Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 15 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Haardt_an_der_Weinstraße_Mandelring_022_(an)_002_2021_07_20.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Late Baroque apex block, middle of the 18th century
    --F. Riedelio 15:05, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:15, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough IMO. Please have other opinions.--Jebulon 15:35, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
✓ New version, resharpened. --F. Riedelio 06:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 12:42, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
    •  Comment Still not sharp at full size--Jebulon 18:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It's unsharp. Not fixable.--Peulle 07:01, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The image is now oversharpened. This has not improved the impression that there is a slight motion blur here. Also, the image resolution is at the very lowest limit of what I expect these days for a photo shoot without "action" and under good lighting conditions. --Smial 11:27, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:22, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Nuvole_su_Vallina_(Bagno_a_Ripoli).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Clouds over Vallina (Bagno a Ripoli). --PROPOLI87 15:23, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Compression artifacts (too small file size) and lacks of quality at the image bottom, sorry. --PantheraLeo1359531 15:52, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Beautiful clouds, not small and good enough, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 20:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sky indeed looks beautiful, but I agree with PantheraLeo. Too strong compression, lacks detail (visible especially in trees) Jakubhal 05:58, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough for QI. --Steindy 09:48, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Panthera,definitly --Commonists 18:13, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nice view but unfortunately low resolution --Moroder 02:35, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Question 4,016 × 2,247 is really low resolution? -- Ikan Kekek 07:19, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me. 9 mp is big enough. --Palauenc05 08:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The clouds are really beautiful, but there are too many artifacts from file compression or post-processing or for some other reason. Look closely at the trees at the bottom right. They look unnatural. --Andrey Korzun 10:40, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nice subject, nice composition, but full of artifacts (jpg-compression, noise/denoising, posterization, sharpening). --Smial 11:41, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose With Others.--Jebulon 15:09, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 7 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:22, 14 October 2021 (UTC)