User talk:Aleksander Kaasik
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:19, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope
[edit]
--Motopark (talk) 15:23, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons has a specific topic
[edit]Motopark (talk) 15:23, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kolga laht.Juminda..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puisenina must lammas..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File tagging File:Diplom."narva Sügis 2008".jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Diplom."narva Sügis 2008".jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Diplom."narva Sügis 2008".jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
And also:
Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Kollaaž näitustest.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Motopark (talk) 16:12, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Sotsialistliku võistluse toime.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Aga (d) 16:49, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Väikene Saarjärv, Antsla vallas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haanja küla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Kategooriad
[edit]Commonsis ei kasutata eestikeelseid kategooriaid (sama kehtib ka vene keele kohta). Samuti tuleb piltide kategoriseerimisel piirduda ainult kõige täpsemate võimalikke (olemasolevate) kategooriatega.
Kohati jäävad samuti küsitavaks pildiandmed (nt siin). Kruusamägi (talk) 13:18, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Töötlused
[edit]Kui enda varem üles laaditud faile töötled, siis palun laadi uus versioon üles sama pealkirja alla. Pildi kirjelduslehel alaosas "Faili ajalugu" on selle jaoks link "Laadi üles selle faili uus versioon" (Upload a new version of this file). 84.50.7.230 09:03, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Kustutamiseks esitatud failid
[edit]Kas see foto on samuti sinu isa tehtud?
Küsimusi põhjustab see, et kuna sina ei ole piltide autor ja pole ka päris selge, et kes ikka autor on, siis arvati, et siin võib-olla tegemist autoriõiguste rikkumisega. Seepärast need pildid ka vastavalt märgendati. Kruusamägi (talk) 13:16, 15 February 2015 (UTC) Mina olen pildi autor, sest digitaliseerisin minu enda negativist. Filminegativi autor on Aleksander Kaasi. ehk teisisõnu minu isa (kes samuti Aleksander). Seda esiteks. Ja teiseks,kui keegi kahtleb autorluses, siis peab ta tõestama, kes siis õige autor tema arvates on, mitte aga ajada "soga" autoriõiguste RIKKUMISEST.Enne tuleb ikka endale konkreetselt/faktidega olu selgeks teha, mitte "võib-olla" tasemel raisata autori aega, tõestamaks oma õiguseid, oskuseid ja võimalusi.Kolmandaks olen leidnud, et minu 30-40 aastat tagused fotod on samas "võib-olla" kaalutlustel koguni kadunud.Tundub, et oleks vaja Skype kaudu mõnele selgitada, kuidas, näiteks aastakümneid vana slaid on fotoaparaadiga digitaliseeritud, sealt saadud värske kuupäev jne.Samas aga näen pilte, kus on moonutatud kujundid, mida tuleks Vikipeediast kustutada.Iga looduses esinev vertikaaljoon ja horisontaalsed jooned (kortsnad,majaseinad,katuseharjad, aknad, lipuvardad jne) peaksid Vikipeedias olema samas asendis nagu looduses- tegelikus olus -- siit pinnalt võiks alustada autorsuse küsimust, sest fotograaf on võltsinud/moondanud tegelikkust ja pole oluline kas tahmatult, oskamatusest või mis tahes juhusel. Vikipeedia pilt peaks vastama tegelikuses esinevale objektile, aga seda paraku alati ei märgata:kas tahtlikult, oskamatusest jne.Ei hakka ka selle teemaga-põhjusega enda aega siinkohal raiskama, lihtsalt vahemärkus. Lõpetuseks:Jah, Kehra pilt on samast olust, mis Aegviidu.Tahaksin rõhutada, et ma ei pane kunagi üles vööraid pilte.Pole sellist vajadust, sest ei kirjuta artikleid, milles pole ise osalenud. Sisuliselt kirjutan enda loomingu, reiskirjade ning tähelepanekute ja mõne aastase teadustöö vallas tehtud märkmete põhjal. Olen seni kuskil kakssada pilti üles laadinud. Samavõrd on veel üles panna, et olemasolevatesse teiste kirjutatud artiklitesse lisa panna (äärmisel juhul siis mõne lausega pildi olu selgitamisek).Asi selles, et kui olen siit ilmast lahkunud, on minu CD ja DVD-l olevad sajad pildid kadunud, sellest siis eelistus ainult pildile, küllap kirjutajaid leidub. Ei kavatse loomulikult veel 73 aastaselt, teise ilma kolida, ent igaks juhuks peaks fotoarhiivi kohendama ja talvel on selleks aega. Suvel plaanin Venemaal 6-7 tuhat km autosõitu ning sealt siis uued pildid uuel talvel jne.Tänan hr.Kruusimäed, kes mitmel juhul mulle abi andnud ja mulle andnud loomisrõõmu Vikipeediasse sisenemiseks/sisenemisel nagu viimane suur Eesti looduspiltide laadimine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aleksander Kaasik (talk • contribs)
- Et küsimusi ja kahtlusi ei tekiks, tuleb piltide juurde kirjutada õiged ja selged andmed. Piltide juurde lisatud märkustega on palutud, et andmed parandaksid või et lisaksid puuduvad andmed. Õigete andmete äratoomine on üleslaadija kohustus. Autor autoriõiguse mõistes on pildi tegija, s.t mitte digiteerija. Parandasin Kehra paberivabriku pildi kirjeldust: Special:Diff/149540458/150168181. Kui edaspidi oma isa pilte üles laadid, siis lisa palun sarnane kirjeldus. 84.50.7.230 16:32, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- Ma püüan lasta üle vaadata ka ülejäänud pildid. Vast annab taastada. Kruusamägi (talk) 13:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- Aleksander, palun mõnda kommentaari siia arutellu. Kruusamägi (talk) 12:28, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
File:Moinaki limaani mudaravila 1980.a..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 16:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Sõnastasin pildi allkirjaks Moinaki limaani mudaravila pääsla 1980. a.Lõhutud ja laiali tassitud Ukraina iseseisuvmise aegu. ja samuti teise pildi: Moinaki limaani mudaravila ujumissild 1980.a.Krimm.Ukraina NSV.Lõhutud ja laiali tassitud Ukraina iseseisuvmise aegu. Ent ilmselt olen laadinud uued pildi, sest artiklis https://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevpatorija on pildid praegu olemas ja mida kirjutise juurde lisatuna oluliseks pean, õigemini väga oluliseks, sest seda olu pole enam peaaegu 20 aastat.Esimest korda olin Jevpatorijas 1980 aastal ja viimati siis 2014 suvi.
File:Sissepääs Moinaki limaani mudaravilasse aastal 1980.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 16:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Mõned märkused
[edit]Lisasin su kasutajalehele keeleoskuse tabeli. Siis ehk ei kirjutata sel määral siia inglise keeles kommentaare, kui on kirjas, et seda keelt väga ei oska. Anna palun teada, kui see tabel vajab kohendamist. Tänan, tabel on õige ja samuti ülejäänud kohendamised Aleksander Kaasik Mõned pildi on nüüdseks taastatud (File:A.Kaasiku fotonäituse avamine.jpg, File:Niinsaare puhkekeskus.jpg, File:Brest, 22 september 1939.jpg). Seega eemaldasin siit lehelt nende kohta käivad kustutamismärkused. Moinaki pilte ei kustutata. Kruusamägi (talk) 18:08, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Вид на Псковский Кром с реки Великой, 2014..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A.Savin 15:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Memoriaal Mamaev Kurgan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Themightyquill (talk) 18:07, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Holodomor 1932-1933.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Base (talk) 00:22, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Püha Jüri võitlus lohega.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 18:20, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Krimm.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Krimm.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Krimm.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 46.118.135.162.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 07:50, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:37, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Skulptuur Toris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |