Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 25 2024
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Waterloopbos, detail of the monumental work of art Deltawerk // formerly Delta Flume. (artists RAAAF en Atelier de Lyon)
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 23 July 2024 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:29, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Waterloopbos, detail of the monumental work of art Deltawerk // formerly Delta Flume. (artists RAAAF en Atelier de Lyon)
-
- Nomination Hortus Haren (Groningen), a detail of the rock garden.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 23 July 2024 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:29, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Hortus Haren (Groningen), a detail of the rock garden.
-
- Nomination Main facade of the Cathedral of Girona, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:08, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination La Pia Almoina in Girona, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:08, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Onyar river in Girona, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:08, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:29, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Dominic convent in Girona, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:08, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Casa Comella in Vic, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:08, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Meadow in SAC and protected landscape area northwest of Sennfeld --Plozessor 03:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:10, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Featherfoil pond near Augsfeld, former natural monument (now part of nature reserve) --Plozessor 03:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:10, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Slope at "Hunters' path" east of Schweinfurt --Plozessor 03:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View into the park of "Paradise" monastic property (now conference center) near Schaffhausen --Plozessor 03:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Hausen flood control 1987-1994" memorial stone near Hausen/Schonungen --Plozessor 03:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:11, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior view (from outside to inside) of bunker 26 in the Dülmen-Visbeck special ammunition depot, Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Watchtower “Alpha” at the Dülmen-Visbeck special ammunition camp, Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Watchtower “Alpha” at the Dülmen-Visbeck special ammunition camp, Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Barrier in front of the vehicular sally port at the Dülmen-Visbeck special ammunition depot, Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:12, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church tower of Trani Cathedral, Italy --Bgag 02:27, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:55, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:57, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture of an elephant on Trani Cathedral, Italy --Bgag 02:27, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:55, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window and statues on Trani Cathedral, Italy --Bgag 02:27, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:55, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mount Adelung viewed from Ugom Chatkal National Park, Uzbekistan. By User:Arina Pan --Екатерина Борисова 02:01, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:50, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:51, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Manhole cover in Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 02:01, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:57, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Liatris spicata in Gatchina, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 02:01, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:31, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bust of Vespasianus, Summer Garden, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 02:01, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:57, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parasols at Strandleben bar on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:42, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:31, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parasols at Strandleben bar on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:42, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:31, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bust of Ernst Wahliss on Johannes Brahms Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:42, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:03, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lanterns on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:42, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:03, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Water slide tower at the lido on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:42, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:03, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Miniature poodle, Tapsi, in a coffee estate near Balamuri, Coorg, Karnataka, India --Tagooty 00:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:18, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gate, New Life Christian Fellowship Church, Nithiravilai, Kanyakumari --Tagooty 00:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Antique gramophone, Heritage Museum, Padmanabhapuram Palace --Tagooty 00:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Armstrong Whitworth braking locomotives, Paranapiacaba --Mike Peel 00:32, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:45, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bridge at Wodna Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bridge at Wodna Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 6-10 Matejki Street in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:34, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination E.Leclerc in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination E.Leclerc in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grave monument of Jan van Polanen II --ReneeWrites 23:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:53, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Haagsemarkt (Market square) in Princenhage --ReneeWrites 23:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Agios Ioannis Prodromos, Zygovitsi. --C messier 20:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Agioi Theodori in Valtesiniko, Arcadia. --C messier 20:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Outside view of the wall and stained-glass windows of the winter prayer hall in Nasir al-Mulk Mosque, Shiraz, Iran. --Lrkrol 20:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination S/S Storskär. --ArildV 19:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 20:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Along the Nordfließ/Neue Polenza within the nature reserve Innerer Oberspreewald --Lrkrol 19:54, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:11, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Carrhotus xanthogramma. By User:Andrefab ph --Civvì 13:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good enough quality to promote the image; Ideas to improve te quality even further: Remove pink highlight outlines on eyes, remove dust spot at the top in the leave, a touch of lightness noise reduction in the smooth areas. --D-Kuru 19:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Open wing of Chersonesia risa (Doubleday, 1848) - Common Maplet. By User:B Savit --Atudu 11:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ethope himachala - Dusky Diadem. By User:B Savit --Atudu 11:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Close wing moisture sucking of Charaxes bharata (C. & R. Felder, 1867)- Indian Nawab. By User:Anitava Roy --Atudu 11:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Close wing moisture sucking of Prioneris thestylis (Doubleday, 1842) - Spotted Sawtooth. By User:Anitava Roy --Atudu 11:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 19:54, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The subwaystation Theresienwiese in Munich - this is the escalator down from the entrance from the Oktoberfest area --Kritzolina 09:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Too unsharp and noisy. --Augustgeyler 13:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The subwaystation Theresienwiese in Munich - this is the entrance from the Oktoberfest area, stairs are under construction --Kritzolina 09:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Noisy. Why ISO 1600 with a static motiv? --Smial 12:18, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Anemone hupehensis (Anemone × hybrida), commonly 'Chinese anemone', 'Japanese anemone', 'thimbleweed', or 'windflower' on a green strip near Petra-Moll-Weg, Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 09:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:11, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Anemone hupehensis (Anemone × hybrida), commonly 'Chinese anemone', 'Japanese anemone', 'thimbleweed', or 'windflower' on a green strip near Petra-Moll-Weg, Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 09:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:11, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bharatanatyam Facial expressions Mudra --Suyash.dwivedi 09:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 09:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bharatanatyam Facial expressions Mudra --Suyash.dwivedi 09:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 09:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Эу 739-93 Steam Locomotive in the Brest Railway Museum. --Mike1979 Russia 07:51, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good overall quality but I'd suppose to include locomotive tender in a photo and not to make crop too tight on its side. --Красный 10:59, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination TGK2-149 locomotive in the Brest Railway Museum. --Mike1979 Russia 07:51, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Красный 10:59, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination П36 0050 Steam Locomotive in the Brest Railway Museum. --Mike1979 Russia 07:51, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 13:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination ЛВ-0202 Steam Locomotive in the Brest Railway Museum. --Mike1979 Russia 07:51, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Competition 200m Freestyle Males Finals at the 2021 German Swimming Championships 2021. By User:DerHexer --Augustgeyler 07:44, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Competition 200m Freestyle Males Finals at the 2021 German Swimming Championships 2021. By User:DerHexer --Augustgeyler 07:44, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Competition 200m Mixed Relay Males Finals at the 2021 German Swimming Championships 2021. By User:DerHexer --Augustgeyler 07:44, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:49, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Competition 200m Mixed Relay Males Finals at the 2021 German Swimming Championships 2021. By User:DerHexer --Augustgeyler 07:44, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Terragio67 08:31, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at 4 Avenue de Brousse in Broquies, Aveyron, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 07:44, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:45, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 32 place de la Carriere in Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 07:44, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:45, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Casino Luxembourg - Forum d'art contemporain; facade of Boulevard Franklin-D.-Roosevelt in Luxembourg City, Luxembourg. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 07:44, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:49, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cattails (Typha minima) grow along the river. Charyn National Park --Naziranildi 07:41, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:37, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flying display of the Airbus A321 XLR at ILA Berlin Air Show 2024 --MB-one 07:31, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hydropolis in Wrocław --MB-one 07:31, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:45, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Village weaver (Ploceus cucullatus spilonotus) female --Charlesjsharp 07:19, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Water thick-knee (Burhinus vermiculatus) --Charlesjsharp 07:19, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 08:09, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination White-backed vulture (Gyps africanus) --Charlesjsharp 07:19, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 20:01, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:07, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination White-backed vulture (Gyps africanus) --Charlesjsharp 07:19, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 19:59, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination White-browed coucal (Centropus burchellii) --Charlesjsharp 07:19, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 13:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Road to Rakhmaninov springs. Katon-Karagay national park. East Kazakhstan Region, Kazakhstan. By User:Ivan ideia --Красный 07:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 13:03, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saxaul in Altyn-Emel national park. Kerbulak District, Zhetysu Region, Kazakhstan. By User:ElenaLitera --Красный 07:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 13:00, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Unused CCTV of make: Hikvision at Tangellamudi, Eluru --IM3847 06:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:49, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Perspective view of Bhooja Clubhouse --IM3847 06:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
the sky view is unfortunately cut off --Georgfotoart 12:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
@Georgfotoart: Oops! Corrected the caption, Skyview is name of the Glass building in background. --IM3847 14:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 19:15, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coral (Dipsastraea matthaii), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 06:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 19:59, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coral (Sandalolitha robusta), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 06:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --IM3847 06:40, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Soldierfish (Myripristis kuntee), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 06:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:57, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coral (Acropora tenuis), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 06:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --IM3847 06:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shmee150's Ford GT at Brussels Auto Show 2024 --MB-one 20:30, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 22:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Closeup shot of Indis One City in KPHB shwoing atmospheric distortion on a sunny day --IM3847 02:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support A great picture and the quality is good enough. --Michael32710 07:40, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eco Bunino residential complex, Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 11:50, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion {{{2}}}
-
- Nomination Panel house 27 in Mukhamedzhanov microdistrict. Yazev street, Balkhash, Karaganda Region, Kazakhstan. --Красный 07:41, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Building looks slightly tilted to me, can you please correct that? --IM3847 08:04, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
It was around 1°, Done. Красный 20:42, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --IM3847 06:20, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fabio Montevecchi - Bass guitarist - Aironi bianchi --Terragio67 18:28, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion A bit grainy, but not bad for ISO 5000. (It would be interesting what this image would look like with something like Topaz Denoise AI) --D-Kuru 19:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Flagpole holder on ruined building of Dacha Orlova stables, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 02:13, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ford Puma (2024) in Böblingen --Alexander-93 16:47, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Antigua ciudad de Herculano, Italia, 2023-03-27 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 08:04, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Almaty botanical garden photographed from above. Bostandyk District, Almaty, Kazakhstan. --Красный 07:21, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Review
It needs a perspective correction, a WB rework (above all the mountains in the back) and some denoising --Poco a poco 09:50, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lappet-faced vulture (Torgos tracheliotos) --Charlesjsharp 07:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose The bird is motion blurred, not sharp enough for QI, sorry. --Красный 10:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Lesser masked weaver (Ploceus intermedius cabanisii) female --Charlesjsharp 07:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Too small to be QI. Do you have full version to upload? --Екатерина Борисова 02:27, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination DS 7 (2022) in Echterdingen --Alexander-93 15:01, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Красный 10:29, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Toyota ProAce (Facelift) in Filderstadt --Alexander-93 15:01, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Красный 10:29, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Glockenspiel used by the Anarchist Brass Collective Regensburg at the Puch Open Air 2024 --Kritzolina 08:12, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Красный 10:29, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Córdoba (Andalusia, Spain) - Mosque-Cathedral - Wooden sculpture at the back of the choir of the cathedral --Benjism89 11:35, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose It looks noisy on the wood. --Sebring12Hrs 20:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Done I improved noise reduction, in order to increase it without making details disappear. --Benjism89 17:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment The second version is worst. There is a lot of multi-color chroma noise. --Sebring12Hrs 20:29, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wasiul Bahar during Wikipedia day 2024 in Bangladesh.--Tanvir Rahat 08:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
A bit noisy. --C messier 20:34, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Too noisy and and NR artifacts due high ISO. --Plozessor 13:29, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination General view of Red Square from GUM, Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 20:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
CA on the star --Mike1979 Russia 07:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
@Mike1979 Russia: I've made attempt to fix CA. --Юрий Д.К. 19:34, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Sufficient quality. Slight, not disturbing chromatic aberration on the right edge. --Michael32710 14:58, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 09:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Grote_Kerk_Breda_preekstoel_detail_4.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Woodcarving of the pulpit of the Great Church of Breda --ReneeWrites 11:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 11:41, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. Noised and soft except central part. Below QI quality IMO. This is not a creator mistake, just poor camera --George Chernilevsky 18:11, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Per George. For a picture taken with a smartphone in low light it's actually quite good, but if you look closely you see that it was heavily processed. --Plozessor 06:30, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Augustgeyler 14:44, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
File:St._Johann_Baptist_(Beyharting),_NO,_2024-05-20.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Die der Kirche St. Johann Baptist (Beyharting), gesehen von Nordosten. --2015 Michael 2015 11:12, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 11:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Beautiful image, but the church tower looks distorted because of strong perspective correction. --Екатерина Борисова 02:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support We have promoted worse examples of distortion. This one is acceptable IMO, and except for the distortion it is perfect. --Plozessor 06:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:49, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Exposure and colour saturation both a little too high, otherwise ok. --Smial 09:00, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 19:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 21:40, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Mariä_Himmelfahrt_(Schönau),_2024-05-20.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Die Kirche Mariä Himmelfahrt in Schönau (OT von Tuntenhausen) im Frühling 2024. --2015 Michael 2015 11:12, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 11:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Beautiful image, but the church tower looks distorted because of strong perspective correction. --Екатерина Борисова 02:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose for now. Here I agree with Екатерина; I think compressing the image vertically would make it look better. --Plozessor 06:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:50, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support The perspective correction is well done.--Tournasol7 19:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 21:40, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Saint_Florian_church_in_Znin_09.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Bell tower of the St Florian church in Znin, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voiv., Poland. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 10:03, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The tower is not upright. --2015 Michael 2015 12:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Are you sure about that? Every vertical line is perfectly straight.--ArildV 07:03, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment For me it -looks- not upright even if it is. Beside of that I also -think- it is not 100 % centered.--2015 Michael 2015 (talk) 16:24, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Tower is perfectly upright. --Plozessor 06:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Spurzem 08:37, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. -- Екатерина Борисова 15:50, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 18:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 21:41, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Brest_Railway_Museum_ФД20-1237_Steam_Locomotive_2023-03-05_3210.jpg
[edit]- Nomination ФД20-1237 Steam Locomotive in the Brest Railway Museum. --Mike1979 Russia 06:40, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Too harsh light here, partially Overexposed --Augustgeyler 08:58, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- New version Reduce exposition. --Mike1979 Russia 11:40, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It improved. But light is still to harsh IMO. --Augustgeyler 12:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support The star at the front is burned out but otherwise it's really good. --Plozessor 06:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 18:59, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 21:45, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
File:At Oxford 2024 039 - Balliol College.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Balliol College, Oxford --Mike Peel 06:17, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:43, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I think the exposure is not OK. --2015 Michael 2015 12:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too dark indeed. --Plozessor 06:41, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's leaning at right. --Sebring12Hrs 07:51, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- I can fix these, but not immediately, hoping @Augustgeyler: reconsiders the decline closure. Thanks. Mike Peel 02:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Augustgeyler 22:00, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
File:2024_Kłodzko,_ul._Sienkiewicza_7_(2).jpg
[edit]- Nomination 7 Sienkiewicza Street in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 01:39, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose 'Sienkiewicza Street in Kłodzko 1' is almost equal. --2015 Michael 2015 14:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support "Not similar to other pictures" is not a relevant criteria for QI. Picture is good. --Plozessor 06:44, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I disagree: "The purpose of quality images is ... the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection." --2015 Michael 2015 (talk) 16:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I would prefer when users would chose only one (their best) image in these situations. But sadly there is no QI guideline about it. --Augustgeyler 07:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I agree. There are too many Wikimedia uploads and therefore they will be never used but waste memory. --2015 Michael 2015 (talk) 16:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:53, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 21:48, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
File:2024_Kłodzko,_ul._Sienkiewicza_7_(3).jpg
[edit]- Nomination 7 Sienkiewicza Street in Kłodzko 3 --Jacek Halicki 01:39, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --IM3847 02:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose 'Sienkiewicza Street in Kłodzko 1' is better than this. --2015 Michael 2015 14:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is not FP where that would be relevant. Picture is good. --Plozessor 06:45, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I disagree: "The purpose of quality images is ... the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection." --2015 Michael 2015 (talk) 17:05, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I think the statement refers to Commons in general, and I agree that we should not upload many similar images. It does not directly relate to QI though, and the relevant guidelines are about composition and technical quality. So, while uploading a bunch of very similar images might be against Commons' purpose, nominating them for QI does not seem to violate QI guidelines. But anyway, I see your point and accept your opinion, I think differently though. --Plozessor 18:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:54, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 19:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 21:48, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
File:A_new_office_building_under_construction_on_Hitech_City_road_(2).jpg
[edit]- Nomination A new office building under construction on Hitech City road --IM3847 00:09, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:16, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective distortion not or not right corrected. --2015 Michael 2015 14:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Perspective seems fine, walls are perfectly vertical. --Plozessor 09:19, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment "perfectly vertical" is often not given the best picture look, perspective correction is its own kind of art, i.e. in my opinion Lightroom Classic makes almost always not usbable results, the following manual correction is often also only some compromise. --2015 Michael 2015 17:20, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality for me.--Tournasol7 19:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 21:50, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
File:McLaren_570S_Spider_IMG_9947.jpg
[edit]- Nomination McLaren 570S Spider in Echterdingen --Alexander-93 15:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:12, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too shallow DoF here. The front of the car is not in focus. --Augustgeyler 00:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Augustgeyler. --Sebring12Hrs 09:07, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Augustgeyler 10:00, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Chapel_in_Münchner_Residenz.jpg
[edit]- Nomination chapel in Münchner Residenz --AuHaidhausen 14:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:12, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I am sorry to oppose here, but there must have gone wrong something at perspective correction. All horizontal lines are straight but the image was not taken from the centre. So the horizontal perspective looks distorted now. --Augustgeyler 00:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:05, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support A bit noisy but otherwise good. --Plozessor 09:22, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Unfortunate lighting. --Smial 09:25, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Perspective correction creates something a little strange here, but acceptable. Otherwise very good for an interior shot with a long DoF. --Benjism89 19:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 19:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 21:51, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Salò_at_Puch_Open_Air_2024_25.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Salò and band at the Puch Open Air in Jetzendorf, Germany --Kritzolina 10:09, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Too noisy. --C messier 19:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sorry but I disagree, the noisy is quite evident but still acceptable for an ISO 3200 shot. --Terragio67 19:52, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Whether it's a photo with an ISO of 3200 or not, it's too noisy. --Sebring12Hrs 20:32, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment For a featured candidate image I would completely agree, perhaps for a QI candidate image your judgment is rather severe. Terragio67 06:50, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose QI has even more emphasis on the technical quality, and this image is clearly too noisy and too blurry for QI. --Plozessor 07:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose. The image noise is borderline, but I'm more bothered by the slight overexposure, which leads to strange colours on the forehead. If there is a RAW version that can be darkened a little so that the colour channels don't clip and remain intact, I would change my assessment. --Smial 09:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC) Ps: simply darkening the JPG usually doesn't work.
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Augustgeyler 21:52, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
File:At_Chiltern_Open_Air_Museum_2024_151.jpg
[edit]- Nomination MG TD at Chiltern Open Air Museum --Mike Peel 08:50, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 09:04, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Please discuss, whether the yellow tint is good for QI. -- Spurzem 13:35, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Done WB tweaked, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 15:34, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It seems a bit better. But I can not imagine that it is the correct color. It is difficult. I don't know whether the cars should be in the English racing green. Let's here what others say. Best regards -- Spurzem 15:46, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support There are other pictures of such cars with similar colors, so I guess it's ok. --Plozessor 10:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The cut mirror of the other car is distracting. --Sebring12Hrs 15:58, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Plozessor. --Smial 09:52, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 21:54, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Schloss_Neuschwanstein_(57_mm).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Schloss Neuschwanstein (57 mm) --AuHaidhausen 14:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment Underexposed. We have a dozen other QI of the same castle from the same viewpoint so comparing is easy :-) --Benjism89 18:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support I disagree, the light is clearly acceptable at full size. --Sebring12Hrs 22:30, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good quality, but underexposed. Easy to correct. --Kallerna 08:40, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Done thank you --AuHaidhausen 16:44, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. Underexposed, sorry -- Spurzem 14:27, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support The new version is fine imo.--ArildV 07:07, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 21:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Vamlingbo_kyrka_July_2024_07.jpg
[edit]- Nomination View towards Vamlingbo church from the lychgate. --ArildV 06:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:26, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sharp and balanced shot but the top crop is to tight and spoils the composition. --Augustgeyler 10:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, I don't have a problem with the top crop of the picture (if that's what you meant Augustgeyler) but I have one with the crop of the stained glass created by the photographer's position (should have walked one step forward) --Benjism89 18:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- I generally don't use zoom lenses for architecture and landscape (just an explanation) so if I had taken a step forward the vault would have disappeared completely. For me the image works anyway, the image captures the feeling of walking through the lychgate and see the church through the vault. ArildV --ArildV 19:43, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @ArildV: , I agree with you. I do like your decission to integrate the gate into your composition. It's great. I just think it is cropped too tight, so there should be a little more of the gate visible at the top to look as intentional as it was. --Augustgeyler 08:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Tight at top, but far enough for QI for me -- George Chernilevsky 06:19, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. Though I understand the photographer's intention, the picture is a failure. It's a shame that things like that happen, but that doesn't mean that the result should be judged as a quality picture. -- Spurzem 14:40, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Per Spurzem. --Plozessor 16:57, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support per George. --Smial 00:05, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Spurzem --Tagooty 04:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:57, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 19:02, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 21:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Kopfweide_bei_Klietznick_02.jpg
[edit]- Nomination old pollard willow on the dike --Georgfotoart 12:56, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Nice wide angle composition. But unfortunately I can not find anything in focus here. --Augustgeyler 00:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Revised, please rate --Georgfotoart 16:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ok for me (now). --Plozessor 16:58, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Lacks details, sorry. --Tournasol7 19:32, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. --Sebring12Hrs 07:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others, sorry. --Benjism89 19:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Augustgeyler 21:57, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Haltern_am_See,_Naturpark_Hohe_Mark,_Weizenfeld_--_2024_--_4462.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Photo art based on a photo of a wheat field in the Hohe Mark Nature Park in the district of Holtwick, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:22, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Kritzolina 13:21, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I like this image, but I have to oppose. This is not a reproduction but claims to be art itself. QIC is not prepared to promote direct artwork if not part of a photographic reproduction of an existing piece of art. I can just judge this nomination with all QIC rules we usually check. The result: The image is unsharp, looks very blurred, lacks detail, is unable to even show it's proclaimed subject and has a non visible DoF. --Augustgeyler 23:17, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. Wikimedia should set up a section for blurry artworks. I could very well imagine the photo presented here as a large picture, for example in the waiting room of a doctor's office. But for me it is not a quality image that should show me an object, a landscape or a person clearly and in an appealing way. -- Spurzem 08:38, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К. 20:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Augustgeyler. --Sebring12Hrs 07:45, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Augustgeyler 09:58, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Vista_panoramica_dalla_fortezza_di_Bertinoro_-_Emilia-Romagna_-_GT_02-_2024-07-01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Panoramic view from Bertinoro fortress, Emilia-Romagna, Italy. --Terragio67 20:14, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Incorrect use of the "Panorama" template but otherwise a great picture. --Plozessor 04:40, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. Huge size, but sky is noisy and posterized. --Milseburg 21:55, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I think some minor posterisation is acceptable for a 222 MP image. --Plozessor 06:00, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. ReneeWrites 08:22, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose Per Plozessor. colour banding at the sky should be fixed.--Augustgeyler 08:32, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you @Augustgeyler, I don't like colour banding too, so, I decided to re-elaborate the pano from 16 RAW files. Thanks for your review. --Terragio67 06:38, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you. Well done. --Augustgeyler 22:21, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Yes, there are some minor issues that you can see when opening this picture at full resolution, but it's hard to have a perfect panorama made from 16 files. When viewed at a normal resolution, this picture is good enough for QI. --Benjism89 19:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 22:31, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Beautiful_view_of_the_mountains.jpg
[edit]- Nomination View of the mountains in Katonkaragay national park. Katonkaragay District, East Kazakhstan Region, Kazakhstan. By User:Picasso.dm --Красный 07:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 11:16, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose I disagree. Too greenish.--Milseburg 22:04, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Better now. --Milseburg 16:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Weak opposeNot that bad but the color looks somehow unnatural. --Plozessor 06:07, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good now. --Plozessor 14:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Uploaded fixed version with help of Екатерина Борисова. Красный 08:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support now. Still a little too high color saturation, at least for the viewing habits of an average Central European, but a very big improvement. A really good composition of an impressive landscape. --Smial 13:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose The image looks over-contrasted and over-sharpened. --Augustgeyler 19:19, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:59, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 09:58, 24 July 2024 (UTC)