User talk:Amada44/Archive 3
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
← Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 → |
Änderung?
Hallo, du hast heute irgendein Nummernschild der C-Klasse hier entfernt. Welches denn, wenn ich das schon gemacht habe? Gruß -- S 400 HYBRID (talk) 19:54, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Ja, auf der talk seite hat jemand geschrieben, dass man dort das Nummernschild auf der Umweltplakette noch lesen kann. Ich hab dann auch grad die alte Version gelöscht. Ich hoffe, dass das in deinem Sinne war. LG, Amada44 talk to me 19:57, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- PS, schade dass du nicht mehr mit machst! sind gute Bilder!!
Hallo, ich habe zwar nichts dagegen, aber eigentlich müsste man selbst das Kennzeichen gar nicht unkenntlich machen. Ich werde zwar noch Bilder hochladen, aber nicht mehr in dieser Menge. Danke für die anerkennenden Worte :) Gruß -- S 400 HYBRID (talk) 14:47, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Duplicates
Thank you for suggestion, I will have this in mind. --Smooth_O (talk) 08:58, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Falls ich noch mehr
solcher Fehlentscheidungen treffe - bist Du dann so gut und haust mir virtuell auf die Finger? LG, --4028mdk09 (talk) 17:55, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- naja, daraus lernt man ja ;) ausserdem finde ich es nicht so eine krasse Fehlentscheidung. Meiner Meinung nach sollte so ein crop nur gemacht werden, wenn jemand das genau so im Artikel benötigt. Das Original ist ja da. Sozusagen prophylaktisch alle möglichen crops zu machen halte ich nicht für sinnvoll. Und ein 'low quality' hat sich das Bild seeeeeehr verdient. Ich hab mal ein Schnitz von einer Orange oder so ähnlich zum löschen vorgeschlagen denn es hätte auch eine Mandarine oder sonst was sein können. Die Qualität war so schlecht, dass man einfach einen orangenen Schnitz gesehen hat. Nur der Name war irgend was spezielles. Irgend eine spezielle Orange oder Mandarine oder Kreuzung oder was auch immer (das Bild hatte vielleicht 200x300 Pixel mit einem älteren Handy aufgenommen). Nun, es kamen Leute daher die 'Keep' gevoted haben: 'denn wir haben ja sonst keine anderen Bilder dieser Frucht'. hummmmmmm,… habe ich mich da gefragt,… was ist denn das für eine Logik? Da könnte ich ja ein schwarzes Bild hochladen und sagen es sei Elvis auf dem Mond das kann dann nie gelöscht werden denn dieses Foto ist absolut einzigartig *smile*
PS. jetzt hab ich doch noch das Bild hervorgekramt. Hier ist der Löschantrag. Das Bild schick ich Dir per mail ;) . Amada44 talk to me 19:18, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Danke fürs Gerade-rücken-meines Bildes, das ich hier von Commons habe. Nachdem ich erst nachdem ich das Originalbild gesehen hatte, überhaupt mal erahnen konnte, was da überhaupt abgebildet wurde - ... ! Aber seis drum: "Die Community" hat entschieden. Ich warte schon mal drauf, dass mir hier irgendeiner den Beinamen "Löschtroll" verpasst. ;-) --4028mdk09 (talk) 19:28, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Zum Mailanhang - da fällt mir nicht mehr viel dazu ein. ;-) Danke für Deine Mühe! --4028mdk09 (talk) 19:31, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Danke fürs Gerade-rücken-meines Bildes, das ich hier von Commons habe. Nachdem ich erst nachdem ich das Originalbild gesehen hatte, überhaupt mal erahnen konnte, was da überhaupt abgebildet wurde - ... ! Aber seis drum: "Die Community" hat entschieden. Ich warte schon mal drauf, dass mir hier irgendeiner den Beinamen "Löschtroll" verpasst. ;-) --4028mdk09 (talk) 19:28, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anti68.jpg
Hallo, Du schreibst als Entscheidung:
- "If you have a problem with File:Flower-Power Bus.jpg put a DR to that, not here."
Diese Entscheidung ignoriert doch völlig den Löschantrag, und unterstellt zudem eine falsche Begründung!
Im Löschantrag wurden an keiner Stelle "Proleme" mit dem File:Flower-Power Bus.jpg angeführt. Eine Löschung dieser Datei File:Flower-Power Bus.jpg wurde nicht verlangt und auch nicht begründet.
Verlangt, und ausführlich begründet wurde die Löschung der Datei File:Anti68.jpg, für welche File:Flower-Power Bus.jpg in agitatorische Weise verwendet, und zum Schaden der Eigentümer des abgebildeten Fahrzeugs mißbraucht wurde.
Daher möchte ich, daß die Datei File:Anti68.jpg doch gelöscht wird. Die Datei File:Flower-Power Bus.jpg dagegen soll nicht gelöscht werden, Gruß --Rosenkohl (talk) 11:04, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
- Tut mir leid das so direkt zu sagen aber der Löschantrag ist absurd. Amada44 talk to me 17:27, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
- Hallo, bitte beachte auch Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Problems_I_have_with_an_administrator.27s_decision, Gruß --Rosenkohl (talk) 18:31, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- Danke für den Link! LG, Amada44 talk to me 08:06, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
- Hallo, bitte beachte auch Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Problems_I_have_with_an_administrator.27s_decision, Gruß --Rosenkohl (talk) 18:31, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Need your help
Hey Amanda I need your help.
Can you please rename this image to: "ProtestsAnnexationAlexanderetta" (notice that I misspelled "annexation")
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DemonstrationAnexationAlexanderetta.jpg --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 23:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- Done. Just happened to notice this, hope you don't mind Amada44. ZooFari 23:12, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- Ok thanks but you forgot the "Protests" that I wanted to replace the "Demonstration" --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 23:29, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
I am still trying to figure out what the colors are, but need to get my hands on FED-STD-595 first. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 18:25, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
- sure :) just meant that both look good and we could keep both versions, the official one and the other one. Amada44 talk to me 08:09, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- It turns out that the official colors are very dark, almost like what this version has. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 16:58, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
My talk page
I can't see what you want. I took that photo ,there is no copyright problems.93.172.72.107 13:45, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- which image are you talking about? Amada44 talk to me 14:03, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- sorry. File:Kueh.jpg of course.Drall (talk) 16:57, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- Ah right, well, did you draw the picture you then took a photo of? Because you would need permission to upload that if you didn't draw/create that. Amada44 talk to me 17:00, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
OK
I have removed the image. I put it because the page when they say that images should be no used was deleted.
Thank you. Luispihormiguero Any problem? 18:29, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Hallo, ähem, könntest Du die Bildbeschreibung ein bissl erweitern und vielleicht auch um den Aufnahmeort ergänzen? LG, --4028mdk09 (talk) 18:27, 21 September 2010 (UTC) *verlegen guck und auf Strümpfen aus dem Raum schleichend*
- hehe, na klar ;) war schon viel zu knapp. Dafür haben jetzt alle 4 Bilder auch noch GPS infos! Danke für den Hinweis. LG :-) Amada44 talk to me 20:19, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
I the copyright holder .... what is unclear about it ?
Hoi, I do not understand what is unclear about that statement. Thanks, GerardM (talk) 14:01, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- I also noticed this edit. Could you please explain why you nominated this file? Multichill (talk) 14:40, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- how about adding a cat? and some other stuff?. I was not aware that {{Self}} would be enough for both author and source.
- By the way, I looked through your photo stream to see if you never used the info template (which you do) and I came across this file: File:Valerie Sutton in 1985.jpg. You will need to get OTRS permission for this. Amada44 talk to me 15:27, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Für Fæ
Hallo Amada44, falls dein comment auf Jimbos talk an Fæ adressiert war, solltest du ihn vielleicht 1 Position nach links einrücken. --Túrelio (talk) 15:48, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Adamska.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Luispihormiguero Any problem? 19:32, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
- I have requested the speedy kept of that image. I hope that this little mistake on my part does not import you... Luispihormiguero Any problem? 19:43, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Luispihormiguero. Don't worry! No problem at all!! cheers, Amada44 talk to me 19:51, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Don't let the __(insert word of your choice)__ get to you -- this certainly wasn't an abuse of DR -- I stay away from dealing with images that have sexual overtones, so I won't close this, but I tend to agree with you. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:40, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Would this be text only when the text has a unique artistic style to it? It's not just plain text. - Floydian (talk) 17:16, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- compare with this for example: File:IBM logo.svg. Its also PD-text. cheers, Amada44 talk to me 19:34, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Why do you removing polish language version? Is it German's POV? 85.202.39.49 17:29, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- as I wrote you. Don't change the username without loggin in. cheers, Amada44 talk to me 17:31, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- And you don't anserw my second question... 85.202.39.49 17:32, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- I'm still waiting and a haven't got much time
- And you don't anserw my second question... 85.202.39.49 17:32, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
You seemed to agree with the thoughts I expressed directly to A. Wagner here. Seems to be a good person, but as several have said, needs to gain some experience. Lord knows we need more help. Perhaps you add to my comments in German? I'm not sure how strong his/her English is. Regards, Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:04, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Jim, yes I'll do that. Somehow I'm not sure if Wagner is really interested in doing admin work though,... but thats just an interpretation. But since you said that you are recruiting admins, what about Jacklee (talk · contributions · Statistics)? - Amada44 talk to me 10:50, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for thinking about Wagner. You may be right, of course, I'm probably missing things in the German. As for Jacklee, I tried. Maybe later, he says. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Guten Morgen - schön schauerliches findet sich da in der Nähe von Basel! ;-) Ich vermute mal, die hier gehören mindestens zur Verwandschaft, vielleicht sogar zur Familie. Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 09:00, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Guten Morgen! wow, das ging ja schnell ;) und ich wollte mich eigentlich noch dran machen und eine Seite erstellen mit den besten Wanzen aus allen Kategorien zwecks Identifikation ;) danke Dir! Das Bild habe ich übrigens mit Focus-stacking gemacht. Es besteht aus ca. 10 Bildern mit verschiedenen Schärfeebenen und eine Software rechnet dann die scharfen Stellen in ein Bild zusammen. Macht grad echt Spass mit der Technik Fotos zu machen weil man Bilder machen kann, welche überall gestochen scharf sind! LG, Amada44 talk to me 09:33, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Bei so tollen Ergebnissen - Spielzeug genehmigt! ;-) LG, --4028mdk09 (talk) 19:50, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Well I'm not all that good with licenses so if you think it's okay I guess it is, though you should probalby rename the file.Plushy (talk) 13:19, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Verschieben vs. Move & Replace
Hallo, war hier verschieben richtig oder wäre move and replace besser gewesen? Falls verschieben richtig war, muss ich noch Antrag auf Schnelllöschung des alten Dateinamens stellen? Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 13:26, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Also für alle Dateien welche irgendwo verlinkt sind ist move & replace das bessere. Mit what links here und Global usage kannst du das auch für redirects rausfinden. Da der alte name noch hier verlinkt ist, müsste man das entweder manuell entlinken oder durch den delinker laufen lassen. Vorher kann man den redirect auch nicht löschen.
- Das Problem ist, dass es da verschiedene Meinungen gibt. Manche sagen, auf gar keinen Fall die redirects löschen (da ja auch externe den Link als Quelle angeben) und andere löschen bereitwillig die redirects wenn sie nicht mehr in den wp projekten verlinkt sind. Ich bin eher dafür die redirects zu löschen wenn sie in wp.projekten entlinkt sind...
- Ich weiss das es mal geplant war, dass wenn eine Datei nicht verlinkt war, das auch User mit Move-rechten eine Datei verschieben können ohne einen redirect zu erstellen (sonst dürfen das nur admins...). Wie der genaue Stand da jetzt ist weiss ich nicht.
- Prinzipiell also: Move&Replace für alles was irgendwo verlinkt ist und wenn der redirect nirgends mehr verlinkt ist, kannst du mich ja persönlich um die Entfernung dessen bitten ;) Amada44 talk to me 20:42, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Danke für die ausführliche Antwort. Ich habe heute eine handvoll Dateien, die ich unter falschem Namen hochgeladen hatte, verschoben. Es wurde in jedem Fall ein Redirect erzeugt, unabhängig davon ob die Ursprungsdatei auf Commons eingebunden war oder auch nicht. Folgende Redirects sind imho entlinkt: [1], [2], [3]. Darf ich auf Dein Angebot zurück kommen und Dich bitte, diese zu löschen? Künftig werde ich dann wohl besser "move und replace" nehmen. Gruß und noch ein schönes Wochenende, --4028mdk09 (talk) 21:22, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Ein kleiner Hinweis: Move & Replace prüft ob die Datei benutzt wird, und beauftragt nur in dem Fall den Delinker --DieBuche (talk) 23:57, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- @Amada44: Guten Morgen - danke! --4028mdk09 (talk) 08:36, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Ein kleiner Hinweis: Move & Replace prüft ob die Datei benutzt wird, und beauftragt nur in dem Fall den Delinker --DieBuche (talk) 23:57, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Danke für die ausführliche Antwort. Ich habe heute eine handvoll Dateien, die ich unter falschem Namen hochgeladen hatte, verschoben. Es wurde in jedem Fall ein Redirect erzeugt, unabhängig davon ob die Ursprungsdatei auf Commons eingebunden war oder auch nicht. Folgende Redirects sind imho entlinkt: [1], [2], [3]. Darf ich auf Dein Angebot zurück kommen und Dich bitte, diese zu löschen? Künftig werde ich dann wohl besser "move und replace" nehmen. Gruß und noch ein schönes Wochenende, --4028mdk09 (talk) 21:22, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Mover rights
I have a question about mover rights: does that include rename and delete rights? --Havang(nl) (talk) 07:26, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- no no, move is only rename. deletion is admin only! btw. nice to hear from you ;) Amada44 talk to me 14:39, 19 October 2010 (UTC).
- A nice reply, thanks.--Havang(nl) (talk) 15:25, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Amada,
I have indicated that this pictures is both a reduced sized copy of another file plus it incorrectly identifies the person in the picture. Why have you chosen not to delete it? Regards,
Regge
- Hi Regge! Thanks for asking me here. The duplicate tag should only be used for exact duplicates! That is the reason why I have reverted your edit. As the cropped black and white images is slightly larger, I would also say that we should keep it. Thank you for noticing that it is not H.F.Tollens but Staring. What you can do is rename the file. For that you just add {{rename|Staring croped.jpg|wrong name}} to the image and it will be renamed. You are also free to edit/correct the description on the page and adding the correct categories. Amada44 talk to me 10:44, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Done see File:A.C.W.Staring.jpg. Greetings --Havang(nl) (talk) 11:20, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Hum. I could also have done that. It would probably have been quicker moving the file that writing the text but I wanted Regge to do it so that Regge gets to know how thinks work here ;) Amada44 talk to me 08:21, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Right. Greetings.--Havang(nl) (talk) 09:18, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- ;) btw. enjoy the weekend! Amada44 talk to me 09:19, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Same to you. Being dutch, I was interested in the file discussion; there were two renaming attempts in nowikiform on the file... which brought me to action. --Havang(nl) (talk) 09:39, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- no problem at all. I just wanted to let you know why I didn't do it. Amada44 talk to me 09:45, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help guys! Regge
- no problem at all. I just wanted to let you know why I didn't do it. Amada44 talk to me 09:45, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Same to you. Being dutch, I was interested in the file discussion; there were two renaming attempts in nowikiform on the file... which brought me to action. --Havang(nl) (talk) 09:39, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- ;) btw. enjoy the weekend! Amada44 talk to me 09:19, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Amada, könntest du das Datum hinzufügen, an dem das Video aufgenommen wurde? Der der Vollständigkeit halber, denn es erscheint auf der Hauptseite. Vielen Dank lg Hekerui (talk) 10:57, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Done thanks for the notice! Amada44 talk to me 14:44, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
hi
Hi there. What was malformed about this? Picture is obviously from this page, which is copyrighted. --Vegetator (talk) 11:14, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- The Deletion Request itself. There was only the userpage notice and I have the userpage on my watchlist, thats why I saw it. The DR page itself had not been created (also the DR notice on the file was/is still missing). But I'll rewrite the text on the DR. Thanks! Amada44 talk to me 14:48, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- I have decided to delete the file as obvious copyvio. Amada44 talk to me 14:54, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, so it was my mistake, i´ll keep it in mind for next time.--Vegetator (talk) 10:32, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
File deleted
Thank you for Modification de File:Amiens (17 octobre 2009) 4ème Nuit Blanche 50a.jpg - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 13:47, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- sure, no problem. I didn't quite get the move thing. Do you need something done there? Amada44 talk to me 14:07, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Could you please explain...
I see you deleted File:Radio Gureshk -e.jpg because it was an "Exact or scaled-down duplicate" of File:Afghanistan (3238337098).jpg.
I have participated in several discussions recently over what administrators should do when one of two files has been proposed for deletion, because it is a duplicate.
Other administrators have said they are careful, to make sure that they do an intelligent merge of the categories and descriptions from the two files.
In these discusssions people discussed the value of keeping the image that was uploaded first, or the image with the most eventful revision history.
Personally, I think that if the later image was uploaded by a bot, it should always be the one deleted, even if it is of higher resolution, because volunteers shouldn't have the discouragement of having a bot's efforts be more highly valued than a human beings.
You deleted the image with the superior name, and kept the one with the totally unhelpful name. Can I ask why you did this? Isn't the use of totally non-descriptive names counter-policy? Geo Swan (talk) 17:03, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yes I can tell you why. This (File:Afghanistan (3238337098).jpg) image has been uploaded on the 13 November 2009. Yours 23 September 2010. I know that the flickr uploadbots do not check for dupes (which they should!!) so its difficult to know if the image has been uploaded already. But since the other image has been on commons for nearly a year and yours just a few days, I have decided to delete your image (as less external source will link to your image, being only a couple of days on commons). I am sorry, that it was your image which was deleted (I read your comment on Village pump...) But you could also see it like this: You uploaded an image which already existed and it took me 4 minutes to check all the parameter and get it deleted.... so what about my time? *smile* no, just kidding. We need dupe-checking with the flickr upload bots, thats the only solution. As for the name, lets do a rename. In fact, I have seen that you have done so many good edits, that I have given you rename rights. Would you be so kind to give that file a sensible name? Amada44 talk to me 18:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
McClintock and Maclintock
I may have screwed up a tag, but the images to KEEP are those named "MACLINTOCK V" (You were supposed to keep , not delete it) I misspelled it the first time. Please delete the versions spelled "McClintock" and KEEP the ones named "Maclintock." And if any of this was MY screwup, sorry! Montanabw (talk) 03:13, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
- Hi there. I have keept this (File:McClintockVpic2.jpg) Version because of the uncropped verison in the version history. If you need the file renamed, please use the rename tag: {{Rename}} . Amada44 talk to me 10:24, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Could you please undelete this image? We have received OTRS permission for it which I can add once it's restored. VernoWhitney (talk) 22:31, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Done. what about the other images of the same uploader? File:Plan1 big.jpg and File:Plan3 big.jpg? Cheers, Amada44 talk to me 07:21, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the undelete and thanks for the reminder - I had spaced the other image. We also have permission for File:Plan1 big.jpg, but that's it (at least that's all in English that I can handle). VernoWhitney (talk) 11:55, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- undeleted both of them (the plans are basically identical). could you please add the OTRS? Thx. Amada44 talk to me 14:04, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, I've added permission to plan1 and OTRS received for plan3 - I'll email for clarification on that one. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:36, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- undeleted both of them (the plans are basically identical). could you please add the OTRS? Thx. Amada44 talk to me 14:04, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the undelete and thanks for the reminder - I had spaced the other image. We also have permission for File:Plan1 big.jpg, but that's it (at least that's all in English that I can handle). VernoWhitney (talk) 11:55, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Book3.svg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Book3.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Trycatch (talk) 20:48, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
ist aber hoffentlich nicht das nette Kerlchen von vor ein paar Tagen? ;-) --4028mdk09 (talk) 14:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- Hehe, nein. eher nicht. Das arme Viech starb schon in 2004.... Und das nette Kerlchen habe ich diese Sommer fotografiert ;) LG, Amada44 talk to me 17:30, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- Schönen Abend noch! :-) --4028mdk09 (talk) 17:47, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Image info Hidetada Yamagishi
you asked for more info. Here is the email I received, includes message I sent:
"Here is my photo. Thanks!
Hide
2010年10月30日10:35 <bill.mceachen@gmail.com>: Bill McEachen
sorry, only know English. I edit Wikipedia and it would be great to have a photo in the article. If you are willing, please send us one. Ref en.wikipedia.org Thanks ...
Do you need something else?best to just email me--Billymac00 (talk) 04:02, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Removing old username
Hey Amada44, I want to remove my old username from the files I've uploaded in the past, so I re-uploaded all those files that contained my old username, so now you can hide the old version of such files. We've discussed this some time ago, remember?. Thank you in advance. --alltheboys 05:14, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I had a look befor but didn't see the problem. Now I did! sorry about the delay. I will do all of them today. Cheers, Amada44 talk to me 07:22, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Done all of them. Would you be so kind to check if I have done it right (and if all of them are done)? cheers, Amada44 talk to me 07:58, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
LG, --4028mdk09 (talk) 13:55, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Danke :) So lange die nicht komplett gelöscht sondern nur verschoben wird ist es mir mehr oder weniger egal. Danke für den Link!! LG, Amada44 talk to me 14:53, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Irgendwann
lerne ich es noch! ;-) --4028mdk09 (talk) 15:30, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- Naja, ich hatte auch einige Schwierigkeiten da durchzublicken da Túrelio es gemacht hatte aber nicht geschrieben hatte, dass er es gemacht hatte. Dann habe ich auch zuerst rumgerätselt was der will bis ich mal die gelöschten Versionen angeschaut habe..... Danke auch fürs reverten ;) Amada44 talk to me 10:06, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Request for rights for sreejithk2000
Hi Amada, my request for file renaming rights is being pending for some time. I have more than 4,800 edits in commons and more than 38,000 edits in English wiki. I am also an admin in Malayalam Wikipedia where I have more than 6,400 edits. I have read and understood the renaming rules in commons and will respect it. When I first put my request I did not take care of this and my request was denied for this reason. Please suggest how can I take this forward. --Sreejith K (talk) 09:24, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Sreejithk. So, once you have read it, are you sure you still need rename?? ;-). Rename should really only be used if really necessary and since we are an international project 'we' want to explicitly allow every language. (One of the reasons for this is, that we would have files renamed all the time. One person wants them like this, a month later somebody renames them to a different language and so on)
- The problem with your request is, that I now have to trust you, that you won't secretly carry out your rename agenda converting everything to english…. can I trust you there? Amada44 talk to me 12:10, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
I don't have an agenda here. I just want to correct file names in Indian languages. I can read and write Malayalam, Hindi and Tamil. I can help people who puts renaming requests with file names in these languages and give suggestions if needed. I am not really a renamer, out of the near 5000 edits I have in commons now, I have hardly suggested renaming 4-5 files. --Sreejith K (talk) 13:39, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
- To state as an example, the file name File:മുരിങ്ങയുടെ പൂവും മെട്ടുകളും.jpg is wrong and it should have been മുരിങ്ങയുടെ പൂവുകളും മൊട്ടുകളും.jpg --Sreejith K (talk) 13:46, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks Amada. I now has the rights. I renamed the above said file as well. One quick question. Is there an option to delete the erroneous file page after it has been renamed? In local wikis, we have an option where we can choose not to keep the old name after renaming. --Sreejith K (talk) 12:28, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- Not at the moment. But if its a really bad name-error, you can can give me a note here (I will then delete the redirect). Amada44 talk to me 12:31, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks Amada. I now has the rights. I renamed the above said file as well. One quick question. Is there an option to delete the erroneous file page after it has been renamed? In local wikis, we have an option where we can choose not to keep the old name after renaming. --Sreejith K (talk) 12:28, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Unidentified plants from Gardenology.org
Hi Amada44. I'm not crazy about this new category you've created. I wish you'd discussed it first. It's not even a location like the others in the category. The files in the "Unidentified plants by location" category tend to get ignored, unfortunately. That has been the case with the plants in the Huntington Library category there with my files. Meanwhile the ones in the simple "Unidentified plants" folder at least seen to get noticed by some people. If the files can stay there a little while they might actually attract people who like to label plants! I'd really love it if you could reverse your changes for now please. Thank you, --RaffiKojian (talk) 20:06, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
* * * :) * * *
--George Chernilevsky talk 13:00, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Fröhliche Weihnachtsfeiertage
und alles, alles Gute für 2011 wünscht Dir --4028mdk09 (talk) 14:24, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Amada44, ich habe entdeckt aus welchem Film hier ein Screenshot genommen wurde. Das Bild ist also, wie in der Diskussion von mir mit Links belegt, eine Urheberrechtsverletzung und sollte nun wirklich gelöscht werden. Die Diskussion läuft ja nun auch schon lange genug. Gruß --Nicor (talk) 15:10, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Naming convention
Hi Amada44,
wir waren schon in Kontakt (vgl. User talk:Lord Koxinga).
Ich habe nun ein Problem. Ein user sieht Probleme mit meinem File naming, das ich schon seit einiger Zeit anwende, und das auch eine Reihenfolge in meine Files bringt (s. User talk:Lord Koxinga, ganz unten). Ich denke mir, die Sache macht, so wie ich sie brauche, Sinn (s. z.B. Category:Chenggong). Was ist Deine Meinung dazu?
Herzliche Grüsse und ein glückliches Neues Jahr Lord Koxinga (talk) 16:53, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Lord Koxinga.
- Hier gibt es eine Guideline für die Dateibenennung (auch auf englisch). Ich denke, dass deine Dateinamen okay sind obwohl die zusätzlichen Nummern vermutlich nur zu deiner Übersichtlichkeit beitragen und weniger zu der des Projektes ;-) . Der User welcher sich bei die beklagt hat, hat hier auf commons sehr wenige edits (nur 40), ist aber in der englischen wikipedia ein admin. Vermutlich hat ihn ein Bild link irgendwo auf der englischen wikipedia gestört und das wollte der user dir mitteilen. Wichtig ist, dass die Dateinamen einen aussagekräftigen Teil enthalten. Da das bei deinen Dateinamen gegeben ist, musst du dir keine Sorgen machen. Ein eher kosmetisches Detail: könntest du die .JPG Endung auch klein schreiben (.jpg)? Liebe Grüsse, Amada44 talk to me 15:23, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Danke
fürs Bestimmen. :-) --4028mdk09 (talk) 17:18, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- Gerne, das war ja auch einfach! ;-) LG, Amada44 talk to me 14:48, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Clematis vitalba
Thanks for identification of Gewöhnliche Waldrebe. Have a nice day!--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 17:39, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Egg plant
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c9/Pr%C3%ADa_-_Bayas.jpg/100px-Pr%C3%ADa_-_Bayas.jpg)
Hi Amada44. I think the plant is a garden plant, in spite of growing wild in northern Spain. I said it is not an egg plant because you can see the fruit on the back. At the beginning it is green and then it becomes red, but does not increase in size, it stays as small as you can see in the background of the photo. The actual size of this fruits is like a peanut, not bigger. Maybe there is a garden type of egg plant that is grown for the flowers?
I have updated another photo of the fruit while still green. It really doesn't get bigger than that. Maybe it helps.
Thanks for taking the time and the effort to classify these pictures! --ecelan (talk) 17:58, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
P.S. Verflixt! Hätte ich auch in Deutsch sagen können! --ecelan (talk) 18:01, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Kein Problem ;). Aber du hattest trotzdem recht. Es sind keine Auberginen sondern viel eher diese hier: Category:Solanum dulcamara . Leider sieht man an bei deinen Bildern die Blätter nicht so gut. Hast du da zufälligerweise noch eines? LG, Amada44 talk to me 18:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Leider habe ich keine andere Fotos. Aber ich bin mir ziemlich sicher du hast Recht, es ist Solanum dulcamara. Gutes Auge! Mein Lob hast du dir auf jedem Fall verdient ;) --ecelan (talk) 20:45, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Deletions
Please also delete File:Myiopsitta monachus -pet perching on cage-6a.jpg. While Snowmanradio was the only person to edit the page, I am the original uploader and author of the image and am requesting it. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 13:10, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- It would be actually cool, if you could do a nice shot of your parrot and upload it here to commons ;). Do you mind to add a speedy tag to your parrot image? An other admin will have a look at it then. Just for your information, Uploader deletion requests are a privilege and not a right. If an image is used in a project, then normally admins will not delete the image. So, to be save delink the image from your userpage before you add the speedy. Cheers, Amada44 talk to me 13:24, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- I was using the redirect still (only found out about the move last night) and will add the speedy tag. I would do another picture (and I really shouldn't say "my parrot" cause it isn't anymore) but we sold the parrot (she was lonely, she has bird friends now) about 2 months ago. We still call her ours out of force-of-habit. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 13:29, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- That image has gone up for a deletion discussion here. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 14:04, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- I was using the redirect still (only found out about the move last night) and will add the speedy tag. I would do another picture (and I really shouldn't say "my parrot" cause it isn't anymore) but we sold the parrot (she was lonely, she has bird friends now) about 2 months ago. We still call her ours out of force-of-habit. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 13:29, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Entschuldigung...
...da habe ich "automatisiert" wohl den Falschen (bzw. die Falsche) erwischt. Tut mir leid. Grüße, abf «Cabale!» 18:08, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- Gar kein Problem! Thanks for the note ;). Amada44 talk to me 07:10, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
One more photo to be deleted
Ive recently asked you guys to take down all of my photos from my Westonci account, as well as to block my Westonci account.
However there is still one photo remaining
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=westonci
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trash_bin_in_Toronto_May_2008.jpg
Im asking kindly that you take it down.
- Hi. You do know, that we are not obliged to deleting your images? And that we have done that because of three reasons: Your images were not really useful (although two where used on wikipedia), because we don't want to get you frustrated and simply because we try to be nice. Now I still don't want to frustrate you, but I have a question: what harm does that image of the trash bin do to you? One can't see your backyard, its not connected to your real name...? Amada44 talk to me 07:10, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
I have OCD
As i explained before, I have OCD (Obsessive Compulsive Disorder) which means i need everything in my mind to be resolved, otherwise my mind will lose it. Its hard for me to explain to a person who doesnt have OCD. Every now and then I'll have obsessive thoughts, and unfortunately this is one of them.
Im sorry if im annoying you, but Im having trouble going to sleep and functioning in daily life if my obsesive thoughts are not resolved. You cant understand how painful this is to me.
If i could i would beg infront of you to delete my photos, i would. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE just delete my photos and let me carry on with my life.
- I don't believe one word of that. Anyhow, you are just trying to command other people around and your ego is feeding on the results of that. This really makes me want to not delete that image and I am wondering if it was a mistake to have deleted the other images. Having said that, I also don't feel like having further fruitles discussions about this topic and we have an image of an Canadian trash bin. So I have deleted your image. Amada44 talk to me 15:09, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi. You closed this as keep, but deleted the image. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:53, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Unidentified plants
Hi Amada - many of the files you've moved to the unidentified plants in Sydney are from (and are labeled) as being from Melbourne. Also, I'm a bit worried nobody will ever look in these folders to notice that there are so many files needing to be recategorized. Can we put a note under the main Unidentified plants category to let people know? What can we do? Thanks. --RaffiKojian (talk) 06:45, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Raffi. I move Melbourne out. Well, as I said, that category is for images, which are not identified so people can look through them and identify them. Now, your images are mostly identified (by label) and just not categorized. The problem is not as much that nobody sees them, the problem is more that nobody wants to do the work ;) The only way is to ask for help every now and again (also on your home wiki!). There is no other way,.. sorry. Amada44 talk to me 09:26, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Ah yes, I'm familiar with that problem :-S Okay, thanks... --RaffiKojian (talk) 22:34, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Amada, would you be able to add a tag to all the photos in the category Category:Unidentified plants at Huntington Gardens? It would be nice if in addition to having that category, they also have the category "Plants at the Huntington Gardens". That way once the genus/species category is identified, and the Unidentified category is removed, we'll still know they're from the Huntington. If there's somewhere else I should request this, please let me know. Thanks! --RaffiKojian (talk) 00:49, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Raffi, I have been thinking about that too. Do you think we should copy all the images from Category:Unidentified plants at Huntington Gardens to Category:Plants at Huntington Gardens (so they would have both cats) and people identifying would just remove the cat Category:Unidentified plants at Huntington Gardens, leaving the cat Category:Plants at Huntington Gardens?. Is that what you would suggest? Amada44 talk to me 12:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, that's exactly what I was thinking. Thanks! --RaffiKojian (talk) 00:50, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
- I have added a bot request here. Amada44 talk to me 07:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- I saw the bot request. I gave cat-a-lot a try, to test wheter it could do the job. But it does page by page, 35 pages, I did only the first page. Greetings. --Havang(nl) (talk) 09:00, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- I have added a bot request here. Amada44 talk to me 07:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, that's exactly what I was thinking. Thanks! --RaffiKojian (talk) 00:50, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
.
- Hey Havang. Yea, I already moved all of those image via catalot but I don^t feel like going through all those 35 pages ;) Thanks for having a go at it! Amada44 talk to me 09:32, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Request
Hi, can you remove the watermark from this image - File:Sonu Sood.jpg. I tried to remove it but didn't work out well. Thanks--Managerarc (talk) 14:49, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Done, do you like it like that? Amada44 talk to me 20:03, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, great work. Thanks a lot :) --Managerarc (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Koriander ist eine Frucht ...
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/29/Coriander_seeds.jpg/170px-Coriander_seeds.jpg)
Ich kann mir nicht erklären, warum in der deutschen WP und englischen WP beim Koriander im Text häufig von Samen, in den Bildunterschriften aber von Früchten die Rede ist. Soweit ich weiß, enthält der Koriander noch das Pericarp (Fruchtwand) und ist damit eine Frucht. Mikroskopischer Farbatlas Pflanzlicher Drogen; ISBN 978-3-8274-1951-4 Haben Sie eine Erklärung? Meiner Meinung nach muss da sauber gearbeitet werden (es wird einfach nicht unterschieden), auch wenn sich da etwas "eingebürgert" haben sollte. Das kann ja in einem Satz in der Einleitung der Artikel geklärt werden. Eventuell sollte das hier aber lieber in die Artikeldiskussionen.
Das Foto finde ich übrigens toll. Aus biologischer Sicht wäre u.U. noch ein sauber halbierter Koriander in der "Innenansicht" interessant gewesen.
Gruß --RE RILLKE Questions? 21:54, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Picture to delete
Hi, please can you delete this picture File:K1HATTYUNYOMOK.jpg? This must be deleted. DenesFeri 12:32, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you! DenesFeri 10:35, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Question on panoramic view artwork
Hi Amada44, although I appreciate your work on the image File:John Vanderlyn - Panoramic View of the Palace and Gardens of Versailles - Google Art Project.jpg, I'm trying to figure out whether it's eligible to be uploaded under PD-Art. Was the original painting a flat one that Google created a distorted image of, or was the original work itself painted on a curved surface? Do you know? Thanks. Dcoetzee (talk) 01:11, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Dcoetzee! That was basically the reason why I de-skewed it. As far as I can tell, it is painted on a circular wall. Nevertheless it should be PD-Art, because its not a sculpture on which the image is painted but just a curved wall. So there is still nothing creative in taking a picture of it. But to be sure we could put a DR on it and ask for opinions. The original image is certainly not PD-Art. Just as theses images aren't:
because of the 3D frames. Amada44 talk to me 18:04, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks - I'm uncertain because precedent has been unclear regarding works painted on curved surfaces, but I'll get a second opinion anyway. Dcoetzee (talk) 19:05, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Can you give reason why you renamed the image? It was properly named, cf. [][Commons:File renaming]]. --Eva K. is evil 12:09, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
pictures to delete 2
Hi, can you delete this pictures, please? I have better pictures for replacement.
DenesFeri 11:23, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- sure and
Done. - Amada44 talk to me 13:26, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you! DenesFeri 15:52, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I done it again. I uploaded the wrong picture. Please delete this.
Thanks. DenesFeri (talk) 11:40, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Done it actually was okay. It was just the old image in the system cache. After a en:wikipedia:Purge the image was fine. I deleted it as a duplicate to the other image. They are much better by the way ;) . - Amada44 talk to me 12:59, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you again! DenesFeri (talk) 13:07, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
You fixed my Moon Phases.svg
Thank you!!! How did you do that? I have been trying to validate that file for almost an hour now and finally succeeded by editing (a bit haphazardly in places) the xml file.
I hope you have a better way that you can share with me!
Gregors (talk) 08:09, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Gregors. Did you see the answer User:Orionist gave you on Village pump? Cheers, Amada44 talk to me 06:37, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
can you please set my antarctic krill image to 1700 high resolution. user kils.
- Ja klar. Vielen Dank dafür!!! Ist echt ein tolles Bild! Es war übrigens jemand anderes der das grössere Bild hochgeladen hatte. Ich hatte es dann auf die ursprüngliche Version zurückgesetzt. Wäre toll wenn es von Dir wieder neue Bilder gibt :) Liebe Grüsse, Amada44 talk to me 13:42, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Amada!
Danke fuer Deine Hilfe. Ich kann nichts mehr auf commons hochladen. Was ist neu? Kannst Du das Bild fuer Pictures of the Day vorschlagen, ich weiss nicht wie das geht. wie giebt man Tilde auf Deutscher Tastatur ein? liebe gruesse uwe user uwe kils
- Bis zu einer Antwort von Amada 44 hier kleiner Kopierservice: --~~~~ --4028mdk09 (talk) 10:09, 9 April 2011 (UTC) PS. bei meiner Tastatur mit AltGr und +
FP Promotion
![]() |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
![]() |
/FPCBot (talk) 20:59, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Danke Amada
gehen jetzt alle alten links auf File:krill666.jpg verloren? das sind viele aus vielen Laendern. Kann nichts hochladen: Author needed, original Source needed. What changed? Best greetings Uwe kils (talk) 12:28, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
- Nein, die gehen nicht verloren und das Original (File:Krill666.jpg) bleibt auch erhalten. Was man theoretisch machen könnte wäre, dass man all die Links von Krill666 auf das neue Bild verschiebt. Oder man lässt die Artikelschreiber aller Wikipedias selbst wählen welches Bild sie verlinken ;). Das mit dem Hochladen ist komisch. Wenn da aber steht, dass Author needed, hast du einen Author angegeben? - Amada44 talk to me 14:11, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
== Hallo Amada
Danke fuer featured picture - ich glaube es war beim Hochladen vorgeschlagen self und das hatte ich gelassen - ich hatte alles gelassen bis auf Bild Location - ich kann es auf diesem Rechner nicht probieren weil der System Administrator Alles geblockt hat - viele Gruesse Uwe kils (talk) 12:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Categorization
Hi Amada - thanks for the help with the categorization! I've looked at some of the plants you've added to the right category, and it's very strange, the photos are usually not appearing in the category at all. Have you experienced this at all? I can't figure out what could be causing this problem, and if it's just on my end. Thanks for any insight. --RaffiKojian (talk) 13:50, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
- they look fine to me. can you give me an example? Amada44 talk to me 15:15, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
- They seem okay to me too now. Maybe there was a lag? I don't know, but oh well! --RaffiKojian (talk) 17:29, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Amada
Danke fuer featured picture - ich glaube es war beim Hochladen vorgeschlagen self und das hatte ich gelassen - ich hatte alles gelassen bis auf Bild Location - ich kann es auf diesem Rechner nicht probieren weil der System Administrator Alles geblockt hat - viele Gruesse Uwe kils (talk) 12:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- Hallo Uwe! sorry, aber ich verstehe nicht genau was du meinst. Könntest Du das noch mal anders formulieren? LG, Amada44 talk to me 08:34, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Amada44, eine Bitte - kannst Du meine doppelte Verschlimmbesserung geradebiegen? Die Datei soll richtig heißen File:Meditation Sewcz Brunnengalerie.JPG - ohne doppeltes JPG und auch nicht wrong named. LG, --4028mdk09 (talk) 20:04, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- klar. Mach ich aber morgen. Bin grade nur auf dem Mobiltelefon. Amada44 talk to me 22:28, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- Danke. --4028mdk09 (talk) 22:34, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- Ist's so gut? LG, Amada44 talk to me 08:31, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
- Perfekt! :-) Danke schön und frohe Osterfeiertage! --4028mdk09 (talk) 09:19, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
- Ist's so gut? LG, Amada44 talk to me 08:31, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
- Danke. --4028mdk09 (talk) 22:34, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Hast Du eigentlich...
... ein persönliches Interesse daran, mir nachzusteigen und meine Bilder zu vandalieren? So langsam habe ich den Eindruck. Wie ich dir bereits schon einmal schrieb: Laß deine Finger von meinen Bildern und tob deine Willkür anderswo aus. WP und Commons haben mit dem Vorlieb zu nehmen, was ich zur Verfügung stelle, sonst nichts. Ich bin die Urheberin und damit Eigentümerin der Bilder. Wenn ich hier etwas zur Verfügung stelle, ist das keine Enteignung und Aufgabe meiner Rechte, auch wenn das manche Ausbeuter ohne eigene Leistung gerne hätten. --Eva K. is evil 22:22, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Danke! :-) LG, --4028mdk09 (talk) 17:41, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- bitte ;) hoffentlich gefällts dir... Amada44 talk to me 18:33, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- Tut es. --4028mdk09 (talk) 18:37, 9 May 2011 (UTC)