User talk:Benzoyl/log12

User talk:Benzoyl/log14 - User talk:Benzoyl/log13 - User talk:Benzoyl/log12 - User talk:Benzoyl/log11 - User talk:Benzoyl/log10 - User talk:Benzoyl/log9 - User talk:Benzoyl/log8 - User talk:Benzoyl/log7 - User talk:Benzoyl/log6 - User talk:Benzoyl/log5 - User talk:Benzoyl/log4 - User talk:Benzoyl/log3 - User talk:Benzoyl/log2

User talk:Benzoyl/log1 1-100 21:49, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

User talk:Benzoyl 101- 11:13, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

archive 1

アップロードするファイルやファイル名の付け方など再考をお願いします

Benzoylさん、こんにちは。多くのファイルをアップロードされていますが、下記などをお読みになってアップロードするファイルやファイル名の付け方など再考してもらえませんでしょうか？

--BunBun-J (talk) 03:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. User talk:BunBun-J --Benzoyl (talk) 03:27, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

「教育的な目的」については、他の方の選択次第でして、一概には言えません。例：

and more --Benzoyl (talk) 03:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

えーっと

お久しぶりです。ちょっと気になったのですが、上にも案内がきてますがコモンズの収載基準をごぞんじですか？
File:醤油煮味噌煮水煮 (22275074669).jpgもそうですが、いったいどのような教育的価値があるのでしょう？
削除依頼により削除されている写真も多そうです。もう少し考えてアップロードして貰えませんか？--Vigorous action (talk) 09:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

どうも。お久しぶりです。アップロード（というか拾い）したうちの幾つかは教育的価値に疑問があるものもあるかもしれません。

ただ、この缶詰を指摘されるのは結構心外です。黒金銀は、何らかの文化的影響のある選択（ゴージャス感？）とも考えられます。その他も含めて引き続き議論を継続いたしましょう。WPと異なり、こちらではキャラが変わってますかもしれませんが、よろしくお願いいたします。 --Benzoyl (talk) 09:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

なお、過去に削除依頼により削除されている写真のほとんどは、著作権問題 Copyright artworkのものです。--Benzoyl (talk) 09:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

例えばFile:Pink Pout (16795048267).jpg どう利用されるか分からないものです。（ru:Губы de:Altfränkische Sprache WPに限らず、[1]）--Benzoyl (talk) 09:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

じゃあ、著作権絡みでいうならこの写真伊藤食品さんの著作物の二次利用ですけど、ライセンスは無問題？伊藤食品さんは缶詰のデザインにもこだわりがあるようですけど。

さらに、File:イー・モバイル 2013 心斎橋筋 (9871988613) (2).jpgですけど、一般人の顔がわかる程度に写ってますが、被写体の許可などの権利関係の処理はお済みですか？--Vigorous action (talk) 05:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1つめは、Commons:Deletion requests/File:酢付手巻のり (14262795742).jpgの他者のご意見「simple text-based labeling」（結果は削除ながら）、Commons:Deletion requests/File:Randoseru.jpg（結果は存続）の系統と考えてます。
2つめは、Category:De minimisと考えてます。肖像権はどうでしょう。 --Benzoyl (talk) 05:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

文字だけを見ればテキスト何だろうけど、配色とかレイアウトってのもデザイン構成の一つですよ。

あと、フリッカーの写真はライセンスはCC-BY-SAになってても実は盗作ってのが結構あるので本当に必要なもの＆自分できちんとリスク判断出来るもの以外は手を出さない方がいいと思うよ。--Vigorous action (talk) 05:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

配色とかレイアウトは、本件は使用色の少なさから判断しました。話が五輪エンブレムみたいな流れになってますが。

他からの引用写真は、結構かどうかは分かりませんが、確かにありますね。#File:Small willy perhaps? (3504481977).jpgがそうでした。日本国内のは同一ユーザーの前後の写真も見てますので、判断できる感じとも思います（画質がまちまちなのとかはカメラ自体が異なってるなど）。何はともあれ、ご忠告ありがとうございます、と慎んで申し上げます。--Benzoyl (talk) 06:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ああ、書き忘れてた。文字であっても『書』と見なされれば著作権は発生します。ちなみに鯖はだれが書いても写真の文字のようにはなりません。--Vigorous action (talk) 13:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

『書』としての独創性。例えば「イラスト素材: 鯛焼き」 [2] [3] 結構、字体似てますよね。魚の下の点3つを繋げるのは。 --Benzoyl (talk) 00:39, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

v_aさんの、トークページ過去ログ方法を模倣したら、ひどい目にあってしまいました（コモンズでは非推奨らしい）。

#Talk page archiving

といっても、私の自己責任ですが。

ただ、個人的には「過去ログ化後」の（編集履歴からの）アクセスとしては、v_aさん方式の方が便利と感じております。

以上です。失礼いたしました。--Benzoyl (talk) 00:10, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Men_handshakes

Men handshakes has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Reguyla (talk) 18:27, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 01:24, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Massive creation of questionable categories. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Beeblebrox (talk) 01:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 01:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Massive creation of questionable categories

--Benzoyl (talk) 01:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ref - User:Benzoyl/Kenkyu

--Benzoyl (talk) 00:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page archiving

Archiving your talk page by moving it to an archive is not a 'standard' way to do it... it obscures the page history. Please read the instructions at COM:ARCHIVE. Material should be archived through a cut-paste move to the archive page. Thanks. Revent^talk 02:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[4] Sorry and thanks. I'll do my best reading COM:ARCHIVE --Benzoyl (talk) 02:12, 10 December 2016 (UTC) check of "page history" is very important. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:20, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I read [5] thanks.

But I should do over again now? ‎I do not know (understand) good enough.

Absolutely, Next chance in future, User talk:Benzoyl/log3 (Make in advance, after that, Copy<or>Cut and Paste to "log3") I don't make the same mistakes twice. --Benzoyl (talk) 11:51, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, The same way in Japanese Wikipedia (user Mr.v_a [#えーっと]) - [6] I won't do this-way again. --Benzoyl (talk) 12:04, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Benzoyl:  Yes, just copy-paste the material to the archive page, then remove it from your talk page. (You can have this done automatically by a bot). That way the history of your talk page stays intact. Revent^talk 02:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no personal attacks

Personal attacks like this are not acceptable behaviour in Wikimedia projects. You may be be blocked if you continue to do it. Ankry (talk) 14:53, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's not, what I meant personal attack. true respect.

But, on this occasion, the misinterpretation arose. I'll never do that again.

English also Japanese, language is difficult. International communication is difficult.

That's why, It might be, There is "Photos", "Wikimedia Commons" for Non-verbal communication. Thanks. --Benzoyl (talk) 00:05, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

too many expensive function calls.

Archived to User talk:Benzoyl/log4 for reducing. But, still have trouble now, 2sections.

{{Autotranslate|base=Idw/heading}}

03:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
04:08, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
00:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

--Benzoyl (talk) 12:00, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

caused by #Bicolor ? --Benzoyl (talk) 02:57, 19 February 2017 (UTC) --Benzoyl (talk) 23:56, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:JR SKISKI Zenbu yuki no sei da as That's all because of the snow.jpg

File:JR SKISKI Zenbu yuki no sei da as That's all because of the snow.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

G I Chandor (talk) 05:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mature_women

Mature women has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--ghouston (talk) 05:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 08:21, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:PNG diagrams in Japanese

Hi Benzoyl,

do we really need this category?--石炭発電所 (talk) 08:01, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There are 94 files (mean "many") in this category. I think "need". also by themes Category:Music diagrams in Japanese, Category:Biological diagrams in Japanese etc. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Degree_of_frost

Category:Degree_of_frost has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 00:25, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Charter_trams

Charter trams has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:17, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FlickrのURL番号をファイル名にするのはお止め下さい

これは要望なのですが、FlickrのURLの番号（例えばこちらの画像の場合、30925816978）をコモンズのファイル名にすることは止めて頂けないでしょうか。代わりに、撮影された日付をファイル名に入れて頂きたいのです。2018年9月14日なら、20180914でも、14 Sep 2018でも。

EXIFがない場合は撮影日付不明ですから、逆に日付をファイル名にしてはなりませんが。アップロードする際に日付が分かるものは結構多いはずです。

私自身が最近県別・月別に大量の画像を整理してみて感じたことですが、ファイル名に撮影された日付があるのとないのとでは、整理する際の効率が全く異なります。

コモンズにファイルをアップロードするということは、詰まるところ、誰かがそれを使用するためにあるものです。今後も増え続ける画像は、その度ごとに再分類される必要が出てきます。利用者（整理する人間も含む）が効率よく画像を発見する上で、FlickrのURL番号は何の役にも立ちません。出典を辿る場合は、ファイル名に入っていなくてもブラウザ上の右上の窓から検索にヒットしますので。

自分の興味のためにファイルをアップするのではなく、いかにして他人が利用しやすい画像となるかを考慮して下さい。米軍画像で感心することは、撮影された日付がそのままファイル名になっていることです。ファイル名のつけ方については他の方も注文をつけられていますが、このあたりもう少し考えてアップロードして下さると助かります。--トトト (talk) 18:34, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ファイル名でFile:岩 (38981036472).jpg、File:岩 (39016682331).jpgなどは利用者が困る典型例です。私が調べて場所を特定した上で改名しておきましたが。調べれば判るものを、ただFlickrのURL番号だけつけてアップロードされても困ります。

利用価値が低いものになるだけでなく、それを整理する人間にとって厄介なものになる。上記2つの画像をCategory:2017 in Okinawa prefectureに入れたならば、いずれ月別・場所別に再分類されることを予見するべきです。BenzoylさんがおつけになったFile:岩 (38981036472).jpg、File:岩 (39016682331).jpgという名称ですと、整理する人間が再確認する手間をかけなくてはなりません。

ついでに別の例で述べますが、| Date= 日付の部分の埋め方ですが、もしファイルにExifデータがない場合、この日付がFlickrにアップロードされた日付であることも疑う必要が出てきます。Exifがなくても撮影日であることが明白な場合、例えば

`\| Date= {{Taken on\|2017-03-20 18:00}}`

として、説明欄| Description =}に

`{{Taken with\|toolcat=Canon EOS 5D Mark II\|text=[[:Category:Canon EOS 5D Mark II\|Canon EOS 5D Mark II]]}}`

といった具合に撮影で使用された機材を記入しておけば再分類されやすくなります。撮影された日付ではない場合、例えばBenzoylさんがアップロードしたFile:Tokyo dinner 2017 (37702567501).jpgの場合、

`\| Date= {{Upload date\|2017-10-15 11:46}}`

とする必要があります。Exifの残滓はありますが、撮影日ではなくレタッチした日付に過ぎないことはFlickr上でも確認できます。こういう手間をかけずに大量の画像をアップロードしても、不正確・無意味な画像集となり、結局は他者を煩わせるだけになります。画像をアップロードする際は、その被写体、日付、場所、撮影機材について1枚1枚もっとよく調べるようにして下さい。気になる画像を見つけても、被写体の場所が分かるまではアップロードしないぐらいの慎重さを持って下さい。--トトト (talk) 10:05, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

URL番号をファイル名にされてるユーザーの方は、他にも多数いらっしゃる訳でして。Yesとは申し上げられません。

非常に丁寧かつ読みやすかったですが、ご長文でしたので、全て読了できていない部分もございます。誠にすみません。「岩」は場所を確認すべきでした。お手数かけて大変申し訳ございませんでした。風景写真に関しましては今後は極力気をつけたいと思います。 --Benzoyl (talk) 01:33, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:花と野菜 2018 (43199158090).jpgですが、Flickrのsenngokujidai4434というアカウントはBenzoylさん御本人だったのですか。それはいいんですが、わざわざEXIFを抜いたものを再アップして10月画像と偽ったりするのは問題だと思いますよ。あまりこういうことは言いたくなかったのですが、あなたは日本語版ウィキペディアを無期限ブロックされているんですよね。心を入れ替えてコモンズに専念すればよいのに、小さな破壊行為でも故意に続けるならば出るところに出なければなりません。正確なデータベースを作るという作業ができないのら、退場して頂かなくではなりません。どうか自重して下さい。念のために申しますが、あなたが憎いからこういうことを言っているわけではなく、他者から歓迎される編集をして頂きたいということです。--トトト (talk) 12:20, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

senngokujidai4434さんって、私ではないですよ。どこからそう判断されたのか謎です。 --Benzoyl (talk) 23:07, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

まあ、いいですけどね。相変わらず中途半端なアップロードが多いですね。この画像やこの画像などは位置情報が附属しているんだから自分で調べれば場所を特定できるでしょうが。説明欄やタイトルが無意味な記号や番号のままの画像を何百枚もアップロードしてどうするんですか。整理する側が迷惑なんですが。これ以上他人に迷惑をかけるのはお止め下さい。--トトト (talk) 16:51, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

まあ、いいですけどね / お止め下さい … これって、相反してるじゃないですか。東急ハンズのほうはすみませんでした。--Benzoyl (talk) 23:35, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Outdoor_stages

Outdoor stages has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 07:34, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 11:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags

español ∙ galego ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Deutsch ∙ suomi ∙ עברית ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ македонски ∙ polski ∙ Nederlands ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ українська ∙ русский ∙ svenska ∙ +/−

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from images that you have uploaded yourself. If you do not believe the image deserves to be deleted, then click "Challenge speedy deletion" to convert the tag to a regular deletion request. Thank you.

You may also file a DR per COM:DR. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 11:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, File talk:Tokyo tour (27344854598).jpg ?

Sorry, I didn't know this rule. I will make sure that this will never happen again. (I'll be careful from now on.) --Benzoyl (talk) 11:44, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you, and please ping me. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 11:56, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

被写体の所在地を確認してからアップロードして下さい

ですが、原典のサイトで撮影地が記載されている、または撮影地が特定できるのにも拘らず、なぜCategory:November 2018 in Japanに入れるんですか。他人に再確認の手間を掛けないで下さい。非常に迷惑です。撮影者が原典を削除すれば確認の手段もなくなります。コモンズを始めたばかりの利用者ならいざ知らず、何年もやっていてこの有様では迷惑利用者認定せざるを得ませんね。何度注意しても改善が見られない。こうした行為を続けるようならば然るべき場所に報告しますのでそのつもりで。--トトト (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Info File:BOSS 新幹線夢の旅 2016 (25665159454).jpgなども全く不正確で、被写体の場所を調べる意思が最初からありませんね。あなたがアップロードした画像はこうしたものが多く、後で整理するのに非常な労力を伴います。それから適切にカテゴリ付けするだけでは不十分で、そのカテゴリ付けを納得させるだけの解説を概要欄に書かなければ、利用者はカテゴリ付け自体の意味が理解できず、信用できないんですよ。あなたが過去にアップロードした画像は特にね（この画像の初版などもそう）。だから結局再確認の手間を強いられる。ちなみに広告の分類なんかしても使える形での画像は著作権に引っかかりますから無意味なんですが、それも分かっていないんですか。
新規に画像をアップロードするのは今すぐ止めなさい。そして自分が過去にアップロードした何百枚の画像を全て整理し直して下さい。被写体が何県の何市・町・村に所属するのか一枚一枚確認して、適切な分類にしなおして下さい。「月別 20xx in Japan」にあるものを残らず整理して下さい。分類がいい加減すぎます。これが出来ないのなら迷惑ユーザー確定です。--トトト (talk) 16:22, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

「原典のサイトで撮影地が記載されている」

外国人観光客の方の場合また国内の方の場合であっても、漠然と撮影地タグを付けてる場合もありますので、万が一違う場所だったら困るので、自分で確認とれたもの以外はカテゴリにはしてません。ということなんですけど。--Benzoyl (talk) 00:05, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

「何県の何市・町・村に所属するのか」

これについては、過去に出た「箱根問題」を参照ください。

User talk:Batholith#カテゴリ外し乱発について / Commons:井戸端/過去ログ15#Template:Low quality「被写体を十分に表していません」の定義について（都道府県や基礎自治体以下のカテゴリは不要です） --Benzoyl (talk) 00:27, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
参考情報 Commons:井戸端#monthbyyearjapan Category:○月 20XX in Japanの県別細分化傾向および強制につきまして --Benzoyl (talk) 12:33, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
自分は関与してないんですが、このような大量カテゴリ例もあります。 --Benzoyl (talk) 07:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Snjezana Kordic keynote presentation Japan.jpg

Commons:構造化データよく知りませんが、カテゴリとかデータ付与とか自動化されるといいですね。 --Benzoyl (talk) 00:50, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

archive 2

Category:Summer_holidays

Summer holidays has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 18:35, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 19:52, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:One_food

One food has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Jotzet (talk) 09:47, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 19:52, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Comic foregrounds

Comic foregrounds has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--El Grafo (talk) 12:56, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 00:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Six_and_nine

Six and nine has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 10:49, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:53, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Very_(adjective)

Category:Very_(adjective) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 10:32, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 10:20, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Foreign_countries

Category:Foreign_countries has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 07:22, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 00:29, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:線路側オープン (536682209).jpg

Hi, I noticed this diff where you added Category:Danger. Where is "Danger"?--Kai3952 (talk) 05:44, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HI, Kai3952. I'm sorry for the delay in replying to you.

In this case, The doors opened on the opposite side of the Train station platforms.

I think, there is a possibility "another trains are coming". Therefore danger. What do you think, Thanks. --Benzoyl (talk) 22:13, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If a passenger sit on the door, or stuck in the door, or fall off from the door, then there is no problem with adding the "Danger" category. However, the problem is that this file just shows the doors opened on the opposite side of the platform and not enough to show "danger".--Kai3952 (talk) 16:30, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder "danger" = results (accidents), "risk" = possibility. In case, Surely the worker near the door looks cautiously = (not danger). --Benzoyl (talk) 23:12, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What I mean to say is, you think might happen does not really happen.--Kai3952 (talk) 18:40, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"The train doors opened on the opposite side of the platform" is it often (=common) case (in Taiwan)? --Benzoyl (talk) 03:26, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What I mean is that "Danger" is from your imagination rather than from the image "File:線路側オープン (536682209).jpg".--Kai3952 (talk) 07:58, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As I said before, I fail to see where the danger was in this case.--Kai3952 (talk) 08:05, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

archive 3

Category:Price_plates

Price plates has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Josh (talk) 00:10, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:33, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Groups_with_objects

Groups with objects has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 04:30, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:20, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Shoulder_loops

Shoulder loops has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 21:28, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indoor

Indoor has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 09:47, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:37, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bamboo_walls

Bamboo walls has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Estopedist1 (talk) 20:14, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 08:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Round_pizzas_by_slice

Round pizzas by slice has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Josh (talk) 00:28, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 21:13, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Restricted_admission

Restricted admission has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 07:44, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 11:01, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Animal Planet (8562925658) (2).jpg

File:Animal Planet (8562925658) (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:52, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:映画「きな子」仕様のコトデン。きな子が乗ってる (5045989501).jpg

File:映画「きな子」仕様のコトデン。きな子が乗ってる (5045989501).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:55, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:田中啓爾監修 (7191720994).jpg

File:田中啓爾監修 (7191720994).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Batholith (talk) 10:35, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 21:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:白ベンチ (8763500605).jpg

File:白ベンチ (8763500605).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:10, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panda Dolls for Girl's Festival in Japan 2005.jpg

File:Panda Dolls for Girl's Festival in Japan 2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:29, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Watagashi 2013 (9527560798).jpg

File:Watagashi 2013 (9527560798).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 09:25, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flickrの写真をアップロードする場合、Exifの中に撮影日があるのかどうかを確認してください。Exifに日付らしきものがあってもファイルの改変日（＝レタッチした日付）の場合もあります。撮影日がないと判定した場合は日付欄| Date= に {{Original upload date}} を使って下さい。枚数を沢山アップロードするよりも、1枚1枚をもっと精査して下さい。10年以上前に撮影した写真を今アップロードする人などざらにいます。この画像などは、2020年6月撮影であるとは限りません。インスタグラムからFlickrに上げられたものについてはその月撮影の写真と推定して構わないケースもあると思いますが、そうでない場合は撮影日は不明とすべきです。ファイル名も雑すぎます。--トトト (talk) 11:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

これは、当方が使用させて頂いてるツール「Flickr 2 commons」側の仕様でして。1ユーザーが人力で逐一対処できるものではない（限界がある）と思うのですが…。あと最近は「沢山」はアプロドしておりません。--Benzoyl (talk) 00:47, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flickrで閲覧して探し出す時点で撮影情報があるかどうかは分かりますよ。Flickr 2 commonsでアップアップロードしてから毎回分類なさっているわけですから、そのときに{{Original upload date}}を日付欄に入れてください。--トトト (talk) 04:27, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- そもそもレタッチした日付になってるのって、何割ぐらいあるもんなんですかね。稀なケースのものを探すために全部を毎回チェックするのを強いるのはナンセンスです。申し上げたいのはそういうことせす。

割合まで調べてませんが結構ありますよ。ソフトによりますがRAWで撮影した写真をJPEGに出力しなおしただけでその出力した日付を入れてしまうものあるようです。さらに切り抜いただけでその切り抜いた日付が無意識に入ってしまう場合もある。コモンズに直接上げてくる人は撮影日の欄をきちんと入れ直す人が比較的多いと思いますが、Flickrなんか個人の写真帳ですからそこまで気にしない人の方が多いと思います。何百枚もアップロードおられるのにそんなこともご存じないとは思えませんが。--トトト (talk) 09:22, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- そして、カメラの時計設定自体が間違ってる場合だってあるでしょう。Exifを鵜呑みにしてはいけないかと。いかかでしょう。引き続き宜しくお願いいたします。--Benzoyl (talk) 06:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

極限すれば撮影された日付がおかしいかどうかを見破るのもコモンズへのアップロード者の責任ですよ。明らかにExifがおかしいと確信できれば{{Invalid Exif date}}を入れます（日付の後ろに　({{Invalid Exif date}})）。外国人の旅行者が撮影した日本の写真でカメラの時刻設定が母国のままになってケースもまま見られます。昼間の写真なのに1:13AMとか。そういう場合は必要に応じて{{According to EXIF data}}を入れます（日付欄に直接入れると|location=Japanが必要になり[[Category:Japan photographs taken on ....]]の分類が正確でなくなることがあり面倒くさいので、私は日付の後に ({{According to EXIF data|}})と入れています）。撮影者でない第三者が資料としてアップロードするという意識をもっと持って下さい。この画像とか、ExifがないのにDecember 2017 in Saitama prefectureとかもう一つ信用できません。これなんかも元の撮影者がFlickrから消してしまったから真相は不明のままです。カメラの設定が間違っているかもしれないからいい加減でいいということにはなりません。--トトト (talk) 09:22, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

({{According to EXIF data|}})などは勉強になりました。ご教授ありがとうございました。やれる範囲でやりたいと考えております。 --Benzoyl (talk) 09:29, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

横からコメントします。Benzoylさんへ。警告:ツールのせいにして対応できないならアップロードしないでください。または対応できるだけのアップロード量にしてください。「Flickr 2 commons」はどのファイルをアップロードするか選択できるチェックボタンがあったはずですから、二次著作物などの著作権侵害ファイルは事前に排除することができるはずです。他者に無神経に尻拭いをさせる利用者とは共同作業は出来かねます。--Batholith (talk) 05:36, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

補足、他者の尻拭いもをするのが共同作業ですが、尻拭いさせ続けるのは共同作業ではなく介護です。--Batholith (talk) 05:48, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

横からと書けば何でも書いていいもんではないですね。悪いですがあなたには今回あまり返答できませんよ。 --Benzoyl (talk) 06:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

誰でも意見できるのがこの共同作業によるサイトですよ。それを否定されるならアウトです。関係ないことを書いた訳ではありません。「Flickr 2 commons」はあなたがトップレベルで使用されているでしょう。この件はしっかり記憶にと留めておきます。 --Batholith (talk) 09:17, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

全然トップレベルではありません。どこソースでしょうか。もうちょっと調べてから発言して頂きたかったので、今回に関しましては距離を置きました。 --Benzoyl (talk) 09:20, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

で、この話題をここでしているだけではもったいないので情報共有目的で「Commons:井戸端#{{Original upload date}} 使用の推奨について」セクションを作っておきました。
この度は、貴重なご提言誠にありがとうございました。一個人でできることは限界ありますが、将来もっと簡略に撮影日情報の編集が可能になることを祈る次第です。 --Benzoyl (talk) 09:43, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Benzoylさんのファイル数がトップレベルかどうかですが、私が調べた限りでは編集回数では392,900回で95位でした。ページの作成数が156位です。ファイル数のランキングまでは私は分かりませんでしたが、ページの作成数にファイル数もカウントされていると思われ、また、Benzoylさんはカテゴリなどのページの作成より、ファイルのアップにかなり偏っていることもあり、ファイル数だけなら100位は軽く超えてくるのではないしょうか。データがないので言い切ることはできませんが、1ファイルでもアップしたユーザーを分母とすれば上位1％には十分に入ってくると思います。 --Batholith (talk) 10:47, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- それは調査対象を、日本語話者であるコモンズ参加者、だけに限定した話ですかね。--Benzoyl (talk) 10:51, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

そんな機能はなさそうです。これ以上は自分でプログラミングするしかないのでしょう。そもそもなぜ「日本語話者であるコモンズ参加者、だけに限定」する意味が分からないのですが。もし限ったとしたらトップ5には入るのでないでしょうか。Benzoylさんは24,945ファイルです。私が知る範囲でファイル数の多そうな方を挙げますと、近年ご活躍されているそらみみさんが42,160ファイル。2005から現在まで多数の自作ファイルをアップしてきた663highlandさんが26,509ファイル。山岳系のAlpsdakeさんが17,604ファイルです。私の属性が影響して地理系に偏っていますが他の分野にも多い方がいるかもしれません。

ここまで書いてやっと気が付きました。日本語話者限定という変な部分が気になるということは、Benzoylさんはファイル数を競ってらっしゃるんですね？。ですからいろいろいい加減だと。利用者のためではないと。なるほどですね。しかしどんなに数を競っても自分で苦労して著作物を創作される方には評価では勝てませんよ。断言しておきます。--Batholith (talk) 11:57, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

逆ですよ。競ってません。日本語話者以外で大量アップロードしてるユーザーを結構見かけますよ、という話です。「カテゴリなどのページの作成より、ファイルのアップにかなり偏っている」も調べてないけど、間違ってませんかね。ソースなし類推は本当に迷惑です。 --Benzoyl (talk) 22:13, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:They rides a handmade-raft down a river. (14706150494).jpg

File:They rides a handmade-raft down a river. (14706150494).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 07:59, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People of the COVID-19 pandemic

Hi. As regards the category Category:People of the COVID-19 pandemic you created as a duplicate of the previously existing Category:People associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, try to look the category Category:People by association to get acquainted with naming conventions for similar categories. Btw., "by setting" is not the most fiting parent category. Pandemic is not a "setting" in the sense in which this word is used – look at the sister categories among which you have inserted that yours there. IMHO the content should be moved back to the original category and the original categorization and interwikis should be restored. --ŠJů (talk) 10:35, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and I agree. Category talk:People of the COVID-19 pandemic. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:51, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Individual

Individual has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 08:35, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 17:00, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:KICMEY MOUSE (130794873).jpg

File:KICMEY MOUSE (130794873).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derivative work of non-free content

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

1989 (talk) 21:15, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Many T-shirts (4894670824).jpg

File:Many T-shirts (4894670824).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derivative work of non-free content

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

1989 (talk) 21:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Many T-shirts (4894670824).jpg

File:Many T-shirts (4894670824).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 18:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:KICMEY MOUSE (130794873).jpg

File:KICMEY MOUSE (130794873).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 18:57, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:蓮舫執行部は初陣 2016-10 (30075459064).jpg

File:蓮舫執行部は初陣 2016-10 (30075459064).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:23, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 14:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:がんばる女子を応援！ハローキティのにんげんだものはっぴょう会 2015 (23067082864).jpg

And also:

File:がんばる女子を応援！ハローキティのにんげんだものはっぴょう会 2015 (23669155566).jpg

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:どのサーバーに入りますか (7722583036).jpg

File:どのサーバーに入りますか (7722583036).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

George Ho (talk) 06:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:25, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

letter combinations (order)

I cannot understand the difference you meant when you created Category:ABC letter combinations (order) out of Category:ABC letter combinations. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 04:47, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I think Category:Syllabaries = order.

For example, American Broadcasting Company is Acronyms, not order.--Benzoyl (talk) 13:33, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I understand now. Not sure if whether that distinction warrants a separate category, but go ahead. If I understood correctly, Category:DEF letter combinations (order) follows this idea, while, say, Category:ANZ letter combinations (order) does not, yes? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 10:12, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
See also Category:Consecutive letter combinations. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 10:20, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply. There may be such a case (DEF=4/5/6 & ANZ=01/14/26). But, unfortunately I'm not familiar with it.
I suppose this category, "ABC-order" is the replacement-system A=1st, B=2nd, C=3rd, D=4th... (X=1st or 10Oct, Y=2nd or 11Nov, Z=3rd or 12Dec). Thanks. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Merry Christmas and Happy New Years!! (15906499567).jpg

File:Merry Christmas and Happy New Years!! (15906499567).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 01:49, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Angulated

Angulated has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Josh (talk) 20:08, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:15, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dishes_using_parsley_of_Japan

Dishes using parsley of Japan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 02:17, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 01:22, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:B'day party at the park (3626499227).jpg

File:B'day party at the park (3626499227).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:40, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jake Cloudchair and Mukku (5033069581).jpg

File:Jake Cloudchair and Mukku (5033069581).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:18, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Groups_of_3_pieces_of_food

Groups of 3 pieces of food has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 17:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 23:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:娘と買い物 (4123683203).jpg

File:娘と買い物 (4123683203).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:33, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Vowing

I see you created Vowing on 1 August 2018. Because no explanation nor definition has been provided for the term "vowing", it looks suitable to be merged into Category:Oaths. Could you tell me what is the main difference between Category:Vowing and Category:Oaths?--Kai3952 (talk) 16:02, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Maybe you are right. Vowing = Oaths. I'm sorry that I failed to make sure. --Benzoyl (talk) 17:26, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keirin ema.jpg

File:Keirin ema.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

whym (talk) 08:08, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 17:27, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:STELLEPHONES (13898435836).jpg

And also:

File:STELLEPHONES (13921976484).jpg

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 18:22, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:14, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Tokyo DisneySea (47438188281).jpg

And also:

File:ただいまファストパス・チケットは発券しておりません (414563879).jpg

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 18:25, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:15, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:マーロウプリン (50078434461).jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:マーロウプリン (50078434461).jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 07:13, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:22, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:レインボーさるぼぼ (15870380351).jpg

File:レインボーさるぼぼ (15870380351).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 06:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:21, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:USJ (49055258388).jpg

File:USJ (49055258388).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Evan0512 (talk) 05:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:22, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Love hotel room selection in Japan.jpg

File:Love hotel room selection in Japan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

FredWalsh (talk) 22:36, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Horiemon 2014 (16002363675).jpg

File:Horiemon 2014 (16002363675).jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. Wikimedia Commons doesn't permit uploading personal files unless you are using them for personal use or an educational purpose.

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images and best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 46.101.18.39.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 09:40, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wide_open_legs_(knees_close)

Wide open legs (knees close) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 21:43, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Various fonts (4416061604).jpg

Yours sincerely, Zppix (talk) 00:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Belt Failure (234582464).jpg

File:Belt Failure (234582464).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Genericusername57 (talk) 17:28, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:39, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Japonica logo.jpg

File:Japonica logo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: http://www.showa-note.co.jp/barcodemaster/common/img/banner.jpg

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Krorokeroro.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 16:40, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Japonica logo.jpg

File:Japonica logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vulp here 08:31, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:New Super Mario Bros. Display (155243447).jpg

File:New Super Mario Bros. Display (155243447).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 15:29, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:One-man_operation

One-man operation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Thryduulf (talk) 00:51, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 15:29, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:こばた (15233011049).jpg

File:こばた (15233011049).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:07, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 15:29, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Middle-aged_women

Middle-aged women has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 14:44, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 15:29, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ueki tani (16675125767).jpg

File:Ueki tani (16675125767).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrighted poster

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 14:31, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 12:09, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:NHK函館放送局 (16534411970).jpg

File:NHK函館放送局 (16534411970).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 12:09, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:20201108rikkoshi01.jpg

File:20201108rikkoshi01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:38, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 12:09, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:20201108rikkoshi02.jpg

File:20201108rikkoshi02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 12:09, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:ハロウィンなミスドのドーナツ 2017.10.3 (37434873966).jpg

File:ハロウィンなミスドのドーナツ 2017.10.3 (37434873966).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:49, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!