User talk:Chenspec/Archive 1

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Chenspec!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:17, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Camel 1.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:17, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:White plastic stopper.JPG was uncategorized on 23 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Chenspec,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 23:44, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

How do I delete a page?

I Need to delete this page - I opened a Category with the same name and it is now redundant. How do I delete a page? Chenspec (talk) 04:51, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Only Administrators can delete pages. Since you are a relatively new user, every new page you create is reviewed by someone doing New Page Patrol. Therefore you can just leave it and one of us will delete it, as I did. You can also add a {{Speedy}} tag to it to request a routine deletion. Finally we have "Nominate for Deletion" in the left hand column of every page, but that is reserved for pages that require discussion before deletion.

By the way -- it is a very common mistake -- I myself have made it many times. If you have questions, you may ask them at the Village Pump in any of 42 languages or on my talk page. I will also watch for questions here on your talk page for at least a week. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:09, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I am new to the site, I am more active in the Hebrew Wikipedia... I started to categorize images for Wiki Loves Monuments. This is a fantastic competition and I think it is also very important! By the way, I'm looking for a more efficient way to categorize images. i use cat-a-lot, But you can use it only from categories and not from my uploads page Chenspec (talk) 12:43, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

קטגוריות

היי,

תודה על עבודת הקטלוג. תשתדלי בבקשה לקטלג לקטגוריות משנה מדויקות יותר. נניח אם את רואה שיש 10+ תמונות של עצים בחיפה/בגנים הבהאיים אז כדאי לפתוח קטגוריה יעודית במקום להעמיס על קטגוריית האם של עצים בישראל. תמונות רבות מידי בקטגוריות אם נוטות ללכת לאיבוד ומקשות על הניווט בקטגוריה. אפשר כמובן לעשות את הקטלוג הזה בשני מופעים: בפעם הראשונה לקטגוריית האם מקטגוריות שונות, ובפעם השנייה לעבור על אותה קטגוריית אם ולמיין אותה. Neukoln (talk) 07:57, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

הי, איזה כיף לקבל פה תגובה בעברית.

אכן - חשבתי לעבוד בשלבים. עכשיו אני עוברת על אתרי המורשת, בעיקר באזור חיפה. אחר כך באמת תכננתי ללכת לקטגוריות האחרות כדי לראות את כל מה שהצטבר. ככה גם אדע יותר טוב איזה תמונות יש ולמה כדאי לחלק אותן.

אבל זה רעיון טוב באמת, אם אני עובדת על תמונות שהן מראש בחיפה להעביר אותן ישר לשם.

ואם כבר אתה פה ובעברית תרשה לי לנצל אותך לכמה שאלות ;-)

אני כרגע משתמשת בכלי cat-a-lot, אבל הוא עובד רק דרך התצוגה של קטגוריות ולא של התרומות שלי או החיפוש. יש דרכים יותר יעילות/טובת שכדי לי לדעת עליהן?
האם יש דרך לראות בחלון אחד את כל התמונות בקטגוריה מסוימת ותת הקטגוריה שלה? תתי הקבוצות עוזרות לחיפוש, אבל דווקא לקטלוג יותר נוח שהכל במקום אחד ושלא צריך לעבור בין חלונות.
בגלל שאני חדשה בזה ואין לי ביטחון עדיין אני עושה בעיקר "העתקה" ולא "העברה", אבל ראיתי כמה תמונות באתרי מורשת בישראל שצריכים להיות בתל אביב או חיפה. להעביר אותן?

אגב, אתה מכיר את המקבץ השבועי בויקיפדה? (תחפש שם "ויקיפדיה:המקבץ השבועי") העלתי שם רעיון להתחיל לשלב בקשות לתמונות. זה כולל דברים שחסר וצריך לצלם ולהעלות וגם לינקים לקטגוריות שצריך לסדר. נראה שאנשים שם קיבלו את זה בחיוב, אבל צריך מישהו שיודע איזה לינקים צריך בכל נושא ונראה לי שתוכל לתרום בזה.

תודה ושבת שלום Chenspec (talk) 05:58, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

נדמה לי שהוא עובד גם בדפי תוצאות חיפוש. לא מכיר דרך יעילה יותר.
צריך לבדוק, אולי אחד מחתולי הקטגוריות עושים את זה. [1] [2]. אני לפעמים פורס את החלונות זה בצד זה. כדאי גם שתעברי בהזדמנות על רשימת הגאדג'טים בהעדפות כאן. יש כלים כמעט להכל, פשוט צריך להכיר ולהתנסות.
כן, אבל צריך במקביל לתקן בתבנית את המספר הסידורי של האתר, את התיאור שלו ואת הנ"צ שלו. אפשר לאתר אותם ברשימות האתרים בוויקי או בתמונות אחרות של אותו אתר.
כמובן שמכיר את המקבץ. לא בטוח שהבנתי אבל את הכוונה בלינקים. יש כלי שנותנים לו נ"צ ורדיוס והוא מוצא ערכים בלי תמונה ברדיוס הזה. אני לא זוכר כרגע איך קראו לו, אבל בזמנו כשניסיתי הוא התקשה להתמודד עם אזורים מסויימים שעמוסים בערכים. אולי עם המעבר לשרתים החדשים הוא יעבוד חלק יותר.

Neukoln (talk) 11:06, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Chenspec,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Chenspec,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Category:Association of Americans and Canadians in Israel Memorial Forest

שלום חן. הוספת לכל תמונה בקטגוריה זו את הקטגוריה של פארק יצחק רבין. אני אוסיף במקום זאת את הקטגוריה של הפארק לקטגוריה של החורש ואסיר אותה מכל התמונות הבודדות. בברכה - יואב ר.

עוד יותר טוב - תודה Chenspec (talk) 12:20, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bet Oren

Hi Chenspec, this is Euphorbia helioscopia and this is Oxalis pes-caprae. Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 16:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WOW great - thanks! I have more pictures of these plants and now I know where they should be categorized Chenspec (talk) 16:41, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category seems excessive

Re [3]: what's the plan here? Do you actually intend to reclassify every picture of a woman that doesn't mention gender into Category:Female humans? - Jmabel ! talk 16:18, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken this up more generally at Commons:Village pump#"Female_humans", because I think the issue goes beyond any one person's edits. You might want to comment there. - Jmabel ! talk 16:26, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop adding this category. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:29, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Didn't stop, so blocked for 2 hours. Yann (talk) 16:35, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I saw it just now. I did not mean to cause trouble .... Chenspec (talk) 16:42, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yann, I can not comment there now so I will be happy if you transfer my message: "It is very difficult to get things through the sub-categories, so it's easier for me to put a lot of pictures in one place and then use the Cat-a-lot. I did not mean to cause trouble. I would be most grateful if you could consider the work I've done and restore the catalog temporarily. I will use it to divide the images into appropriate categories and not leave them in Category: Female humans." Thank you Chenspec (talk) 16:52, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chenspec: probably you should create a hidden category if this is your intent, and most likely use your name as part of that hidden category so that people can tell that this is something for your own use during some work, rather than a permanent part of the category tree. - Jmabel ! talk 17:59, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WOW is a great idea that will help me a lot - it's like using Wikipedia drafts? Chenspec (talk) 18:29, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel: how do I pass the pictures to the new category Category:Temporary categories for User:Chenspec Cat-a-lot - Female humans? Need to restore ... Chenspec (talk) 20:18, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:21st_Century_Skills

21st Century Skills has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Alan Liefting (talk) 08:43, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Une femme dans Paris 2003.JPG

Sorry, there is no plant on that image. --Gampe (talk) 04:35, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I meant the leaves that are parts of the plant - but if it does not fit you can remove from the category Chenspec (talk) 06:16, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:תפקודים ניהוליים.pdf

File:תפקודים ניהוליים.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ldorfman (talk) 14:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Temporary categories for User:Chenspec Cat-a-lot - Female humans

Hi, Chenspec, just by curiousity, why do you keep a Category:Temporary categories for User:Chenspec Cat-a-lot - Female humans ? Lotje (talk) 12:26, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The main reason is convenience. It is designed to help me collect images that I want to categorize, without overloading the existing categories (I really try not to keep more than 200 images in category). It's much more efficient to work with the cataloging tool Cat-a-lot in this way. I chose this topic "Female humans" for now, but later on I plan to do similar categories other issues that interest me. What bothers me is that a lot of good pictures are lost Wikimedia Commons, because nobody knows they are there .... This is my way to promote the accessibility of images. So occasionally I change them - remove images that are in enough categories, or those that I can not find an appropriate category for them. And of course I add new photos when I find them. Now for example, I have too many pictures, it is hard to work with it. So soon I will filter some of them. Hope I answered your question and I'd love to hear what you think Chenspec (talk) 13:29, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Chenspec. I feel like you,... a lot of good pictures, nobody knows they are there. I would be most happy to take a look now and then at your category and see if I can find a suitable page to add the nice ones.

Lotje (talk) 15:16, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WOW, great - thank you very much for your help! Chenspec (talk) 15:19, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Women faces etc.

"Women faces" is simply bad English. Either "women's faces" or "faces of women". - Jmabel ! talk 01:21, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I corrected it to Category:Women's faces, What about categories Category:Girls faces & Category:Female faces? Do their names sound good in English or should we change them too? Chenspec (talk) 05:46, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Female faces is fine. Category:Girls faces should be Category:Girls' faces. - Jmabel ! talk 14:54, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:מרכז חינוך לשואה – בית שלום יפן - Holocaust Education Center – Fukuyama Japan (1).JPG

File:מרכז חינוך לשואה – בית שלום יפן - Holocaust Education Center – Fukuyama Japan (1).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 13:48, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category capitalisation

Hi Chenspec. When creating categories, please be mindful of capitalisation. I've moved "Female Shirts" to "Female shirts" and "Female Undershirts" to "Female undershirts". Words that are not proper nouns should not be capitalised. — Huntster (t @ c) 21:18, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for the correction. I will remember it in the future Chenspec (talk) 04:39, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Female undershirts?

I've seen that one of your new creations is the Category:Female undershirts. The name seems a little strange to me. There may be women's undershirts, but shirts are not female or male. The other thing that disturbs me more ist that you categorized a lot of (my) pictures there, that do not show underwear but sports clothing, and one of a woman in a black dress/gown (that one i corrected, the others are too much for me to change them all). --Tsui (talk) 18:06, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I particularly don't understand images like File:Stav Shaffir.JPG and File:Toray PPO 2009 Li Na.jpg (amongst others) being included. — Huntster (t @ c) 21:07, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tsui, Huntster - Sorry, probably a language problem. The intention was sleeveless shirts (from the pictures that were there before, I thought it was the intention). It's the same word in Hebrew - how it works in English? Chenspec (talk) 21:17, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cat-a-lot

Hello Chenspec. What is your intention for the hidden category Category:Temporary for Cat-a-lot - Female humans? What are you planning to do with the pictures of women? What is the intention? You have categorized images made by users that have contacted me and are worried about what this category is used for. Regards, --Gereon K. (talk) 12:11, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gereon K. No problem, actually I was asked about it already - you can read the explanation in this discussion. Chenspec (talk) 14:03, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Chenspec,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Telephone baby

Hi, you keep moving File:The telephone baby cph.3b17965.jpg into categories for females, when there is no indication that this is actually a girl. In early 20th-century US, children of both sexes were dressed in the same clothes, so it's possible that this may be a boy. For example, see US President Franklin D. Roosevelt as a young child. —howcheng {chat} 16:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good you've noticed. As I recall, I saw it originally in a category of females. But If there is doubt, I agree that we should avoid these categories. Chenspec (talk) 04:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chenspec/gallery page causing database errors

Server logs indicate a high number of lock timeout errors caused by this very large gallery page (WikiPage::lockAndGetLatest 10.64.16.29 1205 Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction (10.64.16.29) SELECT page_latest FROM `page` WHERE page_id = '32843627' AND page_namespace = '2' AND page_title = 'Chenspec/gallery' LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE). It's not urgent, but I was wondering what the page is for and how people use the gallery there. Thanks. Aaron Schulz (talk) 10:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is automatically created when uploading photos through Commonist - I do not really need it .... Chenspec (talk) 10:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mushrooms from Edith Wolfson Park

Hi Chenspec,

these are all Agaricus, please categorize them more precisely.--Nikos Andronikos (talk) 10:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I do not know enough subspecies Chenspec (talk) 14:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, you don't have to know subspecies, or even species, the genus is just enough.--Nikos Andronikos (talk) 10:45, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Staring

[4]: seems odd to put this in Category:Staring. She just happens to be looking toward the camera while speaking. I don't particularly remember her doing anything like staring (which implies a sustained, open-eyed look in a particular direction). Also, adding possibly derogatory categories to photos of identifiable people seems to me like a very bad idea. As the photographer who was there, I'm reverting this addition. - Jmabel ! talk 06:35, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK Chenspec (talk) 06:38, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

Thank for your category Kallalouly (talk) 14:51, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edith Wolfson Park 2016 (59).jpg

File:Edith Wolfson Park 2016 (59).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kulmalukko (talk) 14:37, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I answered there - thank you Chenspec (talk) 16:04, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your categories

Hi, Please do not add silly categories. Thanks, Yann (talk) 04:29, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Women_by_background

Women by background has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Kürschner (talk) 15:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Females_with_black_background

Females with black background has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Kürschner (talk) 15:27, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Females_by_background

Females by background has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Kürschner (talk) 15:28, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category name in romanized Hebrew

Shalom lach, Chen. Just as I prefer using English on Talk pages in the Commons - which as you probably know is the lingua franca here for all but file names - I'm not comfortable with a category name in romanized Hebrew with no accompanying explanation. The case in point:

Category:Halebeniyot, created 5 October 2013 by User:Chenspec
- At present: 1 subcategory (17 files), 92 files

vs.

Category:Cooling towers of Haifa oil refineries, created 23 September 2017 by User:Zaccarias
- At present: 71 files

So prior to taking any action, I'd appreciate your input on how to proceed reconciling this duplication of categories (manual merge? ugh...). Meanwhile, I've adding my own gloss of Halebeniyot to the category page for optimal clarity. -- Cheers from the Western Galilee, Deborahjay (talk) 14:11, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking. Both categories seem to relate to the same thing. One of them mentions the role of the buildings and the other indicates their name according to the local residents. Because it is the name, it can not be translated. Just transcribe. I recommend combining the categories and the names. What do you think about this? "Halebeniyot - Cooling towers of Haifa oil refineries" or "Cooling towers of Haifa oil refineries (Halebeniyot)". Chenspec (talk) 14:29, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with your arguments. I suggest to use the name Category:Halebeniyot (cooling towers of Haifa oil refineries). In my opinion this name would fit the naming scheme on Commons. The commonly used name should also stand first, as it does in this suggestion. When you agree I could perform the merge. --Zaccarias (talk) 15:13, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the category name should be Category:Lebeniyot. See Name. Haifa Oil Refinery Cooling Towers. Alternative Name. Arubot Batei HaZikuk, Lebeniyot. Construction Type cooling tower.... -- Geagea (talk) 15:30, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with both of them. However, there is an advantage in adding the explanation for people who do not speak Hebrew. Chenspec (talk) 17:55, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, the prefix HA corresponds to the word THE in English (that is, it is not part of the name, but it shows uniqueness). Chenspec (talk) 17:58, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So we use Category:Halebeniyot (cooling towers of Haifa oil refineries) the name including the HA prefix, right? Please confirm. --Zaccarias (talk) 18:13, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

YES Chenspec (talk) 18:38, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Zaccarias (talk) 19:03, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is no Halebeniyot in google serch but you can find Lebeniyot. I think it is better without "Ha" prefix. -- Geagea (talk) 19:09, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Both searches on Google and Bing provide only very few results. Lebeniyot shows just one relevant image but no "normal" webpage results. Halebeniyot at least gives some results on he.wikipedia. I think this way or the other: It's not a big difference both would be okay. --Zaccarias (talk) 19:19, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All the results including in he.wiki comes from Commons. -- Geagea (talk) 19:27, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also I think Category:Lebeniyot is good enough. Easier for serch and no duplicats. Explnation from Wikidata or in the top of the category, will set it all. -- Geagea (talk) 19:29, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm okay with Lebeniyot but not yet convinced to solely use this name for the category title. However I don't want to be the one who has to decide this. You surely know better in this case. Instead of re-moving the category right away I'd like to wait a little to make sure that we have an agreement. --Zaccarias (talk) 19:43, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what's better. I posted the link to this discussion in the Hebrew Wikipedia to hear more opinions Chenspec (talk) 05:51, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Yermi Kaplan (3).mp4

And also:

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 12:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Due to a mishap it was possible for a while to upload .mp4 files. You have uploaded one or more .mp4 files in that period. Please go to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MP4 files to see all files that are affected. If the video(s) are entirely your own work or properly licensed you can re-upload them with video2commons.

Yours sincerely, Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 01:43, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Girls_hair

Category:Girls_hair has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 19:39, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Internal_monologue

Category:Internal_monologue has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 17:10, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! קיבוץ בית אורן (232).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The description should be updated, however. This shows a flower, not Beit Oren. And the file name is not great either. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:50, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WOW thanks! Chenspec (talk) 09:12, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

QICbot isn't human. It's a bot, a program. ;-) --XRay ^talk 17:06, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

QI

Hello! Quality images are very interesting. You can learn a lot. Welcome! Please read the guidelines at Commons:Quality images candidates. Thank you. --XRay ^talk 17:06, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks Chenspec (talk) 06:16, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BTW: If an image is already promoted, it is not necessary to promote it again. It's useful to review unreviewed photographs first. (Sometimes there are two promotion votes within minutes. It's an error of the review helper. The does not check for an existing promotion.) Thank you. --XRay ^talk 11:54, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I thought that the more people promote a picture the more quality it shows. If one is enough, then it is better to go first for what has not yet received reviews. Chenspec (talk) 12:24, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's FPC. If you like, please have a look to the Featured Pictures candidates. (Forgotten: You need more than one review for the consensual reviews (discussion) of QIC too.) --XRay ^talk 05:41, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I understand - thanks Chenspec (talk) 14:26, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:חיפה - קזינו בת גלים (14).JPG

Yours sincerely, De728631 (talk) 13:27, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into the issue - thanksChenspec (talk) 14:29, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

File:מגדל הקרייה Migdal HaKiriya (12).JPG

File:מגדל הקרייה Migdal HaKiriya (12).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

89.144.222.205 11:30, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:תל אביב Tel Aviv-Yafo (41).JPG

File:תל אביב Tel Aviv-Yafo (41).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

89.144.222.205 11:34, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azriely Towers מגדלי עזריאלי (73).JPG

File:Azriely Towers מגדלי עזריאלי (73).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

GFJ (talk) 11:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azriely Towers מגדלי עזריאלי (74).JPG

File:Azriely Towers מגדלי עזריאלי (74).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

GFJ (talk) 11:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azriely Towers מגדלי עזריאלי (76).JPG

File:Azriely Towers מגדלי עזריאלי (76).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

GFJ (talk) 12:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recent uploads

Hi Chenspec, your recent uploads appear to contain artwork not created by you. All authors and sources of any content must be provided or they may be deleted. You can add {{SD|G7}} to have them deleted. Thank you.--BevinKacon (talk) 19:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BevinKacon - I'm the one who made these artwork. I took advantage of the Korna days to improve my Photoshop skills and decided to share the results. Hope I have more artworks to share later. Chenspec (talk) 20:06, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Hedgehog background designed in camouflage style.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 21:36, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Like I wrote before - these are my works. Why do you claim they are not mine? Chenspec (talk) 06:39, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Location?

Hi Chenspec - I removed the geotag from File:תל אביב Tel Aviv-Yafo (28).JPG as it was clearly erroneous (it mapped in Tokyo, Japan!!). If you can re-add the correct location, please do :-) Thanks! - MPF (talk) 16:22, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how to add a location, but if you want the photo was taken in Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel Chenspec (talk) 09:00, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! The easiest way to get the exact location is to zoom in on the location in google earth, use the location tag tool, and copt the latitude and longitude from that. Then add these to the file with this format: {{Location dec|1.111|2.222}} (where 1.111 is the decimal degrees north latitude, and 2.222 is the decimal degrees east latitude). As an example, the centre of Ha-Medina Square in Tel Aviv is

Camera location	32° 05′ 12.41″ N, 34° 47′ 23.2″ E	View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMap

. But it isn't that important if you find this too complex :-) MPF (talk) 20:56, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Girls_heads

Girls heads has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 03:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Chenspec/Archive 1

Tip: Categorizing images

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

How do I delete a page?

קטגוריות

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Bet Oren

Category seems excessive

Category:Women faces etc.

Category capitalisation

Category:Female undershirts?

Cat-a-lot

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

Telephone baby

User:Chenspec/gallery page causing database errors

Mushrooms from Edith Wolfson Park

Staring

thank you

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Your categories

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Category name in romanized Hebrew

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Quality Image Promotion

QI

Notification about possible deletion

COM:AN/U

Recent uploads

Notification about possible deletion

Location?

Navigation menu

Search