User talk:Bgag/Archive 13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rabati Malik caravanserai 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Ok, but not too sharp, given that it was taken with an APS-C camera at ISO 100. Probably you could improve sharpness with better raw conversion? --Plozessor 04:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rabati Malik caravanserai 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Ok but also could be sharper. --Plozessor 04:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tombs at Chor-Bakr Mausoleum 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sardoba Malik 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tripitaka Koreana 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lighthouse in Jeju Island.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bomunsa Temple 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bomunsa Temple 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:00, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bomunsa Temple 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bomunsa Temple 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bomunsa Temple 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Is it possible to identify the subject of the statue? --Tagooty 00:54, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bukchon Hanok Village 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:54, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seolmundaehalmang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bomunsa Temple 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rabati Malik caravanserai 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muhammad Aminkhan Madrasa 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cotton cultivation in Uzbekistan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. A better summary is "Cotton picking in ..." --Tagooty 01:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sardoba Malik 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muhammad Aminkhan Madrasa 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalta Minor 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:34, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Itchan Kala wall 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:08, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konya Ark gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:34, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toprak-Kala 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:08, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toprak-Kala 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:34, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Itchan Kala west gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Itchan Kala wall 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:50, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bikajon Bika Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayaz-Kala 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayaz-Kala 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spirited Garden 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dol Hareubang in Spirited Garden 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue in Spirited Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fish in Spirited Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saeyeongyo Bridge 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:57, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daepo Jusangjeolli Cliff 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daepo Jusangjeolli Cliff 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daepo Jusangjeolli Cliff 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:57, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dol Hareubangs at Daepo Jusangjeolli Cliff 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paper lanterns at Tongdosa Temple 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:38, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cheonwangmun Gate 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 02:33, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geukrakbojeon Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:17, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burimun Gate 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:17, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burimun Gate 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:17, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seongsan, Jeju Island.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Juma Mosque (Khiva) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:24, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minaret of Juma Mosque (Khiva).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:10, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Islam Khodja Madrasa 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 02:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toprak-Kala 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toprak-Kala 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayaz-Kala 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayaz-Kala 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Islam Khodja Minaret 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Islam Khodja Minaret 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Islam Khodja Madrasa 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 February 2024 (UTC)