User:A.Savin/Archive/2013/2

Категоризация культурных объектов

Чем плоха и "несовместима" дополнительная категоризация по регионам? --Daryona (talk) 16:54, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

На Викискладе категоризация ОКН России по регионам - по названиям регионов, а не автокодам. Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Russia by region --A.Savin 17:00, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Это ручная категоризация для читателей, а то - автоматическая служебная (скрытая) для разбора новых изображений. Сейчас пойдет большой объем новых фотографий в рамках WLM, по опыту прошлого года они в основном заливаются без категорий вообще. Я, например, могу быстро и качественно разобрать фото по Вологодской области, но отыскивать их среди всех залитых крайне неудобно, хотя в любом фото с указанием ID культурного объекта уже фактически содержится указание на регион. Насколько я знаю, интересующихся "своим" регионом достаточно много, так что такой функционал был бы полезен не только мне. Можно, конечно, и автоматическую-служебную категорию заточить под текстовые названия регионов, но смысл от этого не меняется, хотя потребуются дополнительные усилия по конвертации кодов в названия. --Daryona (talk) 17:14, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Разбивание общей категории, в которую по умолчанию сваливаются все загруженные на WLM-Russia изображения, на 85 (или сколько их там в РФ) регионов, быть может, лично для вас и упростит поиск изображений из вашего региона. Но главным образом оно приведёт к тому, что участникам типа меня, которые категоризуют все файлы, делать это станет практически невозможно, так как несопоставимо проще работать с одной общей категорией, нежели быть вынужденным постоянно следить за более чем 80 штуками. И вообще, я не совсем понимаю, в чём по сути ваша проблема. В настоящий момент все файлы с WLM категоризованы правильно, в прошлом году мы справились в течение месяца после окончания конкурса, а в этом году уже явно, что загружено будет на порядок меньше чем в прошлом. А значит есть все шансы, что если вы оставите всё как есть, то уже к 1 октября общая категория будет пуста. --A.Savin 18:07, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Я не предлагаю убивать общую категорию. Кому удобно - следит за всей кучей, кому удобно - за своим регионом, никто никому не мешает. Казалось бы. Ну да ладно. --Daryona (talk) 18:38, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Ahum, if you just make sure the list on Wikipedia contain the Commonscat template and the uploads have an id, than Commons:Monuments database/Categorization will sort out all your images. Multichill (talk) 21:27, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Paleo Faliro 05 tram at Leoforos Posidonos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 19 Temple of Poseidon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Hills of Hymettus 12 view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Spurzem 13:55, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Paleo Faliro 07 Our Lady Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Rjcastillo 01:14, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 23 Temple of Poseidon Archaeological site.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:56, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Doukissis Plakentias suburban train stop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:22, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 15 Cape Sounion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:31, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Athens 44 View from Lycabettus - Tourkovounia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:38, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Hills of Hymettus 19 Kalogeros.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Jebulon 17:18, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Athens 38 View from Lycabettus - Strefi Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:45, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Zografou 06 StNicholas Chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:07, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Quai Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, Sète 02.jpg

Hi A.Savin, I need help, I want to (re)nominate this file at FPC, that I had withdraw just before its promotion but when I try to create a new nomination I find this page Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Quai Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, Sète 02.jpg. What can I do? -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:24, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2 (source: COM:FPC#Adding_a_new_nomination). --A.Savin 11:31, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

• Спасибо (no, no I don't speak russian) -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:51, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Hills of Hymettus 20 Kalogeros.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good --Christian Ferrer 05:07, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

File:RybnoeDistrict 06-13 Konstantinovo village 05.jpg

Hi A.Savin, you have nominated this file at FPC, it's a very good image but IMO it need sharpening, I've tried on my PC and it's much better, if you have no time, I can do it, just say --Christian Ferrer 19:55, 04 September 2013 (UTC)}}

OK, I'll see what I can do. --A.Savin 20:35, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

 Done --A.Savin 21:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Ano Liosia train station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 18:51, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Piraeus 04 Trinity Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 20:56, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Athens 51 Philopappos Monument backside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 11 Cape Sounion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ca + see note --Christian Ferrer 18:59, 2 September 2013 (UTC)  Done I've cropped it away --A.Savin 19:23, 2 September 2013 (UTC) Support OK --Christian Ferrer 19:35, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 01 View to Makronissos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 17:18, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Вопрос

Здравствуйте! Автор разрешил фото ([1]) выложить. Если у меня есть разрешение, почему удалили это фото? Спасибо! Александр Коновалов (talk) 21:20, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Ваша ссылка не работает. Если есть разрешение - следуйте инструкции на COM:OTRS/ru. --A.Savin 09:07, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Правда, я что-то не понял инструкцию. Кто должен написать письмо? Я? Насчет фото, автор лично прислал мне фото на "ВКонтакте". Как указать ссылку в письме, если ссылка не работает? Александр Коновалов (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Письмо должен написать автор и использовать указанную в инструкции форму. --A.Savin 15:55, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

4 фото

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Vajtek без лицензий и без разрешений на публикацию. По этой фотке я некоторое время назад лично с автором, Алексеем Деминым, переписывался и он разрешение не давал. --ze-dan (talk) 15:00, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Для таких случаев слева от файла есь в тулбоксе кнопка "No permission". Соответствующий шаблон, впрочем, в конкретных четырёх файлах уже проставлен. --A.Savin 15:11, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Athens 37 View from Lycabettus - StNicholas Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 11:23, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 18 Cape Sounion stitch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice colors and details of the cape --Christian Ferrer 11:42, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 28 postbox.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 11:25, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Вклад участника Радион

Добрый день, взгляните, пожалуйста. Участник насканировал гору текстов и иллюстраций из книг. По одному на удаление выносить долго... Sealle (talk) 03:17, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Вынес всё на удаление. Зачем по одному? У вас нет кнопки "Perform batch task" в тулбоксе? --A.Savin 07:24, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

У меня нет. Может, это гаджет?--Ymblanter (talk) 07:39, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Я не помню откуда, но у меня это уже давно. Вот нашёл инструкцию: Help:VisualFileChange.js. --A.Savin 08:03, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Спасибо, мне периодически бывает нужно.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:16, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Ага, спасибо, и я учту. Sealle (talk) 16:30, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:RybnoeDistrict 06-13 Konstantinovo village 05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:RybnoeDistrict 06-13 Konstantinovo village 05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:14, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Удаление моих файлов

Почему вместе с прочим выставлено на удаление 0109MR0684021000E1 DXXX.jpg? Я же дал ссылку на этот файл на сервере NASA, это однозначно общественное достояние. Незнание правил Википедии администратором — это плохо. Радион (talk) 03:47, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Attica 06-13 Athens 32 National Library.jpg

Привет A.Savin, I've tried to edit this file, uploaded my work and immediatly reverted on your version, you can take a look at it in the historic of the file, what do you think of it? Дружественный, -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

There is more noise on the shadows, so no more lightening is needed imo. I'm quite happy with the current version. Thanks anyway --A.Savin 07:43, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Вандал

Коллега, здравствуйте. Разберитесь пожалуйста со вкладом участника Адольф Швиценгауер, да и ним самим тоже. В РуВики я его обессрочил за вандализм. С уважением. --Petrov Victor (talk) 21:26, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

 Сделано файлы удалены, учётка обессрочена. --A.Savin 21:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Konstantin Bazelyuk.jpg

Добрый вечер, взгляните, пожалуйста, на очередное "творчество" участника Siluanov, уже с десяток раз выдававшего себя за автора снимков футболистов. При этом, кстати, почему-то ещё не блокировался. Sealle (talk) 15:02, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OT Berlin 09-13 Linda Zervakis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OT Berlin 09-13 Thomas de Maizière.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img23 View from StAnne Church tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Quality--Lmbuga 19:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img24 Old town.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Quality--Lmbuga 19:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Kifissias Avenue train stop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO --Lmbuga 19:21, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 05 Cape Sounion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 27 Temple of Poseidon Archaeological site.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:35, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Athens 42 View from Lycabettus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:52, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img27 Visitation Order Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:52, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Hills of Hymettus 09 church ruins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:53, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 09 Cape Sounion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice --Rjcastillo 15:53, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img29 View from Palace of Culture and Science.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good --Rjcastillo 15:50, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img13 View from StAnne Church tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very Good --Rjcastillo 15:50, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Undeleting files

Dear A.Savin, could you please undelete these files and add this category to them, as FoP is now allowed in Armenia? Thank you, Chaojoker (talk) 22:11, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, A.Savin :) Here is a few more that I found and would appreciate the same:

• Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Cathedral of Saint Gregory of the Illuminator in Yerevan.jpg
• Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arno Babajanian statue Yerevan.jpg
• Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arno Babajanian Yerevan stat.jpg

Thank you, Chaojoker (talk) 14:04, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

I added them to the undeleted FOP cases. I haven't restored, as each seems to have a duplicate which had been restored earlier (see deletion logs). --A.Savin 16:49, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Ah, cool. Thank you :) Chaojoker (talk) 20:14, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MIBF2013 img 09 Viktoria Tokareva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good, can you remove the purple color in the left eye, is it CA? QI anyway. --Christian Ferrer 19:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC) Not sure what you mean, seems OK to me, I don't think that there is any CA --A.Savin 20:55, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MIBF2013 img 13 view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:44, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 21 Temple of Poseidon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 14:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img09 tram.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice tram. --Florstein 14:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img33 View from Palace of Culture and Science.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:13, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Unfortunately there is no Freedom of Panorama in Belarus for targets whose architects/ designers are still alive or it is less than 50 years since their death. Thus even excellent photos like this which might violate copyright laws, could be deleted from Commons. Kindly note, however, that citation use might still be allowed. In such a case this (these) photo(s) should be - without delay - saved to and used from national wikipedia (as they are likely to be deleted in Commons). BR, --Paju (talk) 23:18, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Monument to the Conquerors of Space

Hey mate, at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Monument to the Conquerors of Space I've raised the question of a possible undeletion date. Any idea of the year of death of the 3 architect? We could add it to the DR, so we can undelete in the appropriate year. Cheers, russavia (talk) 01:06, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:09, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 20 Temple of Poseidon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 18:11, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img03 Palace Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 23:35, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img01 Zwirki i Wigury train stop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:11, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 06 Cape Sounion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 16:24, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img06 skyline.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:47, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img25 Szaniawski Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 14:48, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Hills of Hymettus 10 view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good --Christian Ferrer 11:44, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:17, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img21 View from StAnne Church tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:24, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img36 Gdansk Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 15:01, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OT Berlin 09-13 Ronny of Hertha BSC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Somewhat small DOF, QI though. --Smial 10:49, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your proposal in QI is not editable

Hi, Savin:

I wanted to edit the proposal in QI candidates of the image File:Attica 06-13 Athens 29 Academy of Athens.jpg and it was impossible.

I don't know what happens. The image is QI IMO, but I can't edit.

If you can fix the problem, let me know--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:51, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Really, you cannot edit that section? Try direct link [2], it works by me, otherwise I don't know either. --A.Savin 21:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Now I can. I do not know what happened, sorry--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 22:29, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

The monitor went blank and I could only read something like "link unavailable". I've never experienced anything like--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 22:32, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 SKA train stop 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:06, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 03 Cape Sounion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I think that it's QI, but see the horizon, has it a little bit of barrell distortion?--Lmbuga 17:25, 23 September 2013 (UTC)  Done Hopefully fixed, thanks --A.Savin 19:14, 23 September 2013 (UTC)  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 20:01, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img20 View from StAnne Church tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 17:20, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img30 View from Palace of Culture and Science.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me--Lmbuga 17:20, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Athens 57 View from Philopappos - Parthenon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:51, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OT Berlin 09-13 Sascha Hingst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:48, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OT Berlin 09-13 Thomas Baumann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:53, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rth Schoeneberg 05 view from tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice sharpness. --ArildV 16:36, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 26 Temple of Poseidon Archaeological site.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 23:41, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andrey Bukhlitsky IT 09-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good --Christian Ferrer 18:42, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alexander Karelin RN 09-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:31, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 17 Cape Sounion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 16:37, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MIBF2013 img 04 Igor Prokopenko.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Probably not QI for me: a bit underexposed or dark. I don't like the DOF. Noise--Lmbuga 17:50, 16 September 2013 (UTC) I agree the hair a bit blurred but here it's acceptable IMO  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:57, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MIBF2013 img 06 Andrey Makarevich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 13:44, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MIBF2013 img 10 Sergey Esin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 13:44, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MIBF2013 img 11 Natalia Tochilnikova.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 13:44, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Piraeus 07 Port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:45, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img26 Presidential Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:33, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img14 View from StAnne Church tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The works on the cathedral are a pity for this picture. --Kadellar 18:29, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

File:12Apostles Church B-Schoeneberg 02.jpg

Привет A.Savin, how are you? It's a good picture (maybe better with little bit sharpening), and I want to nominate it at FPC, is it a problem for you or do you want to rework it before? Friendly --Christian Ferrer 07:21, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Christian, glad that you like this picture. However, I'm not very happy with the light and sharpness there (and if I were, I had nominated it myself). --A.Savin 08:25, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Ok maybe, you're right, it's a pity because the centring is very good. --Christian Ferrer 09:45, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img07 Old town.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:05, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Paleo Faliro 09 war cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:49, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img22 View from StAnne Church tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:49, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img35 View from Palace of Culture and Science.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:11, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Athens 17 View from Acropolis Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice view. -- Felix Koenig 14:56, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 14 Temple of Poseidon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:03, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img11 Library.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:14, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img38 Russian church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 14:44, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 12 Cape Sounion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sergei Mironov IF 09-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:03, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Athens 29 Academy of Athens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:Warsaw 07-13 img29 View from Palace of Culture and Science.jpg

Hi A.Savin, congratulation for this photo, it is really very beautiful, one more which comes to enrich my personal collection. --Christian Ferrer 20:26, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks a lot :) Do you see any chance for FP? --A.Savin

According to me, doubtless --Christian Ferrer 21:52, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wittstock 07-13 img01 Goldbeck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:53, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

спасибо

		The Golden Wiki Award
		Для Вашего выдающиеся работы. --Jean11 (talk) 12:50, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks --A.Savin 22:23, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Prignitz 07-13 img11 Plattenburg Burg.jpg

Hi, I've edited this file and tried to kill the CA, take a look please. --Christian Ferrer 22:12, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks --A.Savin 22:23, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Movses Khorenatsi.jpg

You changed the category to Category:Armenian FOP cases/undeleted. Are you sure that this is correct? Looking at the logs, it would appear that there are two different images under that name: the current image and a deleted one. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:24, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Also, I discovered a couple of deletion requests which closed as delete due to lack of FOP in Armenia but which hadn't been undeleted as the deletion requests hadn't been categorised. I've added those to Category:Armenian FOP cases. Maybe you could take a look at them. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:26, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

What's the problem with this image? --A.Savin 21:01, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Logs (Swedish time zone):

• 2013-09-30T13:15:59 23artashes (Diskussion | bidrag) laddade upp "File:Movses Khorenatsi.jpg" (User created page with UploadWizard)
• 2012-07-21T11:06:28 Fastily (Diskussion | bidrag) raderade sidan File:Movses Khorenatsi.jpg (Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Movses Khorenatsi.jpg) (global usage; delinker log)
• 2011-07-18T20:08:32 Beko (Diskussion | bidrag) laddade upp "File:Movses Khorenatsi.jpg" ({{Information |Description ={{en|1=Movses Khorenatsi statue in Yerevan, Armenia.}} {{hy|1=Մովսես Խորենացու արձանը Երևանում, Պետական Համալսարանի շենքի բակում։ Հեղինակը Ա, Պողոսյա)
• 2010-11-26T14:12:12 Martin H. (Diskussion | bidrag) raderade sidan File:Movses Khorenatsi.jpg (Missing essential information: source and/or license) (global usage; delinker log)
• 2010-10-09T15:53:35 PutinVV (Diskussion | bidrag) laddade upp "File:Movses Khorenatsi.jpg" ({{Information |Description={{en|1=Movses Khorenatsi}} {{ru|1=Моисей Хоренский}} |Source={{own}} |Author=PutinVV |Date= |Permission= |other_versions= }} )

This suggests that there are three images under the same file name:

1. Deleted file by PutinVV (talk · contribs) which lacks essential information.
2. Deleted file by Beko (talk · contribs) which was deleted due to lack of FOP and which should be undeleted (unless it additionally has other problems).
3. Current file by 23artashes (talk · contribs) which should remain where it is. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:15, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

 Done restored --A.Savin 21:22, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! --Stefan4 (talk) 21:42, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prignitz 07-13 img15 Demerthin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Carschten 13:35, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 08 Cape Sounion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 11:43, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Athens 55 View from Philopappos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:31, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anton Shkarin IT 09-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:38, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Athens 39 View from Lycabettus - Temple of Zeus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 21:31, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Same bridge?

Is File:Sint-Petersburg trams in 1982 V.jpg the same bridge as in Sint-Petersburg trams in 1982 II? Do you know the location of this one?Smiley.toerist (talk) 09:23, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 22 Temple of Poseidon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 00:39, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Athens 53 Philopappos Monument front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 00:39, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img08 Old town.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 00:39, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, though could do with more contrast. --Mattbuck 10:09, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

QIC page problem

Hello A.Savin, For the problem of QICbot my 6 or 7 nominations from 7th and 8th October are gone. Should I renominate them? --Joydeep _Talk 18:09, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Now I've restored my noms. Is it OK to do? --Joydeep _Talk 18:32, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Joydeep, of course you're free to restore your noms! Basically, it is better to revert the bot straight after its failed run, but as no one (including the bot owner) did it, it's the only way to save own promoted pictures. --A.Savin 18:42, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. I was quite confused what to do. --Joydeep _Talk 18:46, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sergey Anokhin IT 09-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 15:04, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikhail Prokhorov IF 09-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 15:04, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikhail Mamiashvili RN 09-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 15:33, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Athens 31 National Library.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 16:59, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Athens 52 View from Philopappos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:03, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img16 View from StAnne Church tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:46, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img28 Tyszkiewicz Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 11:51, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img02 Rakowiec train stop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:56, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img10 Old town.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:54, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img15 View from StAnne Church tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good view. --Rjcastillo 13:54, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img31 View from Palace of Culture and Science.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:54, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OT Berlin 09-13 Marcel Nguyen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rth Schoeneberg 01 view from tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 12:48, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rth Schoeneberg 03 view from tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:08, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Athens 54 View from Philopappos - Acropolis Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:17, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 10 Cape Sounion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:41, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TF 03 Wuensdorf Buecherstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --P e z i 21:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TF 04 Wuensdorf Buecherstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --P e z i 21:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img37 Plac Wilsona metro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:10, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prignitz 07-13 img03 Schloss Wolfshagen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment CA to correct, see annotations --Carschten 13:35, 4 October 2013 (UTC)  Done, thanks --A.Savin 14:18, 4 October 2013 (UTC)  Support Dach wirkt im Vergleich zwar nun etwas sehr rötlich, aber die Korrektur gelungen. QI. --Carschten 19:13, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Помогите спасти изображение

Доброго времени суток! Помогите пожалуйста мне спасти изображение Валерий Колесник.jpg - Cortm200 16:16, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Если автор Валерий Колесник и это не вы сами, то необходимо получить от автора разрешение на использование фотографии. Получите - скажу, что делать далее. --A.Savin 16:32, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

• А как получить разрешение Валерия Колесника? В каком виде? Он мн устно дал согласие на это фото. Cortm200 16:36, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

  В таком случае пусть г-н Колесник отправит по мылу на permissions-commons@wikimedia.org вот это (заполнив недостающее). --A.Savin 16:44, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

  Валерий Колесник отправил письмо. Что дальше? Cortm200 17:06, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

  В OTRS есть русскоязычные операторы. В ближайшие дни запрос обработают, картинку пометят как подтверждённую и снимут с удаления (а если к тому времени будет уже удалена - восстановят). --A.Savin 17:35, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

• То есть не от меня, не от Валерия Колесника больше ничего не нужно? И как узнать что запрос обработали, где это можно посмотреть? Cortm200 18:16, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

  Просто подождите несколько дней, а если ничего не изменится - спросите у кого-нибудь из русских операторов (напр. Rubin16, Алый Король или др.) --A.Savin 19:04, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

COM:AN/B

In case you haven't noticed, there is a request to block you at COM:AN/B#User:A.Savin. --Stefan4 (talk) 11:37, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Warsaw 07-13 img29 View from Palace of Culture and Science.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Warsaw 07-13 img29 View from Palace of Culture and Science.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 16:48, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

deine Bilder usw.

Ich halte mich zurück, wollte schon einge Male abstimmen, weil mir was gefallen hat. Jetzt auch wieder bei FPC... Es wäre schön, wenn du beim Abgeordnetenhaus Berlin dabei wärst und wir mal drüber reden könnten... --Ralf Roleček 18:32, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

OK --A.Savin 19:07, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Athens 21 View from Acropolis Hill - Agia Apostoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:14, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Athens 50 View from Philopappos - Acropolis Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me.--Jebulon 09:39, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img17 View from StAnne Church tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:44, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img19 View from StAnne Church tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 12:26, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MIBF2013 img 14 view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:19, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MIBF2013 img 08 Viktoria Tokareva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Eyes sharp. Good quality. --XRay 18:33, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MIBF2013 img 07 Vladimir Dolinsky.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 12:10, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Hanfried Lenz.jpg

Regarding the permissions I'm not quite sure how to proceed, since the situation doesn't quite fit a standard pattern. I uploaded that picture 2007 through my account on the behalf of Hanfried Lenz (who was already quite old and not that tech savy). I can testify to that and have the email communication as "proof". However since Hanfried Lenz unfortunately passed away this summer, I cannot ask him to send a new email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. All I can do on my end right now, is confirming that he asked me to upload the picture for him and provide the original email communication.--Kmhkmh (talk) 19:16, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

The copyright status of this picture is very dubious anyway; as Mr. Lenz could not have had himself photographed and I also doubt that he used a selftimer. --A.Savin 19:25, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

No, I assume(d), that somebody (colleague, friend or even a professional photographer who he payed for it, etc.) took it for him (possibly with his camera) but that he owned the copyright of course, which is all what matters for WM. However I did not ask him that explicitly, I just took the picture he emailed me and uploaded it.--Kmhkmh (talk) 19:47, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Athens 41 View from Lycabettus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:35, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Attica 06-13 Sounion 16 Cape Sounion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. You may play a bit with the white balance. --NorbertNagel 16:35, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img18 View from StAnne Church tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:45, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw 07-13 img32 View from Palace of Culture and Science.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be a bit more contrasted imo, but QI. --JLPC 13:34, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prignitz 07-13 img09 Bad Wilsnack Kirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OT Berlin 09-13 Thomas Kausch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:20, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OT Berlin 09-13 Stephan Ziegenhagen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 11:46, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OT Berlin 09-13 Bianca Schmidt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 15:48, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rth Schoeneberg 02 view from tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 16:16, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rth Schoeneberg 07 view from tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:19, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rth Schoeneberg 10 SGW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:06, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wittstock 07-13 img02 Goldbeck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 16:54, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wittstock 07-13 img04 Altstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly unsharp at the left but still OK. --Tuxyso 10:59, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wittstock 07-13 img07 Altstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:53, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wittstock 07-13 img15 Ehrenfriedhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:45, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

User:Flow92

Ich hätte gerne eine konkrete Erklärung warum Sie meinen Account gesperrt haben! Die Begründung wegen der Meldung eines Users der mich ständig beschimpft und Edit-Wars veranstaltet ist jawohl mehr als dürftig!--141.91.136.40 10:18, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

This sockpuppet/vandal is now using this ip to continue his edit wars, introducing countless errors here (and in de.wiki). Thankful for your assistance, mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 22:30, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rth Schoeneberg 04 view from tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:50, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rth Schoeneberg 06 view from tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:03, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rth Schoeneberg 08 flea market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:07, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rth Schoeneberg 09 Library.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:57, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Volokolamskoye Highway

Приветствую! А зачем было объединять категории, они были разделены для разных статей. --kosun (talk) 09:42, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Я только исправил учинённый вами хаос. В старой категории вы оставили половину всех изображений, при этом удалив оттуда все описания и категории. Это что вообще такое? --A.Savin 15:03, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Ну, с описаниями и категориями я, скорее всего, не разобрался, а изображения были поделены для двух разных статей. --kosun (talk) 08:58, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wittstock 07-13 img05 Altstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 18:11, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wittstock 07-13 img09 Altstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:57, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wittstock 07-13 img12 Altstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 18:25, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wittstock 07-13 img14 KathKirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:05, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wittstock 07-13 img17 Alter Bahnhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:53, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prignitz 07-13 img02 Kemnitz FF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:40, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prignitz 07-13 img14 Demerthin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:49, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

File:OB from Moskva River 02.jpg

File:OB from Moskva River 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 10:10, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

User:Flow92

Ich warte noch immer auf eine konkrete Erklärung warum Sie meinen Account gesperrt haben! Dürfte ja wohl nicht so schwierig sein wenn Sie sich so sicher sind!--89.204.139.164 14:22, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Ich habe den Account wegen Sockenpuppen-Missbrauch, Editwars gegen mehrere User, grundloses Leeren von Kategorien gesperrt. Wenn Sie dritte Meinung möchten, bitte {{unblock|Hier den Grund eintragen}} auf Ihre Diskussionsseite. Ich hoffe, weitergeholfen zu haben, Besten Gruß --A.Savin 14:37, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wittstock 07-13 img03 Goldbeck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--ArildV 13:07, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wittstock 07-13 img06 Altstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 12:30, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wittstock 07-13 img16 Ehrenfriedhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 12:30, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prignitz 07-13 img08 Grube Schloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 15:26, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prignitz 07-13 img13 Plattenburg Dorfstr in Kletzke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:41, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prignitz 07-13 img16 Demerthin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:38, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prignitz 07-13 img10 Plattenburg Burg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment In my opinion it's a good image, but the vertical lines of the center are tilted (only the vertical lines of the left seems right). Perhaps a bit too sharpened or a very bit underexposed, but these issues not problem for me. QI for me if you can fix the vertical lines --Lmbuga 16:16, 24 October 2013 (UTC)  Done --A.Savin 08:11, 25 October 2013 (UTC)  Support Good quality IMO--Divesgallaecia2012 20:38, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Frescobaldi

Bonjour A.Savin.

Firts, thanks for all your useful reviews and nice images.

But I don't understand your comment about this picture in QIC page. What kind of "compression artefacts" do you see around letters ? Do you mean the sorts of grey haloes one can see sometimes ? IMO, there is no artefacts, only a careless re-painting in the engraved letters. First, not all letters are affected. Second, there is no other compression artefacts are visible anywhere (like along the frame, for instance). But if there is something other, would you be kind enough to explain me what I don't understand ? Thanks in advance.--Jebulon (talk) 15:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Jebulon, I mean real comnpression artefacts which one can see on sharp edges in low-rate JPG's. I've added a couple of notes, but actually I see artefacts on many of the letters in your photo. Feel free to revert. It might be that some people see it, some not (I had such a case with one of my QI candidates some weeks ago). --A.Savin 17:21, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for quick answer, but I'm sorry, I still don't see anything special !--Jebulon (talk) 17:45, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TF 05 Wuensdorf Buecherstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:25, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TF 06 Wuensdorf Waldstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --NorbertNagel 20:42, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TF 09 Neuhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:25, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikolay Levichev IF 09-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:42, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prignitz 07-13 img01 Kemnitz Kirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:33, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prignitz 07-13 img05 Schloss Wolfshagen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:38, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prignitz 07-13 img07 Grube Kirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:33, 28 October 2013 (UTC)please correct CA in the trees, left and right, thanks.--Jebulon 20:00, 28 October 2013 (UTC)  Done --A.Savin 20:16, 28 October 2013 (UTC)Yes, thank you !--Jebulon 20:58, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prignitz 07-13 img12 Plattenburg Kirche in Kletzke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:33, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TF 01 Zossen Amtsgericht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI. --NorbertNagel 18:37, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TF 07 Wuensdorf Waldstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:12, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TF 08 Wuensdorf Waldstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:14, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TF 10 Neuhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:55, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teltowkanal 01 Schleuse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 14:57, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teltowkanal 03 Stillgelegte Bruecke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice flag ;-) --Smial 14:57, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teltowkanal 06 Griebnitzsee Blick auf Schlosspark Glienicke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though somewhat overexposed (sunny side of the walls). --Smial 14:57, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teltowkanal 07 Wannsee Heilandskirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:01, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wittstock 07-13 img08 Altstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it, but could you correct the perspective please? It's leaning out a bit. Mattbuck 21:22, 28 October 2013 (UTC)  Done --A.Savin 23:06, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Still leaning out on the left, though right side is now correct. Mattbuck 19:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC)  Done but just a few, as I don't think there is significant distortion --A.Savin 11:22, 30 October 2013 (UTC) Well, if you're going to correct the perspective you should get it perfect if possible. Mattbuck 19:08, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prignitz 07-13 img04 Schloss Wolfshagen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Happy Diwali

I wish you a very very happy and prosperous Diwali. --Joydeep _Talk 06:27, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

:)) Thanks Joydeep --A.Savin 09:37, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Warning for repeated vandalism

---

 

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list, you will be blocked from editing Wikimedia Commons.

Blurred Lines 17:53, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

s. User_talk:Blurred_Lines#R.C3.BCcksetzen_von_A._Savins_Edits --Tuxyso (talk) 17:56, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

@A.Savin: Blurred Lines ist noch recht neu, vielleicht wäre es auch nett gewesen eine kurze Info auf seiner Diskussionsseite zu hinterlassen. Ansonsten geht es eigentlich nicht, dich hier des "Vandalismus" zu beschuldigen. Den sehe ich beim besten Willen nicht. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:58, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Müsste nun erledigt sein. --A.Savin 18:07, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teltowkanal 02 Schleuse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:58, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teltowkanal 05 Griebnitzsee Blick auf Schlosspark Glienicke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:27, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teltowkanal 08 Wannsee Pfaueninsel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:22, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leonid E Slutsky RN 09-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Somewhat hard lighting, but acceptable --Smial 08:44, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PM08-13 img01 Kloster Lehnin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 13:13, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PM08-13 img02 Kloster Lehnin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO, the distortion is too much corrected in the left corner below. Could you perhaps consider a crop of the left part and of the foreground, as suggested by annotation ? Anyway, a nice place, a pretty composition, and a very subtle light.--Jebulon 13:31, 2 November 2013 (UTC)  Done good idea I think --A.Savin 20:53, 2 November 2013 (UTC) Thank you. Much better, isn't it ? Happy to support now--Jebulon 00:40, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PM08-13 img06 Kloster Lehnin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 11:24, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PM08-13 img07 Kloster Lehnin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 11:21, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teltowkanal 04 Stillgelegte Bruecke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:08, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Неверное название категории

Вы создали категорию Vladimir Cathedral in Pereslavl. Этот собор не связан со святым князем Владимиром. Он связан с праздником Сретения Владимирской иконы Божией матери. Исторически же в основе этого храма не сретение иконы в Москве, а сретение иконы в Переславле. Владимирская церковь (в честь самой Владимирской иконы Божией матери) и Князь-Владимирская церковь (в честь святого князя Владимира) были в других местах города и с этим собором не связаны.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:45, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img47 Michael Braun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:48, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img58 Joachim Esser.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:11, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img09 Andreas Otto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img34 Frank Jahnke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img31 Marianne Burkert-Eulitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img44 Karlheinz Nolte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PM08-13 img10 Ferch Bonsaigarten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:53, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PM08-13 img12 Treuenbrietzen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 16:06, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PM08-13 img13 Treuenbrietzen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:24, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PM08-13 img15 Treuenbrietzen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:24, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PM08-13 img17 Treuenbrietzen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:55, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PM08-13 img09 Bf Ferch-Lienewitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:14, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img25 Wolfram Priess.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Reflections in the eyes otherwise high quality.--ArildV 15:24, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img27 Stefan Gelbhaar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:09, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img28 Bjoern Eggert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:44, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img17 Clara West.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:11, 3 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment Mrs. West will not be amused to see this photo. I would never present such a boring image of any person here. But as we see it is of good quality. The composition of an image obviously is not important if it comes from certain photographers. -- Spurzem 23:23, 3 November 2013 (UTC)  Question I don't see your point?! Full frontal central composed head shots are quite common and definitly no knock-out criterion for QIC! --Martin Kraft 13:49, 5 November 2013 (UTC) "Photomaton style" is classical in portrait composition and has even been the topic of exhibitions, exemple. --Myrabella 09:57, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PM08-13 img04 Kloster Lehnin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 15:32, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PM08-13 img14 Treuenbrietzen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --NorbertNagel 17:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PM08-13 img18 Treuenbrietzen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:54, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bestensee 08-13 Dorfkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:45, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peitz 08-13 img1 Molkerei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:45, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peitz 08-13 img2 Haus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:22, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maerkisch Buchholz 08-13 Dorfkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:45, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PM08-13 img08 Kloster Lehnin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:43, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PM08-13 img16 Treuenbrietzen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:43, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img01 Guben Altstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:43, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img15 Guben Stadthaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:57, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PM08-13 img03 Kloster Lehnin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:58, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img29 Kirsten Flesch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:24, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img07 Martin Beck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:36, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img07 Gubin (PL).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 16:22, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img08 Gubin (PL).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:51, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img32 Oder River near Gubin (PL).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:19, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img33 Gestowice (PL).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:51, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PM08-13 img19 Treuenbrietzen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 15:26, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peitz 08-13 img3 Restaurant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:12, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Minsk Presidential Palace.jpg

File:Minsk Presidential Palace.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:08, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Zosimova Pustyn 05 Cross.jpg

File:Zosimova Pustyn 05 Cross.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 11:07, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img18 Naturpark Schlaubetal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The lower part is a bit empty, but good quality nonetheless. --Jastrow 13:39, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img23 Naturpark Schlaubetal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:37, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img20 Naturpark Schlaubetal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:37, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img17 Leeskow Dorfkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:37, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img01 Sabine Bangert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:22, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img05 Ajibola Olalowo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:22, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img12 Claudia Haemmerling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:22, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img55 Dirk Stettner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:07, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PM08-13 img11 Ferch Bonsaigarten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, though it feels oddly fuzzy, perhaps it's the trees. --Mattbuck 22:51, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Étang de Vic, Vic-la-Gardiole 01.jpg

Hello A.Savin, you're maybe right with your review of this picture and I want to improve my technique. According to you, what is the problem with this image : the aperture f/7,1 or a focus point too far of me? Or maybe the both problems. Friendly. --Christian Ferrer 07:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Probably it's the focus point --A.Savin 10:47, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Ok and thanks dear friend, see you later --Christian Ferrer 10:54, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Why deleted

Hallo A.Savin, why did you delete my comment? In my opinion your doing is incredible. Would I have better done to decline your photos? -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:16, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Ich antworte mal auf Deutsch. Zum allerletzten Mal bzgl. des Landtagsprojekts, obwohl ich bereits Stellung genommen hatte und übrigens selbstverständlich von jedem der Abgeordneten mehrere Fotos geschossen worden waren, nur hochgeladen wurden nur diejenigen die von ihnen jeweils ausdrücklich freigegeben worden sind, und sei es eben nur ein einziges Foto gewesen. Nun, wenn diese Studioaufnahmen für Sie "no wow" oder mit schlechtem Gesichtsausdruck o.ä. sind, ist das gemäß COM:QIC Richtlinien dennoch kein Grund, diese als QI abzulehnen und wiederholte derartige Aktionen auf QIC stellen eine massive Störung des Projekts dar. Denn bei QIC, anders als bei den "Exzellenten", zählt eben nur die technische Beschaffenheit und keinerlei enzyklopädische Relevanz bzw. auch kein Gesamteindruck. Gleiches gilt für Mattbucks Eisenbahnbilder, die Ihnen nicht gefallen (mir im Übrigen in vielen Fällen auch nicht, nur ist das eben nicht relevant bei den QIC), und solche Äußerungen, die in der Art wiederholt von Ihnen kommen, wo Sie namentlich genannten QIC-Kollegen zweierlei Maß bei den Reviews unterstellen, sind sowieso unter aller Sau und allein dafür müssten Sie eigentlich gesperrt werden. Wie dem auch sei, den PA habe ich ebenfalls entfernt, es steht Ihnen natürlich frei, meine Nominierungen ins CR zu schieben, aber ich rate Ihnen stattdessen, lieber von mir gänzlich fernzubleiben. Sowohl ich wie auch mehrere andere User haben Sie bereits mehrfach auf die QIC Richtlinien hingewiesen und völlig treffend gesagt, dass "langweilige Komposition" etc. kein QI-Kriterim darstellt. Sollten Sie dies auch weiterhin ignorieren und Kandidaturen massenhaft mit solchen Argumenten stören, behalte ich mir Konsequenzen bis hin zu administrativen Maßnahmen vor. Schönen Tag noch --A.Savin 14:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Wenn Argumente fehlen, muss man drohen. Was soll's; ich nehme es zur Kenntnis. Dennoch stelle ich fest, dass in manchen Fallen die unbefriedigende Bildgestaltung Anlass für die Ablehnung eines Fotos ist (zum Beispiel zu enger Zuschnitt oder störender Hintergrund), in vielen Fällen allerdings nicht. Und wenn ich mir die Qualitätsbilder insbesondere von Autos anschaue, kann ich oft bloß sagen: Na ja. Gruß und schönes Wochenende -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 15:12, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Nachtrag: Soeben sehe ich, dass Kollege Christian Ferrer bei File:Brixner_Dom_Innenraum_1.JPG beanstandet: „not the same crop at right and at left“. Darf also tatsächlich der oben erwähnte Gesamteindruck nicht in die Bewertung einfließen? Aktuell gibt es auch einige andere Bilder, bei denen der zu enge Zuschnitt beanstandet wird. – Entschuldigen Sie bitte vielmals, wenn Sie diese Anmerkung wieder als Störung oder „unter aller Sau“ empfinden; ich wollte es einfach noch loswerden. Bitte nichts für ungut und noch mal beste Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Es gibt da bei Commons:Image_guidelines#Quality_and_featured_photographic_images den Punkt Composition, der nichts zu tun haben dürfte mit Gesamteindruck bzw. (Nicht-)Gefallen. Was soll ich aber sonst sagen, wenn Sie meine obige Argumentation gar nicht als solche anerkennen. Wenn Sie Fragen an Christian Ferrer haben, ist hier der falsche Ort dafür; und damit, in der Tat, EOD. --A.Savin 00:42, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img26 Kloster Neuzelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:49, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img28 Kloster Neuzelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:49, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img29 Kloster Neuzelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Jebulon 16:53, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LOS 08-13 img07 Lindenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:34, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img02 Thomas Birk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:13, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img03 Franziska Becker.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:13, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img04 Silke Gebel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:13, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img35 Frank Jahnke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:13, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img03 Guben Altstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 22:42, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PM08-13 img20 Haseloff Kirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the best lighting but OK --Kreuzschnabel 18:03, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Sperre von Dontworry

Hallo A.Savin, ich kann verstehen, dass Dir Dontworrys Herausnahme diverser Kategorien, die er für nicht sinnvoll erachtet, Sorgen bereitet. In Deiner Sperrbegründung schreibst Du, Dontworry sei resistant for discussion. Bei einer oberflächlichen Suche fand ich zunächst nur diese Diskussion. Möglicherweise gibt es da noch mehr, das ich nicht gesehen habe. Aber auf Dontworrys Diskussionsseite sehe ich nichts und mir würde es normalerweise besser erscheinen, zunächst einen klaren administrativen Warnhinweis zu geben, bevor zu Sperren gegriffen wird. Insbesondere stelle ich fest, dass Dontworry noch nicht COM:CFD kennt, d.h. der reguläre Weg, Diskussionen im Kategoriensystem auszutragen, scheint ihm bislang fremd zu sein. Ich habe das jetzt nachgeholt. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 19:24, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Ich weiß ja nicht, inwiefern zusätzliche Ansprachen Sinn gemacht hätten; man schaue mal in sein Sperrlog in Deutscher Wiki. Nun, lasse mich gerne überraschen. Mfg --A.Savin 20:10, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Nunja, auf Commons war sein Sperrlog bislang blütenweiß und wir sollten die Projekte schon getrennt voneinander betrachten. Die Chance einer Ansprache sollten wir meines Erachtens immer geben, wenn dem keine Dringlichkeit gegenübersteht. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 20:19, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Hallo A.Savin, könntest Du bitte aufgrund Dontworrys jüngster Stellungnahme eine Aufhebung der Sperre in Betracht ziehen? In seinem Kommentar sichert Dontworry zu Beginn zu, den Weg über COM:CFD zu suchen, ohne zuvor Tatsachen zu schaffen. Er weist auch darauf hin, dass er nach der Diskussion keine umstrittenen Kategorien-Edits mehr durchgeführt habe. Im einzelnen habe ich das noch nicht nachvollzogen, da ich momentan tagsüber wenig Zeit dafür habe. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 12:42, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Lt. Beitragsliste hatte er Löschvandalismus in Kategorien nach der Diskussion bei Mauruszat betrieben. Hier z.B. [3] jeden Bezug zu Deutschland grundlos entfernt, hier zu Österreich [4]. Hier [5] keine Einsicht, sondern Admin-Bashing und "ego-shooter". Ich verstehe nicht, warum ich die Sperre aufheben soll. Mfg --A.Savin 12:52, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img02 Guben Altstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I would really appreciate, if the branches on the left side could be cropped, together with the only half visible windows of the non-listed house. it would really give a boost to the composition of your photo. --Cccefalon 17:59, 16 November 2013 (UTC)  Done --A.Savin 18:42, 16 November 2013 (UTC)  Support A Savin-QI, no doubts! --Cccefalon 19:12, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img04 Guben Altstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:58, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img05 Guben Altstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:40, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img16 Guben Altstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:58, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img11 Gubin (PL).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:00, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img06 Guben Altstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments At that small distance, perspective correction makes the house look rather odd to me, as if it grew wider towards the top. PC is not to be done for the sake of itself but for make buildings look straight (which it doesn’t do here). Have you got a non-corrected version uploaded? --Kreuzschnabel 18:32, 15 November 2013 (UTC) No perspective correction, but perhaps some WA distortion --A.Savin 21:04, 15 November 2013 (UTC) New file uploaded: feel free to revert. --JLPC 10:08, 16 November 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 20:28, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Stadtbahnbilder

Hallo, danke für die Aufklärung. Von mir aus können sie alle ruhig online bleiben, nur bitte in meinem Account. Hätte ich zumindest Arbeit gespart. ;-)

Viele Grüße, -- Mikosch (talk) 22:32, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Hallo, was heißt in deinem Account? Wenn das heißen soll, dass sie unbedingt in deiner technischen Uploadliste erscheinen sollen, dann musst du die schon selbst hochladen. Dann nützt das Wiederherstellen auch nichts. --A.Savin 22:52, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Ja, das meinte ich. Aber OK, danke für die Info.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LOS 08-13 img01 Beeskow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:53, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LOS 08-13 img08 Glienicke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:53, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigs Wusterhausen 08-13 Schloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:41, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img06 Ole Kreins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:34, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img14 Nicole Ludwig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:06, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img15 Oliver Hoefinghoff.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:24, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LOS 08-13 img04 Beeskow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:13, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img19 Naturpark Schlaubetal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:06, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img24 Naturpark Schlaubetal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good composition. --Hockei 17:07, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img21 Naturpark Schlaubetal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:49, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img12 Gubin (PL).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:23, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img13 Gubin (PL).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:05, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img14 Gubin (PL).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:23, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img31 Chlebowo near Gubin (PL).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img09 Gubin (PL).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The pole bothers but the composition is intrigueing --Moroder 22:58, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Loupian, Hérault 01.jpg

Hello Alexander, I've tried a focus point more close to me and also a biggest aperture (f/10). I think you will be agree with me that it's better than on this file. The sharpper area is maybe a bit less sharp but the general quality is much better. --Christian Ferrer 18:59, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigs Wusterhausen 08-13 Amtsgericht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:34, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LOS 08-13 img09 Storkow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:34, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LOS 08-13 img10 Storkow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:06, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LOS 08-13 img11 Storkow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice compo. The tiny leftovers of CA in the branches are IMO neglectable. --Cccefalon 17:03, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Vertical view Colosseum Rome Italy.jpg

Hi A.Savin,

You declined the QI candidate above because of pixellisation in the sky, due to a too strong Jpeg compression. You are not very lenient in this case, but indeed, you are right. Do you think, or do you know, if any solution exists ? Actually blue skies are a real nightmare to me. They look very good in processing, good in jpg on my screen (Mac 27 inches), and (very) bad when uploaded on "Commons"... Thanks in advance for answer and help, I really wish to improve this.--Jebulon (talk) 15:24, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

I would guess: JPEG compression (after export) or color profile. 2 Megabytes for a 14 Mpx image is quite small. Which quality is set in Lightroom export dialogue? I use values between 92 and 95. --Tuxyso (talk) 15:31, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

I can only descripe what I do myself. I use Lightroom 3 (formerly Canon DPP, today just as an exception) and Photoshop CS6. After the development in LR, I save the file as TIF. Sometimes only as jpg, but then at 100% quality. After the edit in PS, I save it as jpg preferably with quality level of 12 (= maximum) or 11, sometimes 10 (I try to see that the final file size is not far above 5-6 MB). Also, one has to use the shadow-lightening tool of Photoshop rather sparely. With this, I never have visibly pixelated sky. I hope to have helped. --A.Savin 15:53, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, you two !--Jebulon (talk) 20:30, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Attica 06-13 Athens 50 View from Philopappos - Acropolis Hill.jpg

Hi, I really like your Acropolis image and guess, it didn't succeed on FPC just because of dull light and colours. I couldn't resist to retouch and upload an alternative version:

• 
  Attica 06-13 Athens 50 View from Philopappos - Acropolis Hill.jpg

• File:Attica 06-13 Athens 50 View from Philopappos - Acropolis Hill - Retouch.jpg
  Attica 06-13 Athens 50 View from Philopappos - Acropolis Hill - Retouch.jpg

What do you think? -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 22:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Norbert Nagel, I like your version, many thanks! Please let me know if it's OK to upload it over the mine (two different files = unnecessary). --A.Savin 22:20, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

OK for me. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 22:35, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear A.Savin/Archive/2013, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img16 Susanna Kahlefeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:16, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img19 Katrin Moeller.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:16, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img20 Gerwald Claus-Brunner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:16, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img30 Walowice near Gubin (PL).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:16, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LOS 08-13 img02 Beeskow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:43, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LOS 08-13 img03 Beeskow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you try to reduce the magenta CA in the branches at the upper left corner? --Cccefalon 17:40, 24 November 2013 (UTC) Of course, sorry  Done --A.Savin 18:16, 24 November 2013 (UTC) Much better.  Support --Cccefalon 18:30, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LOS 08-13 img05 Beeskow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wonderful. --Cccefalon 17:22, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LOS 08-13 img06 Beeskow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:37, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img13 Heidi Kosche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:43, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederlausitz 08-13 img10 Gubin (PL).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Isn't it boring? Can you work on the perspective? --Moroder 21:16, 23 November 2013 (UTC) For a looking-down shot the perspective is OK imo, some distortions are unavoidable but not dramatic; "boring" is subjective and no QI criterion. --A.Savin 21:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC) **That's why I gave only a comment, hopefully allowed ;-) *  Support Perspective correction should not end in itself. It is more than acceptable here. Boring? Mhhh, I think there is still a compositional idea behind. QI for me. --Cccefalon 10:45, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Rievaulx Abbey MMB 32.jpg

I have significantly brightened the low levels of this image - I'd appreciate it if you'd take another look. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:14, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Nenndorf 08-13 img01 StGodehardi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --NorbertNagel 22:26, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Nenndorf 08-13 img02 StGodehardi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:27, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Nenndorf 08-13 img04 Haus Hannover.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:27, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woltersdorf tram in Rahnsdorf 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A nice photo. Was it on purpose that the color of the tram matches the color of the station sign? --Tuxyso 13:45, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img22 Carsten Schatz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img33 Philipp Magalski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:29, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img39 Antje Kapek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:41, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Achenkirch - Urlaub 2013 - Wegkreuze 010.jpg

Hallo,

vielen Dank für den Kommentar bezgülich meines Bildes bei den Kandidaten für Quality Images. Nun habe ich die Frage, was genau Kriterien für "blown sky" sind. Denn das (ablehnende) Argument kommt öfter und so ganz verstehe ich noch nicht, worauf ich dabei achten muss, wenn ich eine Ablehnung aus diesem Grund vermeiden will. Kann man da ggf. mit Lightroom etwas ändern?

Beste Grüße --Mummelgrummel (talk) 08:32, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Eine gute Kamera zeigt überbelichtete Bereiche direkt nach der Aufnahme an bzw. beim Anschauen der Bilder auf ihrem Display. Weiterhin kann man sich in Lightroom, Photoshop und ähnlichen Programmen das Histogramm und die fehlbelichteten Bereiche anzeigen lassen. Eine so großflächigen Überbelichtung lässt sich im Nachhinein meist nicht korrigieren. Mfg --A.Savin 10:32, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Damit ich das recht verstehe: Es handelt sich hierbei (beim Himmel etc.) also um einen speziellen Fall von Überbelichtung? Da hätte ich tatsächlich eine ganz andere Vermutung gehabt. Werde mal ins Histogramm schauen. Vielen Dank noch mal. --Mummelgrummel (talk) 12:04, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Da habe ich doch wieder etwas gelernt. Und bin froh darüber. Nochmals danke. Laut Lightroom konnte ich das Problem in diesem speziellen Bild beheben. Ich habe das entsprechend bei der QI Kandidaten Nominierung vermerkt. Mit vielen Grüßen --Mummelgrummel (talk) 04:28, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OlympDorf Berlin 08-2013 img10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:17, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img30 Frederic Verrycken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 21:03, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woltersdorf tram in Rahnsdorf 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Noise. Please, see notes. I think that it must be QI with a little noise reduction--Lmbuga 20:35, 25 November 2013 (UTC)  Done removed --A.Savin 20:51, 25 November 2013 (UTC)  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 20:50, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neu-Venedig in Berlin 08-13 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. What a place to live in! --Makele-90 16:45, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neu-Venedig in Berlin 08-13 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Makele-90 16:45, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neu-Venedig in Berlin 08-13 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:51, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neu-Venedig in Berlin 08-13 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Makele-90 16:45, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OlympDorf Berlin 08-2013 img05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:31, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img36 Frank Jahnke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jean11 22:11, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img49 Michael Arndt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:27, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OlympDorf Berlin 08-2013 img01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:59, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OlympDorf Berlin 08-2013 img03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:31, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Lefortovo Park shelduck Mos06-13.jpg

Hi AS - I moved this to Category:Tadorna ferruginea (captive), as these are feral birds of former captive origin, not genuine wild birds (which breed in central Asia, in very different, non-urban habitats). If you prefer, I could create a new Category:Tadorna ferruginea (feral) for it. - MPF (talk) 15:40, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

OK for me. --A.Savin 15:43, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! - MPF (talk) 16:35, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Panorama from Kollhoff-Tower 02.jpg

Здравствуйте, просмотр Wikimedia Commons, я видел серию фотографий, которые могли бы быть собраны. Вот результат, я надеюсь, вы согласитесь. Сердечно. François de Dijon (talk) 19:51, 2 December 2013 (UTC) (Автоматический перевод)

Bonjour, en parcourant Wikimédia Commons, j'ai vue une série de vos photos qui pouvaient être assemblées. Voici le résultat, j'espère qu'il vous conviendra. Cordialement. François de Dijon (talk) 19:51, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, but this image is extremely distorted and hardly usable in project scope of Commons, as it doesn't depict a realistic view. --A.Savin 22:19, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OlympDorf Berlin 08-2013 img06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 15:50, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OlympDorf Berlin 08-2013 img07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 15:50, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KostrzynPL 08-13 img01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --JLPC 17:08, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KostrzynPL 08-13 img02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 15:50, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Meinung gefragt

Hallo A. Savin! Wie ist deine Meinung als Administrator dazu? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuxyso (talk • contribs)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar

Dzień dobry, chcielibyśmy poinformować Pana, że zdjęcie (Wiki-Commons) przedstawiające kościół Trójcy Świętej / Gubin (PL) – oczywiście po podaniu informacji dot. praw autorskich – zostało umieszczone na stronie naszego niekomercyjnego projektu << Kalendarza FVKS "W Podróży" 2013 >>. Motywem przewodnim są "wieże". Nie wykluczone, że pojawią się tam kolejne zdjęcia Pana autorstwa. http://kalender.fvks.eu/pl/ http://kalender.fvks.eu/pl/2013/11/16/wieza-kosciola-trojcy-swietej-gubin-pl/ Mamy nadzieję, że wszystko się zgadza. Pozdrawiamy FVKS - Förderverein Kulturstadt Görlitz-Zgorzelec e.V. (Stowarzyszenie Promocji Miasta Kultury Görlitz-Zgorzelec t.z.) kalender@fvks.eu, Agata, Cornelia, Matthias fvks (talk) 10:22, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

A pie for you!

If you are hungary here is your pie. Mensham49 (talk) 18:50, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img23 Alexander Morlang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 15:28, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img38 Anja Kofbinger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 15:28, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img57 Canan Bayram.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 15:33, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Ershov-vokzal.jpg

And also:

• File:Fili railstation Moscow.jpg
• File:Kovrovvok.JPG
• File:Krasnoe selo station.jpg
• File:Nemchinovka railplatform-vokzal.jpg
• File:Rabochy pos platform Moscow.jpg
• File:Ratusha atkarsk.jpg
• File:Serpukhov railstation.JPG
• File:Suzemka-station1996.jpg
• File:Tsaritsino railstation Moscow.jpg
• File:Zvenigorod railstation-vokzal.JPG

Hi A.Savin. Some of your files are listed in Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter. Could you please have a look and try to fix the syntax errors? Thank you. Leyo 09:53, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Danke fürs Korrigieren! Es wäre nett, wenn du dich um diese Bilder eines inaktiven Benutzers kümmern könntest. Russischkenntnisse sind da von Vorteil. --Leyo 18:55, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Da sind keine Russisch Kenntnisse notwendig, es müssen nur die sich wiederholenden Information-Templates entfernt werden, zumal sie keine zusätzlichen Informationen enthalten. --A.Savin 20:20, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Bei File:Осадки.png beispielsweise weiss ich jedenfalls nicht, ob ich die Fehler verursachende Zeile ohne Informationsverlust löschen kann. --Leyo 20:30, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

 Done Erledigt. --A.Savin 20:35, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Просьба передать свои фото в фонд Викимедиа

Доброе время суток коллега. Видел ваши фотографии сделанные на Троекуровском кладбище загружанные вами в немецкую викиверсию. Может стоит их вам загрузить в фонд Викимедиа ? для использования в разных вики версиях , в частности русской, английской ? -- Dgeise (talk) 16:47, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

К сожалению нет. Это охраняемые АП произведения искусства, а в РФ нет свободы панорамы. --A.Savin 18:09, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

• Очевидно, многих из тех сфотографированных на памятниках деятелей уже фотографировала пресс-служба президента и правительства РФ. Уважаемый Dgeise, пожалуйста, обратитесь туда за оригиналами фотографий. Это будет гораздо лучше, чем использовать копии, выполненные на камне.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Вам лишь бы отметиться? БОльшая часть персон из этой категории переехала на погост ещё когда никакой пресс-службы президента и правительства РФ в природе не было. --A.Savin 20:16, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
    • Я говорю о том, что можно сделать: Козлов, Сергеев, Колбин, Крючков. Снимки этих людей и права на них безусловно есть у пресс-службы, просто никто не хочет протянуть руку. Дальше идут спортсмены, чьи снимки и права на них безусловно есть у спортивных клубов, и опять никто не хочет протянуть руку. По своему опыту должен сказать, что результат в конце концов бывает успешным, достаточно лишь без устали повторять попытки. Моя задача не «отметиться», а подчеркнуть, что нельзя спокойно ждать: надо просить. Несвобода панорамы ничуть не мешает успешно и эффективно выпрашивать права.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 21:40, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
• Первый раз слышу что на фотографии могил распространяются АП, например коллега ShinePhantom с флагом админа в рувики свободно загрузил почти весь наш местный некрополь. -- Dgeise (talk) 19:26, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

  Скульптуры и вытесанные на камень портреты - объекты АП. Если просто плита с надписью - можно грузить сюда. --A.Savin 16:01, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Prades-sur-Vernazobre, Hérault 01.jpg

Hello Alexander, I have just seen this message written down the coordonates of this file :

#coordinates: cannot have more than one primary tag per page

And also on the others file where I've put a location and an object location. Must I stop to do that? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:43, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

I only use {{Location}} for my uploads and find it sufficient. If there are error messages, you indeed should choose one. --A.Savin 20:25, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. I will rectify that, see you later. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BRB Tram 08-13 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:03, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BRB Tram 08-13 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:31, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BRB Tram 08-13 img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:03, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

FPCBot

The bot is not closing any nominations since yesterday; the last closing was yesterday morning. It should run several times (3) a day. I checked all related files; didn't see anything unusual. Please check them from your side, too. JKadavoor Jee 11:58, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Checked the closed noms + the galleries. Unlike last time, there are no recent edits and nothing seems broken. Btw, I'm still waiting for an answer by Daniel78 on his talk page. --A.Savin 13:48, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img40 Katrin Schmidberger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality [ No problem with the suit :)]. --JLPC 17:37, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img41 Robert Schaddach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 13:51, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OlympDorf Berlin 08-2013 img08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 14:43, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OlympDorf Berlin 08-2013 img09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Okay. --Florstein 16:34, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mildenberg Ziegeleipark 08-13 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:34, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mildenberg Ziegeleipark 08-13 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img21 Alex Lubawinski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Warsaw 07-13 img27 Visitation Order Church.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Warsaw 07-13 img27 Visitation Order Church.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 07:49, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img43 Claudio Jupe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 20:02, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img48 Michael Braun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:35, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img51 Alexander Spies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:35, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img52 Gabriele Hiller.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice and good--Lmbuga 19:28, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

File:AGH Berlin 10-2013 img26 Wolfram Priess.jpg

That there, you were not able to turn him ha!ha!ha! --Christian Ferrer 18:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)}}

Road Signs of Australia

Hello,

I am thinking to undelete these Commons:Deletion requests/Files on User:Fry1989/Gallery/Road Signs/Australia, based on 3 supporting requests on UDR. What do you think? Yann (talk) 22:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

I really wonder how some people come to the idea that e.g. this file (meanwhile restored) can be {{PD-trivial}}. The files I deleted all contained some drawings/icons of objects etc. which are by no means something I'd accept as simple geometric shapes etc. (PD-trivial for me = geometric shapes, letters, digits, that's all). So, frankly, I don't understand why these files should be undeleted. Nonetheless, I have no veto right and you as closing admin on COM:UDEL are of course free in your decision. --A.Savin 22:58, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

I agree with you about this file, and I don't want to undelete this kind of images if you don't agree. Fry's request is that the previous mass DR was appropriate, and that individual DR should be created instead. I am not sure that it would positive or not. What do you think? Yann (talk) 09:31, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

OK - actually I had checked the files before deletion and they all seem (more or less obviously) not PD-trivial to me, but if there is some demand for a separate review, fair enough, undelete them . Really sorry to have caused the lot of work, I just wanted to help out reducing the large backlog that time and no one wanted to close that particular nomination. --A.Savin 10:48, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Ignorieren

Lieber A. Savin! Wie soll ich nach deiner Ansicht verfahren, wenn der besagte User nicht müde wird, FPs von mir zu bewerten? Im aktuellen Fall wäre es evtl. nicht unbedingt notwendig zu antworten, da ich die Kritik nicht für sehr fundiert halte. Allerdings zeigt meine bisherige Erfahrung auf FPC, dass Ignorieren von Kritik meist dazu führt, dass Bilder niedergewertet werden nach dem Motto: Der Nominator interessiert sich nicht für die Kommentare, also weg mit dem Bild. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:11, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Ich habe es damals so vorgeschlagen, aber das Ignorieren funktioniert eben nur gegenseitig. Du hast im LA gesenft, er jetzt im FPC. Mehr helfen kann ich auch nicht, wenn Ihr beide selber kein Interesse habt an einer Deeskalation. --A.Savin 10:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Danke für die Rückmeldung. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:47, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Featured_pictures,_list#Places

I added the newly created pages by you there. Check it, please. JKadavoor Jee 10:46, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm not finished so far (religious buildings are yet to be added), I'll check everything later. --A.Savin 10:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

48-Stunden-Regel

Ich will ja nicht meckern, aber der QICtotal-Tag soll erstmalig frühestens 48 Stunden nach der zuletzt abgegebenen Stimme gesetzt werden :) Gruß, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 16:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Uwe, nein. QICtotal kann jederzeit gesetzt werden, {{QICresult}} hingegen nach 48h. --A.Savin 16:56, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Oh danke, das war mir neu! Das habe ich möglicherweise verwechselt. Wie verfährt man denn, wenn ein QICtotal gesetzt ist und eine neue Stimme dazukommt? Updaten und die vorherige Signatur durch die eigene Signatur ersetzen? Ich hatte meine Stimme bisher immer vorsichtshalber hinter das QICtotal gesetzt. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 17:11, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Doch, ist richtig, man trägt dann das neue Ergebnis ein und ersetzt die vorherie Signatur durch die eigene. --A.Savin 17:16, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Besten Dank. Dann mache ich ab sofort hoffentlich alles richtig :) Man lernt hier nie aus. Gruss, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 17:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Uwe, der Rahmen muss mit Promotion bzw. Decline markiert werden, sonst erkennt QICBot das nicht. --A.Savin 22:09, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Na, da brauch ich mich ja nicht zu wundern, dass der Bot sich nicht rührt :) Danke, ich mach mich ans Werk ... --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 22:13, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Achja: Was kommt denn dann als Markierung bei einer Patt-Situation? Unten steht ja schin "Inconclusive ..." --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 22:20, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Aus meiner Erfahrung: blau (Nomination); ob das auch irgendwo so festgeschrieben ist, weiß ich nicht. --A.Savin 22:24, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Schon gemacht. Danke! --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 22:27, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mildenberg Ziegeleipark 08-13 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --JLPC 17:29, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mildenberg Ziegeleipark 08-13 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:13, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mildenberg Ziegeleipark 08-13 img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:00, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img24 Alexander J Herrmann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Okay. DerHexer 13:42, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Peitz 08-13 img1 Molkerei.jpg

The verticals of the facade are tilted on the left, but I think it need not a tilt but only a little perspective correction because this image is certainly a crop of an horizontal image. --Christian Ferrer 11:54, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thanks, I think it should be OK now. --A.Savin 14:03, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi, IMO the crop is a bit tight on the right, have you some area in the raw file? --Christian Ferrer 16:25, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

No. --A.Savin 16:31, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img26 Wolfram Priess.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very good --Christian Ferrer 17:38, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img56 Stefanie Remlinger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:36, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08 View from Rathaus Spandau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img42 Sven Heinemann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img18 Clara West.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:02, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img50 Michael Arndt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Florstein 17:18, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img59 Joachim Esser.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:39, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08 View from Rathaus Spandau 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:21, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Teltowkanal 05 Griebnitzsee Blick auf Schlosspark Glienicke.jpg

Just a small word to say hello and tell you that this image is very attractive, maybe it would have its chances in FPC. --Christian Ferrer 11:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Streets in Saint Petersburg by district

Вы полгода назад начали перенос из Category:Streets in Saint Petersburg в Category:Streets in Saint Petersburg by district - и на полпути остановились. Что с этим делать - завершить перенос или вернуть в общий котёл? Возможно, продублировать? Чтобы найти улицу в районе, надо заранее подымать справочник. Kaluga.2012 (talk) 12:24, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Да, остановился из-за этого. Предлагаю создать Category:Streets in Saint Petersburg by name, скопировав все туда и расставив оставшиеся по районам. Теперь, когда Cat-a-lot признаёт и категории, первое - не проблема. --A.Savin 12:34, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Ок, так и сделаю. Kaluga.2012 (talk) 12:47, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Спасибо, что берётесь. В мае-июне ещё не было связи интервик с Викиданными. Теперь желательно добавлять не интервики, а категорию сразу туда в элемент (в самом низу). Работы не мало. Увы, на фоне дел с категоризацией WLM руки совсем не доходили. С площадями всё то же самое ещё предстоит. --A.Savin 13:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OlympDorf Berlin 08-2013 img04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:41, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08 View from Rathaus Spandau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 21:33, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08 View from Rathaus Spandau 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 15:41, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img54 Marion Platta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 21:07, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OlympDorf Berlin 08-2013 img11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality. --Cccefalon 17:20, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OlympDorf Berlin 08-2013 img12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:29, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08 View from Rathaus Spandau 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:31, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Я-таки разобрался с VisualFileChange.js. Хотя и не сразу :). С уважением, St1995 14:10, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Funkturmbild bei QIC

Hallo Alexander,

ich habe mir das besagte Bild bei QIC nochmal vorgenommen. Die beiden Stelen sind grell weiß. Würde man hier dieses in der Realität tatsächlich existierende weiß "abmildern" würde ich hier eine Retouche vornehmen, welche die Realität verfremdet. Ich denke nicht, dass das im Sinn der Bilder für Wikimedia Commons/ Wikipedia sind. Auch ein HDR, was ich probiert habe, hat praktisch das selbe Ergebnis zutage gefördert wie auch aktuell zu sehen. Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:33, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img11 Andreas Otto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:32, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img37 Frank Jahnke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 18:37, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img46 Karlheinz Nolte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:58, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08 View from Rathaus Spandau 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:08, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08 View from Rathaus Spandau 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:43, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear A.Savin/Archive/2013, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow 09-13 img07 Moscow Day.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:21, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow 09-13 img15 Muzeon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:48, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img08 Martin Beck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Light not optimal (see Joachim Esser, far much better)--Jebulon 20:25, 10 December 2013 (UTC) I think it's ok, but would definitely be better brighter. Mattbuck 10:54, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Innenaufnahmen Uni Leipzig

Hast du eine pragmatische Lösung? Uni anschreiben? Ich erinnere mich auch an etliche Innenaufnahmen aus Berlin von dir. Wie lief es denn dort? Danke, --Tuxyso (talk) 19:46, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Ich verstehe nicht, was du von mir erwartest. Ich bin in solchen Sachen ein schlechter Ratgeber. Bestimmt ist man auf der sichersten Seite, wenn man direkt vom Architekten eine Genehmigung bekommt, das UR dürfte ja in der Regel er innehaben und nicht die Uni. Aber ich habe keine Ahnung, wie man am besten den Draht findet.

Beim zweiten Teil der Anfrage kann ich auch nicht weiterhelfen. Ich habe jetzt meine Uploads der letzten 2 Jahre überflogen, aber außer Rathaus Schöneberg, Preußischer Landtag und Rotem Rathaus nichts gefunden. Die drei sind gemeinfrei. In letzter Zeit bin ich als gebranntes Kind sehr vorsichtig mit meinen Uploads. Unter meinen Altfotos dürfte es aber noch viele damals in gutem Glauben hochgeladene No-FOP Bilder geben. Die werde ich früher oder später zur Löschung vorschlagen, so mir nicht jemand anders zuvorkommt. --A.Savin 20:06, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Danke erst mal für die ausführlichen Infos. Aus Zeitgründen werde ich mich erst am Wochenende weiter mit der Thematik beschäftigen. Zu deinen Bildern: ich meinte den Landtag,dachte das seienmehr gewesen. Grüße, --Tuxyso (talk) 22:42, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow 09-13 img04 Moscow Day.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 20:30, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow 09-13 img10 Zaikonospassky.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:41, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow 09-13 img16 StNicholas Golutvin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow 09-13 img03 Moscow Day.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Peitz 08-13 img1 Molkerei.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Peitz 08-13 img1 Molkerei.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:06, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow 09-13 img05 Moscow Day.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:03, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow 09-13 img09 Moscow Day.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow 09-13 img13 Novo-Peredelkino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:49, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow 09-13 img20 Grand Kremlin Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow 09-13 img08 Moscow Day.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good. I like the different colors and structures on the photo. --Tuxyso 19:13, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow 09-13 img12 Varvarka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:26, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow 09-13 img18 sightseeing boat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:30, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08 View from Rathaus Spandau 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bottom blurred, maybe a crop? (see note) --Christian Ferrer 06:35, 18 December 2013 (UTC) This would be too bare crop at the bottom for the church, which should be centered. The church itself is in focus. --A.Savin 10:06, 18 December 2013 (UTC)  Support ok, just ok --Christian Ferrer 11:17, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow 09-13 img06 Moscow Day.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:08, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow 09-13 img14 Novo-Peredelkino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:37, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow 09-13 img19 rental bikes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AGH Berlin 10-2013 img32 Marianne Burkert-Eulitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:24, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

	Happy Holidays!
	G'day, just a quick greeting wishing you and your family happy holidays and all the best for 2014. And of course, a big thank you for putting a leg up by doing what you do on Commons, and helping to make it the fantastic project that it is. Greetings from a warm west coast of Aussie. russavia (talk) 01:25, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New year

I wish you and your family a very happy Christmas and a wonderful new year. --Joydeep _Talk 11:04, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Dear Alexander, I wish and you and your family a Merry Christmas and lots of health and, of course, nice pictures for the coming year! Your Poco² 14:18, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello Poco, many thanks, same to you too )) --A.Savin 15:08, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Impuls Arena

Just to let you know, I did not strike out the one in the list, and still think they fail the FOP in Germany. Can you clarify you don't see a problem with them. LGA _talk^edits 19:39, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Terraces are utilitarian structure. --A.Savin 19:43, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Panorama Impuls Arena vor NIG-JAP.jpg and File:Impuls arena 06-2009.JPG show much more than that, they show the architectural elements of the stadium including the roof. LGA _talk^edits 19:49, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

That doesn't seem any obvious to me. But ianal and you're free to contact a WMF lawyer for advice. --A.Savin 20:04, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks very much for the Santorum images close

Thanks very much for the Santorum images close at Commons:Deletion requests/Santorum images, which takes into account the unanimous decision in Hustler Magazine v. Falwell.

Much appreciated,

-- Cirt (talk) 21:23, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08 View from Rathaus Spandau 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I miss a little bit contrast. The image looks very soft, nothing is black.--XRay 11:44, 20 December 2013 (UTC)  Support acceptable IMO --Christian Ferrer 05:49, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Impuls Arena

Magst Du Deine Löschbegründung vielleicht ein klein wenig ausführlicher formulieren, nachdem es dort ja einige Argumente für ein Behalten der Fotos gegeben hat? Herzlichen Dank. Yellowcard (talk) 10:09, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Ich habe nur zwei gelöscht, die wurden aus der Luft gemacht und beinhalten die Architektur des Stadions. --A.Savin 10:47, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Wie Du aus der Diskussion ja auch gelesen hast, greift zwar die Panoramafreiheit nicht, die Stadionarchitektur wurde aber von einigen als nicht schützenswert angesehen. Du musst dies doch entsprechend begründen, wenn Du zu einem anderen Schluss kommst als die Mehrheit der Diskussionsteilnehmer? Yellowcard (talk) 13:37, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Da waren zwei Fotos, die zeigten das Stadiongebäude als Ganzes aus der Luft. Keine Tribünen, keine Stützen. Ich habe hier schon erlebt, wie weitaus trivialere Gebäude gelöscht wurden. Die restlichen Bildern von Tribünen habe ich behalten, wofür ich mich, wie man drei Abschnitte weiter oben lesen kann, auch noch rechtfertigen muss. Wiederherstellung ohne Löschprüfung kommt also nicht in Frage. --A.Savin 16:37, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Teltowkanal 05 Griebnitzsee Blick auf Schlosspark Glienicke.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Teltowkanal 05 Griebnitzsee Blick auf Schlosspark Glienicke.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

DRs

Hi Alexander. Can you take a look at this when you have a chance? These are pretty high-quality images, mostly from Peterhof, but the author has come back after several months and tried to DR all of them. The DRs were incomplete, so I removed the tags. I left the user a note in English, but that may not be good enough. I noticed that you had categorized many of these, so I figured I'd ask you about it. INeverCry 20:19, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

 Done --A.Savin 20:28, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. INeverCry 20:38, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

100.42.227.57

Это прокси (точнее, анонимайзер или веб-прокси). В ру-вики заблокирован. Наверное обессрочить лучше. /St1995 18:41, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

 Сделано --A.Savin 18:56, 30 December 2013 (UTC)