File:Do U.S. security commitments discourage nuclear proliferation? (IA doussecuritycomm00wils).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,200 × 1,627 pixels, file size: 5.34 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 126 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
Do U.S. security commitments discourage nuclear proliferation?   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Wilshusen, John D
Title
Do U.S. security commitments discourage nuclear proliferation?
Publisher
Monterey, Calif. : Naval Postgraduate School ; Springfield, Va. : Available from National Technical Information Service
Description
"December 1997."
Thesis advisor(s): Peter R. Lavoy
Thesis (M.A. in National Security Affairs)--Naval Postgraduate School, December 1997
Includes bibliographical references (p. 85-97)
U.S. policy makers claim that nuclear weapons are needed to guarantee security commitments and discourage the international spread of nuclear weapons. This thesis evaluates the link between security guarantees and efforts to prevent nuclear proliferation. It draws three conclusions based on case studies of the use of conventional security commitments and nuclear security guarantees to prevent nuclear weapons development in South Korea and Taiwan. First, nuclear security guarantees alone are not sufficient to prevent proliferation. Second, strong conventional commitments made credible by visible presence of forces are sufficient to prevent nuclear proliferation when the direct security threat is conventional. Third, when the security threat being faced includes nuclear weapons, nuclear proliferation prevention requires both a nuclear security guarantee and a physically evident conventional military guarantee. Two implications for security policy follow from these findings. First, nuclear weapons are necessary in the modem security environment. Second, nuclear security guarantees are not credible without the stationing of conventional forces

Subjects:
Language English
Publication date 1 December 1997, 00:00:00
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink; americana
Accession number
doussecuritycomm00wils
Authority file  OCLC: 1043006584
Source
Internet Archive identifier: doussecuritycomm00wils
https://archive.org/download/doussecuritycomm00wils/doussecuritycomm00wils.pdf

Licensing

[edit]
Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current14:46, 17 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 14:46, 17 July 20201,200 × 1,627, 126 pages (5.34 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection doussecuritycomm00wils (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #14212)

Metadata