File:Improved Airfield Damage Assessment System (IADAS) capstone (IA improvedairfield1094556173).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 7.16 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 184 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
Improved Airfield Damage Assessment System (IADAS) capstone   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Baker, Jennifer
Chinoski, David
Haka, George
Masco, John
Patchet, Edwin
Squire, Cynthia
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
Improved Airfield Damage Assessment System (IADAS) capstone
Publisher
Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School
Description

Timeliness is paramount when restoring partial airfield capability after an airfield has been damaged. The project’s focus was to develop conceptual system alternatives for improving the timeliness of airfield damage assessment. The systems engineering methods used included a morphological box and Pugh matrix for determining physical components and Constructive Systems Engineering Cost Model for cost analysis. Two separate improved airfield damage assessment system solutions were designed, evaluated, and compared regarding their cost and performance. Equipment and standard operating procedures selected were based on the design reference mission (DRM) and the limited time to complete the study. The first system used a remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) paired with a day camera. The second system used a set of fixed-tower emplacements, each with a day camera. Models were created and simulations were executed against the DRM to demonstrate the performance for each alternative. After reviewing the cost and simulation data, the RPA alternative showed superior performance. The modular design could be used with other airfield configurations. The RPA alternative cost more than the fixed-tower alternative. Further research is recommended in order to determine the cost and performance improvements that might result from different equipment configurations and improved camera technology.


Subjects: improved airfield damage assessment; airfield damage assessment; remotely piloted aircraft
Language English
Publication date September 2017
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
improvedairfield1094556173
Source
Internet Archive identifier: improvedairfield1094556173
https://archive.org/download/improvedairfield1094556173/improvedairfield1094556173.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.

Licensing

[edit]
Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current23:45, 21 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 23:45, 21 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 184 pages (7.16 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection improvedairfield1094556173 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #18448)

Metadata