File:A STUDY OF HOW UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS CAN IMPROVE OVER-THE-HORIZON TARGETING AND STRIKE MISSIONS (IA astudyofhowunman1094564868).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 2.94 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 90 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
A STUDY OF HOW UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS CAN IMPROVE OVER-THE-HORIZON TARGETING AND STRIKE MISSIONS   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Boyd, Chadwick J.
Harris, Roderick E., Jr.
Kleparek, Christopher L.
Taylor, Joshua W.
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
A STUDY OF HOW UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS CAN IMPROVE OVER-THE-HORIZON TARGETING AND STRIKE MISSIONS
Publisher
Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School
Description

This capstone project studied the mission utility of using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) systems to accomplish the over-the-horizon mission by modeling a variety of UAV capabilities and evaluating their contribution. An Excel probabilistic model of the mission was created to determine the optimized weapon loadout and swarm configuration, which assumed the electronic countermeasures (ECM) UAV to have the highest probability of enemy engagement due to its lead formation position and large radar signature. An ExtendSim simulation added a time element to the study. Both the model and simulation revealed that a maximum air-to-air and strike weapon loadout, which is four weapons for each role, yields the highest probability of success at the lowest probability of a UAV casualty. A maximum air-to-air and strike loadout was found to produce success and UAV casualty probabilities of 98 and 3 percent, respectively. A comparative cost analysis assessed the financial viability of substituting UAVs for manned platforms. The analysis found the unit and per-flight hour cost, for all UAV platforms except those that fulfill the ECM role, to be less than the cost for manned counterparts. However, the use of the ECM UAV eliminates the potential for a flight crewmember casualty.


Subjects: BREM; management; planning; game theory; unmanned; UAV; autonomous; decision matrix; configuration; loadout
Language English
Publication date March 2020
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
astudyofhowunman1094564868
Source
Internet Archive identifier: astudyofhowunman1094564868
https://archive.org/download/astudyofhowunman1094564868/astudyofhowunman1094564868.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.

Licensing

[edit]
Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current20:49, 14 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 20:49, 14 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 90 pages (2.94 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection astudyofhowunman1094564868 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #8539)

Metadata