User talk:Pasztilla
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Pictures of books
[edit]Hey, pictures such as the one User:Szczepan1990 deleted are not free since the books they are pictures of are copyrighted, as are the book covers. Unlike the English Wikipedia (or some of the other wikipedias) we don't allow fair use on commons. Thanks, Yonatan talk 00:05, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Fabrike bombonish.jpg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Fabrike bombonish.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 91.65.124.174 19:54, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Vonnegut_magyarul.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
-Nard 21:16, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Hungarian_Geological_Inst_11.jpg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Hungarian_Geological_Inst_11.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. -Nard 03:03, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Hungarian
[edit]Hi Pasztilla, Since Hungarians use commas, I instantly assumed that you also use dots. My Hungarian is well..none existent, so I'm sorry if I offended you. Massimo
CFL
[edit]A CFL (compact fluorescent lamp) magyar neve kompakt fluoreszkáló lámpa vagy fluoreszkáló kompakt lámpa
Honnan veszed ezt?? Az OH-ban (és a köznyelvben) nincs ilyen állat. Misibacsi (talk) 14:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT (talk) 06:13, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Zsiráf szőrzete.jpg is uncategorized since 8 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:13, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Pantheon opeion.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Basilica Aemilia 10-2006.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Pantheon by night.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
File tagging File:Oil_field_near_Fier.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Oil_field_near_Fier.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Oil_field_near_Fier.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kam Solusar (talk) 06:39, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Road_to_Tropoja.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Road_to_Tropoja.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Road_to_Tropoja.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kam Solusar (talk) 07:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: Pont és kurziválás
[edit]Ack. Nem félrevezető a családnév (latin fajnév) alak? Próbáltam úgy megfogalmazni, hogy csak akkor legyen ilyen alakban, ha magyarul és latinul is ugyanaz a taxon van. --Tgr (talk) 21:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Az ilyennél mi legyen a ponttal a végén? --Tgr (talk) 12:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Albania_rural_near_Lushnja.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Albania_rural_near_Lushnja.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Albania_rural_near_Lushnja.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Justass (talk) 17:44, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Albán_ipari_épület.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Albán_ipari_épület.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Albán_ipari_épület.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Justass (talk) 17:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Albania rural near Lushnja.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--High Contrast (talk) 09:10, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Hungarian Geological Inst 06.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Hungarian Geological Inst 06.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jarekt (talk) 19:59, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Hungarian Geological Inst 05.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Hungarian Geological Inst 05.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jarekt (talk) 20:01, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Hungarian Geological Inst 09.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Hungarian Geological Inst 09.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jarekt (talk) 20:01, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Hungarian Geological Inst 10.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Hungarian Geological Inst 10.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jarekt (talk) 20:02, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Hungarian Geological Inst 01.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Hungarian Geological Inst 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Denniss (talk) 17:52, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Hungarian Geological Inst 02.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Hungarian Geological Inst 02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Denniss (talk) 17:53, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Hungarian Geological Inst 03.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Hungarian Geological Inst 03.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Denniss (talk) 17:53, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Hungarian Geological Inst 04.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Hungarian Geological Inst 04.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Denniss (talk) 17:55, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Hungarian Geological Inst 07.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Hungarian Geological Inst 07.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Denniss (talk) 17:55, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Hungarian Geological Inst 08.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Hungarian Geological Inst 08.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Denniss (talk) 17:56, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Hungarian Geological Inst 15.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Hungarian Geological Inst 15.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Denniss (talk) 17:56, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments
[edit]Hi Pasztilla
Your latest uploads (Lëkurësi Castle) couuld be great submissions for Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Albania.
Contest runs till Oct' 15th. Just add it to the cat Category:Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Albania and {{Cultural Heritage Albania|X0???}} to the description. The monument ID can be found here: sq:Lista e Monumenteve në Shqipëri (X0897 for Lëkurësi).
Best, --Albinfo (talk) 17:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Great, thank you for the hint! Pasztilla (talk) 18:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Tirana National Art Gallery 2015-09-26 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Halavar (talk) 12:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d4/POTY_barnstar.svg/140px-POTY_barnstar.svg.png)
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.
Dear Pasztilla,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.
Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Elbasan
[edit]Thank you for all the great images from Albania. It's always impressive how you can find nice views even in boring towns.
Regarding the Elbasan Hammam: Sorry, I was confused. Thought it is a different building as this one https://goo.gl/maps/UE2KKP4eUH32 . But checking the images again, it's probably the same hammam. --Albinfo (talk) 08:16, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
@Albinfo: Thanks, maybe it’s because for me there is nothing boring in Albania, I love your country in its entirety. :) This is the exact same building, Hamami i Pazarit, right next to hotel Skampa, just from a very different angle, shot from the top of the Real Scampis hotel across the boulevard. There is one more hammam in Elbasan, in the eastern side of the Kalaja, Hamami i Vjetër, just I haven’t yet uploaded the pictures. Pasztilla (talk) 08:44, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Not my country - I'm also a foreigner in love with Albania. --Albinfo (talk) 08:55, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Ohhh, I see. Pasztilla (talk) 09:00, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Not my country - I'm also a foreigner in love with Albania. --Albinfo (talk) 08:55, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Birthplace of Endre Ady 2017-12 07.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Regasterios (talk) 15:17, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Szia! A tagozott talapzaton a Szt. és a gyermek Jézus. Ez téves? - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 15:19, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Globetrotter19: Szia, igen, az nem a gyermek Jézus, hanem a Nepomukit megdicsőülése pillanatában körülvevő angyalok egyike, épp készül átadni a pálmaágat Jánosnak. A kisded Jézusnak semmi efféle ikonográfiai kapcsolódása nincs Nepomukihoz. Sajnos a muemlekem.hu-n elég furcsa hibákba lehet futni, barokknak titulálják a klasszicistát, már olyat is láttam, hogy Szent Vendelt lejózsefeztek. Pasztilla (talk) 16:07, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- Szomorú dolgok ezek! A kozterkepet is említetted egyszer. Egyébbként én is találtam durva elírásokat. A térképek és a netes források is hemzsegnek az elírásoktól. A wikipédián is ott a Dózsa liget ami már öt éve Baross. Így nehéz jó fájlnevet megadni. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 16:16, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Albania 2005 parliamentary elections map
[edit]Hey there, thank you for creating the map. But i do wonder if you have and willing to share the full dataset results in each district for 2005 Albanian parliamentary election and the district boundaries map? Thank you so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Primuskumus (talk • contribs) 13:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, @Primuskumus: , the dataset comes from the webpage of the Central Election Committee, as far as I remember I might have created an Excel, too, with those data. If you email me, I can share the file with the figures (as long as I find it). The district boundaries can be found at the same webpage. Pasztilla (talk) 16:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Dózsa György út, Budapest átnevezése
[edit]Szia! Segítség kellene átnevezés ügyben! Category:Dózsa György út, Budapest kellene átnvezni mert van a Category:Dózsa György út (Budapest 22) is. A gond az, hogy több kerületet is érint, ráadásul angol/francia cikk is van tehát szétszedve Category:Dózsa György út (Budapest 6) Category:Dózsa György út (Budapest 7) nem lehet összekötni/ill. cikk linket hozzáadni. Ötlet? - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 16:00, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Globetrotter19: , szia, hú, hát így elsőre azt gondolom, hogy szét biztosan nem szedném, mert a Dózsa György út egy entitás, függetlenül attól, hogy több kerületet is érint. Nagyon ördögtől való volna több kerületet is megemlíteni, mittudomén, Category:Dózsa György út (Budapest 6-7-8-13-14), vagy esetleg valamilyen földrajzi megjelölést használni inkább: Category:Dózsa György út (Budapest, Pest) szemben a dél-budai és az óbudai Dózsa György úttal? Pasztilla (talk) 17:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- A Category:Dózsa György út (Budapest, Pest) ill. Category:Dózsa György út (Pest)-re én is gondoltam, de lehet a Category:Dózsa György út (Budapest 6-7-8-13-14) még jobb pontosabb lenne. Nem tudom melyik lenne a jobb wikipédiás cikk címnek... végül is az lenne a jó ha nagyjából hasonló lenne a commonson. Esetleg a Nyelvi kocsmafalon megkérdezzem? Megj. hasonló gond van Lehel utcával is. Van a 22. kerületben és van a 'nagy' Lehel utca ami részben 6. kerületben van nagyrészt pedig a 13. kerületben - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 17:47, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
clean the categories by 2012 The Old Lime Tree of Felsőmocsolád HU.jpg
[edit]Hello Pasztilla, I know this picture was overloaded with categories. But this was intended for the time being, until all images belonging to the ETOY project are uploaded. Until then, at least 1 image should remain in the categories above as an automatic gallery view. After that the pictures will be cleaned from the categories and extra galleries will be created. I hope this is ok for now.--Cookroach (talk) 16:09, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
@Cookroach: That was my mistake that I moved the ETOY Contest specific category links up to the parent category, I should not have done that. The remaining categories (Category:Tree of the Year (Hungary), Category:Felsőmocsolád), however, are best placed in the parent category, irrespective of the contest, in my opinion. Pasztilla (talk) 16:16, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c1/Commons_Autopatrolled.svg/50px-Commons_Autopatrolled.svg.png)
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. rubin16 (talk) 09:59, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Kategóriák
[edit]Szia, csak érdeklődnék, h mi a különbség a Te logikád szerint a November 2021 in Hungary és a November 2021 in Hungary photographs kategóriák között? És ha van ilyen logika, miért nem alkalmazod a budapesti képekre?
A magam részéről én az első típusú kategóriát akkor alkalmaznám, ha az adott kép valamelyest különbözhet egy másik időpontban ugyanott készített fotótól (pl. városkép, vagy jelenet, esemény), a második típusút pedig akkor, ha nem lehet érdemleges különbség a képek között a dátum szerint (pl. múzeumi kiállítási tárgyak, festmények fotói). Úgy tudom különben, hogy a készítés dátuma szerint bot is osztályozza majd a képeket, bizonyos területeken ez már folyik.
Számomra különben nem fontos ez, csak érdekelne a gondolatmeneted. Üdv Szilas (talk) 06:42, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Szilas: szia! Hogy az én logikám mi, az nem különösebben fontos, mert valszeg magánlogika, inkább leírom, hogy alakult, és talán az elmagyarázza. Szóval én is úgy csináltam, mint te (December 2021 in Hungary), de különböző emberek folyton jöttek, és a képeim zömèt tolták át a December 2021 Hungary photographsba. Egy idő után zavart, hogy munkát adok nekik, így kapásból az utóbbiba kezdtem el feltölteni. Meg persze láttam a párhuzamos, más országos kategóriákat. De persze közben gondolkoztam is rajta, és íme a magánlogikám: 1. A 2021 decembere Magyarországon és társai alapvetően szerintem olyan 2021 decemberében jellemző események befogadására lettek létrehozva, mint mondjuk cukrász-világbajnokság, vasúti baleset, Szuperhősmúzeum átsdása stb., tehát amik krónikaszerűen, kifejezetten és csakis 2021 decemberéhez kötődnek. Minden más megy, templomok, ablakkeretek, búzatáblák, Duna fölött szálló hattyúk, amik éppenséggel 2021 decemberében lettek lefényképezve, de ennek nincs krónikaszerű jelentősége, mennek a 2021 decemberében készült fényképek kategóriába. Aztán hogy tènyleg ez-e a logika, annak nem jártam utána, annyira nem volt fontos. 178.48.75.39 06:57, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Én voltam. Pasztilla (talk) 06:58, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ja, Budapest. A budapesti képeimet is a 2021 decemberében Mo.-n készült fotókba teszem, hacsak nincs már 2021 decemberében Budapesten készült fotók kategória, mert akkor oda. Ha utóbbi nincs, akkor pluszban beteszem a 2021 decembere Budapesten kategóriába is (ha van olyan). Pasztilla (talk) 07:04, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Én voltam. Pasztilla (talk) 06:58, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Köszi a válaszodat. Szilas (talk) 15:20, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Albania 2005 parliamentary elections hu.png
[edit]Hey how’s it going I hope you were having a good day or good night in Hungary I was wondering if you would allow me to translate it into English and include it into the 2005 parliamentary elections for Albania? I would not take any credit. If not I understand. 69.14.120.211 01:19, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- You dont even have to ask, feel free! Pasztilla (talk) 05:40, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
1991,1992,2005 Albanian election maps
[edit]Hey Mr. Attila Terbócs I had added your maps to the Albanian elections. However I had to translate in English. But I did in fact put you as the author and included the original Hungarian map as the source. I hope you are ok with that? The maps seemed very Well done so I believed they would help represent the Albanian elections. 69.14.120.211 11:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Sure, no problem at all, happy to see it was useful for someone. Pasztilla (talk) 19:17, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello Attila, I saw your 1992 map in the Albanian elections and wanted to ask what the source of those results is. I have been trying to find them but to no avail. Thank you for these maps! --Vargmali (talk) 10:21, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hello @Vargmali: Sorry, I had read your message, but then forgot about it. If I remember correctly, I was using reports and figures uploaded to the Albanian Election Committee (Komisioni i Zgjedhjeve), but now I cannot find anything on their domain. Pasztilla (talk) 19:23, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hold on, for the distribution of seats, I was using this: The world factbook 1992. Central Intelligence Agency, Washington DC, 2005, p. 3. Pasztilla (talk) 19:27, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot @Pasztilla: , this will be really useful for me and I appreciate it a lot. --Vargmali (talk) 22:12, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hold on, for the distribution of seats, I was using this: The world factbook 1992. Central Intelligence Agency, Washington DC, 2005, p. 3. Pasztilla (talk) 19:27, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Monor, római katolikus templom belső tere 2023 22.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Headlock0225 (talk) 19:37, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
- Dear @Headlock0225: , this is shocking me as in the past three years I have been documenting church interiors, and it seems now that thousands of my pictures can be deleted from the Commons. It has never occurred to me that this might be a problem, and despite the big quantity of pictures I've uploaded, no one has ever approached me with concerns. Also you put me into a hard situation, as with rare exceptions no one is able to say who carved these statues, with the exception of precious works from the 18th century to the mid-19th, typically they got out of workshops specialized for wood-carving, so "author" as such was unknown even say 120 years ago. Pasztilla (talk) 06:05, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- One of the problems of much religious art is that judging its age is difficult from just looking at a picture. So if you were to include a statement of age based on a reasonable assumption in rhe Description or Source that would suffice.. for Hungary and an unknown artist that would have to be pre 1953 to put the work in the Public Domain. Headlock0225 (talk) 20:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- I rather stop doing all this activity, it does not worth the efforts. Obviously the proper action would be to tag all the interior pictures taken in churches of Hungary depicting artworks (altars, baptismal fonts, tabernacles, crucifixes, pulpits, statues etc.) without any age indication, otherwise your action may appear biased: you accidentally target two of the pictures uploaded by me (one of them wasnt even taken inside a church), while ignoring thousands of other pictures raising the exact same concerns. I strongly object deleting my two pictures and leaving the others untouched. Pasztilla (talk) 21:11, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Or i am just deeply disappointed. Pasztilla (talk) 21:43, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- I rather stop doing all this activity, it does not worth the efforts. Obviously the proper action would be to tag all the interior pictures taken in churches of Hungary depicting artworks (altars, baptismal fonts, tabernacles, crucifixes, pulpits, statues etc.) without any age indication, otherwise your action may appear biased: you accidentally target two of the pictures uploaded by me (one of them wasnt even taken inside a church), while ignoring thousands of other pictures raising the exact same concerns. I strongly object deleting my two pictures and leaving the others untouched. Pasztilla (talk) 21:11, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- One of the problems of much religious art is that judging its age is difficult from just looking at a picture. So if you were to include a statement of age based on a reasonable assumption in rhe Description or Source that would suffice.. for Hungary and an unknown artist that would have to be pre 1953 to put the work in the Public Domain. Headlock0225 (talk) 20:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Gyál, római katolikus templom 2023 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |