Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 28 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Oriental_pratincole.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Oriental Pratincole (Glareola maldivarum) wisting and turning on long, angular wings, this relative of the sandpipers and plovers gives a swallowlike impression in flight. Adults are brown overall with an elegant black necklace and pale yellow throat. This bird was photographed at Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. By User:Shiv's fotografia --Satdeep Gill 12:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 13:55, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lacks detail and looks like it was hit with a smoothing filter, the heads of the chicks look distorted by this effect. ReneeWrites 15:12, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per ReneeWrites, something seems off, probably AI processing gone wrong. --Plozessor 17:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. Massive overprocessing, in particular by artificial depth of field. Is this an automatic photoshop function? I think I've seen similar effects more and more often lately, even here on QIC. If that's the case, even with an AI, then this function still has to learn that bokeh from lenses exists, and that it usually looks different in the foreground than in the background.--Smial 18:16, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Definitely  Overprocessed – looks like a painting. --Augustgeyler 13:56, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 17:54, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

File:At_the_British_Museum_2024_019.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination One of a set of Benin Bronzes at the British Museum --Mike Peel 02:43, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:12, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Casual composition. --Moroder 18:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Question What do you mean with that? QI composition guidelines mention "Unbalanced composition", "Unclear subject", "Non-existent subject", "Too tight crop" and "Too busy" as composition failure, none of which I see here. Thus * * *  Support from me. --Plozessor 16:04, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 12:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
  • preliminary  Oppose I suspect that the rod to which the exhibit is attached is probably vertical. The crop at the top and bottom is very unfavourable. Both should be changed, until then I agree with Moroder about the composition. It should be noted in the image description that this is a detail of a group of bronzes. "Third from top" or "centre section", if applicable, or something like that. --Smial 19:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bad crop. --Sebring12Hrs 11:06, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Better, thx. --Smial 10:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support --Moroder 18:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 18:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

File:At_Morocco_2023_20.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Volkswagen Caddy in Morocco --Mike Peel 05:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Lvova 09:01, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Car and background are too distorted. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 13:33, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Spurzem. --Smial 23:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support It seems to me that it is not necessary to find fault with insignificant details in the background, since they are not the subject of the shooting, while the main object is shown very qualitatively. -- Екатерина Борисова 01:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Hello Екатерина Борисова, just for your information: The main object is unnaturally distorted and not "shown very qualitatively". You can't really see it because it's too dark. And the background isn't supposed to be part of the picture indeed, but it is visible and it's hanging very crookedly. Best regards -- Spurzem 12:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Maybe you're right. I'm not much of an expert on cars. But I can't agree that the picture is too dark. -- Екатерина Борисова 20:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Nice looking image. But quit too much unbalanced distortion here. --August Geyler (talk) 07:24, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 17:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)