User talk:Albergrin007

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Albergrin007!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

AAGE

Vos crop 1 et 2 de la photo originale

sont erronés : La femme qui se trouve sur la photo originale que vous avez cropée n'est pas Anne-Aymone Giscard d'Estaing mais Hélène Misoffe (cf les Pdd des pages de wiki où elle se trouve. --Albergrin007 (talk) 11:03, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Ok. - Zil (d) 12:47, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Campagne de France

Bonjour Albergrin007.

J'avais fait ces modifications dans deux fichiers.

.

Je m'étais basé sur une source ([1]) qui précisait différentes choses sur le tableau :

• Ney est immédiatement derrière Napoléon, affiche sa maîtrise, « opposant à la mauvaise fortune un courage presque souriant ». L’homme est droit en selle. Le peintre, au cours d’un voyage en chemin de fer, avait rencontré un officier de santé, qui avait appartenu au corps du maréchal Ney à la bataille de Leipzig. Selon ce récit, Ney avait l’habitude de ne jamais enfiler les manches de sa capote. Ce geste servit à animer le portrait.
• À ses côtés, le maréchal Berthier, prince de Wagram. Il est plus enfoncé dans sa selle, déjà « morfondu de froid et de honte ».
• Le troisième est le général comte de Flahaut, aide de camp de Napoléon. Homme jeune, de 29 ans, il était réputé pour sa beauté et son élégance. Le contraste est marqué avec la désinvolture de Ney.
• Derrière Ney se trouve le général Drouot. Celui qui dort de fatigue sur son cheval, homme sans visage, n’est pas un portrait défini : l’inconnu reflète l’état d’esprit général des officiers.
• Le dernier personnage, derrière Flahaut pourrait être le colonel Gourgaud, même s’il n’est pas nommément cité par Meissonier.

J'ai donc l'impression que ta modification est erronée : d'une part, celui qui dort est un "inconnu", et Drouot est derrière Ney (et son visage est proche de Antoine Drouot). D'autre part, en mettant Gourgaud à gauche, on ne suit pas la source qui précise "derrière Flahaut".--Sammyday (talk) 09:15, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour Sammyday

Au temps pour moi, dans "Jean Louis Ernest Meissonier. Ses Souvenirs - Ses Entretiens, précédés d'une étude sur sa vie et son œuvre, par M. O. Gréard. Librairie Hachette et cie - Paris, 1897, Meissonier" précise lui-même que celui qui dort n'est pas un portrait. Par contre l'auteur évoque la présence de Gourgaud dans un commentaire de la peinture en appendice, sans préciser sa place. J'ai pourtant lu quelque part ce que j'ai écrit mais je ne sais plus où ! Je corrige. Dites-moi si cela convient. Par contre bis, sauf erreur, Gourgaud est général et non colonel en 1814.Cordialement. --Albergrin007 (talk) 18:10, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Effectivement, c'est parfait (et merci pour la source). Je fais la modification pour Gourgaud.--Sammyday (talk) 20:22, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Il n'était bien que colonel en 14. Merci. J'avais encore faux.--Albergrin007 (talk) 21:35, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Montage attentats en France 13 novembre 2015.JPG

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Montage attentats en France 13 novembre 2015.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:46, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Montage2-attentats-13-11-15-France.JPG

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Montage2-attentats-13-11-15-France.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:46, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Merci pour avoir ajouté les sources. Cordialement. Thibaut120094 (talk) 04:17, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Blason Villeneuve-de-Berg

Suite à votre discution avec Chatsam j'ai ajouté:

D'après vous, l'intérieur et l'extérieur c'est quoi pour une crosse ? Pour répondre imaginez la crosse seule sur l'écu. Quelle est votre réponse ? D'après ma (très faible) culture en matière de religion, il me semble toutfois que la croose est tenue de la main droite. Donc imaginez le gus qui tient sa crosse... Tournée vers l'intérieur, c'est vers sa tête... c'est dans ce sens qu'elle est dessinée sur votre blason fautif... --Ssire (d) 18:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

C'est "votre" blason qui est fautif, pas "le mien". Pour votre culture personnelle, religieuse et héraldique (difficile de maîtriser l'une sans maîtriser l'autre): Crosse = "Avec la mitre, la crosse est un des premiers insignes pontificaux que l'art héraldique ait adopté comme marque de dignité. Symbole du Bon Pasteur, elle indique la juridiction. Les abbés et tous les prélats inférieurs aux évêques accrochent à la crosse un voile (velum ou panisellus ou sudarium) partant du bouton, car originellement ils n'avaient pas l'usage des gants dans la liturgie pontificale. Ce voile servait à tenir la crosse pour éviter de la toucher avec des mains moites. La crosse est le plus souvent représentée ouverte à dextre. En France, la crosse des évêques était depuis plusieurs siècles tournée vers l'extérieur de l'écu, alors que celle des abbés devrait être tournée vers le milieu, signifiant que leur juridiction ne s'exerce qu'à l'intérieur de leur monastère.(un ; deux ; trois ; quatre ; cinq ; six)...--Albergrin007 (talk) 19:21, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

PS Il est de tradition que l'évêque porte sa crosse de la main gauche et que l'abbé la porte de la maion droite... Ainsi, aucun religieux ne porte sa crosse tournée vers sa tête.--Albergrin007 (talk) 20:40, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Montage attentats en France 13 novembre 2015.JPG

And also:

• File:Montage2-attentats-13-11-15-France.JPG

Yours sincerely, B dash (talk) 13:21, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Livre Renaud Camus Le Grand Remplacement.jpg

File:Livre Renaud Camus Le Grand Remplacement.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Book cover: copyrighted Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:17, 18 March 2019 (UTC)