User talk:Andreateletrabajo

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Andreateletrabajo!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Deprecated License

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Human mtDNA migration.png, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 04:18, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robot_asimo.jpg

File:Robot_asimo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

78.55.106.133 13:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Foto

Entiendo el tema de los derechos de autor. Viendo el enlace de la foto que subi por flickr en un comienzo el usuario gillespaveau subió dicha foto con licencia CC (algunos derechos reservados), ahora que veo cambió la licencia, es decir, no tengo la culpa de que un usuario hoy suba una foto con CC y mañana cambie la licencia, me hago entender nena ? se que no debo subir fotos con derechos pero si puedo subir aquella fotos con licencia CC. Por eso subi la foto, porque en un comienzo estaba con esa licencia, que la haya cambiado si se me sale de las manos. Si te fijas en la torre de shangai http://www.flickr.com/photos/msittig/2655043839/ ves una imagen de flickr con CC (algunos derechos reservados), esto precisamente fue lo quise hacer. intentaré no subir este tipo de fotos porque de verdad es un problema, solo aquellas con CC (casi siempre lo hago).

Nanovapor9 (talk) 02:01, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

a bueno, perfecto ! ni idea de eso de "Flickrwashing"... todos los días se aprende algo nuevo. estaré pendiente de ello. gracias por tu ayuda, algún día te daré un regalo, ya verás...

Nanovapor9 (talk) 02:37, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Personal explanation

Hi Andrea, I was not trying to cast aspersions on your character, but felt it was inappropriate to remove a file from an article then claim the file was useless and could have no conceivable use. In fact I thought the continued queries about why I have such attachment to the images was verging on insinuating that I had some alterior motive, I ignored such suggestions as they are totally irrelevant to the merits or otherwise of keeping the images. I of course have no association with the images apart from them being on my watchlist (no doubt due to some maintenance editing I did previously).

If the pictures can be shown to be copyright violations then I of course have no problem with deleting them. But I can not accept that they are absolutely useless or outside the scope of wikimedia. I agree that they are of very poor quality, but they do illustrate something. They may or may not represent a real process, but that is irrelevant to Commons (just as diagrams showing how cold fusion was meant to work have a use even if the effect doesn't actually exist). Even if completely removed from all articles I would still keep the images so that later editors of the article can see what was removed, and decide for themselves - perhaps it would give them ideas for further illustrations or improvement of the article. Wikimedia is not a Stock Library for beautiful photos, just a repository for images that might be used in wiki articles. Description and categorization of the images is the important thing, cleaning out poor, or marginally useful images isn't actually needed. Most images will probably never be used in a wiki article, the important thing is that we can find an illustration here when we want one.

I admit that my views are far from those of deletionist users, and see no advantage in deleting images from Commons just because there is some possibility that the images might be copyright violations. This is simply because there is that possibility for EVERY image here - How on earth can I prove to anyone that all the images that I have uploaded, are mine, from my camera. I may easily have stolen them from, say, my brothers camera. When I stop contributing here (get run over by a bus, die of old age, get bored etc), and can no longer defend my images, will someone decide to start deleting some of them because it is improbable that I created them?

I entirely accept that you are working to improve wikipedia/wikimedia in good faith, and hope that my efforts to keep these images does not frustrate your work. I apoligise if my actions are making your blood boil, sorry :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 22:32, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. --Dferg (talk) 17:21, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Licencias de estatuas

Hola Andrea: Disculpa la demora en mi respuesta, realmente no conozco las leyes de Uruguay por lo que creo conveniente hacer la consulta en la discusión de licencias y en la de libertad de panorama, tal vez alguien de Uruguay conoce un poco más sobre su legislación porque no he encontrado referencias sobre lo que me preguntas de ese país. Si no recibes respuesta en las discusiones en español, prueba en las que son en inglés que suele haber administradores de todas partes. Por otro lado la foto que tomas (si la sacaste vos) es trabajo propio, pero lo que hay que acreditar correctamente que es lo que estamos fotografiando. Espero haber sido de utilidad. Saludos, --Arcibel (talk) 20:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Consulten a User:Fedaro, es un tema muy delicado ese, tiene que ser alguien que sepa de leyes uruguayas quien averigue esto Ezarateesteban 00:05, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ya abrí un [1] para discutir este caso, la ley habla de monumentos y cuadros NO de edificios, ojo Ezarateesteban 00:40, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea: Vi la reversiones y creo que están bien; avisame cuando regreses y seguimos adelante con las traducciones! Saludos, --Arcibel (talk) 23:32, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

Gracias por tu trabajo!!!! Ezarateesteban 00:05, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo. Saludos! :) -- Darwin ^Ahoy! 05:46, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requests

Do you take requests to translate things from English to Spanish?

If so, I found some things that I think need Spanish:

Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 16:22, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- Thank you so much, Andrea :) WhisperToMe (talk) 16:38, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea: Gracias por tu respuesta. Pude colocar la foto del óleo de Eustoquio Díaz Vélez en la categoría de Benjamín Franklin Rawson quien lo pintó. Efectivamente la obra tiene más de cien años de antiguedad y fue pintada circa 1850/5. Saludos y muchas gracias nuevamente. inesbugsbunnyines

Is it okay if I request files too? File:Mexican curious monkey.jpg is the featured image If you can't post the description to the page itself, then please post it on the talk page or somewhere and let me know, so I can request that an admin post the description itself WhisperToMe (talk) 07:42, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making the translation!
Foroa's "sp" edit meant he was correcting a spelling error; I don't think he added the Spanish yet...
WhisperToMe (talk) 03:30, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias

Muchas gracias por la traducción Andrea, pero creo que me llegó un poco tarde :( Ayer sometí las fotos a consulta de borrado (una a una), no sé si habrá sido lo más adecuado. Digamos que en Commons me manejo peor que en Wikipedia, que se la va a hacer. Muchas gracias y saludos!!! --Shalbat (talk) 07:38, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:BP Oilspill June25.2010.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:BP Oilspill June25.2010.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:BP Oilspill June25.2010.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:16, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DR

Hello Andrea. I deleted the other file so both are now gone [2]. Thanks for the heads-up! - Badseed ^talk 04:15, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jefatura de Policia - Florida.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 01:20, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

File:San Cono - Florida.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:56, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Consulta

Hola Andrea, tengo una duda. Nunca he utilizado una foto de commons fuera de la wiki. Mi pregunta es, hasta que punto puedo utilizar una foto de commons? ya se que me vas a decir, depende de la licencia, pero es que no entiendo las licencias. Por eso, te pongo un ejemplo:

Que puedo hacer con esta foto? puedeo colgarla en mi web? puedo hacer un cartel (para imprimir muchas copias) para anunciar un evento? Saludos y gracias. --Jorjum (talk) 10:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Saludos

Solo es para agradecer tu respuesta en el cafe, Muchas Gracias me a quedado todo bien claro ahora puedo empezar a contribuir con mayor fluidez.

	Hello, Andreateletrabajo. You have new messages at jmabel's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

gracias for your administrative help

Hi Andrea, just wanted to say muchas gracias (e.g. for the copyvio spotting and help at User_talk:CPGirlAJ or the old Juan Galea case)!
Do you need any additional user rights? Want help to patrol or want a rollback button for faster vandalism revert (without a edit comment)? I guess you know both from eswp. ;-) Feliz navidad! --Saibo (Δ) 04:34, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing to thank :) I never ask for additional rights 'cause my contribs are not daily. I don´t patrol; mostly I found copyvios in es:WP articles or take note of another user´s warnings and then follow uploader's contribs (like this case or this one), but rollback could be usefull, specially 'cause from time to time someone try to write an advertisment or vandalism here. Thanks! It´s a nice detail. When you need something from es:WP... Merry Christmas! --Andrea (talk) 08:57, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, unless users do any harm with rights (also because they simply may not know how the tools work and how the tools are used best) they will use them to help on the backlogs. ;) So, I would have no problem with "not daily".

Okay, you got rollback now. Adios! :-) --Saibo (Δ) 12:07, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problemas con imágenes

Hola Andrea.

Pues creo que ya sabes más o menos cual es mi asunto. Resulta que he estado subiendo unas cuantas imágenes con derechos de autor desde flickr pero con el consentimiento del dueño de la página. El problema es que no sé como voy a hacer entender a estos administradores de Commons que esa persona me dio permiso para utilizar sus imágenes aquí. Me ayudas?--Inefable001 (talk) 20:49, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias por responder.--Inefable001 (talk) 06:00, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Correo OTRS

Qué tal Andrea. Me gustaría saber como me entero si una persona a la cual le pedí que enviara un correo de permiso a OTRS ya lo ha enviado. Pues me dice que debo tener una cuenta para poder acceder a OTRS para ver los correos enviados allí y no sé como crearla.--Inefable001 (talk) 07:07, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conoces algún biblio al cual pueda pedirle el favor de manera directa?--Inefable001 (talk) 18:34, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sería cuestión de preguntarles. Muchas gracias por tu ayuda.--Inefable001 (talk) 06:17, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tengo otra pregunta.

Se puede enviar un correo OTRS para dar permiso a utilizar todas las fotos de una página o sólo se envia para una foto?. Es que la persona que envia el correo daría el permiso para utilizar cualquira de sus foto que se encuentran alojadas en su página oficial y sería una molestia tener que pedirle que lo haga para cada foto, no crees?--Inefable001 (talk) 05:51, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Peñarol

Me parece más a José Enrique de los Santos, el ahora ayudante técnico. Un saludo. MauriManya (talk) 01:31, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Upload wizard

Thank you very much, Andrea :) WhisperToMe (talk) 19:25, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Translating text in an image

Would it be alright if you reviewed some of the translations I tried at File:PepperswithscovilleCentralMarketHoustonTX.JPG? I tried translating the store displays into Spanish - Is it okay to have the pepper name adjective in the manner used in English used the same way in Spanish? WhisperToMe (talk) 00:49, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help! :) WhisperToMe (talk) 12:04, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish copyright help

¡Hola Andrea! This user does only understand spanish (according to his user page). Some translation/help regarding COM:DW would be very nice: User_talk:AlejandroLinaresGarcia#File:DiazFoxMODO36.JPG. You can link to Commons:Trabajos derivados. Otherwise he will continue to, probably unintentional, upload copyrighted stuff. Maybe the stuff he took photos of is public domain but he did not mention the age or why it is PD. Gracias if you can help! :-) --Saibo (Δ) 15:08, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias! Answered regarding the other topic at my page. --Saibo (Δ) 01:48, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

cuales fotos?

¿Cuales fotos son de la red? Todas mías son de mi camara.AlejandroLinaresGarcia (talk) 02:33, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Entiendo... pero las fotos no son derivadas.... hay periódicos múltiples en las fotos. Es derivación si es imagen de una obra solo.AlejandroLinaresGarcia (talk) 21:28, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Por favor, check esto Commons:Trabajos_derivados AlejandroLinaresGarcia (talk) 22:21, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Alejandro, nice or interesting that you apparently can speak and understand English.

Also photos which contain several copyrighted objects are derivative works of those. Only if those objects are totally unimportant and not the subject of the photo, then your photo is no derivative work since the objects are de minimis. --Saibo (Δ) 01:02, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hanoos

Las fotografías son mías, no creo violar ningún derecho de autor. Los cuadros originales del artista claro que le pertenecen. ¿O no puedo fotografiar un Renault 5? --Isidoro Castaño (talk) 22:16, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

foto de la máquina

Siguiendo con lo que te comentaba en la esWiki sobre esta imagen, he traducido el permiso y dice algo como: «Fragmento del correo electrónico: Hola señor Schröder! DMG está listo para proporcionar un total 5 fotografías de tu elección para Wikipedia y con licencia GNU. Además, a DMG le gustaría tener el logotipo de la empresa en las imágenes. He provisto una vez más todas las imágenes con el logo en nuestro servidor FTP.» lo que me hace pensar que mientras han tenido el logo no ha pasado nada, en cuanto se lo hemos quitado, no le ha gustado y las quieren borrar. Pero si aceptaron la licencia libre, como bien dices, no pueden revocarlo y tratar de borrarlo. Como se subió en 2006, y supongo que entonces OTRS no estaba tan desarrollado, habría que ajustarlo a las condiciones OTRS actuales y preguntar a quien la subió si aún conserva aquel e-mail. Me pongo en plan detective a ver qué consigo. --DPC (talk) 10:53, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

El que las subió no edita desde 2007, así que no espero que me conteste. Le he consultado a Cookie a ver qué me cuenta. --DPC (talk) 14:05, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ruta 1 hacia Montevideo.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:37, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

En serio

¿En serio un permiso verbal no basta?, osea que ahora debo molestar al autor solo para usar cuatro imágenes, que al fin y al cabo son usadas en un artículo de Wikipedia, sin ningún otro fin. ¿No hay una forma más sencilla de comprobar que el autor no tiene problema con que se utilicen estas? --Fran.ziro (talk) 04:10, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:El Chana01.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 22:57, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

File:El Chana detail.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:20, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Regalo

Te dejo un regalo por tu constancia en este proyecto, queda en vos aceptarlo o no, saludos!!! --Ezarateesteban 00:45, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Voy a ver como hago para ir, con respecto a tu RfA te dejo unas horas para que lo pienses, se que lo anterior fue duro pero tenes constancia aca y te lo mereces, no creo que te ataquen aca Ezarateesteban 01:18, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taller WMUY Colonia 03.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 00:18, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Cinco de Mayo, 1901 poster.jpg

Hi! Would it be alright if you gave a Spanish description to File:Cinco de Mayo, 1901 poster.jpg? Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 23:23, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Russian Embassy, Montevideo

Hi there, I see you live in Uruguay and I was hoping you might be able to help. If you refer to User:Russavia/Required_photos#Uruguay I am needing some photos from Montevideo for various articles on WP. Is there any possibility that you might be able to help with these photos? Any and all help you can provide would be most appreciated. Cheers, russavia (talk) 00:05, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: User:Fedaro is a very good photographer from Montevideo, and more active in Commons that I am. Maybe he can helps. Bye. --Andrea (talk) 21:03, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mi enhorabuena

Hola Andrea, sólo puedo congratularme porque, a pesar de toda la campaña orquestada en tu contra, todas las insidias y calumnias proferidas en tu contra... 101 wikipedistas te mostraron tu apoyo. Creo que es para estar orgullosa a pesar de todo. También mis disculpas por si algo de lo que te ha ocurrido ha sido, indirectamente, culpa mía. Estoy por aquí para lo que necesites. También atiendo el café en español de commons, así que puedes hacer tus peticiones también allí. Un cordial saludo --Ecemaml ^{talk to me/habla conmigo} 22:12, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rayuela

Pues no sé qué decirte. Está muy en la línea... así que la ha nominado para borrado a ver qué dicen otros. Un saludo --Ecemaml ^{talk to me/habla conmigo} 11:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gary Ridgway 1982 Mugshot.jpg

File:Gary Ridgway 1982 Mugshot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ecemaml ^{talk to me/habla conmigo} 17:03, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Gary Ridgway Booking Photo 11162001.pdf

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Gary Ridgway Booking Photo 11162001.pdf. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ecemaml ^{talk to me/habla conmigo} 22:49, 10 March 2013 (UTC) PD: lo he puesto para que sepamos que carece de permiso[reply]

No, no creo que esa licencia sea válida. Obviamente la foto es posterior a 1989 y, por tanto, no está en el dominio público a menos que se libere (véase File:PD-US table.svg). Saludos --Ecemaml ^{talk to me/habla conmigo} 23:03, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

File:Ruben Paz2011.jpg

File:Ruben Paz2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gunnex (talk) 15:33, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:KT-impact.gif

File:KT-impact.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

62.201.219.118 07:22, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/es/Solicitud de borrado masivo

Commons:Deletion requests/es/Solicitud de borrado masivo has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Anselmo Francisco Aieta (talk) 21:21, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burj dubai 3.11.08 crop.jpg

File:Burj dubai 3.11.08 crop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

B dash (talk) 03:06, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Artigas de AFE

Hola Andrea, hay un error en tu publicación del Artigas de AFE, el mismo es del escultor Juan Luis Blanes, hijo del pintor Juan Manuel Blanes. De hecho él fue quien terminó la obra dado que su hijo falleció antes de verla terminada. Saludos. 2800:AC:C010:3FD7:1:0:60C7:4454 00:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Andreateletrabajo

Deprecated License

Foto

Personal explanation

Autopatrol given

Re: Licencias de estatuas

RE:

Requests

Gracias

File source is not properly indicated: File:BP Oilspill June25.2010.jpg

DR

Consulta

Saludos

gracias for your administrative help

Problemas con imágenes

Correo OTRS

RE: Peñarol

Upload wizard

Translating text in an image

Spanish copyright help

cuales fotos?

Hanoos

foto de la máquina

En serio

Regalo

File:Cinco de Mayo, 1901 poster.jpg

Russian Embassy, Montevideo

Mi enhorabuena

Rayuela

File tagging File:Gary Ridgway Booking Photo 11162001.pdf

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Artigas de AFE

Navigation menu

Search