User talk:Brunokito
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 09:16, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Mario Brunello (3).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yann (talk) 21:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Mario Brunello (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 21:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Mario Brunello (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 21:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Mario Brunello (4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 21:50, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Mario Brunello (1).jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Mario Brunello (1).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:12, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Bruno Biondi.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Bruno Biondi.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Scoopfinder(d) 02:56, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
centro filologico
[edit]Ciao. Non so che attività abbia il centro quindi non posso aiutarti. Non devi chiedere prima l'autorizzazione ma come tutti sono liberi di scrivere su wikipedia che comunque ha delle regole, chiunque può chiedere la cancellazione della pagina. Chiedi aiuto allo w:it:WP:SI sportello informazioni, di quale può essere il progetto di riferimento a cui chiededere lumi. Per la foto anche se fosse del 1995 ormai è sul sito se non hai una fonte che dimostra che è stata pubblicata prima del 1995 il sito deve comunque rilasciare l'autorizzazione tramite com:OTRS. Io però farei personalmente una foto della facciata del palazzo e della biblioteca. Quella dell'atrio è molto a effetto per un sito ma non è che dica molto del circolo.--Pierpao.lo (listening) 15:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- No mi sono spiegato male non è che siccome sta su sito riacquista copyright. è una questione di procedure. Se tu carichi una foto e scrivi che è del 1995 per forza di cose la buona fede si da a ch carica e no si chiedono fonti. Ma se sta su un sito allora siccome molti copiano dai siti, per un fatto di procedure di Commons allora la fonte che dice che è del 1995 si pretende. Se credi che il circolo meriti fai bene a scriverla devi semplicemente chiedere allo sportello informazioni quale progetto ti può aiutare.--Pierpao.lo (listening) 07:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Ho riscritto meglio se hai altri dubbi fammi sapere--Pierpao.lo (listening) 18:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Libro del 1958
[edit]Mi sto studiando il caso. Ti faccio sapere--Pierpao.lo (listening) 22:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Re:Possibile problema con foto caricate da me
[edit]Ciao, il pubblico dominio 20 anni dopo la creazione vale solo per foto (scattate in Italia e) non artistiche, ma queste sono decisamente artistiche. La regola è quindi quella dei 70 anni dalla morte dell'autore: riesci a scoprire chi è l'autore della foto e che anno è morto? --Jaqen (talk) 13:03, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Il concetto di "artisticità" ai fini del diritto d'autore non è quello del senso comune ed è complicato, per non dire inintelligibile.
- Il fatto che siano esposte pubblicamente, come anche il fatto che compaiano in un libro, non è rilevante in questo contesto.
- Il diritto d'autore in generale per le foto "artistiche" dura 70 anni dalla morte dell'autore, che quindi deve essere morto al più tardi nel 1945.
- In ogni caso se vuoi chiedere la cancellazione puoi usare Template:Speedydelete nella pagina di descrizione. --Jaqen (talk) 13:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Visto che non ho certezze e che l'autrice del libro ha aperto una contestazione sulla pagina di discussione della voce, ho inserito il template in ogni foto che potrebbe creare un problema. Ti pregherei gentilmente di eliminarle. L'autrice del libro ha contestato anche la discografia che ho tratto dal suo libro (si chiamano "fonti") e messo nella voce it:Maria Farneti, vedere per credere. Se devo togliere anche la fonte non so come farò in futuro le voci. Oltre a tutto le avevo chiesto il permesso, che mi aveva concesso. Ciao, grazie e scusa per l'impazzimento. --Brunokito (talk) 21:14, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
File:Maria Farneti - Herodiade.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 09:08, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
File:Maria Farneti4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 09:34, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Please sign your postings
[edit]As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
--SignBot (talk) 05:04, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting application updated
[edit]We regret the inconveniences you faced into while attempting to vote in this year's POTY and like to express our sincere thanks for reporting this issue. This allowed us to quickly review the error and fix the software behind it. If your time permits, please browse through our wonderful set of candidates now and decide which one you would like to see in Round two. Kind regards, on behalf of the Picture of the Year voting committee, Rillke(q?) 14:22, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Ilian Fleming.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ilian Fleming.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ilian Fleming.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Secondarywaltz (talk) 23:06, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
File:Winton Dean.jpeg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Secondarywaltz (talk) 23:07, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
File:Jeremy Isaacs.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Secondarywaltz (talk) 23:09, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.Elisfkc (talk) 19:01, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Elisfkc: . Ciao, lo farò senz'altro, ma non sono sicuro Che accettiate la licenza, anche se su Flickr parla di una 2 e dovrebbe andare bene. Me lo puoi confermare? --Brunokito (talk) 19:13, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Ian Fleming.jpeg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Leoboudv (talk) 08:45, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Charles Munch.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Ww2censor (talk) 21:48, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Adrian Boult.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Skivsamlare (talk) 09:39, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Piccole sbavature
[edit]Vedo qualche sbavatura qua e là dalla tua presenza su commons. Nulla di che, a parte il temibile copyright. Ora del copyright non ho voglia di parlarne io ora anche se ce ne è forse bisogno. Tipo qualche giorno fai hai lascito un appunto in una talk, e adesso è rimasta la talk e non il file :D. Io ti consiglio di usare Commons:Bar italiano ok? Lascia detto il problema che stai avendo lì e qualche italofono te lo sistema il prima possibile. Mano mano che vedi i problemi risolti a modo, impari rapidamente.
Ti lascio anche un appunto "leggero". Quando hai trasferito File:Taipei.apo-hsu.altonthompson.jpg hai notato che non aveva categoria? Fai uno sforzo di aggiungerne qualcuna quando mancano. Anche la più generica è di aiuto. Guarda p.e. dalla cronologia come l'ho inserita. Se non lo sai che categoria mettere controlla pure foto simili che categ. usano e parti da quella indicazione. All'inizio è un po' noioso ma poi ci prendi la mano. Grazie. --Alexmar983 (talk) 07:10, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.Elisfkc (talk) 22:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Bruno Biondi.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Bruno Biondi.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain. This applies worldwide. In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so: I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law. |
File:Âkov Krejcberg.Jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Secondarywaltz (talk) 02:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Secondarywaltz: The license says that the file is correct, check the license. --Brunokito (talk) 06:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- That person, despite the claim, has no rights to any of the album cover art uploaded to Flickr. In each case, the copyright is owned by the record company. Secondarywaltz (talk) 07:06, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!
[edit]You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Brunokito,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Categorizzazione
[edit]Ciao. Se ti capita fai più attenzione quando carichi un file a mettere qualche categoria. Altrimenti poi deve provvedere qualcun altro dopo, esempio, e basta poco per usare meglio il nostro tempo. Basta anche una categoria generica, in modo da fare un piccolo passo verso lo smistamento. Grazie.--Alexmar983 (talk) 12:36, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
File:FrançoiseAdret.jpeg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
ManFromNord (talk) 14:40, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Giancarlo Landini.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
ManFromNord (talk) 09:50, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Scharwenka2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:25, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Please sign your postings
[edit]As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
--SignBot (talk) 15:17, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Please sign your postings
[edit]As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
--SignBot (talk) 15:18, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Amandhafox wiki2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Ronhjones (Talk) 13:50, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
File:Adrian Boult.jpeg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
AlbanGeller (talk) 23:12, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
File:Adrian Boult.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 07:59, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
File:Molitor top.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:27, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
File:Jose Collins Maid.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violations
[edit]
Hello Brunokito.
You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
File:MathisMvmt2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:11, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
[edit]Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 04:56, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- @~riley: Ti ringrazio per la fiducia, spero di meritarla! --Brunokito (talk) 07:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]This edit is clear evidence that you intended to transfer a copyrighted image to Commons. Please don't do that. You've had like a billion warnings. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:46, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
File:Vaughan-williams-hoppé.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Wikiacc (talk) 18:21, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Carlstheater.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
We don't know the owner of copyright and thus should delete that image. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:31, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
File:In Moonlight song by Elgar cover 1902.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:01, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Paulo szot awards.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Paulo szot awards.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Paulo szot awards.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Sturm (talk) 01:47, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
File tagging File:Patrick Summers La Traviata HGO 2012.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Patrick Summers La Traviata HGO 2012.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Patrick Summers La Traviata HGO 2012.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Missvain (talk) 21:26, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
File:IMSLP15922-Sibelius - Symphony No.5 Op.82 orch. score 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Apalsola t • c 01:00, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
File:BBC Radio 5 Live.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
ZioNicco (talk) 15:27, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Non ricordando come ho estratto il file, compreso il logo, cancellalo. Forse pensavo che il logo non avesse quelle caratteristiche di originilatà tali da farne un'immagine proprietaria. In effetti è un po' semplice, ma non credo proprio di averlo creato io. Brunokito (talk) 04:46, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jaqen (talk) 17:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ciao, io non sono ancora così esperto al punto da contestare una richiesta di cancellazione. Do per scontato che, provenendo da colleghi più scafati di me, queste richieste siano giuste, per cui il più delle volte, dopo aver controllato, non so esattamente come comportarmi e tendo a dare ragione e non oppormi. So bene che tuttto viene fatto nel bene esclusivo di questa organizzazione, che non ho alcuna intenzione di danneggiare. Per cui se ci sono i motivi per proporre una cancellazione e io non ho le armi ben affilate per contestarla, lascio correre, senza aprire una iatriba che non porterebbe del bene a nessuno. Ci sono colleghi più esperti di me ai quali lascio il compito di decidere: il campo dei diritti d'autore è complesso e molto spesso su un'opera difficile da stabilire (pensiamo solo all'autore, il più delle volte ignoto). Vorrei solo specificare che se non rispondo il motivo è che non so come rispondere e a volte propongo io stesso la cancellazione. Spero di esserre stato abbastanza chiaro e ti saluto. Brunokito (talk) 00:29, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Article topimage musikkfestival topp 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 09:06, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- Stavo per chiedere a voi, quando mi hai preceduto. Cancella. Grazie Brunokito (talk) 09:10, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
File tagging File:Standard compressed 1280px-Swami opening.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Standard compressed 1280px-Swami opening.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Standard compressed 1280px-Swami opening.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:53, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Francesca Pedaci Italian singer.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:56, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Francesca Pedaci - Italian Soprano.jpeg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Beethoven - Consecration of the House (Die Weihe des Hauses), Op 124.pdf
[edit]Copyright status: File:Beethoven - Consecration of the House (Die Weihe des Hauses), Op 124.pdf
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Beethoven - Consecration of the House (Die Weihe des Hauses), Op 124.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Bruckner - Te Deum (first ed. Rättig 1885).pdf
- File:Romilda e Costanza2.jpg
- File:HerodcourtBethlehem.jpg
- File:Immortalhour.jpg
- File:RBGlastonbury.jpg
- File:Rb3.jpg
- File:Die Zauberharfe (D 644) Franz Schubert.pdf
- File:Sogno di una notte di mezza estate (Mendelssohn).pdf
- File:Rameau-Castor-1737.png
- File:Castor et Pollux di Jean-Philippe Rameau-1737.pdf
- File:Johannes Brahms' Liebeslieder Waltzes.pdf
- File:Johannes Brahms Neue Liebeslieder Op.65.pdf
- File:Fünf Lieder Op. 105, Johannes Brahms 1888.png
- File:Johannes Brahms Fest- und Gedenksprüche.pdf
- File:Fünf Gesänge (Five songs), Op. 104, by Johannes Brahms.pdf
- File:JBrahms 3 Intermezzi, Op.117 fe.pdf
- File:Quattro pezzi per pianoforte di Johannes Brahms.pdf
- File:Quintetto per clarinetto e archi op. 115 Brahms.pdf
- File:Johannes Brahms Gesang der Parzen.pdf
- File:Polacca op. 40 Chopin.pdf
- File:Sonate per clarinetto, Op.120 n. 1-2 (Brahms, Johannes).pdf
- File:Schicksalslied, Op.54 (Brahms, Johannes).pdf
- File:Variations on a Theme by Haydn, Op.56 (Brahms, Johannes).jpeg
- File:Rinaldo, Op.50 (Brahms, Johannes).pdf
- File:Quartetto n. 3 per pianoforte ed archi di Johannes Brahms 258.pdf
- File:Fantasia contrappuntistica di Ferruccio Busoni.jpeg
- File:La jolie fille de Perth opéra en 4 actes.png
- File:Georges Bizet Symphony in C.pdf
- File:Bizet-ArlesienneVSFc.pdf
- File:Bizet - Don Procopio (vocal score).pdf
- File:Noé di Fromental Halévy.jpeg
- File:Piano Concerto No.2, Op.22 (Saint-Saëns, Camille) I movimento.png
- File:Piano Concerto No.2, Op.22 (Saint-Saëns, Camille).png
- File:Liszt - S697 Fantasie uber zwei motive aus Figaro (busoni).pdf
- File:Paul-vidal2.jpg
- File:Sibelius - Vårsång, Op. 16 (orch. score).pdf
- File:Sibelius - Pan and Echo, Op.53a (orch. score).pdf
- File:Sibelius - Valse Triste, Op.44 (orch. score).pdf
- File:Rakastava - Jean Sibelius.jpg
- File:Der Barde Jean Sibelius.jpg
- File:The Tempest, Op.109 (Overture) (orch. score).pdf
- File:Schubert D.615 Symphony in D, MS sketches.pdf
- File:Sinfonia n. 10 Schubert.jpeg
- File:SongsOfTravel.pdf
- File:FourHymns.pdf
- File:Vaughan-Williams - 3 Shakespeare Songs.pdf
- File:Symphony No.9 in E minor (Vaughan Williams, Ralph).jpeg
- File:Vaughan Williams - Symphony No. 6 - I. Allegro.pdf
- File:Vaughan Williams - Concerto Grosso.pdf
- File:Symphony No. 7 'Sinfonia Antartica' Page 5.png
- File:Vaughan-Williams - Symphony No. 2 (orch. score) Page 6.png
- File:Ralph Vaughan Williams - A Sea Symphony.pdf
- File:SeaSymOpening.jpeg
- File:Pastoral Symphony (Symphony No.3) (Vaughan Williams, Ralph).jpeg
- File:Edward Elgar Pleading.png
- File:Edward Elgar Sea Pictures.pdf
- File:Always and Everywhere by Elgar.jpg
- File:Is she not passing fair song by Elgar cover 1908.jpg
- File:The Wind at Dawn song by Elgar.JPG
- File:After by Elgar song cover 1900.jpg
- File:In Haven by Elgar song cover 1899.jpg
- File:Where Corals Lie song cover.jpg
- File:Speak Music by Elgar song cover 1902.jpg
- File:Edward Elgar - The Fringes of the Fleet.jpeg
- File:Edward Elgar - Oh, Soft was the Song.jpeg
- File:Edward Elgar - Twilight.jpeg
- File:Edward Elgar - Was it some Golden Star?.jpeg
- File:Fight for Right (Elgar, Edward).jpeg
- File:A Child Asleep (Elgar, Edward).jpeg
- File:Elgar - Imperial March (Op.32).pdf
Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:43, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:2 Arabesques Debussy.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:2 Arabesques Debussy.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:2 Arabesques Debussy.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:43, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
File tagging File:Alula Pankhurst.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Alula Pankhurst.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Alula Pankhurst.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:04, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
File:JackLaine06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Swampforbrains (talk) 17:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Purtroppo non ho informazioni su questa immagine che ho trovato su Commons, quindi non mi sbilancio troppo. Si tratta di una foto del 1906 circa, per la quale è ignoto l'autore e già di pubblico dominio negli Stati Uniti. Per quel che vale il mio parere potremmo lasciarla senza problemi: non credo che potrà essere contestata la sua permanenza sugli archivi di Wikipedia, è veramente altamente improbabile. Brunokito (talk) 07:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Mayor's Office Festivals Billboard.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
✗plicit 00:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Replacing Wikimedia Commons images with AI upscaled/denoised images
[edit]Hello Brunokito,
Thank you for your contributions; your edits seem to be made in very good faith. However, many of your recent changes to images have issues. Most of these issues are caused by the use of what appears to be applying denoising and/or AI upscaling methods, which, while the effort to improve images is greatly appreciated, the unfortunate result of most is an image that is of worse quality.
Denoising and AI upscaling methods often result in losing detail, not increasing detail. Image viewers and web browsers automatically scale images; upscaling low resolution images, in particular signatures, only increases the file size, wasting bandwidth and storage space for zero improvement. While AI upscaling certainly has promise, it isn't where it needs to be when it comes to accuracy and preserving detail, certainly not for blanket replacement of images.
Automatic colorization often results in images that are downright hideous. Look at this image for instance. This is an objectively worse image than the original. The colors are wrong, detail is substantially reduced, the text is less legible; there is nothing about this modification that warrants its use over the original.
Furthermore, per Wikipedia policy (WP:MoS/Images), it's inappropriate to use AI upscaling for historical images:
AI upscaling software should generally not be used to increase the resolution or quality of an old or low-resolution image. Original historical images should always be used in place of AI upscaled versions. If an AI-upscaled image is used in an article, this fact should be noted in its caption.
These machine learning algorithms invent details, and are inaccurate at best, and misleading at worst.
I've reverted most of the images that this was your sole modification to; for the images you cropped or applied contrast correction, I'm in the process of recreating your changes without upscaling.
Please refrain from using AI upscaling images to replace images on Wikimedia Commons in the future. Thank you! - MeanMotherJr (talk) 09:22, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, it will be my care for the future of not changing the images. Many thanks for the explanation and I'm sorry I have created a lot of disorder. Brunokito (talk) 10:11, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Nutshinou Talk! 16:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't understand why I would have violated copyright, I uploaded to Commons a simple image of no artistic value belonging to me as it was present in one of my music books that I scanned and I extracted it from there. The fact that such a file already existed was a coincidence. Since the file name was probably different, a completely accidental duplication was created. 2A01:E11:2013:D110:A99A:B52E:3E5E:692C 17:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is no copyright problem. The same file was uploaded twice. I deleted one of them. --Achim55 (talk) 18:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Frankie Pierce Suffrage Mural - Nashville.jpg
[edit]
Wdwd (talk) 16:44, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ho già contrassegnato la foto come un errore e ne ho chiesto la cancellazione. Vi prego di cancellarla subito, se non già fatto. Grazie Brunokito (talk) 04:02, 28 June 2024 (UTC)