User talk:Aktron/II. archive
Dotaz
[edit]Nazdar, měl bych takový dotaz. Mám silné podezření na imagevio a nevím, co s tím mám dělat. Jedná se o všechny obrázky od uživatele Cilit, který sem nahrál několik téměř jistě oskenovaných fotek prototypových Karos (jak sám u některých uvádí tak ze Světa motorů nebo z prospektů Karosy). Jsou to všechny jeho nahrané fotky (celkem 7 kusů), u většiny z nich je "No source" nebo něco podobného, takže budou snad brzy smazány. Ale u dvou z nich (Image:C2.jpg a Image:C5.jpg) je vyplněn zdroj i licence. Takže jsem se chtěl zeptat, co s tím. --Harold17 20:14, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- Podle mě to jsou rozhodně imagevia. Autor uveden není, kdyby to mělo být vpořádku, tak by to vypadalo hodně jinak. Prostě bych ty licence odmazal, dal tam nějakou šablonu Nolicence nebo uvědomil správce. --Aktron 20:19, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
OK, hodím žádost o smazání na Commons:Deletion requests --Harold17 21:33, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- Super. --Aktron 21:34, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Budapest metro
[edit]Hi! Sorry for answering very late, but you wrote me in the past about the budapest metro. Yeah, I am the editor of metros.hu portal and that will be translated to english. I don't know yet which pictures could shared in wikipedia from the metros.hu, but I will think of. You can email me to christo3 worm freemail point hu
Christo 3:30, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Nazdar. Právě jsem vytvořil článek o tomto kloubovém autobusu, který byl představen na Autotecu 2006. A protože by se moc hodil obrázek, tak jsem se tě chtěl zeptat, jestli náhodou nějaký nemáš :-) Pár fotek jsi z tohoto ročníku už na Commons hodil ([1]), tak jestli jsi náhodou nevyfotil tento vůz... --Harold17 23:12, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Tak podle slovenského BUSportálu [2] bude NB 18 vystaven i na letošním Autotecu. Letos by tam měl mít premiéru i trolejbus SOR TN 12, takže jestli se u nás v Brně stavíš, tak bych tě poprosil o fotky těchto dvou vozů. Já bohužel nemám peníze a ani čas na Autotec zajít (zkoušky :-(). Díky moc --Harold17 12:45, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Dneska jsem kupoval do Brna lístky :-) Takže bych to neviděl jako problém. --Aktron 16:01, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry about this but commonist is not working and manual uploading has more space for making any error. --Aktron 11:23, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Heading
[edit]Zdravím. Koukám, že se zabýváš podobnou činností jako já - doplňováním souřadnic. Poradil bych ti, abys tam rovnou doplňoval i orientaci (směr foťáku z místa daného souřadnicemi), abys to pak celé nemusel procházet podruhé. Dělá se to parametrem „heading:“ a za dvojtečkou buď anglické zkratky světových stran, nebo azimut ve stupních (ta druhá možnost mi přijde praktičtější, ale nahrubo stačí rozlišovat aspoň těch 4 až 8 až 16 základních světových stran - vždycky je lepší hodit to aspoň baj vočko než nic). Já jsem zhruba od října do března psal souřadnice bez headingu a ještě k tomu jsem občas souřadnicemi místo stanoviště foťáku označoval focený objekt a už se děsím, že to všechno budu muset kontrolovat a opravovat. --ŠJů (talk) 22:30, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Tohohle jsem si všiml už dřív, vím o tom, klidně to doplním, jestli o to jde. Já se chci dostat někam ke 20-40 % osouřadnicovaných fotek což je práce ještě na dlouho, takže jsem se chtěl vyhnout tomu, aby to bylo na tři roky :-) Ale tak samozřejmě lepší pořádně než mizerně ;-) --Aktron (talk) 10:03, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Asi to není akutní samostatně doplňovat, ale pokud už odněkud odečítáš a doplňuješ souřadnice, tak uvedení headingu není skoro žádná práce navíc, zatímco když bys to měl doplňovat zvlášť, tak je to skoro dvojnásob práce. Ale nechci tě do ničeho tlačit, záleží na tobě, čemu dáš přednost. Jen jsem tě chtěl uchránit toho, aby ses za pár týdnů chytal za nos, proč tě to včas nenapadlo :-) --ŠJů (talk) 04:09, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- No k novým to dávat budu, ke starým možná až to bude aktuální. A to bude až budou dány souřadnice, ty jsou důležitější. A ono to rozhodně nebude za pár dní :-) --Aktron (talk) 09:34, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Čeština v názvech
[edit]Ahoj Aktron! Mohl bys, prosím, při tvorbě kategorií v Bratislvě použít anglický anebo slovenský název? Nemyslíš že by bylo divné kdyby někdo dělal kategorie pro Prahu kupříkladu v maďarštině? Ďekuji a přeji Ti hezký den, --Pescan (talk) 14:56, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm, to je vskutku na místě, já jsem si to uvědomil až poté, co jsem ty kategorie založil. Slovenský název mi příjde lepší než ta angličtina, která je dost nevýstižná. Dám si na to pozor, díky za připomínku. --Aktron (talk) 14:57, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Your archives English translations ....
[edit]Hi there, I was rude enough to correct some translations in the descriptions of your archives, particularly I-IV section as the later ones were more accurate. Czech -> Byl sem neslusnej a opravil sem nektere Vase preklady na opisech archivu v anglickem jazyce hlavne v sekci I-IV aby to znelo ponekud lepe. Dalsi sekce sou spravne. Panoha (talk) 00:59, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- Jo určitě, já se čas od času seknu :-) --Aktron (talk) 11:20, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Cyrilice
[edit]Pokud píšeš nějakej text v srbštině, dej tam vždycky cyrilici. Dole si to můžeš přepnout. Pokud cyrilici neznáš, dám ti alespoň tu ruskou:
Velká písmena
[edit]- A – A
- Б - B
- B - V
- Г - G
- Е - JE (Ě)
- Ж - Ž
- З - Z
- И - I
- Й - J
- К - K
- Л - L
- М - M
- Н - N
- O - O
- П - P
- Р - R
- С - S
- T - T
- У - U
- Ф - F
- Х - CH
- Ц - C
- Ч - Č
- Ш - Š
- Щ - ŠČ
- Ъ - tvrdý znak
- Ы - Y
- Ь - měkký znak, v bulharštině Ă
- Э - E
- Ю - JU
- Я - JA
Malá písmena
[edit]- a - a
- б - b
- в - v
- г - g
- д - d
- е - je (ě)
- ж - ž
- з - z
- и - i
- й - j
- к - k
- л - l
- м - m
- н - n
- o - o
- п - p
- p - r
- c - s
- т - t
- у - u
- ф - f
- х - ch
- ц - c
- ч - č
- ш - š
- щ - šč
- ъ - tvrdý znak
- ы - y
- ь - měkký znak, v bulharštině ă
- э - e
- ю - ju
- я - ja
Nabídka, kterou si to můžeš přepnout, je pod tlačítkem Uložit změny. Železnice (talk) 13:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Myslím že u srbštiny/bosenštiny atp. to samozřejmě nezbytnostní není (jako by byla třeba u ruštiny nebo makendonštiny), neboť znaková sada je pro latinku a azbuku stejná. Co se týče psaní azbukou tak s tím problém nemám, píšu a rozumím plynule, mám na to spešl plugin (po stisku F2 se okno orámuje modře a změní se psané znaky). Ale i tak dík za upozornění. --Aktron (talk) 15:28, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Image:Katowice, Plac Wilhelma Szewczyka, autobus Solaris.JPG
[edit]This photo show a bus from the enterprise PKM Jaworzno, not Katowice. User:Skyblue in Polish wikipedia.
- But the photo is taken right in front of the Katowice train station. And I consider the location much more important for the filename. --Aktron (talk) 15:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Kaple v Litovicích
[edit]Mohl bys, prosím, doplnit souřadnice ke kapli v Litovicích? Mate mě totiž, že podle dostupné literatury a plánku se kaple přímo v Litovicích už nezachovaly, ale ta na fotce vypadá velmi zachovale. Že by ji někdo vytáhl ze sklepa? Případně pak doplň číslo kaple do popisku fotky v článku Poutní cesta Hájek-Loreta, pokud bude poloha odpovídat některé z položek seznamu. --ŠJů (talk) 23:12, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- OK, už je to vyřešeno, dohledal jsem literaturu. Ta kaple pochází z doby kolem roku 1815. --ŠJů (talk) 23:56, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Pracuju na souřadnicování všech fotek ale protože nesedím u tohohle každý den 2 hodiny tak mi to jde velmi pomalu. Zatím mám hotovo 16 % fotek, další budu dělat samozřejmě taky. Oblast Hostivic-Litovic klidně udělám teď někdy, abych měl v seznamu odpíchlou další obec/položku a pokročil jsem. Teď ale budu potřebovat zpracovat ty fotky z DOD ČSAD Mělník, které bylo docela zajímavé a také návštěvy TT Laurová - Radlická z dnešního večera. Kromě toho díky za zájem o tu poutní trať, je to podle mě unikání památka a její dokumentace na wiki je nezbytná. --Aktron (talk) 18:01, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Rozlišovače
[edit]- Právě jsem narazil na nějaká nevhodná poojmenování, např. Category:Vepřek (Nová Ves, Mělník district) Takhle tedy rozhodně ne...
- Vepřek i Nové Ouholice jsou jen jedny, rozlišovač tudíž nepotřebují žádný. Natož dvojitý.
- U částí obce rozlišujeme pouze názvem obce, okres nepřipojujeme ani když jde o obce stejnojmenné. Sama kombinace názvu části a názvu obce je jednoznačná.
- U obcí (kde názvem okresu rozlišujeme) používáme formát (Mělník District) s velkým D.
Zkrátka funguje to jako na cs:, akorát to pojmenování je anglické. Podle článku v cs: se tedy dá většinou dobře odhadnout, jak budou znít názvy kategorií na Commons (výjimkou jsou pochopitelně takové případy jako Hovězí či Radnice, které tu oproti cs: žádný rozlišovač nepotřebují, protože se tady s žádným článkem tlouct nebudou apod. :-)) --Miaow Miaow (talk) 01:41, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- Jo díky za upozornění, já občas si 100% jistý nejsem. Název typu Vepřek působí dojmem, že se bude vyskytovat častěji, minimálně v několika okresech. Je možné, že se někde u kategorií seknu, jako třeba teď, ale nepovažoval bych to za nějakej podstatnější problém; do budoucna se samozřejmě těmhle věcem vyhnu. --Aktron (talk) 09:41, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Mohlo by se to stát tradicí
[edit]
- To je skvělé že aspoň něco :-) Já se do Vojníkova tento rok nedostal (to by bylo na delší vyprávění proč ne) a vlastně snad ani v Písku jsem nebyl. Zato jsem viděl i spoustu jiných míst. Je ale fajn že nějaký obrázek takhle je, čím více tím lépe. A já až někdy v budoucnosti ve Vojníkově budu, tak tam něco vyfotím, třeba ten rybník, kapličku... atp. --Aktron (talk) 20:21, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
About the Horse Chesnuts' photos
[edit]Hi, I've read your comment to my vote on your cadidation of Praha, Stodůlky, Velká Ohrada, ořech.jpg and so I went to see your other photos of Horse Chesnuts: the problem of overexposure is quite common on those photos, but some of them aren't affected by this matter, as Praha, Stodůlky, Velká Ohrada, ořechy IV.jpg, which I really like, especially for its combination of lights and shadows. However in this photo the right Horse Chesnut is a little out of focus and the photo is strangely cut on the right. Bye, --sNappy 12:04, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well I had to rely on manual mode much more than on aperture or shutter priority. And also, the picture does look on display a bit different than in computer. Yet such things I could expect and so avoid. Maybe next set of some "cute" photos will be in higher quality. I am really happy for such critics, because next time I know what to do not so I can get better and learn something. This is the very essence of my motivation of working on commons and taking new pictures. --Aktron (talk) 20:23, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Your opinion welcome
[edit]Až budeš mít chvilku čas, mohl by ses prosím podívat na User_talk:Miaow Miaow#Category names – Czech train stations. ŠJů a já se nějak nemůžeme shodnout na návrhu pro jednotný formát názvů kategorií - jeden prosazuje stručnost názvů, druhý jednoduchost schématu. Budeme rádi za každé mínění k věci, které to pomůže rozhodnout. --Miaow Miaow (talk) 12:33, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- Já do toho nechci zasahovat. Diskuze se ŠJů znám moc dobře z časů správcování na Wikipedii, jeho pojetí kategorizace je velmi svojské a nemyslím si, že by se dalo nějak dohodnout. Víceméně nemá ani cenu se snažit nějak unifikovat názvy, když jsme na wiki a za týden nám to stejně nějakej hej počkej typ předělá. --Aktron (talk) 12:58, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Územní příslušnost
[edit]Zdravím. Vím, že máš svůj systém pojmenovávání fotek, a nic proti tomu. Ale pokud už ses rozhodl dávat název čtvrti přímo do názvu fotky, tak by bylo dobré si územní příslušnost vždycky ověřit a nestřílet to od boku. Když si nejsi jistý a nemáš po ruce dobrou mapu nebo se ti nechce (nemáš čas) to ověřovat, tak neověřené údaje aspoň nedávej do názvu fotky, ono je dost problematické jak dodatečné přejmenovávání, tak chybný název fotky. Dnes jsem třeba narazil na kostel Panny Marie Vítězné v Ruzyni místo v Řepích a na Dlabačov a Pohořelec na Břevnově místo na Hradčanech. Hranice čtvrtí jsou vyznačeny například na infomapě na webu Prahy anebo v některých novějších vydáních plánu města z Kartografie Praha. Ale jinak samozřejmě díky za všechny fotky. --ŠJů (talk) 17:34, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- A kromě map elektronických (které jsou díky kamenným technologiím značně pomalé) tu mám samozřejmě i mapy svoje (s hranicema). Já to beru takhle - nahrávám nemalé množství fotek, takže se dostkrát seknu. Snažím se s tím samozřejmě něco dělat aby to bylo dokonalejší ale 100% to nikdy nebude. Když budu pojmenovávat ty obrázky bez MČ tak a) budu mít zmatek v porovnání s ostatníma, protože kvůli některým věcem jako například souřadnicování potřebuju mít systém jednotný, b) přesně se nepozná, odkud ty snímky jsou a název bude dost vágní. Jediný co můžu udělat je kouknout do mapy a snažit se vyvarovat chyb. Samozřejmě, dobrým řešením by byl nějakej tool, kterej by umožnil fotky přejmenovávat ale ten mají k dispozici nejspíš pouze správci a myšlenka, že se vyhoví člověku na požadavek přejmenování v desítkách případů... to dříve bude v pekle sněžit. Já bych to bral radši tak, že ta územní příslušnost je spíše orientační tj. že z toho vyplývá, že kostel v Ruzyni opravdu není ve Štěrboholích. Co si budeme povídat; hranice jsou dělané silně nepřirozeně (když se Liboc táhne skoro až k Vypichu a Stodůlky končí u Hlušičkovy že). Ale nemá cenu tady hodnotit práci úřadů; já to beru tak tedy že prostě námitka je, nadšen z toho nejsi a já pro to něco udělám aby tu nevznikaly dezinformační bludy.
- Na druhou stranu je třeba si uvědomit ale, že nemůžeme brát územní příslušnost smrtelně vážně, to bychom tu skončili v hádkách o kroužek nad u. Přeju pěkný den a příjemnou práci na focení materiálu pro články o tram. tratích - pár jsem viděl a byl jsem mile potěšen. --Aktron (talk) 17:58, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Comment FP Candidate
[edit]"Just a coast, no FP-like features." made in reference to a Featured photo candidate. May I just what exactly are Featured Photo features? I've only recently joined and want to be able to contribute better.
- Well maybe I should write it more exactly. I meant better angles, lighting... more interesting things in the picture, like rocks and so on.. Aktron (talk) 21:50, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:34, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:34, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:34, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:34, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:36, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Tarnów, centrum města, pohled k Rynku.JPG
[edit]If the original is B+W it is no good idea to add colors. As i Wrote on my page I just do Fastfood. So my software which normally make dark parts brighter regard your grey as green. It would interest me if the guess was right or not. --Marku1988 (talk) 11:26, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Well never mind. I am not sure which guess you are talking about - yes, if all 3 channels are opened for editing, then the resulting picture may be shifted a bit. But I think it is quite unusual so that's why I was a bit surprised :-). Someday I will correct this picture so no further misunderstandings like this one will occur. --Aktron (talk) 11:58, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT (talk) 05:36, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Cswiki bus.jpg is uncategorized since 31 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:36, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
