User:Mizunoryu/III

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

[1]

Uma dúvida

[edit]

Mizu, me tira um dúvida: considerando que há dois adultos e uma criança nesta foto, seria razoável colocar a Category:Children of Brazil? Outra coisa, a autora dessa foto foi bloqueada na wikipedia como sock, mas ela não é sock, só usou meu computador pra postar a foto ja que ela não sabe postar então falei pra vir postar daqui, já que é a autora real do trabalho (embora a máquina fosse a minha). Isso não da problema não né? Abraços! Quintinense (talk) 03:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Agência Câmara

[edit]

Mizunoryu, tendo em vista que vc é o criador da predefinição da Agência Senado, gostaria de sua inestimável ajuda para que seja também feita para a Agência Câmara [2], ao que me parece, atende aos quesitos do Commons.

Poderia avaliar a possibilidade da Secretaria de Imprensa da Presidência da República [3] de também ser incluida?

--Borowskki (talk) 20:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 04:56, 17 February 2010 (UTC)


Pay attention to copyright
File:Picto_infobox_toy.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 19:11, 12 March 2010 (UTC)


File:American_Video_Entertainment_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:21, 17 March 2010 (UTC)


File:DJCTQ - ER.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--GANO (talk) 01:31, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


File:ESRB - K-A.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--GANO (talk) 01:39, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

junius

[edit]

Boa ideia! rsrsrs. Leandro Rocha (talk) 20:32, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Agência Câmara

[edit]

Mizunoryu, reiterando pedido de ajuda para que seja feita para a Agência Câmara, a atribuição já feita por vc para a Agência Senado e Secretaria de Imprensa da Presidência da República. Obrigado.Borowskki (talk) 13:52, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Agência Câmara [4] e Presidência da República [5] (http://www.info.planalto.gov.br/static/inf_fotonormas.htm link direto). Neste último clicando em Fotografias e depois Normas.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Borowskki (talk • contribs) Mizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 (talk) 01:49, 4 May 2010 (UTC) (UTC)

Re: Pedido

[edit]

Olá. Posso, sim. Já estava pensando em fazer isso mesmo. Sobre as do CERO, eu encontrei umas aqui, então não seria mais prático pedir ao criador para colocá-las aqui? Me pouparia trabalho, hehe.
No resto, vejo o que eu posso fazer, só não espere algo muito rápido porque eu não tenho muita experiência nem tempo livre.
Sobre o tamanho, realmente não importa, já que imagens vetoriais são escaláveis, mas a imagem base é bom que tenha alta resolução, pois facilita a criação dos vetores. Abraços. --GANO (talk) 02:00, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Bom, já fiz uma parte, carreguei algumas, mas ainda faltam varias outras pra carregar. Tomara que eles não queiram excluir pra meu trabalho ser todo em vão, hehe. Abraços. --GANO (talk) 07:00, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Tinha uma nó solto e o softwere da wiki é bugado e não exibiu a imagem corretamente, mas já consertei :)
Já tenho os icones de condições, mas estou com medo de eu carregar e eles excluírem. abraços, --GANO (talk) 07:29, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright
File:Second Life logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 09:01, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Mizunoryu!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

REnomeação

[edit]

Japa, tem como renomear um arquivo carregado. Troquei os nomes. MachoCarioca (talk) 05:28, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Mas como é que eu vou colocar um badname num nome que não sai do titulo, japa? Essa aqui[6] está com nome de Rita, mas essa é a Helga, está marcado o artigo onde ela esta, na Wiki-pt, la embaixo. Depois que eu vi o engano e subi a tal Rita, que está como Rita real, veja no meu log de carregamento, é tudo cortado de uma foto maior, com um monte de gente, a legenda da foto raíz é em alemão, me enrolei. MachoCarioca (talk) 18:38, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Dúvida

[edit]

Olá Mizunoryu! Como vai? Gostaria de saber se você sabe qual fonte utilizada no seguinte logo:

Se você souber, me dá um toque? Obrigado! =) --Deivson Prescovia Scherzinger 16:57, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Elsa

[edit]

Japa, dá uma olhada nessa imagem aqui e na licença dela, é dominio publico na italiana [7] Dá pra subir pro Commons? MachoCarioca (talk) 09:07, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Vc faz pra gente? Claro que eu vou me enrolar todo pra fazer e demorar muito mais e ainda ficar ruim haha MachoCarioca (talk) 13:38, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done [8] Valew hehe MachoCarioca (talk) 19:46, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 02:56, 27 May 2010 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Pitaya2.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Pitaya2.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--ZooFari 14:47, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Public Domain Super

[edit]

esse tal Belgrado é encrenqueiro. postei lá na Esplanada, eles tem personagens open source, deixei uns comentários lá na página de um dos admistradores dessa Wiki:[9].Hyju (talk) 03:23, 30 May 2010 (UTC) vê a resposta lá:Commons:Village pump#Open Source Characters.Hyju (talk) 21:21, 30 May 2010 (UTC) veja esse post:[10].Hyju (talk) 21:24, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

This license is not accepted on Commons, please see Commons_talk:Licensing#PD-Italy-film. Also the Italian law does not apply to creative works such as the movies its being used on. It only applies to simple panoramas or natural scenes. I'm afraid the template will have to be deleted. -Nard the Bard 16:13, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Ô Mizu, que lance é essa que esses caras inventaram aqui sobre a predef que vc criou? [11]. Eu tinha carregado mais de 30 imagens e querem deletar tudo!Esses caras criam as regras aqui? MachoCarioca (talk) 17:44, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

E viva o URC e o fair use!! Lidar com nerds ignorantes que se acham o que não são é dose em qualquer lingua, meu camarada! Nenhum deles entende porra nenhuma disso, essa é a pura verdade, é tudo achismo, basta tres 'acharem ' e acabou! Querem mandar mais que o governo e as leis da Italia, são totalmente fora da realidade do mundo. Não dá nenhum tesão! MachoCarioca (talk) 18:21, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

É impressionante o numero de pessoas neste universo que não fazem NADA para ajudar a transmissão de conhecimento, a razão base da existencia dessa josta, só estão aqui pra criar caso sobre coisas que nem dominam. Qual a razão disso, cacete? Por isso que esse Commons ninguém quer mais saber. Esse lugar é uma piada,um garotode 16 anos decide o que o mundo dever ser informado ou não! MachoCarioca (talk) 18:47, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Aquele tal de Nard the Bard que colou sua tag em eliminação foi bloqueado perpetuamente aqui ontem? Olha lá. MachoCarioca (talk) 18:54, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Japa, eu troquei a tag lá na categoria de speedy deletion pra delete enquanto a coisa se discute ali, [12] só que as imagens, individualmente, estao com a tag de speedy, não sei como trocá-las e algumas ja foram deletadas por causa disso, por alguns adms que nao estao a par da discussão, como troca-las? No 'edit' de cada imagem a tal tag de speedy nem aparece, pra poder ser substituida. MachoCarioca (talk) 22:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

È preciso marcar posição, pressiona lá tbém, assim não é um só. Mal não faz. A melda é ter que recarregar tudo de novo. MachoCarioca (talk) 16:12, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Backrollback

[edit]

Hey Mizunoryu, Sorry for the double rollback here, clicked a wrong link. Here's a flower to make it up, have a nice day. –Krinkletalk 16:33, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

PS: While I'm here, is it intentional that the text on this talkpage is all the same size (headings and paragraphs)? If not, add " </font> " before " </div> " on the bottom of this pageKrinkletalk 16:37, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

No problem, that happens. And thanks for the flowers. I love flowers =p

Ah, thanks for the advice too. I'm terrible about web and wiki codes :S Mizunoryu (talk) 16:43, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

RE:

[edit]

Obrigado por me dizer que não está me perseguindo. Os que perseguem geralmente se esquecem de avisar isso. Abraços, Junius (talk) 12:50, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Se o commons permite a utilização de escudos de times em outras wikis, não é possível que proíba a prática só na lusófona. Há escudos de times espalhados por todas as wikis, menos a nossa? Agora quem não tem o que fazer passará a empreender uma caça a escudos? Abraços, Junius (talk) 20:06, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
É necessário ENTENDA VOCÊ que o Commons permite o que queremos porque nós que o fazemos FUNÇÃO. a MINHA volta depende assinatura da. Abraços, Junius (talk) 20:31, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Não, não precisa chamar ninguém. Normalmente a situação piora ainda mais e muito. Muito mesmo! Enquanto ficar no Mvaldeck e você, que é o meu perseguidor-mor, já está de bom tamanho. Abraços, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Junius (talk • contribs) 13:38, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Você sabe muito bem que não ando inserindo informações falsas na wiki-BR tampouco imagens pirateadas. Eu sou jornalista esportivo e é normal que historie e fotografe essas cousas. Os próprios clubes me pedem. Aliás, gostaria de te perguntar como é esse negócio aí que você mencionou e OTRS. Como se faz isso? Abraços, Junius (talk) 14:02, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Você já imaginou ter que enviar email a mais de 50 ou 100 associações dessas, sendo que muitas nem de email dispõem? Claro que essa burrocracia é um tremendo absurdo, sem contar que facilmente eu ou qualquer um poderíamos falsificar essas mensagens ou respostas o que em nada adiantaria o caso. Melhor aprovarmos logo o carregamento de imagens na Wiki-BR. Abraços, Junius (talk) 14:15, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

SVG

[edit]

carreguei uma imagem .svg do open clipart e ela não aparece.Hyju (talk) 01:52, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

a imagem é essa File:Elvish-archer.svg.Hyju (talk) 01:59, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
[13]Hyju (talk) 02:04, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

valeu, tava tentando upar arquivos do tipo "move to commons" e não consegui pelo script e sim baixando e carregando para o commons, só que não sei como colocar no link original que o arquivo está no Commons.Hyju (talk) 02:22, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

quando logos são considerados domínio público podemos carrega-los no Commons certo? na Wiki tem uma predefinição chamada "move to commons" indicar que essas imagens são candidatas ao Commons, há um assistente para isso, mas nunca consegui usar, coloquei alguns logos, só queria saber se tem alguma predefinição que indique que o arquivo foi para o commons.Hyju (talk) 13:18, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Foi algum tradutor que colocaram aqui. Não sei porque está assim. Abraços, Junius (talk) 13:53, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Quanto às imagens eu agradeço pela explicação. Já deu para entender, mas acho perda de tempo esse negócio de ficar perseguindo imagens pela wiki afora. Abraços, Junius (talk) 13:54, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Esse negócio de copyright, violação de imagens é tudo uma balela. Nenhum time de terceira divisão, que mal tem para o seu sustento, irá se preocupar em processar ou ameaçar processar quem lhe divulga gratuitamente. Ainda mais que sabem muito bem, pois não são burros, que a mídia privilegia a divulgação dos grandes em detrimento deles. É simples. E se o commons reage dessa forma, a qual considero retrógrada e imbecil, pouco deveríamos nos importar, pois não somos adeptos dessa política antiquada. Felizes foram aqueles que se insurgiram contra políticas oficiais que hoje consideramos retrógradas e imbecis como a do apartheid, nazismo, fascismo, entre outras tantas. Pureza, meu caro, é uma palavra da qual não gosto. Me lembra pureza étnica. Abraços, Junius (talk) 13:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

RE:Deletion request

[edit]

Olá Mizunoryu. Na minha discussão, você incluiu: "Vc por outro lado está viajando na maionese." Está falando comigo ou com o Junius? Fiquei na dúvida, se meus argumentos estão incorretos ou não, em relação a imagem do Junius que fiz o pedido de exclusão (que foi atendido, o que parece que estou correto). Abraços Mwaldeck msg 14:22, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Pois é, imaginei, mas fiquei na dúvida. Depois li seus comentários na página dele e dele na sua e me inclinei a achar isso mesmo, mas para evitar interpretações equivocadas, decidi perguntar (e não ofende). Também acho isso muito subjetivo, eu, que não entendo nada de imagens, não conseguiria (ok, com muuuuito tempo até consigo) montar esta imagem.
Essa para mim também seria complexa, mas para meu espanto, foi mantida. Tudo bem que são apenas texto e cinco estrelas coloridas. Eu cheguei a pensar nisso também em relação ao logo do Mesquita, mas o logo em si, cheio de bordas quebradas, me pareceu não ser tão simples, como quadrados, triângulos, etc, ou seja, imagens facilmente encontradas no Power Point, por exemplo. Por isso não achei que fosse tão simples assim.
Como disse ao Junis, acho que muitos artigos da Wiki mereciam imagens, mas, infelizmente, elas não estão disponível em licença livre e, portanto, não podem ser carregadas aqui. C'est la vie. Teremos que esperar o "fair use" lá na wp:pt e, enquanto isso. Abraços Mwaldeck msg 14:54, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Eehehe, você tem sempre que dar a sua porradinha, né? Não sei que amizade é essa que você alude minha com Koehne e Dantas (a quem tampouco conheço). OS2Warp foi disparado o melhor administrador da Wiki lusófona. Eu prefiro ele a essa cambada de incompetentes que hoje abundam, no pior sentido do termo. Quanto ao Commons, URC, OTRS, CTC, CUT e outras siglas mais ou menos famosas, eu agradeço pela explicação delas, mas não concordo e acho que o Mvaldeck deveria se ocupar com assuntos mais importantes do que deletar logos de times de segundo ou terceiro escalão. Abraços, Junius (talk) 01:08, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Se mandarem você voar e cagar para cima você fará? Há muito com o que se ocupar e essa questão do que é certo ou errado é muito relativa. Você quebrou o braço uma vez e tirou o gesso. Foi certo ou foi errado? Só o tempo dirá. Pelo visto foi certo, pois percebo que não vem tendo dificuldades em escrever-me. Para o médico seria errada a prática. Aí está. Para alguns foi errada a mordaça que me aplicaram. Para outros, foi correta. Para mim é indiferente porque eu cago e ando para aqueles pedaços de asno e para aqueles que vomitam regras como se fossem normas eclesiásticas. Muito melhor do que isso é trepar, meu filho! O dia que você conhecer a sonhada tataca, não quererá saber de outra cousa. Ainda bem que Deus inventou isso. Abraços, Junius (talk) 03:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

É por isso que eu quero odiar wikipedia e realmente frustra realmente, me ofende e me faz nunca querer nada contribuem cada vez mais.

  • Porque as pessoas odeiam wikipedia? Beacause é tão difícil e menos amigável coisa que nunca para editar e por elitest editores da Wikipédia, que nada são melhores que outros e possui este site. Você não. Uma pessoa que fez uma edição é tão importante como alguém que fez 1.000 edições.
  • As falhas estruturais na wikipedia (não incluindo o de me nos debates de eliminação, a dificuldade techinical como não fazer a história de arquivo específico, claro, não me notificar de mudanças para o meu trabalho, em desordem, etc interfactes usuário criou isso.
  • Em geral, você está completo e implacabilidade e total indiferença ao ser humano por trás do trabalho é o que mantém wikipedia de volta. Abraços, Junius (talk) 20:12, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Eu entendo que não possuem esta imagem. Mas eu não investiu muito tempo e não oww as lágrimas eo suor original que foi para ele. Para excluir todos os que você faz, e subjetivamente, como um ditador, isso tem uma conseqüência humana. Como você se atreve. Sério mesmo. Por que não mostrar a cortesia e notificar o autor e ter uma conversa respeitosa? Acho que este conjunto vai eliminar cerca de realmente ofensivo e elitest. Muito obrigado caras para fazer Wikipédia chupar e bloqueando algo que realmente poderia, contribuiu para o bem comum.

A Wikipédia é a coisa mais frustrante que nunca e eu absoluto ódio algumas destas coisas. Odeio!:

1. Eu gasto cerca de 5 + horas de trabalho em algo como essa imagem e, em seguida, alguém apenas swoops-lo e apaga-lo. O que lhe dá o direito de fazer isso? Esta foi uma peça de trabalho honesto. Ninguém lhe fez o chefe de exclusão. Como você gostaria se eu fui e apagou todos os seus trabalhos. Wikipédia é elitest SO. Eca.

2. I deverão ser notificados de quaisquer alterações e exclusões que são especialmente feitas para o meu trabalho.

3. Estou extremamente chateado que o debate "apagamento" aconteceu e eu não estava envolvido. Esta é a coisa mais attrocious sempre. Como um processo judicial em que o réu e seu advogado não estiver presente. Eu deveria ter sido notificado automaticamente.

4. Seguindo o histórico das alterações e exclusões ao meu trabalho foi tão difícil. Eu poderia visualizar todas as alterações a uma página, mas eu quero ver toda a atividade na minha imagem específica e as mudanças feitas a ele.

Quanto ao mérito do presente debate "apagamento": 1. Esta imagem foi self-made. Não, eu fiz a fotografia não pessoalmente todos esses líderes mundiais. Du.

2. FYI A foto de Obama não é uma versão cortada da imagem flickr. Trata-se de uma imagem diferente. OverlordQ você está errado.

3. Obrigado 211.181.143.3 o arquivo é útil e pode contribuir. Eu penso que pode e, portanto, não há nenhum dano em sua inclusão.

4. O cowboy Obama na minha opinião, não é amador, mas mostra um lado original de Obama e arrancar uma exclusividade americana. portrati Oficial ficaria bem comigo. A coisa wikipedia madura a fazer seria entrar em contato comigo e me pede para alterar ou usar a imagem original para mudar a si mesmo (ou pedir a alterantive. Pub).

5. Imperador Akihito e da Rainha Elizabeth não são diretamente relevantes, mas eles mostram os líderes e personalidades políticas de cada país. Os 2 principais tanto chefe de estado e presidente. Eles seguem e servem como forma de comparação de figuras políticas e rainhas / imperadores como eles se relacionam com o ambiente geopolítico.

6. Obama copyright foto, por que apagar toda a imagem, mudar a imagem. Junius (talk) 20:17, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

"Dorgas", manolo? Mizunoryu (talk) 01:21, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Imagens editadas

[edit]

Você costuma fazer fotomontagens para o Commons? carreguei esses arquivos só que ficaram com baixa resolução:File:Deep Funk 45.jpg e File:Dicionário Marvel.jpgHyju (talk) 13:26, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

OTRS

[edit]

poderia me ajudar a escrever uma OSTR para essa imagem File:Blackmerdaposter2.jpg, demoram muito a aceitar?--Hyju (talk) 13:15, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

se você puder redigir a pergunta sobre esse arquivos de montagens, eu te agradeço, não muito bom em inglês, esses P-icons, qual a origem deles? esses logos podem ser postados como domínio público? [14] [15]?Hyju (talk) 13:43, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

== Pergunta ==

carreguei os seguintes arquivos só que ficaram com baixa resolução:File:Deep Funk 45.jpg e File:Dicionário Marvel.jpg, alguém poderia conserta-los?Hyju (talk) 14:00, 14 June 2010 (UTC) na verdade queria uma versão deles em .svgHyju (talk) 14:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC) obrigado, cara.Hyju (talk) 18:21, 14 June 2010 (UTC

na Wiki anglófona, o usuário Vveasey se diz membro da banda Black Merda, porém está ausente desde 9 de Abril de 2009.Hyju (talk) 18:41, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Resolução

[edit]

o André Koehne (talk · contributions · Statistics) me explicou que era para eu ter salvo em png que não perderia qualidade, upei novas versões.Hyju (talk) 01:06, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Imagem do Governo Americano

[edit]

essa capa:File:US Navy 050428-N-0295M-003 The front cover of a Marvel comic book unveiled at a Pentagon ceremony.jpg rdá em domínio público, será que posso recortar alguns dos personagens e postar como uma imagem solo?Hyju (talk) 02:35, 15 June 2010 (UTC) OKHyju (talk) 14:09, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Rockstar North logo.png

[edit]

As far: File:Rockstar North logo.png I see the point - OK :). As far your second post, the file was considered (in discussion as you see) as, citing: "highly original and complicated logotype" and deleted, so I can't agree with your point. Regards, Sir Lothar (talk) 06:08, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

And please try avoiding statements like this: "the user is clearly trying to prove a POV" ;), because everything I'm doing on Wiki projects are in good faith and wasn't forcing POV in any way. Thanks, Sir Lothar (talk) 06:32, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

[edit]

Moin Mizunoryu, thanks a lot for Youre translation. Tschüß ---Ra Boe- (talk) 17:41, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

[edit]

Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:PSP_Go.jpg --DieBuche (talk) 11:43, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

About your Account name.

[edit]

Although you cannot understand Japanese, you have attached a name like Japanese, but it is not so good.

水龍←When the dragon which was God lay hidden in the lake, in old Japan, it was worshiped by people. You had better change it into this name. But thus it may be good if I like the present name.--軅飛 (talk) 20:21, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Logo e OTRS

[edit]

posso enviar esse logo? It:File:Topolino (libretto) logo.png, o músico da banda que pedi permissãoOTRS já mandou o e-mail, ainda não foi aceito mandei links da wiki en:, há algum problema nisso?Hyju (talk) 02:07, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

quem eu posso perturbar pra consegui? as discussões sobre Raruto estão paradas.Hyju (talk) 03:52, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

o assistente deixou esse aviso:"This image has no verificable good license, and can thus not be uploaded to commons through this tool.", tem vários logos de revista como esse [16] que estava querendo postar aqui.Hyju (talk) 04:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

onde posso reclamar a OTRS? lá Wiki ninguém escreve nada.Hyju (talk) 17:54, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Template:Welcome

[edit]

Uma pequena dúvida: Estou a trabalhar no Template:Welcome/pt. A versão inglesa Template:Welcome/en refere o uso de {{speedy}} para eliminar uma imagem própria (está no penúltimo ponto, ao fundo da página). Isto deveria agora aparecer na versão pt e pt-br ou, dado que não está nas predefinições actuais e não encontro referências a ela na Commons:Propostas para eliminação, não a colocamos? Hamilton Abreu (talk) 05:12, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:38, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

As per the discussion, I've nominated the file for deletion. It may be of interest to you, as you originally uploaded the file. --O (висчвын) 00:21, 31 July 2010 (GMT)

Response: Deletion of PEGI symbols

[edit]

Thank you for informing me of the deletion of the PEGI symbols. I held it obvious that these symbols are ineligible for copyright, but if my judgement was wrong I will accept your opinion. I also saw the comments in the file-deletion-archive. But nevertheless I think that it is most likely in behalf of the Pan European Game Information to have their duty largely published (as Wikipedia would serve for) - containing a complete list of symbols they use to mark Games. Thus - for now - I set the deletion-status from speedy to normal in order to be able to explicitly request the PEGI for permission to redistribute their symbols. In case they give their permit I will re-upload those symbols already deleted leaving a comment explicitly referring to this permission.

Hoping this was a good idea, kind regards, Riders Flame

Update: License of PEGI symbols

[edit]

To inform you: as I told you I wrote to the PEGI and asked for copyright information of the PEGI's symbols. I came in contact with an official of the ISFE, the organisation superior to the PEGI and holder of copyright for those symbols. The ISFE doesn't want those symbols to be free content and thus they cannot be published through Wikimedia Commons, but this official also thinks that it would be useful to have the symbols in the PEGI's Wikipedia articels. So he signed up at Wikipedia and promised to take care of the issue to publish the symbols inside Wikipedia under copyright restrictions.

Thinking this is a good solution for the issue and kind regards from Germany, Riders Flame

URC

[edit]

Dá uma olhada na minha PD. Vc está carregando quase tudo sem especificar ao abrigo de que item da PID está subindo e é obrigatorio isso. Se nós, que corremos atrás de instalar o URC ali por anos, e temos a responsabilidade por isso, não dermos o exemplo, quem vai fazer? Cabe vc, a mim e a outros, nao apenas fazer uma licença impecável como cobrar e vigiar os outros. MachoCarioca (talk) 06:16, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Vou dar uma olhada com calma no que vc me falou, mas a principio é necessario seu voto contra esta imagem aqui [17] que o Mazuco carregou. Esse pirralho está querendo avacalhar a nossa luta de maneira irresponsável, somos nós que temos que cuidar disso. O malandro quer interpretar as regas à sua maneira, colocando 'bandas extintas' como 'pessoas falecidas', rs.

É preciso cortarmos isso pela raíz, para que esses precendentes não se abram, o URC não permite que toda e qualquer coisa seja carregada ali. Ajuda lá a cortar logo essa coisa do Mazuco, a regra é clarissima sobre isso. Isso era para ser ER, pra evitar uma guerra de reversão o outro editor lá passou pra PE, mas era ER. O Mazuco e sua infantilidade não vão atrapalhar a implantação do URC na Wikipedia. Vote lá e mostre que os mais conscientes não são irresponsaveis. Abs MachoCarioca (talk) 19:44, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Tem msg na minha PD. MachoCarioca (talk) 20:53, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Pode pedir ao Fabiano Tatsch pra dar um pulo na minha PD? Ele está carrergando diversas imagens de falecidos sem indicar na licença. MachoCarioca (talk) 21:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Tem um msg sobre logotipos e logomarcas na minha PD :-) MachoCarioca (talk) 23:59, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Te respondi lá. MachoCarioca (talk) 00:19, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

  • Seu dialogo com o Heitor:

Está correto assim? Heitor diz aí! 00h35min de 8 de setembro de 2010 (UTC)

Agora está ótimo. Valeu pela compreensão. Nós que somos a favor do URC temos que dar exemplo aos demais. Abraços. Mizunoryu (discussão) 00h37min de 8 de setembro de 2010 (UTC)


Não, não está, ele justificou a inserção com "Prover informação visual fundamental para descrever o jogo no contexto do artigo"

A imagem é uma maquete das novas torres que serão construidas, no artigo dos atentados de 11 de setembro, não tem nenhum JOGO sendo descrito ali, fala pra ele corrigir. E mais, [18], fez a mesma coisa, está usando copy&paste errado, pra um "jogo". MachoCarioca (talk) 00:46, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Vai acompanhando o que está subindo, todos estao subindo sem o item de permissão. Só o Eric preenche correto. Tem que atacar na subida, assim eles começam a corrigir o que ja fizeram. Não esquece de avisar na PD deles, se não as vezes nem notam. Abs MachoCarioca (talk) 00:46, 8 September 2010 (UTC)



Mizu, estes carregamentos do Roger 360 são ilegais [19] [20] [21][22] e todos os de Limpin Park feitos por ele. A fonte dele é a "wiki-en". A Wikipedia não é fonte de nada. Não consta nenhum copyrgiht nas autorizações e "Prover informação visual fundamental por se tratar da capa da Single", não é justificativa ceita para o URC , mas "Prover informação visual fundamental do produto no contexto do artigo, impossível por outros meios."

Ajuda lá. Abraço. Amanhã tô de volta na Wiki e vou começar a arrasar o terreno destas autorizações. rs MachoCarioca (talk) 20:01, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Esse do Windows tbém [23] ele está fazendo copy&paste da Wiki-en MachoCarioca (talk) 20:18, 8 September 2010 (UTC)


Mizu, as Organizações Globo não permitem a reprodução integral de conteudo de seus veículos impressos ou eletronicos de maneira explicita

"© 1996 - 2010. Todos os direitos reservados a Infoglobo Comunicação e Participações S.A. Este material não pode ser publicado, transmitido por broadcast, reescrito ou redistribuído sem prévia autorização. [24]"

Esta página de jornal[25] não pode ficar ali, pois traz integralmente o texto de O Globo, devendo ser substituida apenas pelo logo, que está aqui [26]. Pode fazer a troca e colocar a capa em ER com a razão? Inclusive acho que nestes artigos o que deve ficar na infobox é o logo e não a capa da revista toda. Abs MachoCarioca (talk) 20:46, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Tem um novo topico na minha PD:

Para os editores que estão controlando carregamento URC

Abracim MachoCarioca (talk) 02:05, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

PS O editor Lucazeppelin reverteu a tag que vc colocou ontem e continua sem justificar o item de permissão da PID [27] Talvez tenha feito isso em mais.

Ô Mizu, de quem é aquela frase na tua PU sobre mim q não tem assinatura. É tua? rsMachoCarioca (talk) 03:55, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Parental_guidance_tag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

69.156.56.201 19:58, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Pique-esconde

[edit]

Vc está por aqui? Vi vc na Wiki, deixei recado na discussão mas vc nao respondeu, achei que estava aqui. Se estiver responde lá, quero ver uma cisa que tem a ver com o Commons. MachoCarioca (talk) 03:40, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Mizu, depois da uma passada na Esplanada do commons em português, deixei uma pergunta la que creio vc pode responder. Leandro Rocha (talk) 12:52, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Obrigado por ver. Duas coisas que eu ia te pedir, 1- não tinha como mover pra wiki.pt sob fair-use não? 2-não tinha como vc vigiar pra mim os artigos de escolas de samba não, pelo o menos as do Grupo Especial do Rio? Pq o usuário:Biantez continua revertendo em discordância do que foi definido no manual do projeto carnaval. Eu acho incrível como o usuário retira conteúdo, inclusive referenciado, dos artigos, e nenhum administrador ve, mas quando se trata de mim a "justiça" deles vem rápida. A proteção a integridade do conteúdo fica sempre em último plano. O Junius por exemplo é um que fica puto quando retiram conteúdo dos artigos de times de futebol de nonagésima divisão semi amadora que ele cria, mas quando é com os artigos criados pelos outros, ele defende o cara. Da uma olhada la por favor, pq sem mim não sobre mais ninguem pra vigiar aquilo. abç! Leandro Rocha (talk) 02:32, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Veja essa tb. Teria como apagar essa tb, que é duplicada dessa? A primeira está com nome errado, pois o nome da empresa não é Viação Estrela. abç! Leandro Rocha (talk) 22:58, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
File:F.._your_war.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

24.53.146.0 19:23, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair-use

[edit]

isso tem possibilidade de ser postado sob fair-use na wiki.pt? Leandro Rocha (talk) 14:04, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Upload/pt-br has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Juniorpetjua (talk) 13:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Upload/pt-br has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Juniorpetjua (talk) 14:07, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Mapa de notas

[edit]

Mizu, tem algum problema com isso? Leandro Rocha (talk) 00:45, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

File:DVD_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FASTILY (TALK) 20:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Opinião

[edit]

Gostaria da sua opinião: mapa do Google ou da Prefeitura?. Leandro Rocha (talk) 13:43, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Ajuda

[edit]

Oi Mizunoryu, precisava da tua ajuda para passar meta:Licensing tutorial/pt para pt-br e criar uma versão pt europeu. Tenho algum receio de mover as coisas e estragar o que existe (não estou familiarizado com aquele processo de traduções). Podia pedir-te o favor de movimentar as coisas por mim? Eu depois altero o Licensing tutorial/pt e peço ao Otourly para criar o ficheiro. Abraço. -- Hamilton Abreu (talk) 14:37, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Oscar_icon.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Trycatch (talk) 17:52, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG)

[edit]
In other languages (translate this)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  italiano  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  日本語  +/−

Please use SVG
Please use SVG
Thank you for uploading some images! Did you know that Wikimedia Commons recommends the SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) format for certain types of images? Scalable Vector Graphics are designed to look appropriate at any scale, and SVG images are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export. If you encountered problems or have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (To avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put raster images into an SVG container as embedded raster.) Thanks, and happy editing!

theMONO 02:40, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:UMD icon.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Fred the Oyster (talk) 09:01, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ice Cream 2 icon.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ice Cream 2 icon.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Lymantria (talk) 10:57, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Namco_Bandai_Games_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cwbm (commons) (talk) 09:37, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Template:Attribution-AgenciaSenadoBr has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Giro720 (talk) 00:59, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Eidos_logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MaxBioHazard (talk) 04:51, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

File:E3_2011_-_Sony_Media_Event_-_PS_VITA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Giro720 (talk) 19:32, 24 September 2011 (UTC)


File:Coffee icon.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 07:15, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:39, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Tikara_&_Keika_sambando.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 11:51, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Toy_Fair_-_Sportacus_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fangusu (talk) 05:13, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Mizu, esta bandeira pode ser usada? Está dentro de minimis? Ou não? Leandro Rocha (talk) 00:51, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Pink.pitaya.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ytoyoda (talk) 05:39, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

File:BBFC 12A.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:59, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

File:BBFC 18.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 20:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Modem icon.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

High Contrast (talk) 17:22, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Modem icon 1.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

High Contrast (talk) 17:22, 18 May 2012 (UTC)


File:BBFC U.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 18:45, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Translation request: Template:Bennylin

[edit]

Hi, Mizunoryu! Would you be interested in adding Portuguese to the user template Template:Bennylin? Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 15:35, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Color icon orange.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

V!v£ l@ Rosière /Murmurer…/ 07:25, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Color icon pink.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

V!v£ l@ Rosière /Murmurer…/ 07:30, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Color icon purple.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

V!v£ l@ Rosière /Murmurer…/ 07:35, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Color icon red.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

V!v£ l@ Rosière /Murmurer…/ 07:46, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Color icon silver.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

V!v£ l@ Rosière /Murmurer…/ 07:47, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Color icon violet.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

V!v£ l@ Rosière /Murmurer…/ 08:03, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Color icon yellow.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

V!v£ l@ Rosière /Murmurer…/ 08:42, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

File:SNK PLAMORE LOGO.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bulwersator (talk) 16:02, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

File:BBFC 12.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:40, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

your applying a Header template in 2008 with an undocumented parameter succeeded

[edit]

You solved a problem in 2008; do you remember how? The Header template is not producing a proper rendering for my essays, mainly in that the first or only shortcut fails to appear on the screen, apparently because I need an undocumented valueless parameter named after an abbreviation of the page title, which implies that I need to add the abbreviated title somewhere else also, and I don't know where that is. This affects my new pages, Commons:Personality rights and Commons:Nonphotographs, video, and inaccuracies. On the other hand, you caused a proper display with Commons:Administrators/De-adminship (see your revision in question), which has the parameter "Lang-DESYSOP" (without quote marks, an equals sign, or a value)), and I've seen a proper display on Commons:Photographs of identifiable people (see the revision with this feature vs. the immediately previous revision)), which has the parameter "Lang-PhotoOfPeople" (likewise without quote marks, an equals sign, or a value), apparently copied from the name of an earlier template without parameters and with only minimal documentation on Commons. I checked the documentation but it says nothing on point. I asked at the template's talk page, at the template doc's talk page, and at the help desk to no avail and of the editor who did it for Commons:Photographs of identifiable people to no avail because that editor is on a wikibreak of indefinite length. Do you know how I should get the proper rendering? Thank you. Nick Levinson (talk) 15:31, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


You may consider to upload the file in ja wikipedia as 屋外美術                                        Yours sincerely, Nightingale (talk) 00:39, 29 May 2013 (UTC)


Commons:Licensing/pt-br has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 13:48, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Tecmo logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ricordisamoa 17:15, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

File:CERO crime.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dcoetzee (talk) 05:29, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

File:CERO drugs.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dcoetzee (talk) 05:32, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

File:CERO violence.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dcoetzee (talk) 05:33, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Dynacom logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

OAlexander (talk) 14:57, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Template:Delete/pt-br has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

179.218.78.65 13:43, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

File:D3 publisher logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 10:04, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rodrigolopes (talk) 21:06, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Maurício de Sousa & Presidente Lula.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnex (talk) 22:32, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Parental-advisory-explicit-lyrics.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

WWB Too (talk) 19:52, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Logo brazil & japan.jpg

[edit]

#invoke:Autotranslate shizhao (talk) 07:39, 5 July 2016 (UTC)