Commons:Valued image candidates/Philaeus chrysops podgorje 01.jpg

Philaeus chrysops podgorje 01.jpg

undecided

Image
Nominated by	Kulac (talk) on 2012-06-18 20:46 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Two males Philaeus chrysops fighting for a female Philaeus chrysops (male)
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 19 June 2012 (UTC)  Oppose I think this scope is too narrow. Philaeus chrysops (male) would be OK. Yann (talk) 11:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC) Scope changed from Two males Philaeus chrysops fighting for a female to ''Philaeus chrysops (male) --George Ho (talk) 15:13, 21 June 2012 (UTC) Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn". OK now. Yann (talk) 15:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)  Comment For once we have a scope that is well suited, do not change it. I suggest returning to the original scope and vote with your arguments. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:52, 21 June 2012 (UTC) I don't think we should have more than one scope (or two, one for male, one for female), for a species of insects and spiders. Yann (talk) 10:00, 22 June 2012 (UTC) I agree, but here there is a very specific action which is interesting from the perspective of ethology. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:00, 22 June 2012 (UTC) This action is certainly not specific to this species. If a scope such as "Male spiders fighting for females" be OK? Yann (talk) 05:21, 23 June 2012 (UTC) This action is not specific to this species but all do not. I propose : Philaeus chrysops, two males fighting. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 23 June 2012 (UTC) OK, but unless the behaviour of the species while fighting is different, we should not have such a narrow scope. And even in this case, I doubt that this image would show the difference of behaviour. Yann (talk) 12:59, 23 June 2012 (UTC) Result: 0 support, 0 oppose => undecided. MrPanyGoff 21:09, 25 June 2012 (UTC)