Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 20 2023
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination View over the wetland nature reserve.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 18 May 2023 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --XRay 04:30, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination View over the wetland nature reserve.
-
- Nomination Paesens-Moddergat. Vissersmonument Moddergat (Fisherman Monument.) 1 of 5 parts.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 18 May 2023 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --XRay 04:30, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination Paesens-Moddergat. Vissersmonument Moddergat (Fisherman Monument.) 1 of 5 parts.
-
- Nomination View of Reykjavík from Hallgrímskirkja. Esja mountains in the background --Jakubhal 04:08, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Comber (Serranus cabrilla), Cablo de Palos, Spain --Poco a poco 04:00, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:04, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ornate wrasse (Thalassoma pavo), Cablo de Palos, Spain --Poco a poco 04:00, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:04, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spotted sea-rind squirt (Pseudodistoma cyrnusense), Cabo de Palos, Spain --Poco a poco 04:00, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spotted sea-rind squirt (Pseudodistoma cyrnusense), Cabo de Palos, Spain --Poco a poco 04:00, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:04, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spotted sea-rind squirt (Pseudodistoma cyrnusense), Cabo de Palos, Spain --Poco a poco 04:00, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:04, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dülmen wild horses at the wild horse track in Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dülmen wild horses at the wild horse track in Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Eureka Tower (Yarra River and Evan Walker Bridge), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia --XRay 03:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of the Holy Cross Church, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Candle at a wayside shrine at the Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture of León, in the west access of Cerro Santa Lucía. --Rjcastillo 02:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture Strong Love. --Rjcastillo 02:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture The Twilight. --Rjcastillo 02:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture to Horace. --Rjcastillo 02:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:09, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture Arturo Maximiano Edwards Ross. --Rjcastillo 02:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cherry Blossom --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:08, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mallard Ducks --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:10, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunset from Ontario Place --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:10, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunset from Ontario Place --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:10, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunset from Ontario Place --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:08, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former rectory from the year 1727 in Glantschach #1, Liebenfels, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fresco of Saint Christopher at the parish church Saint Andrew in Glantschach, Liebenfels, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Homestead Hafner in Gabriel, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:01, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Forest in Gabriel, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:01, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shooting stand at the forest in Gabriel, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:01, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination WD-40 --Jacek Halicki 00:35, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:03, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Conical lead bullets --Jacek Halicki 00:35, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:03, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Protective glasses 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:35, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:03, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Protective glasses 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:35, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:16, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 9 mm cartridge cases --Jacek Halicki 00:35, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:16, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 4GB Imation branded SD Card --Mister rf 00:19, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:36, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination MGS2086 Vacuum Photocell in a box --Mister rf 00:19, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:36, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination MGS2086 Vacuum Photocell --Mister rf 00:19, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:36, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Miniature monochrome CRT --Mister rf 00:19, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:36, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 6Ж8 (6Zh8) and 6K3 vacuum tube boxes --Mister rf 00:19, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:36, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Terrace of the Elephants. Angkor Thom, Siem Reap Province, Cambodia. --Halavar 16:33, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bayon. Angkor Thom, Siem Reap Province, Cambodia. --Halavar 16:33, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rossiya on the Khimki Reservoir --Mike1979 Russia 16:26, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:24, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Knyazhna Viktoriya on Khimki Reservoir --Mike1979 Russia 16:26, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes-AMG GLC (X254) development mule in Sindelfingen.--Alexander-93 16:08, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:26, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Violet sea urchin (Sphaerechinus granularis), Arrábida National Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 13:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:31, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Violet sea urchin (Sphaerechinus granularis), Arrábida National Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 13:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mediterranean fanworm (Sabella spallanzanii), Arrábida National Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 13:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pond in the Schellenbergmoor
--F. Riedelio 13:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination Pond in the Schellenbergmoor
-
- Nomination Pond in the Schellenbergmoor
--F. Riedelio 13:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination Pond in the Schellenbergmoor
-
- Nomination Hôtel de la Coquille in Provins, Seine-et-Marne, France. --Tournasol7 13:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:37, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at 14 rue du Palais in Provins, Seine-et-Marne, France. --Tournasol7 13:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:37, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 3 place du Châtel in Provins, Seine-et-Marne, France. --Tournasol7 13:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:35, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dovecote in Mistelbach near Bayereuth --Ermell 10:03, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rectory of the Church of St. Bartholomew in Mistelbach --Ermell 10:03, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baptismal font of the Bartholomäus church in Glashütten --Ermell 10:03, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountain in Mistelbach near Bayereuth --Ermell 10:03, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Evangelical church St. Bartholomew in Mistelbach --Ermell 10:03, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination DFSK Fengon 7 in Esslingen.--Alexander-93 09:50, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:05, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Close wing basking position of Danaus genutia (Cramer, 1779) - Striped Tiger (Male) --ManaskaMukhopadhyay 08:40, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sammandi 10:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Close wing mud puddling behaviour of Eurema andersonii (Moore, 1886) - One-spot Grass Yellow (Male) --ManaskaMukhopadhyay 08:38, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sammandi 10:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grave in the Bellu Cemetery, unknown owner --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:39, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 15:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rural house, Rue de Bousbecque 1, in Halluin, France --Velvet 06:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 13:13, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former Tiberghien country house, Rue de Lille 364, in Roncq, France --Velvet 06:31, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 13:13, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Falkenhaus, Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany --XRay 03:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Question Is that pink/purple CA on the lights inside the shop in the building on the left, or were some of those lights actually that color? -- Ikan Kekek 07:53, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Done IMO CAs. Anyway, they are removed (reduced) now. Thank you. --XRay 13:18, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Much better. Thanks! -- Ikan Kekek 19:21, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fatima une contributrice de wikimedia . --Aboubacarkhoraa 00:50, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:54, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ruedenau, still of St. Kilian Distillers --KaiBorgeest 21:54, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 06:02, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hordafor II in Austevoll. --Vasmar1 19:43, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Audi Sport Quattro (Group B) in Filderstadt.--Alexander-93 19:25, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hyundai Ioniq 6 in Filderstadt.--Alexander-93 19:25, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint-Roch Church, in Roncq, France --Velvet 06:44, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Siége de la direction de la société Orange Guinée --Aboubacarkhoraa 23:35, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Would need perspective correction, but the detail on the building is also low, seems blurred to me --FlocciNivis 18:22, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the vineyard "Forster Kirchenstück" to Forst --FlocciNivis 21:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 17:40, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BMW i7 xDrive60 in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 21:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Münsing-Ammerland via Lake Starnberg to the west to the setting sun
--F. Riedelio 07:10, 14 May 2023 (UTC) - Promotion Nice, but tilted in ccw direction Poco a poco 08:12, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
New version Improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 06:02, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Support OK now for the new uploaded pic. Good quality. --Mister rf 22:53, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination View from Münsing-Ammerland via Lake Starnberg to the west to the setting sun
-
- Nomination View from Münsing-Ammerland via Lake Starnberg to the west to the setting sun
--F. Riedelio 07:10, 14 May 2023 (UTC) - Promotion It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 08:18, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
What's the noise in the water under the sun? Is it fixable? --Vasmar1 20:46, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
New version Thank you for the review. Perspective correction and noise improved. The noise under the sun was probably caused by stitching 5 photos into one HDR photo. --F. Riedelio 05:50, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Support The new version is OK. --Mister rf 22:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination View from Münsing-Ammerland via Lake Starnberg to the west to the setting sun
-
- Nomination View of La Toussuire from below la Grande Verdette, wide, 2023 by User:DimiTalen--Ezarate 16:50, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline Tilted CW, buildings are leaning, so image needs perspective correction --Halavar 18:43, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
done, thanks --Ezarate 10:46, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Better, but still buildings on the right side are leaning. Verticals of those buildings should be straight. --Halavar 18:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
done, thanks --Ezarate 11:09, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose I don't know what have you done, but now it is worse. Picture is now not sharp enough and Level of detail too low. Sorry, not a QI. --Halavar 17:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Hoesbach, valley of Kellerbergbach --KaiBorgeest 21:44, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: A Green-veined White on a flower in the special conservation area Ismaninger Speichersee und Fischteiche --FlocciNivis 19:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: A Green-veined White on a flower in the special conservation area Ismaninger Speichersee und Fischteiche --FlocciNivis 19:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: A Green-veined White on a flower in the special conservation area Ismaninger Speichersee und Fischteiche --FlocciNivis 19:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Street sign of Saint-Lazare Street in Paris, France. --Chabe01 08:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Street sign of Vosges Square in Paris, France. --Chabe01 08:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Street sign of Rivoli Street in Paris, France. --Chabe01 08:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Volcán de Teneguía --Imehling 05:48, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: he emptiness is palpable on this sad day at Noarderleech. (information board about accessibility of the area.)
--Famberhorst 05:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: he emptiness is palpable on this sad day at Noarderleech. (information board about accessibility of the area.)
-
- Nomination: Waltensburg/Vuorz, railway station. View from the Vorderrheinbrücke of the Vorderrhein stream upstream.
--Famberhorst 05:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Waltensburg/Vuorz, railway station. View from the Vorderrheinbrücke of the Vorderrhein stream upstream.
-
- Nomination: Vue du Grand Baobab de Kankan --Aboubacarkhoraa 15:25, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review
There are some dust spots that need to be removed, otherwise it's imo good enough for a QI --FlocciNivis 19:08, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Seattle_in_May_2023_-_66.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle --Another Believer 02:50, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 17:42, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice light and interesting view, but the image lacks texture and detail ( Overprocessed). --Augustgeyler 22:11, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Augustgeyler.--Alexander-93 16:58, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Augustgeyler 23:36, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Seattle_in_May_2023_-_075.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Seattle Japanese Garden, U.S. --Another Believer 06:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality --Halavar 18:41, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose "Seattle in May 2023" is not a proper description. Additionally the image lacks sharpness and detail.--Augustgeyler 22:07, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Support Of course somebody says the picture is not sharp enough and that he miss details. The fact that the image description is now also important for the quality is a new addition. For me is the form of the picture very important too, and that is good. -- Spurzem 10:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Level of detail too low Level of detail too low, especially the white flowers. --F. Riedelio 13:16, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per F. Riedelio --Jakubhal 14:47, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Augustgeyler 23:37, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Seattle_in_May_2023_-_076.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Seattle Japanese Garden, U.S. --Another Believer 06:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 20:47, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose "Seattle in May 2023" is not a proper description. Additionally the image lacks sharpness and detail.--Augustgeyler 22:07, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Support. Sharp enough for me, beautiful image, good composition. -- Spurzem 10:33, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Level of detail too low Level of detail too low, especially the white flowers. --F. Riedelio 13:18, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per F. Riedelio --Jakubhal 14:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Parts seem overexposed. Might be fixable. -- Ikan Kekek 19:31, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Augustgeyler 23:41, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Mallard_Ducks_in_High_Park_03.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Mallard Duck --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:18, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose no need for grass in front of face for such an easy-to-snap bird --Charlesjsharp 08:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- IMO the grass represents it's natural habitat. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:41, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Support Somewhat low DOF, but good enough for a decent A4-print. The grass is a very minor composition problem and a matter of taste. --Smial 09:48, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Support Acceptable for QI, per others. -- Ikan Kekek 21:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but there are some visible CA on the grass in the lower part of the image. Also some purple fringing on feathers and the DOF is low, the head is not all in focus, because the exposure time is to small and to compensate the diaphragm is wide open. Try the opposite. It's a standing duck. :) -- Mister rf 00:58, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, I worked a bit on the CA and the fringing. As I was taking the picture without a tripod I wanted to make sure the picture is sharp, so I used a higher shutter speed. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Support ok. --Rjcastillo 02:48, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Support Ok, for me --Jakubhal 04:53, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 23:38, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Irschenberger_Str._7_St._Korbinian_Dettendorf_Bad_Feilnbach-1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Irschenberger Straße 7; Filialkirche St. Korbinian; barocke Anlage, 1669, ausgebaut 1735; mit Ausstattung. By Rufus46 --Nightflyer 07:22, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
OpposeTilted, lacks perspective correction --Poco a poco 07:26, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Support New version is QI, thank you Spurzem Poco a poco 08:21, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose And very slight pink CA on left side of the building--LexKurochkin 08:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral Looks like I cannot see the new version, clicking on both versions I see the same result at full resolution. --LexKurochkin 09:04, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Support I made the small corrections myself and I hope that the critics will agree if I rate the picture with QI. -- Spurzem 13:34, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I think, we need to discuss it --LexKurochkin 15:00, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- IMO it's a license violation now. Authors of the image are Rufus46 (original) and Spurzem (overwritten original/derivative). --XRay 08:18, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Support Good for 2012 and at least a borderline QI in 2023. -- Ikan Kekek 06:50, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Info I started discussion on self-approval practice on Discussion page. I am not sure, if we can just count votes for this nomination, as the last version was made and uploaded by Spurzem who supported it. Sorry. --LexKurochkin 07:50, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Good looking. Resolution and detail are borderline. I think as an editor we should not vote on nominations. --Augustgeyler 08:51, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:01, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Something went wrong with the re-edit at the bottom, should be easy to fix though.--Julesvernex2 10:58, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Done. @Julesvernex2: You are right. Please look now. -- Spurzem 17:39, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Fixed, thank you! --Julesvernex2 (talk) 17:52, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Weak support Luminance noise could be improved. --F. Riedelio 09:48, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Support Good job fixing it. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:15, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 08:32, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Ola_Ryggefjord_in_Salthella,_Austevoll_02.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Ola Ryggefjord in Salthella, Austevoll. --Vasmar1 05:41, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Neutral There is something very strange with ship's name on the starboard. Several letters look blurred, like motion blur, but the most of the ship, and even part of its name is obviously sharp. Frankly, I don't understand how it might happen. --LexKurochkin 08:48, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Support Those details are not so important IMO.That's a nice pic. --Mister rf 18:46, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice pic indeed, but the blurred areas are noticeable even without zooming in (e.g. above the bridge and below the radar, on the poop deck). Caused by water droplets on the lens front element, perhaps? --Julesvernex2 11:10, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- The picture was taken inside my car, trough an open window, with no rain that day, so it can't be water causing it. It would be good to find out until next time. --Vasmar1 05:34, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- This one is a head-scratcher... It kinda seems like heat haze, but they're not near any obvious exhaust vent? It doesn't seem like an issue with the lens either (as it doesn't get worse towards the edges), but it's maybe worthwhile to take a few test shots to double-check --Julesvernex2 18:20, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, possible that it is due to heat haze because the photo was taken from the car, trough an open window, considering the temperature differences between inside and outside. -- Mister rf 21:54, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- This one is a head-scratcher... It kinda seems like heat haze, but they're not near any obvious exhaust vent? It doesn't seem like an issue with the lens either (as it doesn't get worse towards the edges), but it's maybe worthwhile to take a few test shots to double-check --Julesvernex2 18:20, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Weak support The luminance noise could be improved. --F. Riedelio 09:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Support ok. --Rjcastillo 02:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Support Acceptable. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:13, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 08:28, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Catedrala_Patriarhală,_București_(2023)_-_IMG_01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Romanian Orthodox Patriarchal Cathedral, Bucharest --Chainwit. 08:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --J. Lunau 09:01, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Good composition. But due to intense sharpening and noise reduction level of detail is too low here. --Augustgeyler 19:25, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Yeah, a lot of the photo looks strange, and the left side of the sky looks like it has smudges put on top of it like somewhat thick paint, rather than clouds. -- Ikan Kekek 06:53, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Augustgeyler and Ikan Kekek --LexKurochkin 07:42, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Augustgeyler --Halavar 12:18, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Disturbing person in the foreground --F. Riedelio 09:42, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Augustgeyler and Ikan --Jakubhal 14:53, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Declined --Augustgeyler 23:39, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Mumbai_-_Municipal_Corporation_Building.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Mumbai - Municipal Corporation Building --Imehling 05:53, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Poor crop. --SHB2000 08:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Question What's so bad about the crop? --Imehling 15:41, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Support The issue with the crop is that it could be nicer to include the entire fence around the statue. However, this crop is defensible, and the building is well captured. -- Ikan Kekek 07:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose The very strong PC led to unrealistic proportions of the buildings reproduction. --Augustgeyler 21:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- I wonder how you want to get such a building from that point of view without some distortion. This is just physically impossible. --Imehling 06:23, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment From this point of view there is no QI possible. Even with a wider lens, that standpoint would have to be much higher. Sometimes there is an alternative point of view available. Or another composition by selecting details of the building might work. But yes, there are objects which can't (or at least not without unrealistic amounts of effort) be photographed under QI standards. --Augustgeyler 09:00, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- You could get a better point of view by using a drone. But you would probably end up in a prison for planning a terrorist attack if you tried to do that in Mumbai ;-) --Imehling 19:21, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment From this point of view there is no QI possible. Even with a wider lens, that standpoint would have to be much higher. Sometimes there is an alternative point of view available. Or another composition by selecting details of the building might work. But yes, there are objects which can't (or at least not without unrealistic amounts of effort) be photographed under QI standards. --Augustgeyler 09:00, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- I wonder how you want to get such a building from that point of view without some distortion. This is just physically impossible. --Imehling 06:23, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Support Ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 09:10, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Support OK. --Rjcastillo 02:41, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Weak support Per others. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC)~
- Support Ok for QI --Jakubhal 14:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 23:40, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Seattle_in_May_2023_-_048.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Seattle Japanese Garden --Another Believer 14:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:02, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm not conviced about the sharpness here, sorry --Poco a poco 18:13, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Weak Support. Sharpness could be better, but good for me. -- Spurzem 16:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Not really sharp, slightly overprocessed, clouds are partly blown-out --LexKurochkin 09:29, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per others.--Peulle 11:38, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Support I agree, that sharpness could be better, but I think it's enough for a QI --Halavar 12:03, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Level of detail is IMHO too low Level of detail too low --F. Riedelio 09:34, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. In addition to the observations that have been made, the sky is posterized. -- Ikan Kekek 21:48, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined --Augustgeyler 08:30, 19 May 2023 (UTC)