User talk:Augustgeyler/Archive 2024

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taube auf einem Baum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Startende Ringeltaube.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zerlegung einer Stahlnietenbruecke bei gleichzeitiger Wasserkuehlung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:35, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zerlegung einer Stahlnietenbruecke mittel Brennschneiden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:23, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zerlegung einer Stahlnietenbruecke – Vorbereitung zum Ausheben.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good imo. --ArildV 10:23, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zerlegung einer Stahlnietenbruecke kurz nach dem Ausbau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:58, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ebing Brücke Arbeiter-20160907-RM-114411.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ebing Brücke Arbeiter-20160907-RM-114411.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

SMUR (Emergency medical intervention) on the Vauban place

Hello,

I even asked myself the question of the advisability of publishing these four photos.

But, while taking them, I remained at a distance, just like the many people present in the square at that time. But, as the victim is not visible and completely anonymous, I saw in this photo a tribute to the daily work of the rescuers. And this is also the objective when I offer it as a quality image.

Kind regards.

(Google translate from french).

-- JmH₂O^(talk) 18:13, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Merci Jmh2o!

Thank you very much for your detailed reply. I did expect your reason in some way because the image clearly shows your large distance. So I think if you were a journalist making a photo report about this, if you had been close to the medical personnel, showing their work, their tools, their emotions, those people's break room and their whole work it would be OK. But I assume: Mais tu n'étais qu'un passant qui se trouvait là-bas. (But you were just a passerby who was there.)

If we promote images here at QIC we tell others to use these image as something good, as good examples of something. And here we would tell: If you are seeing an emergency from some distance, you should stop and take a nice picture. That's a story I think we should not tell. August Geyler (talk) 18:35, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

I hesitated to take the photo, and then, I decided to do it for the reasons given above.

I'm not a journalist, but I've seen people die in front of me.

Just two months ago. In a train accident near my house, actually a suicide. I was there with my camera, But I didn't take any photos. The body was in three pieces: head, torso and legs. I simply forbade anyone to film with their smartphone. And I notified the emergency services.

Here are photos after the accident : Category:Travaux au passage à niveau 104 Infrabel (2024)

So, I accept the non-promotion of the photo.

Kind regards.

--JmH₂O^(talk) 18:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Oh my good! What a terrible experience you had to make. I am very sorry for you. It sounds like you got traumatised by this. I hope you can find a way to deal with this.

I think you acted very well. And if you want to not promote the image I suggest setting to {{withdraw}} " I withdraw my nomination". Thank you. August Geyler (talk) 19:12, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

4-H Mädchen

Hallo August,

Danke für die Bewertung des 4-H Mädchen-Bildes auf den Qualitätsbildern. Deine Rückfrage habe ich schlicht übersehen. Könntest Du mich beim nächsten Mal bitte anpingen? Ich schau auf die Seite nicht jeden Tag drauf und in der Beobachtungsliste gehen diese Dinge immer leicht verloren.

Und ja, in den USA dürfen Personen im öffentlichen Raum fotografiert werden, auch Kinder. In diesem speziellen Fall halte ich das auch ethisch für unproblematisch. Ich finde es aber gut, dass Du auf solche Dinge achtest.

Herzliche Grüße aus Kalifornien, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:36, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Hallo Frank,

ich werde Deinen Wunsch in Zukunft versuchen zu berücksichtigen, damit Du solche Dinge nicht verpasst. Ich habe meine Bewertung bei QIC entsprechend angepasst. Ein wirklich sehr schönes Portrait, das Dir da gelungen ist! August (talk) 09:14, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Dankeschön! Beste Grüße und alles Gute! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:00, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nieten einer im Abbau befindlichen Stahlbrücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi August,

I just realized that you nominated two of my photos for QI. Much appreciated & kind of you.

Thank you again.

—Paul Danese Pdanese (talk) 16:28, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi Paul,

I spotted them and thought they should be promoted as QI. Many of your images are very nice and well composed. August (talk) 19:12, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stockente im Feldsee (NSG Feldberg).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stockente im Feldsee (NSG Feldberg).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

QI - consensual review

Hello, few days ago I nominated my photo for QI [1]. Somebody voted for it, someone else suggested a perspective correction. Why did you close the review/discussion before I had a chance to apply the suggestion? JiriMatejicek (talk) 20:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Hey Jiri! I am sorry for the outcome. But the rules say, that CR are to be closed, when no more vote is made within the last 48h. So that's the time anyone has to react. As there was no more vote, and no response within that time I closed it. August (talk) 20:21, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

OK, you probably didn't make these rules yourself. But the list of nominations spans two weeks, so I don't think there is need to hurry so much. If it's a mere yes/no voting, then OK, but if there is suggestion for modification, the author should get a decent chance to apply it. JiriMatejicek (talk) 07:34, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Ahoj Jiri,

I have to explain it a bit more in detail. But first I'd like to apologize for your inconvenience. It is very good that your are taking photos for Commons and taking part in the QIC process. Let me try to explain the process a bit more in to detail and let me make a suggestion, that will help us enjoying OIC in the future:

• There is no two weeks rule.
• Nominations are listed for seven days. At the end of day seven / beginn of day eight, they are sorted out as unassigned if they got no vote or comment.
• If a nomination got a vote, a maximum 48 hour rule comes into action. After this time the vote is processed automatically by the QIC-bot.
• If a nomination got no vote but a comment, there is no rule in place now. Theoretically the nomination could stay in the status for ever. But usually reviewers tend to vote on these nominations after a week. The vote will be processed like described above.
• CR: So if someone is opposing to an existing vote or the nominator wants to get more opinions, than Consensual Review (CR) comes into action. This was the case with your nomination in question.
  • The rules say the process can take up to 8 days (or longer if there have been new votes within the last 48 hours). So in theory, if every 47 hours one vote would be added, it could take much longer. In practice it does not expand that much, because after a view days most active reviewers have pointed out their statements and more votes are unlikely after a week or so.
  • The time for CR is counted from the moment when someone initiated the CR-process.
  • If there is a majority for decline or promote, the process can be switched to result when nobody did a a vote within the last 48 hours.
  • If there is no majority for decline or promote than the process ends as inconclusive when 8 days are gone since start of CR and no vote was added within the last 48 hours.

So to respond to your suggestion not to hurry: In your case there was of course no explicit need to hurry. If I would have known, that you are preparing a reupload or in any way working on it, I would not have closed it, even if I could. The problem here is (I try to give you an idea of the bigger picture of that process) that we always try to keep the CR process as efficient as possible to not overcrowd the CR page. There are days, were over 10 new CR start. If you take into account that some CRs can take a longer time, it can happen that there are 40 oder 50 open CRs at the same time. To go through this huge amount as a reviewer coming back after a view days would mean spending hours. That's why we try to end CRs as soon as possible, if there is no other indication. Which brings me to my suggestion:

Tell the others about your plan to edit your nomination if it takes a while!

You nominated your image on 17th July. On the same day you got two reviews.

•  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 15:23, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Perspective errors should be corrected. --Ermell 20:11, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

So on the same day you could see that there is something to do about your image. You could have reacted by saysing that you will do something.

Two days later Plozesser added the same oppose

•  Oppose Per Ermell. --Plozessor 04:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

I closed the process on day 4 after your nomination at 08:28, 21 July 2024 (UTC) because there was no sign, that you are going to react. Please don't get me wrong. You might be engaged in reacting in those types of situations but for me this is not predictable very easily. There are many CRs were the nominator is not reacting, sometimes willingly. So It would have helped everybody if you would have pointed out your plan to do something with the file at any point within these for days. There are even templates for this:

• {{doing}} →  Doing…
• {{done}} →  Done
• {{Already done}} → Already done
• {{Half done}} →  Half done

So in short: I am very sorry for the outcome in this case. I would like to do better in the future by remembering your explizite wishes for a longer reaction time. But I am asking you for pointing out your plan for redoing a file. You could just say, "sorry guys I will need a couple of days to do this." Than I think, nobody would close such a CR case.

Best regards August (talk) 12:36, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

thank you for detailed explanation. Now I understand the whole process and your approach more. In my case, I didn't look at the reactions immediately (because it often takes longer and because one gets notification only when the image is promoted); when I noticed the suggestion I decided to follow it, but didn't have time to react right away and then I was away from the internet for 2 days. That was just to explain my situation, no need to react further. I will remember your suggestions. JiriMatejicek (talk) 08:02, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof Trebsen (Mulde) – Empfangsgebäude mit Gleis und Bahnsteig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemaliger Gleisanschluss Trebsen-Pauschwitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:00, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnsteig des Bahnhof Trebsen (Mulde).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof Trebsen (Mulde) – Giebel des Empfangsgebäudes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemaliger Gleisanschluss Trebsen-Pauschwitz mit Prellbock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:00, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof Trebsen (Mulde) – Empfangsgebäude – Fassade mit Bahnsteig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:17, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof Trebsen (Mulde) – Empfangsgebäude – Fassade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:17, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Einfahrweiche des Bahnhofs Trebsen (Mulde).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:17, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuertonne auf dem Bahnsteig des Bahnhofs Trebsen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:28, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof Trebsen (Mulde) – Empfangsgebäude.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 24 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:28, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:CH.BE.Boenigen 2021-08-15 Seaplane-Meeting 5322 16x9-R 8192x4608 s-ai Br1137.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CH.BE.Boenigen 2021-08-15 Seaplane-Meeting 5322 16x9-R 8192x4608 s-ai Br1137.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemaliger Gleisanschluss Industriegebiet Trebsen mit Prellbock und Bahnübergang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:25, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof Trebsen (Mulde) – Empfangsgebäude mit Bahnsteig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:CH.VS.Zermatt Hotel-Wellnessresort-La-Ginabelle 4747 3x2-R 11K.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CH.VS.Zermatt Hotel-Wellnessresort-La-Ginabelle 4747 3x2-R 11K.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station Trebsen (Mulde).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Thi (talk) 10:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ReneeWrites (talk) 10:53, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dinkel-Vollkornbrot - Detail der Brotkrume mit Kruste.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:22, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dinkel-Vollkornbrot - Detail der Brotkrume.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 17:26, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:CH.VD.Yvonand 2021-08-29 Seaplane-Meeting 10869 16x9-R 9K.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CH.VD.Yvonand 2021-08-29 Seaplane-Meeting 10869 16x9-R 9K.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Saint-Petersburg. Bolsheokhtinsky Bridge (Peter the Great Bridge). Rivets on the bridge support.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint-Petersburg. Bolsheokhtinsky Bridge (Peter the Great Bridge). Rivets on the bridge support.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Otto-Neururer-Haus (Weimar).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 15:32, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cultural heritage monument: Wurzner Straße 117 (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plaußiger Straße (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rail tickets of Pommersche Landesbahnen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:49, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:28, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Detail is too low

Hello Augustgeyler, Greetings!
Regarding this: [2] could you plz give a brief about what is ‘Detail is too low’ ? I am asking you because I recently got a review on a Quality Image nomination, as the same ([3]).
--Gpkp (talk) 18:15, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello Gpkp,

"Detail is too low," or  Level of detail too low, refers to an issue that can arise for various reasons. Essentially, it indicates that despite having an adequate resolution, the image lacks sufficient surface structure or fine details. This can occur, for example, if an image has been heavily de-noised. De-noising reduces fine structures to eliminate sensor noise or film grain, but if overused, it can also erase important details such as fine grains of sand on a beach, delicate grass blades in a garden, or intricate textures on a façade.

If you're shooting with a DSLR and processing from RAW, you can easily correct this by manually adjusting the processing settings. Alternatively, shooting with a lower ISO will result in less noise, thereby reducing the need for de-noising. However, if you're using a smartphone, addressing this issue can be more challenging. Smartphones typically have very small lenses, which often require higher ISO settings. To create the impression of a high-quality camera, smartphones usually apply intense default processing, including strong de-noising. This is often combined with aggressive sharpening, which can further contribute to the loss of detail.

Determining whether the level of detail is too low or adequate is difficult because it must be evaluated in relation to the situation, lighting, resolution, and subject matter. This is why the criterion is often debated among different reviewers assessing the same image. August (talk) 19:18, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

• Augustgeyler, Thank you for all the details. --Gpkp (talk) 16:39, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wurzner Straße 119 (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:30, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:57, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sellerhäuser Straße 8 (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:49, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:44, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:M019F001 Deckenlicht im Vulkan im Wörlitzer Park.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:M019F001 Deckenlicht im Vulkan im Wörlitzer Park.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Herbartstraße (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:07, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Franckestraße (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 07:37, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blockheizkraftwerk Möckern (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:45, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schönbachstraße (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Meet all criteria -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:11, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theodor-Neubauer-Straße 21 (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:54, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kino REX (Bern).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 15:26, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:57, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Peilickestraße (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Request What is special about this street (scope)? Visually, there is no architectural feature visible, it is just a street. Image not used in real wiki-articles to calrify value --George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:53, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment Oh. I can only tell that all the buildings on the right are listed as cultural heritage monuments. --August (talk) 20:08, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Per comment above, meet all criteria -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:25, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theodor-Neubauer-Straße 62; 64; 66 (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:29, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Postgasse (Bern).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:01, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kippenbergstraße (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:04, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:34, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Vielen Dank

Einfach mal vielen Dank für das Beachten und Wertschätzen meiner Bilder! --Harald Krichel (talk) 09:54, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Gerne! Ich finde Du leistest einen tollen Beitrag zu Commons mit Deinen Bildern, und ich möchte helfen, die fotografisch besten auszuzeichnen. August (talk) 11:10, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historic office building of the former Karl-Krause machine factory (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 04:59, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Expressionist entrance of Cunnersdorfer Straße 3-7 (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

English · français

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Inductive axle counter. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 22:46, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much! August (talk) 11:26, 24 August 2024 (UTC)