Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 05 2020

• 
  • Nomination Gargoyles at the St. Lamberti Church in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:08, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Maria Hamicolt Abbey in Rorup, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:08, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building No. 9 at the former Heeresverpflegungsamt/Speicherstadt (“An den Speichern”), Coerde, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:08, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former rail tracks of the field railway (rubble railway) at Kellermannstrasse 13, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:08, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:08, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main portal (designated 1686, set up in late Renaissance conceptual design) at the former bishop`s castle, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arcade yard of the former bishop`s castle, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Access balcony at the arcade yard of the former bishop`s castle, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arcade yard of the former bishop`s castle, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:10, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arcade yard of the former bishop`s castle, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:10, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lake Victoria, Christchurch, New Zealand --Podzemnik 01:19, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:59, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A tree in Hagley Park, Christchurch --Podzemnik 01:19, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:11, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hagley Park, Christchurch --Podzemnik 01:19, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:11, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hagley Park, Christchurch --Podzemnik 01:19, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:11, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hagley Park, Christchurch --Podzemnik 01:19, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:59, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Toledo. --King of Hearts 23:57, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Toledo. --King of Hearts 23:57, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Toledo railway station. --King of Hearts 23:57, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ammophila sabulosa --Christian Ferrer 21:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination AMIRA LOLA (ship, 1983) --Christian Ferrer 21:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Halavar 21:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Galerie de la Reine in Brussels (empty due to COVID-19) --Trougnouf 20:50, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:08, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manneken Pis wearing a protective mask --Trougnouf 20:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Lion-hearted85 22:11, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Façade of the Naples Cathedral. --Lion-hearted85 20:20, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. The sky could use a little bit of denoising and the top isn't as sharp but only visible at zoom. --Trougnouf 20:52, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
     New version Thank you for your advice. I have uploaded a new version with selective denoising on the sky. I have also increased the exposure a little, so that it will look better on less bright screens. --Lion-hearted85 22:59, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Colonnade on the side of the Forum of Pompeii. --Lion-hearted85 20:20, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose the shadow is too disturbing. One of QI requirement: "Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result;" --Christian Ferrer 21:17, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
    You're right. Thanks for pointing this out. --Lion-hearted85 23:02, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Macellum of Pompeii. --Lion-hearted85 20:20, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 20:52, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lonely house in a residential area of Burano. --Lion-hearted85 20:20, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 20:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entrance of a brick-red painted house in Burano. --Lion-hearted85 20:20, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 21:28, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2 Mark banknote (1914) of Reichsschuldenverwaltung in Berlin. --Palauenc05 11:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 21:07, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chapel of the Blessed Sacrament in the Santa Maria Annunziata church in Salò. --Moroder 10:32, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:03, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vestibule and Bell Tower of Split CathedralI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2020. --RajashreeTalukdar 10:24, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline I think this is a gorgeous picture with a very strong composition. But for QI it just has too many technical issues: Chromatic aberration wherever sky meets stone, the stones itself look like they've been sharpened too much (especially the stones exposed to sunlight). The sunlit area left from the center is overexposed while the shadows are too grainy. --ReneeWrites 22:41, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pipe organ of the Catholic Church in Theilheim near Würzburg --Ermell 10:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Halavar 13:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Baking and washing house in Veitlahm Patersbergweg 9 --Ermell 10:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Protestant church St.Veit in Veitlahm near Kulmbach --Ermell 10:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks OK to me. --Argenberg 10:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Baking and washing house in Veitlahm Patersbergweg 9 --Ermell 10:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination eggs of black-headed gull - Oeufs de Mouette rieuse --Ercé 10:08, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 11:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Studzionka, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 10:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Argenberg 10:27, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle. Kończyce Małe, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 10:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:08, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Matthew church. Ogrodzona, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 10:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ercé 10:12, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clematis 'Juuli' flower. --Salicyna 09:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ercé 10:12, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hemerocallis 'Darla Anita' flower. --Salicyna 09:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Abit too dark, but good quality IMO. --Tournasol7 10:09, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hemerocallis 'Pink Flirt' flower. --Salicyna 09:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rhododendron nitidulum var. omeiense flower. --Salicyna 09:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A sunset on the Mediterranean Sea, Pigeon Rocks, Beirut, Lebanon. --Argenberg 09:27, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The largest Crusader fortress in Lebanon, the Citadel of Raymond de Saint-Gilles, Tripoli, Lebanon. --Argenberg 09:27, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Alexander Leisser 12:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The wall with two gates in Grodziszcze 1 --Jacek Halicki 07:44, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Rodhullandemu 09:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The wall with two gates in Grodziszcze 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:44, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Rodhullandemu 09:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The wall with two gates in Grodziszcze 3 --Jacek Halicki 07:44, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Rodhullandemu 09:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Michael Archangel church in Krzyżowa 1 --Jacek Halicki 07:44, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Michael Archangel church in Krzyżowa 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:44, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Deposition by Zenone Veronese in the Santa Maria Annunziata church in Salò. --Moroder 07:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ceiling of the church of the Assumption of Mary, Kirchhaslach, Germany --Poco a poco 07:00, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Back view of the church of the Assumption of Mary, Kirchhaslach, Germany --Poco a poco 07:00, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Back view of the church of the Assumption of Mary, Kirchhaslach, Germany --Poco a poco 07:00, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pipe organ of the church of the Assumption of Mary, Kirchhaslach, Germany --Poco a poco 07:00, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination High altar of the church of the Assumption of Mary, Kirchhaslach, Germany --Poco a poco 07:00, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wildflowers & Mountains, Sissu, Lahaul, Himachal. Elev. 3,200m (10,500') --Tagooty 06:56, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Buffalo calf, Marhi, en route to Rohtang Pass, Himachal. Elev. 3360m (11,024') --Tagooty 06:56, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, --Fischer.H 07:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Paul church in Salles-la-Source, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, nice evening atmosphere. --Aristeas 07:31, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Senhora do Padrao chapel in Monte Córdova, Portugal. --Tournasol7 06:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:32, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flowers and buds of an Eucomis montana (Pineapple lily). Focus stack of 12 photos.
    --Famberhorst 05:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:49, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a false limpet, Siphonaria javanica --Llez 05:24, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tree lungwort, Lobaria pulmonaria, Wutach region, Germany --Llez 05:24, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Esbeek-NL, statue: baron Edward Remy --Michielverbeek 05:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Esbeek-NL, church: the Sint Adrianuskerk --Michielverbeek 05:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 08:11, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Diessen-NL, church: the Sint-Willibrorduskerk --Michielverbeek 05:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hilvarenbeek, windmill: windmolen De Doornboom --Michielverbeek 05:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bulungu. The Crypt "Qach-Keshene" --Александр Байдуков 02:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose The branches are sharp, but disturbing. And there are halos and CAs. --XRay 08:09, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vasilkovo bridge --Александр Байдуков 02:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sky overexposed and unsharp. F/22 is too much, better something like f/8 or f/11 and ND filter. --XRay 08:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Assumption of Saint Mary church. Zebrzydowice, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 13:27, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Comment Very good composition, but it could be sharper. --Augustgeyler 21:18, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
     Done Sharpness added. Please take a look again. Hope is better now:) --Halavar 00:27, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support  Weak support It did improve. But the sharpness is still low, but meeting the mimimum for QI. --Augustgeyler 09:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The top floor of the bell tower of the Cathedral of Saint Domnius - SplitI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2020. --Sumitsurai 11:31, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:34, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Santa Maria Annunziata church in Salò. --Moroder 05:21, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. Nice lighting in my opinion. --Lion-hearted85 20:08, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Asthma inhaler isolated on white background in Benin --Adoscam 14:35, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Noisy, poor focus. Mobile phone cameras usually do not give QI. --Tagooty 07:02, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Asthma inhaler isolated on white background in Benin --Adoscam 14:32, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Noisy, poor focus. --Tagooty 07:00, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Populonia - The door of the Castle --PROPOLI87l 07:44, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Focus problem. Image is not sharp enough. --Halavar 10:01, 30 September 2020 (UTC) DoneI added sharpnessPROPOLI87 09:51, 2 October 2020
     Oppose Sorry, the top of the wall is still not sharp enough and strange artefacts seem to have been added. Rodhullandemu 09:56, 2 October 2020 (UTC) * Doneimproved sharpness, but starting from the rawPROPOLI87 19:08, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
    It may just be me, but I still think teh top of the wall is not sharp enough and there appears to be a halo effect at its top right, but I'll happily defer to anyone else's better eyesight. Rodhullandemu 19:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)* CommentNo problem, I've tried to improve it but it's not great. Thanks for your suggestions.PROPOLI87 20:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 20:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Populonia - Santa Croce Church --PROPOLI87l 07:44, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose too less detail --Augustgeyler 20:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
     Comment What do you mean by too few details? In the photo or description?I would like to fix it because it is part of the WLM --PROPOLI87 09:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
     Comment With "detail" I mean the density of information your picture is able to reproduce from the real world. Your image shows very less. It does not show a sharp structure of surfaces like stones etc.. If you don't have a large RAW this might not be fixable. --Augustgeyler 09:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)* CommentThanks for the clarification. I tried to give the photo more structure, but in some parts it gets worse, so I leave it like this. We'll see. PROPOLI87 10:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 10:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Populonia - Populonia Castle – Interior --PROPOLI87l 07:44, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose No detail here and lack of perspective correction, pictures like this one are far from QI, there's no point in nominating them after months. I expect by now that you make something out of the reviews you get here and in FPC. --Poco a poco 17:24, 30 September 2020 (UTC): Commentok. thank youPROPOLI87 19:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 19:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)* DoneCorrectPROPOLI87 12:14, 2 October 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 12:14, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Annunciation church, Mindelheim, Germany --Poco a poco 11:35, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Some noise should be removed. --Ermell 20:55, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
     Done --Poco a poco 18:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Amanita muscaria Location De Famberhorst. Focus stack of 9 photos.
    --Famberhorst 06:14, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:33, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
     Comment Awesome! Could you identify the seed on the left? Is it an acorn? I'd recommend adding a category for it if you can identify it. -- Ikan Kekek 06:35, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
     Done. Category Chestnuts added. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst 08:26, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
     Support Very good quality and composition --Tagooty 01:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
     Comment It's not necessary for more than one person to support a QIC nomination with a vote, unless it's in consensual review, but what is important is not to change "Promotion" back to "Nomination" by mistake. I changed its status back to promotion. -- Ikan Kekek 04:58, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
    @Ikan Kekek: I used QICvoter to comment, I did not notice that it changed the "Promotion" back to "Nomination" --Tagooty 15:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monument to Johann Strauss, Stadtpark, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 17:31, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    f you want to make it super perfect, try to crop a little on the left to get the composition perfetly centered --Augustgeyler 18:59, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
     New version --Poco a poco 19:25, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
    Sorry, I hardly tried but I could not see any visiual differenz between both version. Could you please check that? --Augustgeyler 21:18, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
    Please, clean the cache of your browser, as you can see in the file history the change in terms of pixels is significant --Poco a poco 11:46, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Nice shot. The crop on the sides is perfectly balanced now. --Lion-hearted85 19:59, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Before the dust storm in Rosignano(Livorno)--PROPOLI87 13:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    Description and categories need improvement --MB-one 13:56, 28 September 2020 (UTC) DonePROPOLI87 08:36, 29 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 08:36, 29 September 2020 (UTC)  I withdraw my nominationPROPOLI87 19:55, 29 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 19:55, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Polish Embassy in Prague. By User:Jorgeroyan --Andrew J.Kurbiko 22:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Some CA along the roof edges. Perspective, and only part of the main subject shown. --Tagooty 07:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Downtown Toluca City, Abasolo Street. --Marrovi 02:02, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    The image is leaning in, please fix it. --XRay 04:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination station Stötteritz: at turn-off Anger to entry signal A new superstructure was build (by Falk2) --Augustgeyler 16:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Stepping onto railway tracks is life-threatening. This template should not be missing here. --Ermell 20:29, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
    Are you sure. It was taken by a track worker directly at reconstruction. Is it that template a wikimedia rule I did not know? --Augustgeyler 22:14, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
    It is not a rule, but there are always accidents with people during such photo actions. It is therefore important to draw attention to this fact. The safest place for entering the tracks is the level crossing. --Ermell 19:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
     Done I added: „Danger: Railway-tracks may never be entered by unauthorized persons outside special facilities like level crossings!“ --Augustgeyler 20:38, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
    The author (Falk2) reverted my edit. He says such warnings might not be necessary. He is allowed to take such pictures as a railway official. --Augustgeyler 22:42, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
    It is not a matter of permission but of endangering imitators. --Ermell 22:15, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
    The autor was uppset when I added the warning. He said it can't be an argument aggainst QI. I think he is right. --Augustgeyler 20:46, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
     Support There is no reason to be upset when a required warning is added. However, it is also no reason for rejection. --Ermell 07:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
     Comment You may want to use a sharpening filter as the frame lacks clarity --Virtual-Pano 08:05, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Neue Burg, Hofburg, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 07:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    The disturbing shadow at the right side should be removed. --Ermell 20:40, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
    What do you mean? it's a night image and the light of the buildings is not very powerful, there are many shadows. Which one is disturbing? --Poco a poco 10:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
    A ghost person can be seen on the right edge. --Ermell 19:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
     Cropped --Poco a poco 18:36, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:24, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relaxed People in City Gardens adjacent to Latvian Freedom Monument (Independence Memorial in Riga) --Scotch Mist 06:22, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 12:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blue Moon over Zeche Gneisenau in Dortmund Scharnhorst --Rainer Halama 10:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
    I am not sure about the monitor calibration. Is it too dark? I don't want to spoil the mood by pulling it up too much. --Rainer Halama 10:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose good balance between light and shadow, but pretty much everything is severly washed out --Virtual-Pano 22:17, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blue Moon over Zeche Gneisenau in Dortmund Scharnhorst --Rainer Halama 10:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support detailed and well balanced --Virtual-Pano 22:17, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Basilica, Ottobeuren, Germany --Poco a poco 06:33, 24 September 2020 (UTC)  Comment I suggest to change the aspect ratio. The portal has probably a semicircular arch --Moroder 01:59, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
     Done --Poco a poco 18:38, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 07:14, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Wiki Loves Earth 2020. By User:VITORBBARBOSA --Rodrigo.Argenton 20:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    Amazing. But Is it allowed to nominate pictures with a white frame? --Augustgeyler 00:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Głowacki shaft hoisting tower. „Ignacy” Historic Mine. Rybnik, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 08:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Slightly dark imo. --ArildV 13:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
     Done New fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 12:15, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Vincent60030 15:02, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
     Weak support well executed, the very top of the steel tower is blurred, hence only a weak support --Virtual-Pano 23:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Saint Paul church in Salles-la-Source, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:52, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    I'd argue too much empty space. I tried (on my screen) a crop which removes the top 5% and the bottom 20% and it was an improvement to my eye. --Bobulous 17:14, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spier of limestone rock of the Mount Alben in Lombardy, Italy.--Mænsard vokser 18:10, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
    The image is too dark for me. --SCP-2000 08:14, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose Brighter shadows would be beneficial to the picture; but it lacks detail, I'm sorry. --Lion-hearted85 19:44, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Tomb_of_I'timād-ud-Daulah_-_Agra_-_Uttar_Pradesh_-_008.jpg

• Nomination Tomb of I'timād-ud-Daulah, India (by Rupeshsarkar) --Atudu 09:19, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
  
•  Support Good quality. --Alexander Leisser 12:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I disagree. Pixelated, washed out, not centered... --Podzemnik 06:44, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose … and the building looks like collapsing — I mean, a perspective correction would be necessary, but will be difficult because there is probably not enough room at the left and right. --Aristeas 09:07, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. Far from QI --Milseburg 10:57, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Perspective --Palauenc05 20:50, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Palauenc05 20:50, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Butzweiler_Wegekreuz_1635.jpg

• Nomination Wayside cross (1635) in Newel-Butzweiler, Germany. --Palauenc05 15:03, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 20:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
  A bit soft. But its white balance is not ok. --Augustgeyler 09:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
  What does that mean? It's exactly the colour of the stone. --Palauenc05 11:51, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

 Comment Was hier seit einiger Zeit an Nörgeleien abgeht, ist ungeheuerlich. Ich habe mittlerweile keine Lust mehr, hier noch ein Bild vorzustellen. Mehr dazu steht auf meiner Benutzerseite. – The nagging that startet here for some time is outrageous. Meanwhile, I don't feel like presenting another picture here. You can find more information on my user page -- Spurzem (talk) 19:19, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support (Very) Slight overexposure (somewhat fading colours in the background), but main object is well depicted. --Smial 20:46, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support exactly as Smial. --Aristeas 09:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Milseburg 11:06, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Baralacha_La_towards_Leh_Jul19_D72_10848.jpg

• Nomination Bara-lacha La, Himachal towards Leh, Ladakh. Elev. 4,890m (16,040') --Tagooty 08:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion

 Support Good quality. --DXR 08:46, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

 Weak oppose In my point of view there is not enough detail, espcially at the foreground with its cars. --Augustgeyler 21:18, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

@Augustgeyler: Pl. see the new version with some sharpening to improve clarity. Note that the focus of this image is the landscape in this desolate high-altitude semi-desert. The vehicles add only a small element of context -- the highway from Manali to Leh. --Tagooty 05:56, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Neutral Yes your edit improved it. I changed my vote to neutral.--Augustgeyler 07:58, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Moroder 10:34, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Moroder 10:34, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

File:2015_Kraków,_Wawel,_Baszta_Złodziejska_04.jpg

• Nomination Thief Tower. Wawel. Kraków, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 10:02, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose The upper part of that building is out of focus. --Augustgeyler 14:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
• I disagree. I would like to hear opinions of others --Halavar 14:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose well composed image but bricks and roof tiles in the upper part of the frame (starting just below the line of the white window sills) are blurry. An artistic shot nevertheless. --Virtual-Pano (talk) 22:17, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Moroder 10:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 16:40, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

File:2015_Kraków,_Wawel,_Bazylika_archikatedralna_św._Stanisława_i_św._Wacława_13.jpg

• Nomination Sigismund Chapel. Archcathedral Basilica of Saints Stanislaus and Wenceslaus. Wawel. Kraków, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 10:02, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose It is cropped to much on the left. --Augustgeyler 21:18, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Yes, the composition is lacking.--Peulle 09:24, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:24, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Augustgeyler. Should be some room for a wider crop on the left, I would support it. --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 19:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad crop to the left. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:20, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per above Poco a poco 21:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 19:57, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Old_Jewish_Cemetery_in_Josefov,_Prague_-_8363.jpg

• Nomination Old Jewish Cemetery in Josefov, Prague. By User:Jorgeroyan --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:30, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Moroder 04:22, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose The composition is missing a clearer decission what to show and what to cropp; and the white balance is looking strange. Please discuss! --Augustgeyler 10:06, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality --Jakubhal 05:33, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality to me, too. -- Ikan Kekek 16:39, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unclear subject.--Peulle 09:25, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. --Fischer.H 12:49, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Not the best photo ever, but OK if we compare it with many other QIs promoted in the last years. The subject is the cemetery, of course, and while the composition is not a masterpiece, the photo easily achieves to give an impression of the cemetery. --Aristeas 07:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support OK for QI. --A.Savin 14:05, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't have any problems with the compo and yes the WB is a bit too cold but still ok, but the image is clearly tilted, look at the building on the right (background) Poco a poco 21:21, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promote?   --Aristeas 07:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

File:2015_Kraków,_Zespół_klasztorny_paulinów_01.jpg

• Nomination Skałka Monastery. Kraków, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 09:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 19:51, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose In my eyes there is not enough detail. --Augustgeyler 14:45, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, I agree with August on this one. -- Ikan Kekek 06:44, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support The very soft lighting fools you into thinking that the image is not sharp enough. But in fact it is still within acceptable limits, although not necessarily outstanding. --Smial 10:30, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Ok for me. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:14, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm landing on the opposing side; even for a 2015 photo, the minimum level of sharpness I expect of a building is to be able to read that text on the wall.--Peulle 09:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose somewhat soft throughout and even taking the dificult light conditions into the consideration the left hand side of the roof is too blury

•  Comment Virtual-Pano, if that's your comment, please sign it. -- Ikan Kekek 19:07, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose Agree, it lacks sharpness Poco a poco 21:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Decline?   --Virtual-Pano 21:52, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Karden,_Stiftsschule_-_Nordost_(2020-07-12_Sp).jpg

• Nomination Old school building with stepped gable in Karden -- Spurzem 10:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. Image is not sharp enough. Pixelization. I think that problem can't be fixed. --Halavar 15:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Where are you seeing pixellation, and at what screen size? Even at full size on my 19-inch screen, it looks pretty good, with some blotchiness in the sky. Looks fine on my 13-inch. IMO, solid quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:28, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
•  weak contra I do see not enough detail.--Augustgeyler 13:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

@Augustgeyler: Don't you have another better contra argument? If you look at the building on Google Maps, you will see that a photographer cannot find a position to show the eastern front and the stair gable together. I suppose that's what you mean when you don't see enough detail. Or should I have had a few more windows broken in the gable wall? -- Spurzem 14:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

 Comment Dear @Spurzem, you got me wrong. Of course nobody wants the photographer to change the taken object. What we may ask the photographer, is to reproduce as much detail as we could see as a real observer in situ. I am missing these existing details of the real world which are not captured (or at least not reproduced) by that image, like structures of leaves, plaster, metal and other surfaces. Your image shows very less details of that kind due to processing or compression or perhaps coursed by overexposure at some areas. --Augustgeyler (talk) 17:06, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose As always a very good composition and informative view, but burnt, overexposed clouds, sorry. This is most likely not to be fixed without it looking very strange. --Smial 15:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

@Smial: Danke für den erneuten Tritt! Er sollte mir endgültig verbieten, hier noch weiter vorstellig zu werden. Lange wäre es sowieso nicht mehr. Trotzdem weiß ich nicht, ob ich mich nur wundern oder ärgern soll, welcher Murks und Schrott hier mitunter hochgejubelt wird. Ich habe schon QIs mit helleren Wolken, dunklen Schatten (zum Beispiel etwas weiter oben), hässlichen Unschärfen, Farbstichen und Überbelichtungen gesehen, die niemand beanstandete. Gruß -- Spurzem 17:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Schade, daß du das persönlich nimmst. Du weißt genau, daß ich sehr viel von deiner Fotografie halte und habe schon manche deiner Bilder bei mMn ungerechtfertigten Abwertungen verteidigt. Aber ich bemühe mich sehr um Neutralität. Solcherlei ausgefressene Lichter habe ich schon sehr häufig bemängelt (und bin dann oft genug überstimmt worden), da kann ich hier nicht drüber hinwegsehen. Wenn du aus dem Raw eine Version entwickeln kannst, bei der die Wolken eine halbwegs natürlich erscheinende Struktur bekommen, ändere ich gerne meine Beurteilung. Aus dem JPG geht es nicht, es sieht Sch**** aus, wenn man daran herumfrickelt. -- Smial 20:51, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

@Smial: Mit RAW habe ich mich noch nicht befasst; das ist mir auf meine alten Tage zu kompliziert. Mal sehen, vielleicht lade ich das eine oder andere Bild noch in die Commons hoch, wenn es mir inhaltlich interessant erscheint. Aber bei QI habe ich offensichtlich nichts mehr verloren; schade. Gruß -- Spurzem 09:32, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Oh, sorry, daß du nicht RAW knipst, war mir nicht bekannt, den Vorschlag hätte ich dann nicht gemacht. Hast du es mal mit Belichtungsreihen versucht bei statischen Motiven mit solch hohen Kontrasten? Aufhellen zu dunkler Bereiche geht fast immer, aber was einmal RGB (250,250,255) hat, ist halt futsch. Speicherplatz kostet ja nichts. Und, ja, du solltest in jedem Fall hier weiter Bilder vorstellen und nicht immer gleich mit Rückzug drohen, wenn mal eins keine Mehrheit bekommt. Deine Fotografie ist gestalterisch deutlich über dem Durchschnitt hier. --Smial 15:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose details lost in the white areas of the sky, likely due to a small overexposition. Christian Ferrer 22:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Imo some wrong pixels in the sky are irrelevant. What counts is the good composition --Moroder 04:17, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose A little bit to much CAs for me. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:16, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 06:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Not so concerned about white areas of the sky but reduced CAs would have been preferred although overall still QI for me --Scotch Mist 08:20, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others, sorry. --A.Savin 14:02, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Sorry? Okay. -- Spurzem 21:04, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose as per Augustgeyler. Crep171166 09:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Apart from the overall sharpness issue that is no sky for QI, sorry Poco a poco 21:13, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 8 oppose → Decline?   --Crep171166 09:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Riga_Landmarks_98.jpg

• Nomination Riga Castle from opposite embankment of Daugava River --Scotch Mist 05:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. Too dark. --Augustgeyler 16:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:09, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment a bit dark indeed. --Christian Ferrer 20:24, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I tend to agree with August and Christian; I'd like to support, but the water looks too dark compared to the sky. Would you like to address that? -- Ikan Kekek 05:38, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Have lightened foreground including river --Scotch Mist 15:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment I marked some artefacts (black „painted“ lines) which now exist – perhaps – due to your corrections. Otherwise there are still completely black areas in the trees.--Augustgeyler 20:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Have reverted image to original and lightened --Scotch Mist 04:54, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Good enough quality for the rather large size. Ikan Kekek 06:23, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I am wondering that nobody is seeing the very dark trees and that very high contrast. Perhaps it's a matter of taste or I am just completely wrong.--Augustgeyler 20:57, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Exactly. I see them and give the photographer some latitude to make that choice. -- Ikan Kekek 05:08, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Perhaps you are right.--Augustgeyler 07:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. I agree with all of you with the fact that the picture has quite a strong contrast and dark shadows (especially the black area in the foreground trees). If you have a raw file of this picture, you could try to raise just the shadows and/or the blacks in the tone curve to soften the contrast. I have seen the photo with screens of different types and this could be beneficial on some of them. --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 10:32, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment In fact, Scotch Mist, you tend to apply too much contrast in your processing, same applies here. In this case the image sharpness is IMHO just over the bar, but you need a better equipment as the compos of your images are really good and you travel a lot. Apart from some processing issues the main problem here is the camera...

•  Comment @Lion-hearted85: Thank you for taking the time to provide informative comments which are appreciated! I find it interesting that while some of the photos I nominate admittedly challenge QI technical standards I have not opposed photos that IMHO I find relatively dull and uninteresting, and where perhaps the QI technical standards have also been challenging, but instead have still appreciated merits of photo subject\composition. Certainly my photos often tend to highlight specific features and natural colours, sometimes from odd perspectives, but as previously indicated by others the final balance is, and I believe should remain, a matter of individual preference and ‘artistic licence’ afforded the photographer. (If all QI photos were to reflect the apparent colour palettes seemingly preferred by some who oppose the images of others on apparently subjective bases I would respectively suggest that the overall range of photos assessed as QIs would seem rather limited in the eyes of more widely objective reviewers!:) --Scotch Mist 10:27, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Ikan Kekek 06:22, 29 September 2020 (UTC)