User talk:Bermicourt

English: Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bermicourt!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Fil nik 07:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Bermicourt!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:40, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gedeckter-Güterwagen-Hbillns-der-ITL-Ansicht.jpg is uncategorized since 14 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:40, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Untersteinach KU Bahnhof.jpg is uncategorized since 12 April 2009.
Image:TreppenspchBaven1767.jpg is uncategorized since 4 June 2009.
Image:TrpSpchHiesterhf.jpg is uncategorized since 4 June 2009.
Image:TreppenspeicherWeesen.jpg is uncategorized since 4 June 2009.
Image:Bayer B IX 1000 1.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Verbotsschild1836.jpg was uncategorized on 15 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Museum entrance.jpg was uncategorized on 3 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Wolfsberg IMG 0912.jpg was uncategorized on 25 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Rotestein - view of Rappbode Reservoir looking W.jpg was uncategorized on 5 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Volkmarskeller Cave 2.jpg was uncategorized on 5 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:View from Heimburg Castle looking W over the village.jpg was uncategorized on 5 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Ziegenberg from Struvenberg.jpg was uncategorized on 5 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Schloss Friedenstein.jpg was uncategorized on 3 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Thueringen-topo.jpg was uncategorized on 3 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Use of existing Wikimedia playing card images e.g. File:Rosamond's Bower Patience.png

I am creating images using graphics software to illustrate how patience or solitaire games are played e.g. File:Rosamond's Bower Patience.png. However the actual playing card images are taken from Category:SVG playing cards 4 on Wikimedia Commons. Under "Source" I have described them as "Own work" because I produced the actual graphic, but added the words "The card images are from "Category:SVG playing cards 4" here on Wikimedia Commons." Is that acceptable or is there another, preferred, way of indicating the source of the actual playing card images? Bermicourt (talk) 14:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Other ways to show such origins are the templates Own based, Own using, and maybe in this case probably Attrib/Attribs. Less suited is Derived from because it is not a derivation.

IMHO your solution is good and acceptable, the link to the category summarizes the use of 14 cards where an Attribs table of all these cards seems not helpful.

Have you ever thought of creating an SVG image when you used SVG card images? It is kind of downgrading when you convert the SVG images to a PNG image. -- sarang♥사랑 08:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: -- sarang♥사랑 08:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[Copy of question at Commons:Village pump/Copyright ]

Please use a tool

Dear Bermicourt, could you use the Commonshelper tool in the future to transfer images from local Wikipedias to Commons? You do never ever add a link to the original image or the original uploader's userpage. The tool does this. Please get a TUSC-account and use the tool. Thank you. Regards, --Svens Welt (talk) 09:02, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:C-Lok_2.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you.

ThePhil (talk) 17:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Streckennetz_Sachsen_1902.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 11:22, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 7e4070e42c2434d42da98e102107b675

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Click on Commonshelper and follow the instructions.

File tagging file:Dachmarke Rhoen.png

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading file:Dachmarke Rhoen.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:file:Dachmarke Rhoen.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

File:99561 near Oschatz Sudbf (Germany) 06Jul06.jpg may be deleted

català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ magyar ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ français ∙ македонски ∙ slovenščina ∙ русский ∙ suomi ∙ 日本語 ∙ +/−

99561 near Oschatz Sudbf (Germany) 06Jul06.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("99561 near Oschatz Sudbf (Germany) 06Jul06.jpg") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.

HersfoldOTRSBot^(talk) 00:05, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorien

Hallo Bermicourt, kategorisiere doch bitte etwas sinnvoller. Beispielsweise sind bei File:Lauenburg (kleine) 01.jpg Category:Buildings in Germany by city und Category:Europa einfach nur Unsinn, der anderen Usern nun unnötige Arbeit beim Aufräumen machen wird. Danke. -- Ies (talk) 18:54, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portal_Tirol.png

File:Portal_Tirol.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

91.57.68.204 08:57, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Altenburg pattern

The Altenburg pattern is copyrighted by ASS Altenburger. The only other company that produces this pattern is KZWP-Trefl of Krakow which does so by license though I think they have stopped recently. I advise you to delete images of them with the exception of the packaging which I think is allowed.--Countakeshi (talk) 09:02, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll delete them all. Bermicourt (talk) 19:41, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete deletion nomination

Hi there. I noticed you emptied Category:Playing cards by card game and then tagged it for deletion without completing the process. Could you please complete the full deletion request process, and also explain why that category was emptied. As an example of my concern, Category:Magic: The Gathering cards was removed from that category but no replacement was added. Mind matrix 23:34, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bermicourt. I noticed that you've made more malformed deletion requests. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 10:56, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: thanks for helping me out. I'm trying to clean up the categories in the area of card games and playing cards which have become a bit of a mess. I'm quite used to deleting pages on English Wikipedia but, if I'm honest, I don't find the process here on Commons easy to decipher, even having read the policy pages. Even finding the process isn't easy and then the policy seems to be written more from an administrator's perspective rather than that of an editor with little or no experience of the process. Anyway I've created the subpages and the error messages on the category pages has gone. Is there anything else I need to do? Bermicourt (talk) 11:22, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read COM:TALK and en:ː. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 12:38, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I need help with the deletion process, not how to use colons. Bermicourt (talk) 21:05, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:English card games

Category:English card games has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 11:05, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Use of existing Wikimedia playing card images e.g. File:Rosamond's Bower Patience.png

I am creating images using graphics software to illustrate how patience or solitaire games are played e.g. File:Rosamond's Bower Patience.png. However the actual playing card images are taken from Category:SVG playing cards 4 on Wikimedia Commons. Under "Source" I have described them as "Own work" because I produced the actual graphic, but added the words "The card images are from "Category:SVG playing cards 4" here on Wikimedia Commons." Is that acceptable or is there another, preferred, way of indicating the source of the actual playing card images? Bermicourt (talk) 14:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Other ways to show such origins are the templates Own based, Own using, and maybe in this case probably Attrib/Attribs. Less suited is Derived from because it is not a derivation.

IMHO your solution is good and acceptable, the link to the category summarizes the use of 14 cards where an Attribs table of all these cards seems not helpful.

Have you ever thought of creating an SVG image when you used SVG card images? It is kind of downgrading when you convert the SVG images to a PNG image. -- sarang♥사랑 08:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: -- sarang♥사랑 08:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berlin pattern - Ace and Ten of Spades - IMG 7607.jpg

File:Berlin pattern - Ace and Ten of Spades - IMG 7607.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 09:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Handa's house pattern

Handa's house pattern is copyrighted by that company. It's not a standard pattern since no other company has printed them due to the copyright. They should be deleted.--Countakeshi (talk) 08:49, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I thought they were a derivative of the Rheinland pattern. I've put them up for deletion. Thanks for letting me know. Bermicourt (talk) 10:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Bermicourt

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images

Use of existing Wikimedia playing card images e.g. File:Rosamond's Bower Patience.png

Please use a tool

TUSC token 7e4070e42c2434d42da98e102107b675

File tagging file:Dachmarke Rhoen.png

File:99561 near Oschatz Sudbf (Germany) 06Jul06.jpg may be deleted

Kategorien

File:Portal_Tirol.png

Altenburg pattern

Incomplete deletion nomination

Category:English card games

Use of existing Wikimedia playing card images e.g. File:Rosamond's Bower Patience.png

File:Berlin pattern - Ace and Ten of Spades - IMG 7607.jpg

Handa's house pattern

Navigation menu

User talk:Bermicourt

Tip: Categorizing images

Use of existing Wikimedia playing card images e.g. File:Rosamond's Bower Patience.png

Please use a tool

TUSC token 7e4070e42c2434d42da98e102107b675

File tagging file:Dachmarke Rhoen.png

File:99561 near Oschatz Sudbf (Germany) 06Jul06.jpg may be deleted

Kategorien

File:Portal_Tirol.png

Altenburg pattern

Incomplete deletion nomination

Category:English card games

Use of existing Wikimedia playing card images e.g. File:Rosamond's Bower Patience.png

File:Berlin pattern - Ace and Ten of Spades - IMG 7607.jpg

Handa's house pattern

Navigation menu

Search