User talk:Bgag/Archives 2016-17

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Begonias on the Bosphorus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:53, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roseline A on the Bosphorus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:53, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of lions, Dolmabahçe Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sadirvan of the Süleymaniye Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:43, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domes of the Süleymaniye Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:10, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sydney Opera House 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:24, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal spoonbill, Kakadu National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:00, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sydney Harbour Bridge 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:53, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Lima - Sculpture 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good picture--Lmbuga 14:51, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle del Rastro de San Francisco, Lima.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:12, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Lima - Door knocker.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:00, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle de Mercaderes, Lima.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 17:52, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Trujillo, Peru 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Reserve Bank of Peru, Trujillo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trujillo Town Hall (Peru).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:07, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle del Mirador de Santa Clara, Trujillo, Peru.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:36, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque of the Central Reserve Bank of Peru, Trujillo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:51, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trujillo Town Hall (Peru) (exterior) NW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freedom Monument, Trujillo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:12, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Trujillo, Peru - Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:59, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Trujillo, Peru - Bell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:59, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Archiepiscopal Palace of Trujillo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mausoleum of Roxelana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:31, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality --Themidget17 06:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Reverted irrational sending to CR. Themidget17, do not add double support votes and sending to CR in the same moment. --Cccefalon 07:31, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Trujillo, Peru - Bell tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:31, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality --Themidget17 06:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Reverted irrational sending to CR. Themidget17, do not add double support votes and sending to CR in the same moment. --Cccefalon 07:31, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auto rickshaw in Huanchaco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Too bad that bucket for the vehicle, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:18, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huanchaco Beach Restaurant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp enough for a Q1photo, good composition --Michielverbeek 14:38, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reed boat in Huanchaco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:39, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huanchaco Beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:39, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chan Chan - reliefs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --A.Savin 15:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe, Pacasmayo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chan Chan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:42, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pacasmayo Beach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Freedom Monument (Trujillo), Peru - South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Archiepiscopal Palace of Trujillo, Peru, exterior - South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sultan Süleyman Türbesi, Istanbul (exterior) East view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pacasmayo Beach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel La Estacion, Pacasmayo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pacasmayo Beach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pier of Pacasmayo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo de Sitio Huaca Rajada - Sipán.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:47, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomb of Lord of Sipán 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:47, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boats on Pacasmayo Beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --A.Savin 15:37, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe, Pacasmayo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auto rickshaw in Sipán.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Site of Huaca Rajada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! State flag of Peru, Túcume.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Site of Túcume 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Site of Túcume 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo de Sitio, Túcume.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tumbas Reales de Sipán Museum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Augusto B. Leguía, Lambayeque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museo de Sitio Huaca Rajada - Sipán, Peru (exterior) North view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tumbas Reales de Sipán Museum, Lambayeque, Peru (exterior) SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Establecimiento de salud San Pablo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Catacaos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia San Juan Bautista, Catacaos 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia San Juan Bautista, Catacaos 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia San Juan Bautista, Catacaos - Statue of Jesus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia San Juan Bautista, Catacaos - Statue of Saint Andrew.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trash bin in Tumbes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly, this image can sneak into the photo challenge "Mailboxes" --Cccefalon 06:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC) Witty gag, Uwe. --Johann Jaritz 06:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cuenca, Ecuador 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia San Juan Bautista, Catacaos 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Restaurant Vista Linda, Eucador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Theobroma cacao fruit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de la Inmaculada Concepción, Cuenca 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de la Inmaculada Concepción, Cuenca 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Santo Domingo, Cuenca 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:04, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle Mariscal Sucre, Cuenca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:04, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street in Tumbes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Santo Domingo, Cuenca 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de la Inmaculada Concepción, Cuenca 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia de Santo Domingo, Cuenca (Ecuador) (exterior) SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dome of the Catedral de la Inmaculada Concepción.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:50, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Cuenca 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:50, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domes of the Catedral de la Immaculada Concepción.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:44, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woman in Cuenca, Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:44, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle Benigno Malo, Cuenca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:45, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galápagos Lava Lizard 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:45, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minarets of Hagia Sophia, Istanbul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:13, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shrunken head, Cuenca, Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:16, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street in Cuenca, Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:14, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Catedral de la Inmaculada Concepción, Cuenca, Ecuador (exterior) South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

30 years ago

[edit]

I was in Cuenca. It hasn´t changed so much... (as far as I can see from your pictures) --Hubertl 01:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minaret of Blue Mosque, Istanbul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feria de ganado, Biblián 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:21, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de la Inmaculada Concepción, Cuenca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:21, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minaret of the New Mosque, Istanbul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Santo Domingo, Cuenca 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Llama in Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:56, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grilled pork, Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:56, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ingapirca 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:32, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ingapirca, Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:56, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ingapirca 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:45, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ingapirca 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --СССР 04:12, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ingapirca 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:52, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ingapirca 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support Good quality. A little bit oversharpened. --XRay 06:28, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ingapirca 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:39, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ingapirca 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:39, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ingapirca 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:52, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Alfonso, Cuenca 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --СССР 02:13, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Blas, Cuenca 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:04, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ingapirca 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:16, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia de San Blas, Cuenca (Ecuador) (exterior) West view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Alfonso, Cuenca 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Blas, Cuenca 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Blas, Cuenca 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:49, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Blas, Cuenca 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cañari woman 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cañari woman 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment IMO the image is tilted CW. --XRay 11:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC) ✓ Done --Bgag 15:31, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thanks. OK now. --XRay 15:43, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cañari people 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:40, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agriculture in Ecuador 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Stepro 06:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroecuador petrol station 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:33, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroecuador petrol station 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 04:20, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cañari people 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Nice capture! --Michael Barera 04:41, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Pedro statue, Alausi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:55, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fire engine, Alausí.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:38, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle Eloy Alfaro, Alausí.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buildings in Alausí.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gobierno autonomo descentralizado municipal del Canton Alausí.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Train station of Alausí 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Municipio Intercultural of Cañar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment IMHO, tilted CCW. --C messier 11:46, 27 March 2016 (UTC) ✓ Done --Bgag 14:46, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. Ram-Man 16:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Train station of Alausí 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Train station of Alausí 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Train station of Alausí 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:07, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Train station of Alausí 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:07, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Train station of Alausí 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Balbanera 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Balbanera 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A week support, just good enough for Q1 I think --Michielverbeek 05:22, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of María Natividad de Balbanera, Cajabamba, Ecuador, exterior North view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hosteria La Andaluza 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:48, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chimborazo 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Light halos here and there at the top, but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 17:13, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Photographer's Barnstar
Superbe photos Krazy Soviet (talk) 15:25, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! School in San Juan, Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:06, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vicuña in Chimborazo Wildlife Reserve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vicuñas in Chimborazo Wildlife Reserve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Limpiopungo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:06, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque Nacional Cotopaxi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:15, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Limpiopungo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:13, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza Grande sign, Quito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cotopaxi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:13, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Sebastián de Benalcázar, Quito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:19, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque of Sebastián de Benalcázar, Quito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:11, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle de San Agustin, Quito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio Gangotena, Quito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:07, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:08, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plazoleta Benalcázar sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:40, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:40, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:36, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:36, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de la Compañía de Jesus, Quito 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:46, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de la Compañía de Jesus, Quito 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:34, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza del Teatro, Quito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Houses in Quito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:47, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de la Compañía de Jesus, Quito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle de las Siete Cruces, Quito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flag of Quito, Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of José Martí, Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gorgeous and very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Convento de San Diego, Quito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle Eugenio Espejo in San Pablo del Lago.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rooster in Otavalo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pig in Otavalo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pig in Otavalo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Poor pig. Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia San Luis, Otavalo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:41, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cow in Otavalo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --A.Savin 13:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City hall of Otavalo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia El Jordán, Otavalo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rooster in Otavalo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bundoran Golf Club 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bundoran Golf Club - 9th hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bundoran Golf Club 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Narin & Portnoo Golf Club - 1st hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Narin & Portnoo Golf Club - 10th hole sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:50, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bundoran Golf Club - 5th hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:18, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bundoran Golf Club 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. May be it's leaning out a bit. --XRay 04:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Narin & Portnoo Golf Club 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:57, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Narin & Portnoo Golf Club - 7th hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ballybunion Golf Club 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:17, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ballybunion Golf Club - 10th hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:14, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ballybunion Golf Club - 11th hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ballybunion Golf Club 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poulnabrone dolmen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 04:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poulnabrone dolmen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ballybunion Golf Club - Cashen Course.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ballybunion Golf Club - 7th hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poulnabrone dolmen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very smart composition. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Columba's Church of Ireland, Drumcliffe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Payne Stewart at Waterville Golf Links.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drumcliffe cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:38, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Mick O'Dwyer in Waterville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ballybunion Golf Club - 1st hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:31, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at your contributions and noticed that you are naming "Category:Sansiantai Bridge". I was able to find information about "Sansiantai Bridge" by searching for it in Google. This result was also to be found by searching at [1], [2], [3], but not by searching at "Sansiantai Bridge". Would it be appropriate to change the category name?--Liji (talk) 17:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. Both appellations are correct. --Bgag (talk) 23:37, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What is your proof that "Sansiantai Bridge" is the correct name? After some searching, I find no evidence to support the your statement about "Sansiantai Bridge". I have changed the way my search works once again, but couldn't find any sources for "三仙台大橋". So, I don't think you say that both appellations are correct.--Liji (talk) 08:18, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have no problem if you want to change the name of the category. --Bgag (talk) 14:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can you tell me that why do you react so?--Liji (talk) 20:25, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! County Sligo Golf Club - 8th hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:00, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! County Sligo Golf Club - 7th hole 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! County Sligo Golf Club - 7th hole 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! County Sligo Golf Club clubhouse 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! County Sligo Golf Club - 1st hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 04:05, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! County Sligo Golf Club clubhouse 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:51, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz giant tortoise 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:45, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz giant tortoise 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:44, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz giant tortoise 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:00, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz giant tortoise 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:00, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galápagos sea lions 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galápagos sea lions 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:14, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz giant tortoises 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz giant tortoises 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:54, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chelonoidis vicina 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:27, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chelonoidis vicina 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:37, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chelonoidis vicina 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chelonoidis vicina 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:28, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lava Heron, Santa Fe Island.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galápagos sea lions, Santa Fe Island 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:27, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red rock crabs, Galápagos Islands.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:48, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz giant tortoises 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:41, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galápagos sea lion, Santa Fe Island 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galápagos sea lions, Santa Fe Island 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galápagos sea lions, Santa Fe Island 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galápagos sea lion, Santa Fe Island 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:26, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Fe Island 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opuntia echios, Santa Fe Island 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Fe Island 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:57, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opuntia echios, Santa Fe Island 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galápagos hawk 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:44, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galápagos hawks 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galápagos hawk 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:25, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galápagos hawk 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galápagos fur seal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:45, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galapagos land iguana 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 04:16, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galapagos land iguana 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. No doubt! --Hubertl 03:30, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swallow-tailed gulls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galapagos land iguana skull.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:10, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marine iguana 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marine iguana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:14, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swallow-tailed gull, South Plaza Island.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:50, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blue-footed booby 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Breast bird very white and little detail, but good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blue-footed booby 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:34, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red rock crab, Galápagos Islands.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:52, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great blue heron, Galápagos Islands 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:51, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rayen Castle 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rayen Castle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rayen Castle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rayen Castle 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rayen Castle 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good to me. -- Ikan Kekek 05:35, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rayen Castle 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rayen Castle, Iran NE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shrine of Remembrance, Melbourne - statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shrine of Remembrance - View of Melbourne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shrine of Remembrance, Melbourne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jameh Mosque, Kerman 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ganjali Khan Complex, Kerman.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windcatcher at Ganjali Khan Complex, Kerman.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Exhibition Building - Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:32, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Arch 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Arch 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 05:25, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Twelve Apostles (Victoria).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 05:28, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yarra River, Melbourne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ifrane lion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Busy, but gets its point across --Daniel Case 03:54, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kinkaku-ji 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Batholith (talk) 17:10, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]