User talk:BjørnN

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to the Commons, BjørnN!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Yann 14:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Rail Icons

[edit]

Hi. I see we are both creating missing rail icons! One thing though; You just uploaded a "dSTR" which so far as I can tell is the wrong coding for that symbol. Could you let me know how you cam by that code? You might like to see w:en:User:AlisonW/Rail_Icons by the way. --AlisonW 22:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The "d" is a prefix of the parallel lines feature. This icons were originally created for the german WP, "d" meaning dünn = thin, it is used as the prefix of all 250px width icons (half-icons), which are used to create parallel lines pictures. The "d" is also used as a prefix for some full width icons, what I think is not correct. BjørnN 11:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is that latter point which is the problem I think. d for dünn is fine, but that means that the full-width icons currently coded 'd' need to be changed to something else to match full-width parallel. Some should be 'v' but others are more difficult. This might be difficult though to find all the current uses. --AlisonW 15:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is possible to find the current use by utilizing the [check usage] tab. I tested a couple of icons in this manner, fr:WP seems to be using them quite frequently, dÜST for example is used 15 times by fr:WP and once by de:WP. However, in fr: the icons are not directly used in the articles - they are 'hidden' inside french mnemonic templates. This means that it would be sufficient to amend just this template if the icon coding is changed. BjørnN 19:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Missing?

[edit]

Hello! I was editing pt:Ramal_da_Figueira_da_Foz and noticed you lack here of icons of the type (row) *ABZfg, which I had to create for that diagram. Is it an overlook or intentional? Tuvalkin (talk) 21:28, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Tuvalkin, I'm afraid I don't quite understand what you're telling me. Sorry, BjørnN (talk) 16:05, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

blokkering

[edit]

hei

jeg ble bokkert pga. en missforståelse for noen minutter siden. Jeg mente ikke å fjerne vedkommendes innlegg. Saken er den at jeg drev å redigerte da den andre allerede hadde lagret slik at min lagring ikke ble lagret. Jeg kopierte derfor det som stod i artikkelen til utklipptavla og gikk ut av artikkelen. Jeg åpnet den så igjen og og fjernet innholdet litt for hastig for så å lagre det jeg hadde kopiert til utklipstavla. Dermed ble ikke den forrige brukers innhold med.

Det var min feil, men det var en missforståelse grunnet hastverk.

hilsen Ezzex. --88.89.136.85 20:21, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BjornNbot

[edit]

I recommend you to request bot status for BjornNbot. You can submit request on Commons:Bots/Requests. Thank you.--Kwj2772 (msg) 15:29, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! It has bot status now. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! BjørnN (talk) 15:20, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright
File:Aristarchos Samos.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

-Iconoclast (talk) 20:22, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Aristarchos_Samos.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Iconoclast (talk) 14:38, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Slette kategori

[edit]

Skal vi slette kategorien Category:Islands in Tromsø? --Peter Kaino Jensen (talk) 13:02, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vi bruker kategorien Category:Islands of Tromsø, så den er ikke nødvendig. På commons går det også an å legge en kategoriomdirigering, se feks. Category:Photos. -- BjørnN (talk) 14:38, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Syns du vi trenger omdirigering? --Peter Kaino Jensen (talk) 22:55, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Egentlig syns jeg ikke det i dette tilfellet. En omdirigering her kan forføre til å bruke feilaktig engelsk. BjørnN (talk) 12:11, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flott jobb

[edit]

med katoriseringer av øyer med mere! Finn Rindahl (talk) 20:00, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Takk for det! Håper at media på commons blir lettere å finne etter hvert... BjørnN (talk) 14:35, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ja det bra jobba du har fådd mail adressa mi fullt me mail fra commons ;) --Peter Kaino Jensen (talk) 20:07, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stetinden.jpg - No vandalism intended

[edit]

Hi BjørnN! thanks for your attention. I tried to change the date because the description said 03. November 2009 which obviously couldn't be true. By checking the history I found out that the uploader meant 2009-03-11 instead of 2009-11-03 so I changed it to the correct format. Unfortunately it seems that I wasn't aware that I edited a previous edit. So the description disappeared, but that wasn't intended. Kind regards. --Rupert Pupkin (talk) 10:25, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Making mistakes proves you´re a human and not a robot. Regards, BjørnN (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:57, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license

[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:20, 17 February 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:22, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Overcategorization

[edit]

Hello BjørnN, could you please stop this "over"-categorization of BSicons?!? I spend a lot of time to have all those icons categorized, if you have suggestions, you should tell them first! axpdeHello! 12:29, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reason is keeping track of the basic shapes. Keeping an own category for those as a repository might help avoiding innumerous variants of the same shape. I added the STR icons for completeness only, they are not really needed there as this are the icons that are known by "everybody". It's no problem for me if they are decategorized. Regards, BjørnN (talk) 13:12, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's what galleries are good for! I strongly support galleries as a repository just as you suggested! The big problem with the existing galleries: Most are long time out of date or part of automated lists of everything. We need some pretty good description pages instead of icons shown up in half a dozen different categories ... axpdeHello! 13:24, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
P.S.: I hope you like the (temp.) name of those danish commuter train icons, I didn't like the "... legende" stuff as well, but we need a consistent naming for all those icons! axpdeHello! 13:26, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's a good idea using galleries, I'm sorry that I didn't get the idea myself. Now about the icons with "funny" names: dMASK250 is used in the overlay technique to prevent the underlying icon from shining through the overlay icon. Here is an example:
||uvTUNNELa|d|dSTR|vSTR - the bottom icon bar
||dMASK250|dMASK250|dMASK250|dMASK250|dMASK250|dMASK250 - the masking icon bar
|uHLUECKE|uhSTRqa|uhSTRq|uhSTRqe|uSTRrf|MWEXIT - the top icon bar
I would appreciate if you know a better name, I needed it pretty quickly, so I just had to invent a name to be able to upload it. The 250 is just a mnemonic for 250pixels. An example of usage you'll find in no:Mal:Grefsen linjekart. dMASK, a whole half-width icon as a mask is used for edge trimming in the overlay technique. The icon BSicon_c.svg is also needed for overlay technique only, it is used for alignment, and makes it possible to use overlay together with the conventional technique. I just named it 'c' because it was convenient to remember that c is half the width of d. An example of those icons you'll find at the top of no:Mal:Brynseng-Stortinget. Regards, BjørnN (talk) 17:53, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, those track maps are ... well, if those had been watches I would have called them "la Grande Complication" ;-)
The "c" is not standard (yet ;-), but ... well ... why not? Can't think of any other sensible meaning of a prefix-"c", so let's call it "compact", ok ?-)
The "MASK" shall whiten the middle of an icon to superimpose it with e.g. hSTRq? So let's just call it "(d)MASKq". Looking at your supercomplicated system of superimposing icons I now understand the sense of the full "dMASK", although a "MASK" with 500x500px size and a 250px white stripe in the middle would be much easier to allocate ... so well, it's of no use for de-WP and several other local projects without your sophisticated superimposing system, but go ahead! I'd place them in the general Category:Icons for railway descriptions. Regards axpdeHello! 19:24, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File:BSicon_edSTR.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wiebevl (talk) 23:01, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to speedy delete, 1:1 replaced by File:BSicon exdSTR.svg. axpdeHello! 15:42, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted category, Stavern is not in Oslofjorden

[edit]

Hi, I have deleted categories for several pictures, Stavern is not in Oslofjorden. Ulflarsen (talk) 19:29, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Du bør da også rette no:Oslofjorden, der står det at «Oslofjorden strekker seg fra Oslo til Langesund på Telemarkskysten, som er grensen for ytre Oslofjord.» Mvh. BjørnN (talk) 00:28, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bot driven miscategorization in BSicons

[edit]

You robot is changing "Category:Icons for railway descriptions/parallel railways/bridge" to "Category:Icons for railway descriptions/set mixed/parallel railways" on file pages that are already tagged with Category:Icons for railway descriptions/set mixed/parallel railways/crossing road: Not only it is adding a cat which is parent of another already in use (a big no-no), it is removing legitimate categorization. This was done at least in:

Please make it stop. --Tuvalkin (talk) 18:09, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't recognise that. I hope it was those 4 icons only. BjørnN (talk) 13:08, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I’m checking randmly from Special:Contributions/BjornNbot: So far all other changes seem to be okay. --Tuvalkin (talk) 13:17, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, BjørnN!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you by any chance give a look at this bot work request? Thanks, Nemo 10:39, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Royal Standard of Norway as of 19 July 2009.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 16:59, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:WikiProject BSicon‎

[edit]

You are invited to join Commons:WikiProject BSicon‎. Useddenim (talk) 19:54, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unødige kategorier

[edit]

Hei, booten din har produsert en rekke unødige kategorier som er for spesifikke til å gi mening. Man trenger ikke egen kategori for hver eneste tunell i Norge.--Ezzex (talk) 14:02, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Når? Jeg har ikke kjørt boten på commons siden august i fjor... Jeg mener å huske at tunnelkategoriene ble opprettet av Snurre86 for et par år siden. Mvh BjørnN (talk) 09:16, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Blank map of Europe cropped - E18.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

79.161.99.31 18:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BjornNbot error

[edit]

This edit was supposed to just add a category but it re-created auto-generated categories from license templates. This should not happen. AFAIR this category function has been fixed some time ago in the source code, maybe yours is outdated? --Denniss (talk) 20:45, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've now downloaded the latest version of core using git clone, my old version was core as of 2014-02-02. Regards, BjørnN (talk) 18:44, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But the error still persists, still an outdated component somewhere? Maybe Bot needs to be stopped and restarted to take effect? If it still doesn't work as intended please have a look at and maybe reopen Bugzilla58084. --Denniss (talk) 09:29, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The error seems to concern the add option, the move option is working correctly. In bugzilla the move option is reported as fixed, the add option is appearently still buggy.
I have deleted the old bot and then installed the current version complete new. The new version have also new bugs, for example is a category page move now always performed when the target category does not exist, even when a subset only of the images in a category are moved, using the option -match. The bug does not appear when the target category is created manually before the move, this was not necessary with the old version. Regards, BjørnN (talk) 09:52, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Are these problems already reported at Bugzilla? --Denniss (talk) 12:30, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No, I don`t have an account there. BjørnN (talk) 17:20, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Is the new verson already live? Got a quick reaction after reopening the bugreport, please check. --Denniss (talk) 15:11, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Using git today, 28 files was changed. I'll check category.py soon. Regards, BjørnN (talk) 17:45, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have not tested the add option yet, however, the move option now produces strange duplicates of the interwiki links, as you can see here. Regards, BjørnN (talk) 07:54, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Legge inn kategori på et stort antall bilder

[edit]

Hei! Jeg lastet nettopp opp et stort antall bilder fra Bergen Public Library sin Flickr-stream, men av en eller annen grunn så ble ikke kategorien «Category:Images from Bergen Public Library» lagt på bildene slik jeg ba flickr2commons om å gjøre. Er dette noe botten din har mulighet til å legge inn? Alle bildene har Author: Bergen Public Library Norway from Bergen, Norway. Se f.eks File:Luigi_Cherubini_portrait_(9566464843).jpg for et eksempel. TommyG (talk) 20:27, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eksempelet som du har angitt har jo kategorien, som hidden category. Har du et annet eksempel? Mvh BjørnN (talk) 21:27, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, sant nok. Dårlig eksempel. Her er et annet: file:Pjotr Tschaikowski portrait (5427269291).jpg TommyG (talk) 21:50, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Jeg har startet boten, med Category:Vintage som anker, og flytter samtidig bildene fra denne til Category:Vintage photographs, den kommer nok til å gå en tid. Mvh BjørnN (talk) 22:29, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tusen takk :) TommyG (talk) 07:24, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Jc86035 (talk) 15:54, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Jc86035 (talk) 15:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vossebanen vs Gamle Vossebanen

[edit]

Bør vi skille mellom den historiske Vossebanen og museumsbanen Gamle Vossebanen? Sistnevnte er jo betydlig kortere enn den opprinnelige Vossebanen, og nå er stasjoner å strekningen lagt i en kategori som har navn etter museumsbanen. Så altså: Bør vi ha to delvis overlappende kategorier (i tillegg til Bergensbanen)? Vinguru (talk) 05:22, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gamle Vossebanen bør nok ryddes, slik den står er den verken fugl eller fisk. Kategorinavnet tilsvarer museumsjernbanen, mens infoboksen beskriver den historiske jernbanestrekningen mellom Bergen og Voss. Innholdet tilsvarer heller den historiske strekningen (som museumsbanen er del av), derfor foreslår jeg å flytte kategorien til Category:Vossebanen. Dersom noen mener at museumsjernbanen trenger en egen kategori, kan den opprettes senere som underkategori av Vossebanen. Mvh BjørnN (talk) 06:02, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Enig. Hadde for så vidt tenkt å foreslå dette selv nå som jeg ser at alle forbindelser later ut til å gå til vossebaneoppslag. Da blir det vel å omkategorisere — kanskje til kvelsen. Cat-a-lot, eller finnes det noe mer effektivt? Vinguru (talk) 06:17, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Afjord komm.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Worldlydev (talk) 12:21, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heim komm.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Worldlydev (talk) 16:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hustadvika komm.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Worldlydev (talk) 16:32, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Airports in Antarctica has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribs) 12:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]