Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 02 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:2019-10-05-Schwebebahnstation_Ohligsmühle-7325.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Schwebebahnstation Ohligsmühle. By User:Superbass.
  • Promotion
  •  Support Excellent composition. --Im Fokus 21:54, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Well composed but level of detail is too low, perhaps too much noise reduction. The train is too unsharp. --Augustgeyler 11:37, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Probably motion blur, but just barely acceptable for me. --King of Hearts 02:25, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 10:24, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Hamburg_Veddeler_Damm_Windhukkai_9.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Hamburg-Mitte, Veddeler Damm/Windhukkai 9, shed 59 --KaiBorgeest 22:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Light and weather conditions resulting on underexposed --Wilfredor 23:54, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I think this photo is OK as a depiction of this scene in fog. -- Ikan Kekek 21:13, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan. -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose all days are not suitable for photography. --Kallerna 08:57, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan --Asmodea Oaktree 11:55, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose with Kallerna. --Augustgeyler 18:58, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan--Ermell 10:00, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 10:26, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Mille_Miglia_2020_partenza_N_126_Fiat_Aladoro_in_Viale_Venezia_a_Brescia.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Ready for departure at the Mille Miglia 93th edition 2020 of the number 126. --Moroder 05:07, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:39, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It looks distorted to me. Did you apply strong perspective correction? --MB-one 12:16, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Of course it’s distorted: a closeup with a wide angle lens (45 mm. medium format). Every photo bears distortions, it’s up to anyone to accept it or not, unless you don’t accept photography --Moroder 14:22, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Question It looks good to me. MB-one, are you seeing stretching in front, or is there something else that's bothering you? I'm not familiar with the appearance of this model. -- Ikan Kekek 10:14, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: Yes, it seems to me, as if the right side if the vehicle is reaching further forward, than the left side. --MB-one 20:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Thanks for explaining. It's reaching further forward because it's closer to the viewer than the left side and we're looking at it at a slant. It looks like normal photographic perspective to me. -- Ikan Kekek 10:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I also think that this image is too distorted. -- Spurzem 11:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. I really don't like the wide angle perspective, but technically the image is without faults. --Smial 14:20, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Weak support The wide angle effect is used properly to exaggerate the existing long front proportions of this special car. The not centered view is not optimal for that effect but OK. --Augustgeyler (talk) 20:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Distortion. --Palauenc05 21:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I cannot say to which extent the image is accurate or just deceiving --Poco a poco 19:47, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support A valid way to photograph a car. --King of Hearts 01:33, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 04:56, 2 November 2020 (UTC)