Commons talk:Categories for discussion/editintro

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is not Deletions Requests

[edit]

{{Editprotected}} These instructions says "insert it in Deletion requests", but it should say "insert it in Categories for discussion". /Ö 19:48, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done thanks. --Steinninn ♨ 04:26, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of "Current requests" subpage

[edit]

{{editprotected}}

Both occurences of "/Current requests" need to be removed to update this in accordance with Commons _talk:Categories _for _discussion#"current _requests" subpage and keep it working. -- User:Docu at 17:27, 24 September 2009 (UTC), updated 18:33, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Rocket000 (talk) 19:03, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. -- User:Docu at 19:36, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear usage of {cdw}

[edit]

{{Editprotected}} The use of {{SUBPAGENAME}} as a parameter name in the cat-creator notification warning doesn't work with the {{Tls}} template. It's appearing to users as:

{{subst:cdw}}

instead of, say:

{{subst:cdw|Category:Title}}

- dcljr (talk) 00:13, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you can just change "tls" to "tlsp" to make it work. - dcljr (talk) 00:18, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. Done. -- RE rillke questions? 18:45, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

noinclude

[edit]

{{editprotected|technical=yes}}

The "manual" explaining the next steps is often transcluded on files including a CFD based on this editintro. After fixing that many times by either blanking the explanation or hiding it with <noinclude>…</noinclude> I suggest to hardwire this business here, IIRC that's how it's already done for deletion requests.

Disclaimer: untested, the following gibberish means "just enclose everything with noinclude and let's see what happens":

 <noinclude>
 {{msgnw:Commons:Categories for discussion/editintro}}
 </noinclude>

Possible Plan B:

 <includeonly><noinclude></includeonly>
 {{msgnw:Commons:Categories for discussion/editintro}}
 <includeonly></noinclude></includeonly>


Be..anyone (talk) 02:29, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done It's not clear how your suggestion improves anything. DR doesn't do this, despite your suggestion otherwise (see Commons:Deletion requests/editintro). I'm happy to revisit this if you have a more concrete proposal. —RP88 (talk) 07:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]