User talk:Țetcu Mircea Rareș
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:39, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Strugureni (18).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Strugureni (14).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Strugureni (7).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (9).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sieu Sfantu (7).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (24).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sieu Sfantu (3).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (25).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sieu Sfantu (2).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Strugureni (13).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (23).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (16).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Strugureni (10).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (2).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (33).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (12).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (4).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (7).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Strugureni.JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (10).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Strugureni (16).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (20).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (32).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sieu Sfantu (6).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (18).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Strugureni (3).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (8).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (36).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Strugureni (8).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (35).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Strugureni (6).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sieu Sfantu.JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (22).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (30).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (15).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (26).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sieu Sfantu (5).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Strugureni (11).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (5).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Strugureni (17).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Strugureni (19).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (3).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (6).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu.JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sieu Sfantu (8).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Strugureni (12).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (21).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (11).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (37).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (13).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (29).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (28).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Strugureni (5).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (27).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Strugureni (9).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sieu Sfantu (4).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (34).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Strugureni (4).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Strugureni (15).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Strugureni (2).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (19).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (31).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (38).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (14).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (17).JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (23).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (8).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (28).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (34).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (22).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (16).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (3).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (27).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (24).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (7).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (18).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (15).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (19).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (14).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (12).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (4).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (32).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (29).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (5).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (21).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (11).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (26).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (9).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (13).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (30).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (35).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (31).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (17).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (6).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (20).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (2).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (25).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (33).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:Biserica de lemn din Sarata (10).JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
- Image:DersidaSJ.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:16, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:DersidaSJ (106).jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:16, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:DersidaSJ (2).jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:16, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:DersidaSJ (108).jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:16, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:DersidaSJ (107).jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:16, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:ChiesdSJ (43).jpg was uncategorized on 6 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:36, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:ChiesdSJ (44).jpg was uncategorized on 6 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:36, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:ChiesdSJ (196).jpg was uncategorized on 8 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:03, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:ChiesdSJ (198).jpg was uncategorized on 8 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:03, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:ChiesdSJ (195).jpg was uncategorized on 8 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:03, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:ChiesdSJ (200).jpg was uncategorized on 8 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:03, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:ChiesdSJ (201).jpg was uncategorized on 8 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:03, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:HarcanaCJ (3).jpg was uncategorized on 9 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:35, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:PruneniCJ2011 (114).jpg was uncategorized on 11 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:11, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:PruneniCJ2011 (112).jpg was uncategorized on 11 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:11, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:PruneniCJ2011 (110).jpg was uncategorized on 11 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:11, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:PruneniCJ2011 (113).jpg was uncategorized on 11 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:11, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:ManastireaBicSJ (107).JPG was uncategorized on 22 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:05, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:ManastireaBicSJ (110).JPG was uncategorized on 22 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:05, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:ManastireaBicSJ (112).JPG was uncategorized on 22 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:05, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:ManastireaBicSJ (109).JPG was uncategorized on 22 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:05, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:ManastireaBicSJ (113).JPG was uncategorized on 22 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:05, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:ManastireaBicSJ (95).JPG was uncategorized on 23 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:09, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:ManastireaIzbucBH (11).JPG was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:ManastireaIzbucBH (47).JPG was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:MureseniiDeCampie.JPG was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:MureseniiDeCampie (2).JPG was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:MureseniiDeCampie (3).JPG was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:ManastireaIzbucBH (55).JPG was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:ManastireaIzbucBH (4).JPG was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:ManastireaIzbucBH (77).JPG was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:MureseniiDeCampie (74).JPG was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:MureseniiDeCampie (115).JPG was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:ManastireaIzbucBH (43).JPG was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:MureseniiDeCampie (85).JPG was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:ManastireaIzbucBH (34).JPG was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:SalisteCJ (84).JPG was uncategorized on 25 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:SalisteCJ (5).JPG was uncategorized on 25 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:BagaciuCJ (57).JPG was uncategorized on 25 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:SalisteCJ (128).JPG was uncategorized on 25 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:SalisteCJ (110).JPG was uncategorized on 25 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:SalisteCJ (2).JPG was uncategorized on 25 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:SalisteCJ (83).JPG was uncategorized on 25 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:MureseniiDeCampie (83).JPG was uncategorized on 25 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:SalisteCJ (111).JPG was uncategorized on 25 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:SalisteCJ (85).JPG was uncategorized on 25 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:BagaciuCJ (55).JPG was uncategorized on 26 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:24, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:BagaciuCJ (58).JPG was uncategorized on 26 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:24, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:BagaciuCJ (59).JPG was uncategorized on 26 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:24, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:BagaciuCJ (56).JPG was uncategorized on 26 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:24, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:BarghisSB (5).JPG was uncategorized on 7 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:BarghisSB (6).JPG was uncategorized on 7 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:ToparceaSB (12).JPG was uncategorized on 7 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:BarghisSB.JPG was uncategorized on 7 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:ToparceaSB (13).JPG was uncategorized on 7 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:ToparceaSB (15).JPG was uncategorized on 7 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:BarghisSB (2).JPG was uncategorized on 7 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:BarghisSB (11).JPG was uncategorized on 7 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:ToparceaSB (9).JPG was uncategorized on 7 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:BarghisSB (9).JPG was uncategorized on 7 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:ToparceaSB (14).JPG was uncategorized on 7 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:BarghisSB (3).JPG was uncategorized on 7 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:MetisSB (11).JPG was uncategorized on 9 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:11, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:MetisSB (8).JPG was uncategorized on 9 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:11, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:MetisSB (13).JPG was uncategorized on 9 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:11, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:MetisSB.JPG was uncategorized on 9 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:11, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:RuscioriSB (27).JPG was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:52, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:RuscioriSB (17).JPG was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:52, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:RuscioriSB (28).JPG was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:52, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:RuscioriSB.JPG was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:52, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:RuscioriSB (18).JPG was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:52, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:RuscioriSB (15).JPG was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:52, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:MohuSB (117).JPG was uncategorized on 4 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:47, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:MohuSB (115).JPG was uncategorized on 4 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:47, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:00, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:21, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:RO CJ Ciurila 24.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:RO CJ Ciurila 24.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Saibo (Δ) 04:58, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
File:RO_CJ_Ciurila_23.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Saibo (Δ) 05:05, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished
[edit]Dear Țetcu Mircea Rareș,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 21:21, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
... and happy holidays! --Codrin.B (talk) 23:33, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
--Codrin.B (talk) 00:14, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Țetcu Mircea Rareș, who has created the painting shown in your image? --Túrelio (talk) 20:03, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- Anonimous popular zographer (peasant), maybe end of the eighteenth century or the beginning of the 19th. It is a collection of old artefacts collected by the priest from the village and shown in a little museum in the old wooden church.
- O.k., thanks. Then we have no problem with the copyright of the artist. --Túrelio (talk) 20:24, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Țetcu Mircea Rareș, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 04:09, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Țetcu Mircea Rareș, who is the painter of this painting and when has it been painted? --Túrelio (talk) 22:21, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
The official painter of the Archbishopry of Cluj at that time (1921), I do not know its name and the photos are made with the approval of the actual bishop in the section of the museum dedicated to former bishops of the Archbishopry of Cluj.
Same question for File:EpiscopNicolaeIvan (5).JPG and File:ArhiepiscopNicolaeColan.JPG. --Túrelio (talk) 22:23, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 22:12, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:AghiresuInteriorCJ (8).JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:AghiresuInteriorCJ (8).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Denniss (talk) 11:30, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 09:26, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
File:HategHD2012 (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
// Gikü said done Tuesday, 15 October 2013 16:43 (UTC) 16:43, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (31).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 07:49, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (34).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 12:33, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 12:36, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (11).JPG
- File:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (12).JPG
- File:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (13).JPG
- File:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (14).JPG
- File:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (15).JPG
- File:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (5).JPG
Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 12:47, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Biserica de lemn din Apatiu (18).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 12:49, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear Țetcu Mircea Rareș, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear Țetcu Mircea Rareș, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
biserica ortodoxa din Padureni,com.Chinteni
[edit]....Poate fi intersanta stirea ? Acest asezamant ortodox,dupa spusele batranilor din sat,in toamna anului 1945 ,o data cu retragerea armatelor germane si urmarirea lor de catre cele rusesti,a fost folosit drept refugiu si adapost de catre cei din urma.Naosul bisericii are cupola din lemn ,pe care au fost aplicate picturi pe panza.In nemernicia lor,ostasii sovietici au tras rafale de arma atat in bolta naosului cat si in iconostas,urmele fiind vizibile si astazi.Prin grija preotului paroh si sprijinul celor de la Arte Plastice din Cluj le-au reconditionat dar,in asa fel incat urmele gloantelor se vad.In sat mai sunt ,dar doar cativa care au trait acele momente.
File:RO AB Barlesti 42.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Amitie 10g (talk) 05:41, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Gelou
[edit]Your comment here or action in connection with your picture would be highly appreciated. Thank you in advance. Borsoka (talk) 01:32, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:RO BN Castelul Wessélenyi din Chiochis (1).jpg
- File:RO BN Castelul Wessélenyi din Chiochis (2).jpg
- File:RO BN Castelul Wessélenyi din Chiochis (3).jpg
Yours sincerely, JCP (a.k.a. John Carlo Pagcaliwagan) 22:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I have fixed the problem.Țetcu Mircea Rareș (talk) 09:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:RO GJ Targu jiu Coloana Infinitului (5).JPG
- File:RO GJ Targu jiu Coloana Infinitului (6).JPG
- File:RO GJ Targu jiu Coloana Infinitului (7).JPG
Yours sincerely, —Andrei S. Talk 08:42, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO GJ Biserica Sfantul Ioan din Cojani (35).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Biserica de lemn Sf.Arhangheli Rogoz (109).JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Biserica de lemn Sf.Arhangheli Rogoz (109).JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Biserica de lemn Sf.Arhangheli Rogoz (109).JPG]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
JuTa 20:37, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
The photo is mine and was moved by a bot in 2009. Because I saw that it was tagged for missing description, I tried to fix the problem. The bot was not mine, but the photo is, and has no copyright problems. All that is of interest can be seen in the history.Țetcu Mircea Rareș (talk) 21:06, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Teatrul Odeon has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Jmabel ! talk 05:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
File:RO AB Biserica Sfintii Arhangheli din Vidra (34).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:54, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit](Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Categorisire redundanta
[edit]Buna ziua! Pozele din categoriile dedicate diferitelor monumente istorice (biserici din judetul Mures, in cazul de fata) nu trebuie sa se regaseasca si in categoria-mama Historical monuments in Romania. Ele se regasesc in subcategoria corespunzatoare. O zi buna!
Robotul de încărcare le-a inclus în categoria respectivă, eu nu am trecut decât categoria specifică.
Wish
[edit]Hello. Help improve for [1]. Thanks you.125.214.50.74 12:32, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.
[edit]
Dear Țetcu Mircea Rareș,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.
To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Files affected:
- File:Aiton - blazonul nobiliar.jpg
- File:Biserica reformata din Stejeris.jpg
- File:Biserica reformata din Feldioara.jpg
- File:Interiorul bisericii reformate din Legii.jpg
- File:Biserica reformata din Rascruci.jpg
- File:Cublesu Somesan - casetele pictate.jpg
- File:Biserica reformata din Viisoara 2019.jpg
- File:Biserica reformata din Dabaca 2019.jpg
- File:Biserica Pogorarea Sfantului Duh din Micesti.jpg
- File:Biserica Inaltarea Domnului din Bedeciu.jpg
- File:Biserica reformata din Nima 2019.jpg
- File:Interiorul bisericii reformate din Capusu Mare.jpg
- File:Bagara - Masa Domnului.jpg
- File:Biserica unitariana din Plaiesti.jpg
- File:Unguras - coronamentul amvonului.jpg
- File:Bustul lui George Cosbuc din Nasaud.jpg
- File:Biserica Sfintii Arhangheli din Feldru.jpg
- File:Biserica evanghelica din Dorolea.jpg
- File:Biserica de lemn din Sarata 2019.jpg
- File:Biserica reformata din Reteag.jpg
- File:Biserica evanghelica din Vermes.jpg
- File:Biserica reformata din Tonciu 2019.jpg
- File:Scoala din Nasaud.jpg
- File:Castelul Rákóczi-Bánffy din Urmenis.jpg
- File:Castelul Lázár Imre din Sarata.jpg
- File:Biserica reformata din Fantanita - amvonul.jpg
- File:Castelul Haller din Matei.jpg
- File:Scoala din Prundu Bargaului.jpg
- File:Turnul bisericii evanghelice din Petris.jpg
- File:Sangeorz - Vila 1.jpg
- File:Biserica reformata din Vita.jpg
- File:Tarpiu - amvonul.jpg
- File:Biserica reformata din Strugureni.jpg
- File:Biserica reformata din satul Sirioara.jpg
- File:Biserica reformata din Sasarm.jpg
- File:Unirea - portalul intrarii.jpg
- File:Biserica evanghelica din Viisoara.jpg
- File:Biserica de lemn greco-catolica din Spermezeu.jpg
- File:Biserica Cuvioasa Paraschiva din Maieru.jpg
- File:Ansamblul bisericii evanghelice din Jelna.jpg
- File:Bustul lui Vasile Nascu din Feldru.jpg
- File:Bozies - Masa Domnului.jpg
- File:Biserica reformata din Delureni.jpg
- File:Castelul Teleki - blazonul.jpg
- File:Biserica reformata din Comlod.jpg
- File:Biserica evanghelica din Monariu.jpg
- File:Biserica evanghelica din Livezile.jpg
- File:Biserica de lemn de la Manastirea Cormaia.jpg
- File:Altarul bisericii evanghelice din Slatinita.jpg
- File:Dipsa - bolta.jpg
Best regards, --Pafsanias (talk) 12:28, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)
[edit]
Dear Țetcu Mircea Rareș,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.
To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 03:21, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Post-thrombotic syndrome
[edit]Hello there. Thank you for uploading the 3 pictures of post-thrombotic syndrome. I am currently working on improving the deep vein thrombosis article on English Wikipedia, and I have added one of these pictures to the Prognosis section:[2] I was curious about one thing because I might add the information to the description of the picture there. Do you know how many days after the DVT this picture was taken? Do you know if, before the picture was taken, the person had only one DVT in that leg or do you know if there were other previous DVTs? And there was no injury to the leg? The discoloration is only due to post-thrombotic syndrome? Thank you for your assistance if you are able to provide it. I wish you the best health attainable! Biosthmors (talk) 15:44, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
@Biosthmors: That is my leg. The photo was taken in 2015, the DVT was in 2003. But the photo was taken after a fall. I fell on the staircase of a Saxon fortified church and that caused a huge hematoma, because the INR ratio was 8, instead of maximum 3 as it should be (I must reckon I was doing the tests sporadically). In 2003 I suffered a DVT out of the blue, a clot of 20 cm, I was more dead than alive. In 2005 I suffered a DVT at the other leg, under treatment with acenocumarol. In 2006 I met my wife, who is a pathologist, she talked to a specialist in Genetics. I made some tests: I have three genetic mutations that cause DVTs, one is the Leyden mutation and there is another one in the gene of protrombine. In 2008 a well known rheumatologist here in Cluj put the diagnosis: Systemic lupus erythematosus, Antiphospholipid syndrome, Vasculitis. This is my right leg, after another incident in the autumn of the same year, 2015. Finally, a young vascular surgeon, saved my leg, but I do not have the tendons. But during the months in which I could not walk and I stayed at home, I suffered a devastating glaucoma and I can barely see something, and only with my left eye. I presume the very high doses of metilprednisolone they gave me over the years caused this. In 2005 I was looking like Van Damme, now I look like Kermit the frog. In the last 18 years I was in hell here on earth: two DVTs, one heart attack, leg ulcers, and now the sight. I only wish I go to bed and never wake up again, because such a life is unbearable.Țetcu Mircea Rareș (talk) 21:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- Dear kind and generous sir, I want to thank you very much for your informative, thoughtful, and helpful reply. I was afraid that the picture was of your leg, as you did, unfortunately, confirm. I have known for several days that I owed you a reply, but I was not sure exactly all that I wanted to say. But I was recently listening to a podcast[3] and at about 16 minutes in the interviewee said something that resonated with me because it reminded me of your message here. (The interviewee is a scholar of religion and was speaking about suffering in terms of her own experience of losing a young son and her husband in different tragedies and in terms of religious tests.) She said, "But this other text talks about suffering not as if it were some kind of wonderful state that can teach you a spiritual lesson. I think that kind of piety is very much overrated. Certainly it would have been for me. But rather, this spoke about the fact that when people suffer, there is a potential in that dreadful complex of experiences of grief to open up to other people in a deeper way, that it can demonstrate our connection with all other people. And for me, that's - that feels accurate. And I'm grateful for that." I have to say that that resonated with me in relation to your reply to me. Perhaps, through your suffering, you have been given the gift of being able to be open to others. I thank you for your openness. That said, I am not happy to hear of the pain and suffering you currently experience. I hope that you can find slightly more meaning and slightly less suffering in your daily life. It is wonderful that you are active with Wikimedia projects, and I count myself as lucky to have had the good fortune of being able to correspond with you. It does sound that you're suffering right now (understandably) with a state of depressed mood, and I hope that the cloud of that can lift slightly. Do you have a counselor, a physician, a therapist, a support group, or anything like this to help you with these feelings of hopelessness? My best wishes to you sir. Thank you again for your kindness and generosity. Biosthmors (talk) 17:12, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:41, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Vlaha 02 retusat.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Vlaha 02 retusat.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Vlaha 02 retusat.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) 07:08, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Vlaha 02 retusat.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Vlaha 02 retusat.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Vlaha 02 retusat.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:07, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Septembrie 2020: A început Wiki Loves Monuments în România!
[edit]Deși trecem prin momente dificile în aceste vremuri imprevizibile generate de pandemia de COVID-19, competiția Wiki Loves Monuments are loc și anul acesta, implicit și în România.
Am fi încântați dacă ați participa și în acest an la documentarea fotografică a patrimoniului nostru cultural construit. Întrucât o carantină nu este programată în România, puteți să ieșiți în continuare să faceți fotografii - luând toate măsurile de siguranță recomandate de autoritățile locale de sănătate. Dacă preferați să evitați ieșirile, cu siguranță aveți fotografii cu monumente înregistrate pe calculator din ultima călătorie! Aceasta este o oportunitate excelentă de a le oferi o a doua viață prin concursului Wiki Loves Monuments. Pe lângă faptul că vor fi vizibile pentru toată lumea, fotografiile dumneavoastră ar putea reprezenta România în competiția internațională. De asemenea ele pot apărea în diverse articole la Wikipedia și pot contribui la conservarea online a patrimoniului cultural și istoric al României.
Pentru detalii și reguli de participare, puteți găsi mai multe informații pe pagina Wiki Loves Monuments România. Dacă aveți fotografii și din alte țări, puteți verifica aici țările participante.
Mulțumim și nu uitați, concursul se desfășoară până pe 30 septembrie! Mult succes vă dorim și să vă bucurați, în condiții de siguranță, de patrimoniul care vă înconjoară!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey
[edit]Dear Țetcu Mircea Rareș,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.
Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:20, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Profil1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
Gikü (talk) 16:24, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
@Gikü: Iar începem cu circul ăsta de trei lulele. Pozele sunt primite direct de la episcop, pentru wikipedia, persoana respectivă este fotograful mitropoliei Clujului, plătit de ei. Mailul i l-am redirecționat și lui Strainu pentru că am avut o problemă tehnică, pot să ți-l redirecționez și ție. Mie mi se fură anual mii de poze, fără a respecta licența și a menționa autorul. Ce face wikipedia? Nimic. De fapt, prost e cine stă pe aici.Țetcu Mircea Rareș (talk) 18:22, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Scuze, Țetcu Mircea Rareș, dar este imperativ să fie respectată politica de licențiere. Deținătorul drepturilor de autor trebuie să trimită un email (COM:OTRS) către Commons, nu Dvs. sau lui Strainu. Gikü (talk) 18:27, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
@Gikü: Nu eu sunt mama scrupulozității. Eu de abia zăresc monitorul, v-am făcut rost de poză, după ce mi-am mâncat o zi întreagă, aveam lucruri mai bune de făcut. Dacă vreți să o păstrați, ai adresa de mail acum, explică-i episcopului cine ești, cât de sucită e wikipedia și cine trebuie să trimită ce și unde pt ca fotografia oficială să rămână. Eu am făcut destul. Ajunge. Să nu vă mirați dacă din tot sinodul aveți imagini la 10%. Episcopii nu trimit mailuri la OTRS, ăsta e un om tânăr, care mă cunoaște, restul nici nu te bagă în seamă.Țetcu Mircea Rareș (talk) 18:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Țetcu_Mircea_Rareș,
- as I have to rely on Google-translation, I need to verify: did said photographer sent a permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org)? --Túrelio (talk) 19:36, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
@Túrelio: The photo was sent by the bishop himself to me, by mail. The photo was taken by the official photographer of the bishopric, paid by them. I am a very ill man and I am sick and tired of wikipedian bureaucracy. My colleague has the bishop’s mail address, if he wants to explain him the situation is his choice. Bishops don’t send mails to OTRS, irrespective of country and religion. Maybe this one is different.Țetcu Mircea Rareș (talk) 20:44, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
@Túrelio: : The photographer sent the permission you requested.Țetcu Mircea Rareș (talk) 18:18, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Biserica Sfântul Nicolae din Vișea (21).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lmane8939 (talk) 00:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Eroare
[edit]Nu-mi dau seama ce cod ați vrut să puneți la File:RO GJ Biserica de lemn din Rugi (2).jpg, dar sigur nu e cel din format. După ce-l corectați, puteți scoate parametrul eroare. Mulțumesc.--Strainu (talk) 22:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Biserica de lemn din Stoieneasa (1).jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Biserica de lemn din Stoieneasa (1).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Biserica de lemn din Stoieneasa (1).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Biserica de lemn din Stoieneasa (6).jpg
- File:Biserica de lemn din Stoieneasa (3).jpg
- File:Biserica de lemn din Stoieneasa (2).jpg
- File:Biserica de lemn din Stoieneasa (4).jpg
- File:Biserica de lemn din Stoieneasa (7).jpg
- File:Biserica de lemn din Stoieneasa (5).jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
File:BustHakimOmarKhayyam (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 16:32, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Cosul de dispersie Baia Mare (3).JPG
- File:Cosul de dispersie Baia Mare (4).JPG
- File:Cosul de dispersie Baia Mare.JPG
Yours sincerely, Ox1997cow (talk) 23:14, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
File:HambaSB (8).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
File:HambaSB (7).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Biserica Nașterea Maicii Domnului, PausaSJ2011 (127).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 18:51, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 19:06, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:RO HR Memorialul Tamási Áron (2).jpg
- File:RO HR Memorialul Tamási Áron (3).jpg
- File:RO HR Memorialul Tamási Áron (4).jpg
- File:RO HR Memorialul Tamási Áron (5).jpg
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
File:ReneJeannel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 10:03, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
File:CatedralaOrtodoxa.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:14, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:52, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Ce reprezinta imaginea?
[edit]E vorba de
File:AltanaSB (7).JPG
Fara o legenda e imposibil de ghicit. Mersi. Arminden (talk) 11:16, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- E poarta de lemn a bisericii fortificate, întărită cu fâșii de metal. Pe vremuri încărcam sute de imagini pe zi (sau pe noapte), e imposibil să faci o descriere individuală. Oricum mi-am făcut viața praf ca un prost, am lucrat aici cât n-am lucrat în viața mea pe bani în locurile de muncă pe care le-am avut. Dacă aș putea da timpul înapoi nu aș mai mișca un deget. Țetcu Mircea Rareș (talk) 11:30, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Sâncraiu versus Nazna
[edit]Buna ziua!
I might have caused some anomalies, and am interested to have your opinion on how to sort it out.
Two years ago I visited a Roman Catholic church near Targu Mures, then I uploaded my pictures in this category: Category:Our Lady church in Nazna My firm belief was that I was in Nazna, hence the category title, even when I am checking administrative maps now, it seems to me that the RC church is located in Nazna (even if historically affiliated with Sâncraiu), although very close indeed to the boundary with Sâncraiu.
But yesterday I accidentally noticed that seven years ago you had already created this category: Category:Roman Catholic church in Sâncraiu de Mureș to which my category is a complete duplicate.
What do you think, how this could be settled? thanks. Pasztilla (talk) 16:12, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- One more, the official town sign indicating the boundary of Sancraiu is right there near the church some 20 meters to the east, it can be checked out Google Streetview. Pasztilla (talk) 16:18, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Attila, from the official point of view, in the monuments lists, the church is in Sâncraiu de Mureș (Marosszentkirály). Here is another confirmation on templomok.org [4]. You can leave things as they are or move the photos to the category I have created. I used your photos in my articles, because I, a Romanian, I had to document thousands of Hungarian churches that did not have photos at Wikipedia. Unfortunately I am an almost dying man, so what you do is a great help, mostly for the Hungarian heritage. Țetcu Mircea Rareș (talk) 17:06, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
File:MiercureaSibiuluiSB2013 (4).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:42, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Bustul lui Cornel Medrea din Miercurea Sibiului.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:42, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
File:BustOvidiu.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
File:IoanCampineanuNr16.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 28 November 2024 (UTC)