelt Suresnes.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Túrelio (talk) 07:11, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:2011 Charia Hebdo Luz caricature Mahomet.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:2011 Charia Hebdo Luz caricature Mahomet.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2011 Charia Hebdo Luz caricature Mahomet.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Coyau (talk) 17:46, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
File:2010_expo_51_dinosaures_grandeur_nature_025.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 19:31, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
File:2010_expo_51_dinosaures_grandeur_nature_020.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 19:52, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
File:2010_expo_51_dinosaures_grandeur_nature_038.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
File:2011_Boite_expo_Benjamin_Vautier.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
- Zil (d) 09:05, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
File:Jean_Dubuffet_Le-reseda_Siege_social_Caisse_des_depots_CDC.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
- Zil (d) 09:29, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
File:Musée_départemental_Albert-Kahn_entree.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
- Zil (d) 09:32, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
File:2011_Expo_Mougins_Benjamin_Vautier.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
- Zil (d) 09:40, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
File:Andre_Gernez.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ludo (talk) 09:42, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
File:Classement_iTunes_Rewind_2010_Voyages_France_Audioguide_AudioGuidia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
- Zil (d) 09:49, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
J'ai supprimé ce fichier. Ce n'était pas ton travail, mais une photo d'un écran de télé. Ludo (talk) 09:55, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Navrant
[edit]Oui je remonte tes uploads sur Commons. Plus je remonte, plus ce que j'y vois me fais peur. Un exemple au passage : File:1856_gravure_Istanbul_Constantinople.jpg.
Tu te fous de la gueule de qui pour te mettre auteur d'une gravure datée de 1856 ? Tu t’appropries le travail d'un autre. Et en plus tu fraudes sur le régime de droit d'auteur en mettant ce document en CC By SA. C'est juste écœurant surtout quand en plus tu sembles te permettre de donner des leçons sur le droit dans les mailing listes de l'association française. Je continue à faire de le ménage dans ton œuvre. J'en suis à me questionner pour demander des sanctions à ton égard. Ludo (talk) 10:06, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
File:Lorenz_smile.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ludo (talk) 10:32, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:1985 Monique Mayere bronze angel head tete d ange.JPG
- File:2010 banane de noel art ephemere en hommage a Gérard Le Roux.jpg
- File:2010 banane de noel snow chistmas banana.jpg
- File:2010 Lit Famille Mayere Uhl.jpg
- File:Couple of Sirens.jpg
- File:Lithographie Monique Mayere enfant avec marionnette.jpg
- File:Miroir Monique Mayere Mirror.JPG
- File:Monique-Charles signature black.png
Yours sincerely PierreSelim (talk) 11:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
File:Walt_Disney-Mickey3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
PierreSelim (talk) 11:51, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
J'ai ajouté: File:Walt_Disney-Mickey.JPG à la demande. Bonne journée. PierreSelim (talk) 13:09, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
File:2007 visit card aforsys.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Trivialist (talk) 12:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
unsuitable file format
[edit]Hi Copyleft,
could you please upload file:2003 agenda Ben par Dan.svg as a jpg file since the svg format is only meant for real vector graphics. Cheers --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 18:19, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
File:Château de Coubertin Muse nue2.JPG, File:Château de Coubertin Muse nue1.JPG, File:Château de Coubertin Muse nue3.JPG
[edit]Hi Copyleft, who is the sculptor of the sculptures shown in these images? --Túrelio (talk) 12:48, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
File:Château de Coubertin Muse nue1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 13:12, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
File:Château de Coubertin Muse nue3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 13:13, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
File:Château de Coubertin Muse nue2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 13:13, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
File:Mozart musique classique sifflee (Le siffleur-Clodine Tardy) 29e Festival des vendanges (arts de la rue) Suresnes 2012.ogg
[edit]File:Mozart musique classique sifflee (Le siffleur-Clodine Tardy) 29e Festival des vendanges (arts de la rue) Suresnes 2012.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
McZusatz (talk) 10:03, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
File:Erik Satie Musique sifflee (Le siffleur-Clodine Tardy) 29e Festival des vendanges (arts de la rue) Suresnes 2012.ogg
[edit]File:Erik Satie Musique sifflee (Le siffleur-Clodine Tardy) 29e Festival des vendanges (arts de la rue) Suresnes 2012.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
McZusatz (talk) 10:04, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio?
[edit]I converted the two files mentioned above into proper ogv format. You tagged them as {{Own}} but it seems you did not take into account the work of the performers and the copyright status of the composition. en:Erik Satie died in 1925 so his work should be PD-old. Nevertheless in some cases a rearragement of piece of music can possibly enjoy revived copyright protection. --McZusatz (talk) 18:30, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- yes, you're right. Thank you for your message, i put PD-old on these files. But Copyrighted work as fair use could be better--Copyleft (talk) 14:34, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:06, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- yes, thanks. I try to choose best licence for pedagogic purpose. --Copyleft (talk) 11:29, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Orbs-est-là-3.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ginés90 (talk) 00:30, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
File:2007 Nicolas president en alphabet socio politique de Villegle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
86.217.72.133 22:59, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
File:Gagnants des Internationaux de France de tennis.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:33, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Eiffel tower into Unesco sphere.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Trizek from FR 08:59, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Votre participation à Wiki Loves Monuments
[edit]Bonjour, (for an english translation, scroll down)
Merci pour votre participation au concours Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 sur Wikimedia Commons. Je me permets de vous laisser ce message pour vous informer, au cas où vous ne l'auriez pas vu, que la participation au concours n'est pas limitée à une seule contribution. Si vous souhaitez soumettre d'autres images dans le cadre de WLM 2013, il vous reste donc jusqu'au 30 septembre.
Si vous avez besoin de précisions sur ce concours n'hésitez pas à revenir vers moi.
English translation : Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 on Wikimedia Commons. I send you this email to inform you, in case you didn't notice, that the contest is not limited to a single contribution. If you have other images of historical monuments then you have until September 30 to contribute to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. If you need information on this contest feel free to contact me. Sincerely.
Symac, WLM2013 - France.
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear Copyleft, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
File:2010 autoportrait Daniel Rodet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 18:15, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:2013 Global Conference at Unesco entrance.JPG
- File:2013 Global Conference at Unesco gardens lunch.JPG
- File:2013 Global Conference at Unesco sculpture.JPG
- File:2013 Global Conference at Unesco vision.JPG
Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 02:50, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Jean de la Lune (film, 2012) Stephan Schesch und Tomi Ungerer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 10:56, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Why did you decrease the file resolution compared to the previous version? -- AnonMoos (talk) 10:35, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- i just added 2 new projects. --Copyleft (talk) 14:42, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- And decreased file pixel dimensions (image resolution)... AnonMoos (talk) 09:52, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
File:Ariane de rothschild.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Buxtehude (talk) 00:27, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Philharmonie de Paris (vue de la Grande Salle depuis le parterre).JPG
- File:Philharmonie de Paris Concert dans la Grande Salle (vue du parterre).JPG
- File:Philharmonie de Paris Grande Salle (vue du public depuis la scene).JPG
Yours sincerely, — Racconish 📥 20:43, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
License verification
[edit]Hi Copyleft. Could you help clarify the licensing of File:2011 Milipol Claude Gueant and Abdullah bin Khalifa Al Thani.jpg and File:2011 Abdullah bin Khalifa Al Thani.jpg at COM:VP/C#File:2011 Abdullah bin Khalifa Al Thani.jpg. You uploaded the files so perhaps you can clear things up. Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:47, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:2011 Milipol Claude Gueant and Abdullah bin Khalifa Al Thani.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2011 Milipol Claude Gueant and Abdullah bin Khalifa Al Thani.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Wikicology (talk) 16:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
File:2011 Abdullah bin Khalifa Al Thani.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
INeverCry 21:46, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:45, 16 October 2016 (UTC)