Commons talk:Quality images by user
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Incorrect numbers in the column "Number QIs"
[edit]Hello @Mike Peel:
apparently, some users do not take into account the subcategories. For example: Chris Woodrich, Ralf Roletschek, Rama, Fischer.H.
F. Riedelio • talk 08:19, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- @F. Riedelio: I've changed the bot code so that it counts the images in the category + subcategories. It's slower to run, but hopefully provides more accurate numbers, if the category tree is properly maintained. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 23:33, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the change. Unfortunately, it does not work properly yet (e.g.: Quality Images by Rama, Quality Images by Rama). F. Riedelio • talk 07:58, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- @F. Riedelio: Thanks for pointing out the problem, it should be fixed now. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:43, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel: The list is still not correct. There are several users who have made quality images, but in the list in column "Number QIs" the number is 0. Maybe this can be fixed with the help of the structured data. --F. Riedelio • talk 12:07, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
- @F. Riedelio: Can you point me to an example please? The 5 users with 0 QI's in the table here all have empty categories. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 06:39, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel: The 5 users with 0 QIs in the table have empty categories, but still uploaded QIs. Again the question: Is it possible to get this information from the structured data (P6731 with Q63348069)? --F. Riedelio • talk 09:22, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
- @F. Riedelio: Can you point me to an example please? The 5 users with 0 QI's in the table here all have empty categories. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 06:39, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel: The list is still not correct. There are several users who have made quality images, but in the list in column "Number QIs" the number is 0. Maybe this can be fixed with the help of the structured data. --F. Riedelio • talk 12:07, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
- @F. Riedelio: Thanks for pointing out the problem, it should be fixed now. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:43, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the change. Unfortunately, it does not work properly yet (e.g.: Quality Images by Rama, Quality Images by Rama). F. Riedelio • talk 07:58, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Updated intro text
[edit]@F. Riedelio: Just seen this. I'm not sure how you could translate the text without noticing the part that says 'Manual changes will be ignored by the bot update.'. I've updated the bot code now to include the new header text, though, and that should be used for future updates. Also, @Johann Jaritz: , purging doesn't change anything here, since the numbers are bot-updated not auto-generated by mediawiki (see the above discussion for why this is). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:28, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- This shows that arbitrarily updating the table by a bot in this way was probably not such a good idea. This prevents improvements from being made. F. Riedelio • talk 07:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Improvements are still possible, and welcome - I just need to be pinged about them so I can update the bot code, otherwise it takes me a while to notice them. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 08:52, 27 February 2022 (UTC)