Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 11 2024
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Left valve of a hatchet shell, Loripinus fragilis --Llez 04:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bascule bridge „Jann-Berghaus-Brücke“ crossing river Ems in Leer (East Frisia) --JoachimKohler-HB 04:16, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 04:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Half-opened flower bud of (Hypochaeris radicata) Focus stack of 39 photos.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Half-opened flower bud of (Hypochaeris radicata) Focus stack of 39 photos.
-
- Nomination Ecocathedral in Mildam municipality of Heerenveen, Part of surplus building material stacked in a special way.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Ecocathedral in Mildam municipality of Heerenveen, Part of surplus building material stacked in a special way.
-
- Nomination Bräuergasse in Enns, Upper Austria, Austria. --Tournasol7 04:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at Römerstraße 2 in Linz, Upper Austria, Austria. --Tournasol7 04:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:15, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Danube in Linz, Upper Austria, Austria. --Tournasol7 04:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:11, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nameless lake in Ugom Chatkal National Park, Uzbekistan. By User:Arina Pan --Екатерина Борисова 03:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pskem river in Ugom Chatkal National Park, Uzbekistan. By User:Arina Pan --Екатерина Борисова 03:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 2ES4K-053 with a train going across Finlyandskiy bridge to Prigorodnaya station. Vyborg, Leningradskaya Oblast, Russia. By User:Красный --Екатерина Борисова 03:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Jupiter, Grand Cascade of Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flagpole holder on Kirochnaya Street 22 building, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aurach north of Lisberg --Plozessor 03:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:05, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View across southern part of "Eichelberg" ("acorn mountain") protected landscape element towards Gädheim church --Plozessor 03:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. It's a pity that the wires interfere with this beautiful view. --Екатерина Борисова 03:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Love locks at the viewpoint at "Hunters' path" east of Schweinfurt --Plozessor 03:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:25, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination One of the "Düttingsfeld community ponds" protected landscape element near Oberschwarzach --Plozessor 03:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:25, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fly agaric in "Fichtelseemoor" natural forest reserve --Plozessor 03:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:25, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Banya yeonji pond water reflection of stone bridge and trees under blue sky, at Bulguksa Buddhist temple, in Gyeongju, South Korea. --Basile Morin 03:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:11, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Water reflection of trees and clouds under blue sky at Kinkaku-ji Temple, a sunny day, in Kyoto, Japan. --Basile Morin 03:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wide-frame view of water reflection of Kinkaku-ji Temple, trees and clouds Under blue sky, a sunny day, in Kyoto, Japan. --Basile Morin 03:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:11, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pond water reflection of Hyangwonjeong Pavilion and Chwihyanggyo Bridge at Gyeongbokgung Palace in Seoul, South Korea. --Basile Morin 03:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:11, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sacred lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) leaves and flowers covering a pond, in Don Det, Si Phan Don, Laos. --Basile Morin 03:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bunkers 26 and 27 in the Dülmen-Visbeck special ammunition depot, Dernekamp, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 02:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:04, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination “Charly” watchtower at the Dülmen-Visbeck special ammunition depot, Dernekamp, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 02:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:04, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of a tree trunk in the Hohemarkenbusch in the Hohe Mark Nature Park in the district of Holtwick, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 02:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tree root in the Hohemarkenbusch in the Hohe Mark Nature Park in the Holtwick district, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 02:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of a tree trunk in the Hohemarkenbusch in the Hohe Mark Nature Park in the district of Holtwick, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 02:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Boat on Geum River during Baekje Cultural Festival in Gongju, South Korea --Bgag 02:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Small boat in Gongju, South Korea --Bgag 02:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gongju National Museum, South Korea --Bgag 02:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tomb guardian (also called jinmyoso or seoksu) at Gongju National Museum, South Korea --Bgag 02:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tomb guardian (also called jinmyoso or seoksu) at Gongju National Museum, South Korea --Bgag 02:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Subsidiary church Saint Michael and cemetery in Tauchendorf, Glanegg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:35, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:32, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination othic apse of the subsidiary church Saint Michael and cemetery in Tauchendorf, Glanegg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:35, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:32, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Porch of the subsidiary church Saint Michael and cemetery in Tauchendorf, Glanegg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:35, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:32, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Porch of the subsidiary church Saint Michael and cemetery in Tauchendorf, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:35, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:37, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church portal at the porch of the subsidiary church Saint Michael and cemetery in Tauchendorf, Glanegg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:35, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 8 Połabska Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:58, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:36, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 8 Połabska Street in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:58, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:36, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 10 Połabska Street in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 00:58, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:36, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 30-32 Połabska Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:58, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:36, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 30-32 Połabska Street in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:58, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:36, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moussier's Redstart (Phoenicurus moussieri) at Ichkeul NPI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --El Golli Mohamed 23:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:06, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House bunting (Emberiza sahari) in Jebil NPI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --El Golli Mohamed 23:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Pdanese 02:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Street sign on a church wall --Romainbehar 22:26, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:06, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination National monument in Geertruidenberg --ReneeWrites 21:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 23:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Volkswagen T2 camper with high roof --ReneeWrites 21:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 23:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mandatory bike path traffic sign in the Netherlands --ReneeWrites 21:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 23:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Directional road sign in the Netherlands --ReneeWrites 21:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 22:27, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Toyota Tacoma TRD Off Road (N400) in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 21:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality though the unfortunate tight crop -- Spurzem 21:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Drama Theatre in Nizhny Novgorod, Russia --Bestalex 21:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 21:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant (Facelift) in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 18:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church in Canhusen (East Frisia) --JoachimKohler-HB 17:12, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:21, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Úbeda (Andalusia, Spain) - Sacra Capilla del Salvador - Bossed keystone of the vault --Benjism89 16:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:21, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Úbeda (Andalusia, Spain) - Façade of Sacra Capilla del Salvador - The Transfiguration of Christ, by Esteban Jamete --Benjism89 16:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 22:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Úbeda (Andalusia, Spain) - Façade of Sacra Capilla del Salvador - Coat of arms of the Mendoza family, between two women and above a sarcophagus --Benjism89 16:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 22:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gasthof "Bären" (Baeren Inn) in Madiswil, canton of Bern. Built 1646. --JoachimKohler-HB 16:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:21, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bay windows at the "Gasthof zum Bären" in Meersburg (Lake Constance) --JoachimKohler-HB 16:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 17:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baeren Inn and roundabout at the west end of Bottighofen --JoachimKohler-HB 16:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Very good image. Please add a geocode or give a more precise location. --Augustgeyler 18:21, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Done. --JoachimKohler-HB 19:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Question Is this the only "roundabout at the west end of Bottighofen"? --Augustgeyler 19:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Der Kreisverkehr ist unmittelbar an der Grenze zu Kreuzlingen und Teil der Hauptstrasse. --JoachimKohler-HB 21:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination EC-NRA Pilatus PC-24 during landing at LFBT airport --Shougissime 15:31, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Valley with the Navarco River near Salento, Colombia. --Carschten 14:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 16:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Buildings on the street Östra Ågatan in Uppsala, Sweden. --ArildV 13:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:31, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Frankfurt skyline during the blue hour from the Flößerbrücke. --Carschten 09:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Frankfurt skyline during the blue hour from the Flößerbrücke. --Carschten 09:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gate tower "Kuhhirtenturm" in Frankfurt-Sachsenhausen, Hesse. --Carschten 09:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hestinalis nama (Doubleday, 1844) - Circe. By User:Sourabh.biswas003 --Atudu 09:26, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:44, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cethosia biblis (Drury, 1773) - Red Lacewing. By User:Sourabh.biswas003 --Atudu 09:26, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Children on jetty of Grand Anse, Praslin, Seychelles. By User:Mozzihh --Augustgeyler 09:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Comment The horizon is is tilted at right. --Sebring12Hrs 13:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination
Thank you. As I am not the author I can't do anything about it. --Augustgeyler 17:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bicycle sculpture at MOCAK Museum of Contemporary Art, Krakow, Poland. By User:Mozzihh --Augustgeyler 09:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination many people visit the ancient Celsus Library in Ephesus, Turkey. By User:Roy Egloff --Augustgeyler 09:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of microprocessors. By User:PantheraLeo1359531 --Augustgeyler 09:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Could probably add model to the description (currently it's only as a category). --Plozessor 13:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Done
Thank you.
-
- Nomination View of microprocessors. By User:PantheraLeo1359531 --Augustgeyler 09:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ArildV 11:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Door of the Hospitalkirche in Wetzlar, Hesse, Germany. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 08:31, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Conques from above, Aveyron, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 08:31, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle of Belcastel, Aveyron, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 08:31, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes-Benz W 196 used in the 1955 F1 world championship by J. M. Fangio on display at the National Automobile Museum in Turin, 2020. --Hotolmo22 10:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Not sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 13:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ruins of the New Monastery and Bell'Alda Tower, 2014 --Hotolmo22 10:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Not sharp, blurred and may be camera shake. Borderline quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination At the Lower Volta Bridge in Sokpoe, Ghana --MB-one 07:54, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 09:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Volkswagen Buggy up! at IAA 2011 --MB-one 07:54, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 09:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Antigua ciudad de Herculano, Italia, 2023-03-27 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 07:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former Hamburg Süd general cargo ship Cap San Diego on the Weser estuary near Bremerhaven (by Leo Johannes) --Niels Johannes 07:49, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry, I like the photo and its lovely to see here in open sea. But not very sharp, specially the stern part of the ship. Also a big dust spot. --ArildV 11:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yellow-billed cardinal (Paroaria capitata) --Charlesjsharp 07:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 07:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Black-striped capuchin (Cebus libidinosus) --Charlesjsharp 07:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 07:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Uppsala baptistkyrka, Uppsala- --ArildV 06:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 07:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Low resolution compared to the camera used. But good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC) Its a very tight space and narrow streets around the church. Therefore a crop from an portrait format (upright image).Imo sometimes the best way to avoid heavy perspective distortion. I never use downsampling.--ArildV 08:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. That's a very good point. --Augustgeyler 09:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Impressions of Leipziger Buchmesse and Manga-Comic-Con 2024. Consent given. By --Stepro 06:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 07:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Impressions of Leipziger Buchmesse and Manga-Comic-Con 2024. Consent given. By --Stepro 06:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 07:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Impressions of Leipziger Buchmesse and Manga-Comic-Con 2024. Consent given. By --Stepro 06:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 07:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Impressions of Leipziger Buchmesse and Manga-Comic-Con 2024. Consent given. By --Stepro 06:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 07:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Leipziger Buchmesse 2024: Helmut Holter, Thuringian Minister of Education. By --Stepro 06:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 19:35, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former butcher shop, Rue du Tilleul 22, in Wattrelos, France --Velvet 05:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 07:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Rue du Tilleul, in Tourcoing, France --Velvet 05:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spiny red gurnard (Chelidonichthys spinosus), Arrábida National Park, Portugal. --Poco a poco 05:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Benjism89 20:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tompot blenny (Parablennius gattorugine), Arrábida National Park, Portugal. --Poco a poco 05:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Benjism89 20:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fawn with the kid Fountain, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 04:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flagpole holder on Back revenue house, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 04:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cobbled steps on Trail 587 above Corniglia, Cinque Terre, Italy --Tagooty 00:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trail 587 along terrace, above Corniglia, Cinque Terre, Italy --Tagooty 00:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 16:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pedelec bicycle at Eurobike 2024, Frankfurt am Main --MB-one 21:56, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Shougissime 15:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Europa stage at Fan Zone Mainufer in Frankfurt am Main during UEFA EURO 2024 --MB-one 21:56, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Interesting scene. But unfortunately the
DoF does not include the stage. --Augustgeyler 18:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Elbe meadow on the dike --Georgfotoart 20:36, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose The image is lacking sharpness. --Augustgeyler 19:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maison des Gardes in Capdenac, Lot, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 11:02, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 05:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Terespol Gate of the Brest Fortress, Brest.This file was uploaded with VicuñaUploader. --Mike1979 Russia 08:50, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:10, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose
perspective distortion
needs correction here.--Augustgeyler 09:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
New version. Is it ok now? --Mike1979 Russia 14:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Support Well done!
Thank you. --Augustgeyler 18:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Half tower in the Sourth part of the ring barracks of the Brest Fortress, Brest. --Mike1979 Russia 08:50, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Impressionen aus dem Naturschutzgebiet "Herrenmoor bei Kleve" --Nightflyer 01:54, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Ist der Weg so schief, wie er auf dem Bild aussieht? --Plozessor 04:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Vermutlich ja, ist aber 10 Jahre her, das ich dort war. Gruss --Nightflyer 04:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Plozessor 12:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Merida gravelbike at Cyclingworld Europe 2024 in Meerbusch --MB-one 22:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Shougissime 15:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fisherman silouhette at Cape zebib rocky beach during sunsetI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Marwenwafi 17:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Tilted, overprocessed --Plozessor 12:04, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Steep bank Ferchland --Georgfotoart 17:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
CA should be removed. --Ermell 20:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip - better now? --Georgfotoart 10:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip - better now? --Georgfotoart 10:22, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip - better now? --Georgfotoart 10:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, the line was so slow --Georgfotoart 10:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Photographed in 2024, April 20th in Heidelberg (Germany). By --Ahmet Düz 15:56, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry, unclear composition (what is it supposed to show?), no meaningful title, perspective. --Plozessor 13:17, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Remains of historic hill fort in Brucebo nature reserve, Gotland. --ArildV 12:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Comment Very good quality! But are you sure about the rotation? I wonder if it might be rotated ccw. --Augustgeyler 12:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, new version uploaded! --ArildV 10:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Support Very good now!
Thank you. --Augustgeyler 18:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of Iglesia de Nuestra Señora del Rosario, Fuerteventura --Mike Peel 06:26, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Sharpness is quite low here, but might be OK. I suggest removingchromatic aberration at the second left window and reduce noise-reduction slightly. --Augustgeyler 12:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Tweaked as requested, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Support Good quality.
Thank you. --Augustgeyler 21:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Terespol Gate of the Brest Fortress, Brest. --Mike1979 Russia 06:10, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Cropp is a little bit too tight at bottom and top. Fixable? --Augustgeyler 12:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
New version. There was space at bottom only. --Mike1979 Russia 15:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Ah I see, there is a fence in front of the building, right? You tried to cropp it out in the first place? --Augustgeyler 22:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Yes, there's fence in front of the gate and I trayed to crop it. I took foto at the edge of the Zapadnyy Bug shore. There is no space behind the point of photography. --Mike1979 Russia 15:43, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Question Are you able to redo the image on location and trying to get a little higher point of view to get rid of the fence naturally? --Augustgeyler 09:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. I find much better foto from the same point. Thank you. --Mike1979 Russia 14:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bovenau, Naturerlebnisraum Wakendorfer Mühle --Nightflyer 02:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Itzehoe, im Klosterhof: "Dem Andenken der Prinzessin Juliane zu Hessen, Aebtissin, die dankbare Stadt. Sie war geboren auf Gottorf den 19. Januar 1773, ward Aebtissin des hiesigen Klosters den 23. Mai 1810 und starb den 11. März 1860." --Nightflyer 02:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Das Nationale Geotop "Liether Kalkgrube" im Mai 2020. --Nightflyer 02:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:20, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yazyavan nature monument. Fergana Region, Uzbekistan. By User:Arina Pan --Екатерина Борисова 02:32, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Railway viaduct at Matejki Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 01:20, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
The half car in lower left is distracting. A tighter crop with only the viaduct and train? Add CAT "Train ...". --Tagooty 03:19, 5 July 2024 (UTC)@Tagooty:Done--Jacek Halicki 06:30, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 16:25, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination San Nicolò Bay, Sazan Island 2023 --Hotolmo22 18:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:27, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Subaru Crosstrek in Bietigheim-Bissingen --Alexander-93 19:26, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chełm Gate of the Brest Fortress, Brest. --Mike1979 Russia 14:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Not the best light. But well composed. --Augustgeyler 18:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ruin of the barracks of the 333rd Infantry Regiment, Brest Fortress, Brest. --Mike1979 Russia 14:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Canoe in abandoned channel, River Ljubljanica --PetarM 12:12, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of São Jose Dos Campos from Monreale Plus --Mike Peel 07:12, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose not sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 16:26, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination All Saints Parish Church, Macclesfield --Mike Peel 07:12, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 14:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Barn in Ljungdalen, Berg Municipality. --ArildV 06:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. just barely - the snowdrifts have hardly any contours --Georgfotoart 10:35, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bridge at Matejki Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 06:28, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 10:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Amans du Fort church in Aubin, Aveyron, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 08:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 10:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Les Cuirs d'Agathe" leatherwork market stall at the "Les Légendaires de Mormal" medieval festival in Locquignol, France --Trougnouf 08:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 10:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hyundai Tucson (NX4, SWB) in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 19:23, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Too dark, can you brighten it? --Mike Peel 07:22, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Comment @Mike Peel: thanks for your review, I uploaded a new version. Not sure wheather thats enough, the image was taken in the evening.--Alexander-93 13:47, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "les grottes de Bizerte" during a cloudy sunsetI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Marwenwafi 16:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
The right and bottom part of the image aren't sharp (out of focus), but maybe cropping this image would make it OK. Also tilted --Benjism89 21:22, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Nothing is sharp here. Overprocessed, blurry... --Sebring12Hrs 16:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: On the way to reforest in the Andes --Felino Volador 15:04, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Review
CA at the rocks should be removed. Metadata would be nice. --Ermell 15:11, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Eine Reihe von Spielautos, bereitgestellt für Kinder --Nightflyer 11:57, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Review Ich habe den Eindruck, die Fahrzeuge seien zum Teil ein bisschen überbelichtet, vor allem das fünfte von links und das dritte von rechts. Auch die Schärfe dürfte vielleicht besser sein. -- Spurzem 12:10, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dinghy Go inflatable sailing dingies at Interboot 2020 --MB-one 08:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Blurred sign (camera shake ?). --Sebring12Hrs 14:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Door of the church in Le Vibal, Aveyron, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 08:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:24, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Antigua ciudad de Herculano, Italia, 2023-03-27 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 08:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 19:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coleus scutellarioides, commonly known as coleus or painted nettle, is a colorful and ornamental plant often grown for its vibrant foliage. It comes in various leaf shapes and colors, making it popular in gardens and as a houseplant, Kurigram, Bangladesh.--Tanvir Rahat 07:42, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose It lacks sharpness. --Sebring12Hrs 16:20, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Brassica juncea (flowers), Bangladesh.--Tanvir Rahat 07:42, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:17, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kew Gardens Pagoda --Mike Peel 02:20, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
slightly tilted to the right? --Georgfotoart 17:14, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Rotated, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 21:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination nest of African foam nest tree frog (Chiromantis rufescens) --Charlesjsharp 09:23, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:17, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Open wing Basking posture of Loxura atymnus (Stoll, 1780) - Yamfly --Sandipoutsider 08:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Posterization and missing detail --MB-one 12:17, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bar in Arnavutköy, Istanbul --MB-one 08:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Blurred, camera shake, not sharp. And perspective. --Sebring12Hrs 14:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Driver's workplace of a Setra S 531 DT on display at Busworld Europe 2023 --MB-one 08:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Busy background in the windshield. --Sebring12Hrs 11:54, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial view of Prichsenstadt --Ermell 04:15, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
I know most people won't agree with me but in my opinion, this is an example of how strong PC with a 3D subject can create something awkward. As it is not natural, the two towers seem to me to be leaning. Otherwise good. --Benjism89 05:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Done
Looks like this. I have tried to correct this. The spire of the church (left tower) is crooked which cannot be corrected. Thanks for the review. --Ermell 08:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks but perspective still looks strange to my eyes. Feel free to discuss, others may probably have different opinions. --Benjism89 20:49, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Support Ok to me. Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:20, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Herrengasse 23 in Ybbs an der Donau, Lower Austria, Austria. --Tournasol7 04:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
In my opinion, strong PC makes this picture really unnatural. --Benjism89 05:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chinese guardian lion at the Winter Palace of the Bogd Khan, Ulan Bator, Mongolia --Bgag 02:09, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Horse racing at Naadam Festival 2023, near Ulan Bator, Mongolia --Bgag 02:09, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Very nice scene. But horse and rider is too soft. Additionally the sky looks partially
Overexposed --Augustgeyler 09:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Two male Baya Weaver fight as one of them tries to steal the nesting material. By User:Mildeep --Nirmal Dulal 10:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bottom view of the float "Floating" at the 2023 flower parade in Zundert --ReneeWrites 09:46, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Nice motif, exposure and sharpness. But unfortunately the main subject is cropped in from two sides --MB-one 08:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination re:publica 2024: Victoria Reichelt. By --Stepro 20:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Unfortunate crop as the upper head is cut off. Fixable? --Zinnmann 14:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
No, because this is intended. --Stepro 19:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Oppose Bad crop. --Augustgeyler 19:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wikipedia-Zukunftskongress: Theresa Züger. By --Stepro 20:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Unfortunate crop: The hair is cut off, very little space to the right. Fixable? --Zinnmann 14:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
No, because this intended. --Stepro 19:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Oppose Bad crop. --Augustgeyler 19:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hanwell and Elthorne sign at Hanwell station. --Suntooooth 18:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Question Am I right that you are the author of the image who uploaded it to flickr in the first place and later transferred it to Wikimedia – always under creative commons licence? --Augustgeyler 08:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment Needs perspective correction. ReneeWrites 08:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
@Augustgeyler: Yep, I took it, uploaded to Flickr, and then uploaded it to Commons (to make a few aspects of uploading quicker, considering I was already uploading to multiple sites); this applies to all photos imported from Flickr user Suntooth. --Suntooooth 20:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
I suggest removing the smallchromatic aberration at the uper white frame of the sign. --Augustgeyler 18:45, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose
Not done --Augustgeyler 07:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The silversmithing school in Stemnitsa, Arcadia. --C messier 21:42, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Main building is leaning out, can you perspective correct? --Mike Peel 18:48, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Support Acceptable. Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Germany, Trier, view of the roman Barbara baths --Berthold Werner 12:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Comment The roof is cut at right. --Sebring12Hrs 08:19, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Müthing Vario mower mulcher at Agritechnica 2023 --MB-one 07:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Can you perspective correct, particularly on the left side? --Mike Peel 18:48, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Done Thanks for the review --MB-one 19:32, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
No new version uploaded...? Thanks. Mike Peel 07:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
@Mike Peel: Apparently the upload failed, but I had already jumped the gun here. Sorry for the confusion. Will reupload later today. --MB-one 07:39, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
@Mike Peel: Thanks for your patiences. It should have worked now. --MB-one 22:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Вид_на_Большой_Кремлевский_дворец_со_стороны_Софийской_набережной.jpg
[edit]File:Вид на Большой Кремлевский дворец со стороны Софийской набережной.jpg
- Nomination Grand Kremlin Palace from the Sofiyskaya Embankment, Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 20:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Unsharp, harsh light, sky is
Overexposed --Augustgeyler 19:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment Not overexposed. Sharpness is normal. I don't understand you, sorry. --Юрий Д.К. 19:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Harsh light. A bit overexposed sky while the building is underexposed ---- Jakubhal 05:41, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Warning At 06:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC) @Юрий Д.К.: completely deleted this nomination which was sent to CR on the day before. We cannot manipulate this process by just deleting things. The corresponding image was deleted hours later at 10:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC).
I checked all other nominations by this user. All nominations which were directly promoted or had good chances getting promoted at Consensual Review remained untouched. All nominations which were about to get declined were deleted by for fast deletion or had ben withdrawn. --August Geyler (talk) 21:17, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Info I just reinserted this to make the deletion transparent. As this file is not on Commons anymore I set this to result. --August Geyler (talk) 21:17, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →
Declined --August Geyler (talk) 21:17, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Фасад_Большого_Кремлёвского_дворца_со_стороны_Софийской_набережной,_Москва.jpg
[edit]File:Фасад Большого Кремлёвского дворца со стороны Софийской набережной, Москва.jpg
- Nomination Grand Kremlin Palace facade --Юрий Д.К. 20:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Difficult lighting but still good quality. --MB-one 22:16, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The lighting is borderline. The sky appears
Overexposed . But most importantly the image is not sharp enough. --Augustgeyler 19:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment Not overexposed. Sharpness is normal. I don't understand you, sorry. --Юрий Д.К. 19:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Not sharp (especially on the left side), building too dark (due bad light conditions; it was simply a bad time to take this picture from this angle), also slight blue tint. --Plozessor 08:40, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Question Who was suddenly deleting this file?
- author or uploader request deletion
- I never saw something like this. Is this bad behaviour? And what should be done to the process here? --Augustgeyler 21:37, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Obviously an image that does not exist cannot be promoted, thus closing this with decline. --Plozessor 08:40, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Юрий Д.К.: Are you deleting your images intentionally? --Augustgeyler 16:18, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- author or uploader request deletion
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →
Declined --Plozessor 08:40, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Fisherman_silouhette_at_Cape_zebib_beach_during_sunset.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Fisherman silouhette at Cape zebib beach during sunsetI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Marwenwafi 17:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose
chromatic aberration, overprocessed --Jakubhal 06:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment I disagree --Marwenwafi 13:12, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Per Jakubhal. CA at water surface on the left side, lack of detail due NR, general lack of sharpness. --Plozessor 13:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →
Declined --Augustgeyler 22:55, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Общий_вид_ул._Охотный_ряд_с_Театрального_проезда,_Москва.jpg
[edit]File:Общий вид ул. Охотный ряд с Театрального проезда, Москва.jpg
- Nomination General view of Okhotny Ryad from Teatralny Proezd, Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 20:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Not sharp enough. --Augustgeyler 09:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment Strong disagree. Good sharpness. Again, I don't understand where you see "not sharp" --Юрий Д.К. 20:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Deleted. --Milseburg (talk) 16:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment I can't believe it. @Юрий Д.К.: what is happening here? Who is deleting all these nominations? Are you deleting them? --Augustgeyler 16:16, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →
Declined --Milseburg (talk) 16:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Фасад_ГУМа_со_стороны_Красной_площади,_Москва.jpg
[edit]File:Фасад ГУМа со стороны Красной площади, Москва.jpg
- Nomination GUM facade from the side of Red Square, Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 20:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:16, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Lacking sharpness and
Level of detail too low --Augustgeyler 09:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment Strong disagree. Good sharpness. Again, I don't understand where you see "Lacking sharpness and
Level of detail too low" Юрий Д.К. 20:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment Unfortunately, as strong as you disagree I am certain about what I saw. Please don't get me wrong. It is a very nice and well composed image. I just spotted some technical flaws. I double checked it: When I lock at the image at 80 or 100% it looks unsharp, especially the left part of the image. There musst have been some more intense digital sharpening and de-noising involved which led to loss of texture at the façade and trees for example. --August Geyler (talk) 07:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose The left ca. 200 pixels of the image are blurry and have CA (look at that small tower and the man walking there). The rest of the image is borderline but would be acceptable. --Plozessor 09:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Info Deleted anyway. --Milseburg (talk) 16:16, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →
Declined --Milseburg 16:15, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Фестиваль_цветов_2024_в_ГУМе,_Красная_площадь,_Москва.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Tagetes at Flower Festival 2024 in GUM, Red Square, Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 20:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Unfortunately parts of the facade are
Overexposed and the WB looks a bit off. --Augustgeyler 09:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment Disagree, close to original view. Not overexposed --Юрий Д.К. 19:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Looks ok to me. Strong contrast due sunny day but no blowouts. --Plozessor 09:12, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment. The image is a bit oversaturated, has a slight yellow cast and is overexposed above the left window. The perspective also looks a bit unnatural. But I remember that less successful photos were praised as QI. -- Spurzem 13:30, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose per Spurzem. And red color channel clipping not just above the left-hand window, but in all sunlit areas of the façade. --Smial 22:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I withdraw my nomination. Юрий Д.К. 06:28, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes? --August Geyler (talk) 06:39, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Fisherman_during_Sunset_at_Cape_zebib_rocky_beach.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Fisherman during Sunset at Cape zebib rocky beachI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Marwenwafi 17:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Noise or compression artifacts, overall blurry and lacking detail, sorry. --Plozessor 19:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment I disagree --Marwenwafi 03:41, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Overprocessed and blurred --Jakubhal 06:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →
Declined --Augustgeyler 07:37, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Sun_behind_the_rock_at_Cape_zebib_beach_during_sunset.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Sun behind the rock at Cape zebib beach during sunsetI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Marwenwafi 17:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose No detail, too soft, probably from massive noise reduction made by the camera/smartphone --Plozessor 19:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment I disagree --Marwenwafi 03:41, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Strongly overprocessed - plasticine rocks --Jakubhal 06:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Per others. --Augustgeyler 06:57, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →
Declined --Augustgeyler 07:38, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:A_man_on_the_cliff_at_Cape_zebib_rocky_beach.jpg
[edit]- Nomination A man on the cliff at Cape zebib rocky beachI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Marwenwafi 17:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose This wouldn't be so bad but it seems to suffer from too strong JPG compression, resulting in artifacts. --Plozessor 19:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment I disagree --Marwenwafi 03:41, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose It's so overprocessed that foam from the wave looks like frost on the window --Jakubhal 06:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Per others
Overprocessed and
compression artifacts --Augustgeyler 06:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →
Declined --Augustgeyler 10:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:2024_BMW_M4_(G82)_Competition_IMG_9370.jpg
[edit]- Nomination BMW M4 (G82) Competition Facelift in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 09:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 11:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The roof and rear window of the car are too bright for me and the contrast between the rear and rear wheel of the car next to it is too low. Please discuss whether it is still a QI. -- Spurzem 09:20, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Unfortunate lighting, and the car doesn't stand out from the one next to it since they're the same color. --Plozessor 15:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →
Declined --Augustgeyler 18:41, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Wienerstrasse_1_in_Amstetten_(1).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Wienerstraße 1 in Amstetten, Lower Austria, Austria. --Tournasol7 04:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:17, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Very unfortunate lighting with shadow on the main part and much too bright parts at the roof. For me no QI. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 09:33, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose Good composition. But per Spurzem due to the large shadow. --Augustgeyler 06:47, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment It's a shame... --Sebring12Hrs 10:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose Yeah, the contrast between the dark and bright parts is strong. Probably a different raw conversion with more clarity and less contrast could improve it. --Plozessor 15:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →
Declined --Augustgeyler 18:45, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Bianchi,_Cyclingworld_Europe_2024,_Meerbusch_(P1170795).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Bianchi road racing bike with mannequin at Cyclingworld Europe 2024 in Meerbusch --MB-one 08:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose People clearly recognizable --Georgfotoart 20:25, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment That's not relevant for QI. Plus, the photograph was created with an official permission by the organizers of Cyclingworld.. --MB-one 22:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Question More relevant in this case would be if all the visitors agreed on being photographed when entering the event. Did they? --Augustgeyler 06:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Augustgeyler: Yes, all visitors are made aware in the T&Cs as well as with posters at each entrance, that they are subject to photography and videography. That's commons practice at such events. So legally, we're 100% ok. --MB-one 07:58, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Neutral It seams to be legal to show these people here. The image is technically OK. I just think the bike does no separate well enough from the cluttered background. --Augustgeyler 09:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Weak support I agree with the cluttered background, but the picture is meant to show the situation at a fair. I guess it would not have been possible to take a picture of that bike at that fair without a cluttered background. It's not ideal but IMO it stands out just enough. --Plozessor 16:10, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, with permission it's fine
Support --Georgfotoart 20:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →
Promoted --August Geyler (talk) 21:54, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:H145M_LUH_SOF,_ILA_2024,_Schoenefeld_(ILA44675).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Airbus H145M LUH SOF of the German Air Force at ILA Berlin Air Show 2024 --MB-one 21:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
--Georgfotoart 10:52, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Oppose People clearly recognizable
Comment That's not relevant for QI. Plus, the photograph was created with an official permission by the organizers of ILA. --MB-one 22:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Obviously it is "relevant for QI" whether the picture can be legally published at all, but this is the case here per my understanding of German law. Picture is good. --Plozessor 16:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, with permission it's fine
Support --Georgfotoart 20:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. I'm not a big fan of having recognizable people in a picture here (unless they are the subject of the picture, of course), but I can't oppose it if German law allows it. (but no country prohibits blurring a little bit people's faces in pictures :-) ) --Benjism89 21:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →
Promoted --Augustgeyler 22:53, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:20240628_juvenile_american_robin_south_meadows_PD202740.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Juvenile American Robin, South Meadows Trail, East Hartford, CT USA --Pdanese 21:27, 01 July 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
--Roberto9191 17:29, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Support Good quality.
Warning Invalid vote. Only registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination --ArildV 19:44, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Picture is good though. --Plozessor 06:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Support I agree.--ArildV 10:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- a bit too much shade, but
Support --Georgfotoart 19:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Neutral Well composed but harsh shadow. --Augustgeyler 07:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Borderline (strong shadow and low level of detail on the tail) but good enough to me. --Benjism89 21:17, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →
Promoted --Augustgeyler 22:51, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:Después_de_la_inundación_02.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Dead fish after the Parana river flood --Felino Volador 21:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
--Roberto9191 17:29, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Support Good quality.
Warning Invalid vote. Only registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination --ArildV 19:44, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Support --Georgfotoart 19:23, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Borderline resolution, low level of detail and not sharp enough. --Augustgeyler 17:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Per Augustgeyler. Also crushed blacks. Sorry --Benjism89 21:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →
Declined --Augustgeyler 22:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:At_Hardwick_Hall_2024_225.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Baked potato with coleslaw and cheese, with side salad, at Hardwick Inn, Cheshire --Mike Peel 00:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --Kritzolina 10:11, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The image is not well composed. The plate is cut slightly at the bottom. The image was coincidentally taken slightly from a non vertical angle and is tilted ccw compared to the table. --Augustgeyler 19:20, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose unfavourable image detail--Georgfotoart 19:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Bad crop. --Sebring12Hrs 13:43, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Per others, bad crop. Also lloks overprocessed and / or noisy. -- Benjism89 21:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →
Declined --Augustgeyler 22:49, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Glori_3.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Catherine Palace - western facade. By User:Игорь Гордеев --Lvova 08:10, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Good image, but resolution and detail are too low here. --Augustgeyler 18:45, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Support This one is good in sharpness come on ! --Sebring12Hrs 11:29, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Borderline resolution, but sharpness and detail seem perfect to me. --Plozessor 10:44, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment The camera has 21 megapixels. To get such a small image it must have been downsized – which is against QIC – or massively cropped. --Augustgeyler 10:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose per Augustgeyler. The image size only slightly exceeds the hard limit for QIC, and with static motifs like this one, that is clearly not enough these days. The narrower side of the image should be at least 2000 pixels or the whole photo 6 Mpixels or more. I have no fundamental objection to a moderate downscaling if the shooting conditions are difficult. You can't reject Moroder's 60 Mpixel++ images because they have two pixel wide CA residues or blurs of similar smallness, but on the other hand promote small images like this one that hide such defects. --Smial 11:42, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Small but good--Georgfotoart 19:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Support per above.Ermell 05:59, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Weak support Per others, the low resolution makes this image look as sharp, but you can't take it to 4 Mp which is the size I usually have a look at pictures nominated here. Sharpness is actually borderline, and I do object the downscaling that has probably been made here. Nevertheless, I weakly support the promotion of this image, thanks to its composition and exposure. --Benjism89 21:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →
Promoted --Augustgeyler 22:48, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:L5_Sydney_Light_Rail_diagram.png
[edit]- Nomination Route diagram of L5 on the Sydney Light Rail network. --SHB2000 04:40, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Question Why are there different thicknesses in fonts? --Basile Morin 04:53, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- semi-bold represents a terminus and/or interchange, bold is for the title. --SHB2000 05:34, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Atkins road, interchange? --Basile Morin 05:53, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- That's bolded due to the terminus (see turnback at OSM). --SHB2000 10:25, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like "Murdoch Road" does not exist --Basile Morin 13:24, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Done – Fixed that. --SHB2000 13:40, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Are there more issues, like this? I'm not from Sydney and could easily find an error. Also it looks like Robin Thomas is linked to F3. Ferry terminus seems misplaced. Can't find any indication of Atkins road's terminus on this map. Which source has been used to create the document? How to verify the content? --Basile Morin 02:51, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- I live close to the line, so a lot of the knowledge is somewhat local and on-the-ground. Robin Thomas may be equidistant from F3 as Parramatta Square, but the official maps on the L4 trams (no photos and not open yet – I got to go in on a community event) encourage using Parramatta Square as the ferry interchange and I'd rather reflect that as I have with all my other Sydney public transit diagrams. Atkins Road turnback is based on the environmental impact map (I have it saved offline), but you can see the turnback on OSM (I can't link the URL without breaking the template, but just enter "map=18/-33.81554/151.06620" after the # to see the turnback). --SHB2000 07:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Or just copy https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-33.81553/151.06562 into your browser for Atkins Road turnback. --SHB2000 07:38, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Connections to Tramway Avenue and Robin Thomas seem to be missing -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don't mark minor/non-standard interchanges, only the important ones (e.g. File:T2 Sydney Trains diagram.png) – their omission is deliberate. --SHB2000 05:57, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:No original research. -- Basile Morin 11:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- This is not Wikipedia. NOR has no relevance here. --SHB2000 13:07, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Commons:Evidence-based mapping: "Although inaccurate or unsourced maps may not be easily deleted on Commons, accurate and well-sourced maps are much more usable. [...] Please use reliable sources and cite them. Otherwise, you risk wasting your time on creating maps that are much less usable than they could be, and will be replaced as better, well-sourced maps become available." And you put this file on Wikipedia. So it is (also) Wikipedia-broken -- Basile Morin 13:43, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- This is not Wikipedia. NOR has no relevance here. --SHB2000 13:07, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Font emphasis with no symbol and no indication on why the text is bold sounds like unconventional. A new version of this file has now been uploaded with a different title (and a misleading summary since the major change is not the imperceptible modification of the "L4 color" but more obviously the title) and I don't think this diagram respects the norms of any official map.
- This file "L5" is currently used on a Wikipedia page L4 ( https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Parramatta_Light_Rail&diff=next&oldid=1232143401 ). Do you have a reliable source to confirm the name L5 is associated to Parramatta (like here for L4)? -- Basile Morin 04:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's the only other light rail line under construction – the chances of it being numbered anything else is next to zero. --SHB2000 05:57, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Verifiability. -- Basile Morin 11:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- COM:NOTWP. --SHB2000 13:26, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- COM:Evidence-based mapping -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Essays are not policy. --SHB2000 00:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- This essay is an excellent recommendation on Commons. Try to follow it and you'll have more chances of success. -- Basile Morin 02:00, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Recommendations don't need to be followed if it doesn't serve the viewer best. --SHB2000 03:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- It does. Healthy recommendation. -- Basile Morin 04:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Recommendations don't need to be followed if it doesn't serve the viewer best. --SHB2000 03:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- This essay is an excellent recommendation on Commons. Try to follow it and you'll have more chances of success. -- Basile Morin 02:00, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Essays are not policy. --SHB2000 00:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- COM:Evidence-based mapping -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- COM:NOTWP. --SHB2000 13:26, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Verifiability. -- Basile Morin 11:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's the only other light rail line under construction – the chances of it being numbered anything else is next to zero. --SHB2000 05:57, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment Purely from technical side, this picture seems good, I don't see the need for 'an indication why the text is bold' because it's implicit that the bold stations are somehow important. But I can't judge the correctness. --Plozessor 04:15, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- The picture looks very good, yes, and that's a problem, because it doesn't come from a serious institution, and its content is unreliable / potentially erroneous. It was called "Parramatta-Olympic Park Light Rail Line Diagram" and now it is "L5 Parramatta & Olympic Park Line diagram". Maybe tomorrow it should be named differently according to the authorities and we will have a Quality Image with wrong facts and labels -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:06, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Honestly, the comments that have come from you are quite frankly, disappointing. I've been following the project closely with news on the ground (and been to project open days + public consultations) and I know what's accurate and what's not. The line doesn't have a name yet, so there are no "wrong facts and labels", so I've just followed what I've done on every other line diagram (but neither name is "incorrect"). --SHB2000 05:57, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
-
- And please, don't say that the comments that have come from me are "disappointing". At least one station was wrong by your own fault and I am the guy who has noticed it here. You could say "thank you" and be grateful instead of throwing unwarranted reproaches. Maybe the other maps contain mistakes too, I didn't check them, and probably nobody did. -- Basile Morin 11:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- You're the one who frivolously accused me of adding "wrong facts and labels" and failed to address that (the Murdoch St was a genuine error, but that's about as far as it goes). And again, COM:NOTWP. --SHB2000 13:07, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- And again... COM:Evidence-based mapping. What I wrote about wrong facts and labels: "Maybe tomorrow it should be named differently". Moreover, you changed the title with a misleading summary "fix L4 color". -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- ...because I did? (from D8163A to CD0D4D) The title was a minor fix which had no effect whatsoever (only you seem to be fussy about it). --SHB2000 22:53, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- And again... COM:Evidence-based mapping. What I wrote about wrong facts and labels: "Maybe tomorrow it should be named differently". Moreover, you changed the title with a misleading summary "fix L4 color". -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- You're the one who frivolously accused me of adding "wrong facts and labels" and failed to address that (the Murdoch St was a genuine error, but that's about as far as it goes). And again, COM:NOTWP. --SHB2000 13:07, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- And please, don't say that the comments that have come from me are "disappointing". At least one station was wrong by your own fault and I am the guy who has noticed it here. You could say "thank you" and be grateful instead of throwing unwarranted reproaches. Maybe the other maps contain mistakes too, I didn't check them, and probably nobody did. -- Basile Morin 11:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Question Can you show an official source with this logo L5 (color and number)? -- Basile Morin 04:21, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- color is from https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/styles/_large_x2/public/2024-02/Parramatta-Light-Rail-Stage-1-and-2-map.jpg.avif?itok=wYeWiA3I, number is implied. (it's certain that it won't be numbered anything else) --SHB2000 05:57, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Verifiability. It would be also very surprising that L4 gets almost the same color as L2 from the official institution. The name "L5" is just inexistent in 2024. The authorities don't use it, certainly for fair reasons. The line was supposed to open in 2026, and is now postponed until 2031. Maybe will never be finished. Thus the invention of this number + color is clearly original research. On Commons, a QI cannot be replaced nor deleted, once it's promoted, it has to remain unchanged. Which means likely wrong in this case -- Basile Morin 11:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- This isn't Wikipedia. See my comment above. --SHB2000 13:07, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- COM:Evidence-based mapping. The file makes it appear that there is an L5 line, with misleading logos, when this line was never called L5, does not yet exist, and perhaps never will exist. -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- "and perhaps never will exist" – not true, construction has already started. There will be an L5 line, logo is not misleading when this is a stock-standard TfNSW logo with the color directly taken from the website. If you don't know about something, don't comment on it instead of accusing someone who does know what they're doing of promoting "wrong facts and labels". --SHB2000 22:53, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Nord Stream 2 also started, some day. But a start does not guarantee an end. See Second stage of Parramatta light rail line will not open until 2031. Will there be a logo L5 with this color in 2031? It is pure speculation at this stage. There is no valid link today, and anything could happen within 7 years. The official sites do not even venture to give figures. So the content of this file falls into "Original research", and we should take into consideration that the goal is to use it on Wikipedia, of course. According to the authorities, there will be interchanges in at least two other stations. Those are not indicated. Which means a traveler who wants to go from point A to point B could make a long unnecessary detour while taking inspiration from this map. Perhaps more connections are missing too, if we check carefully. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:20, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- a) if it's the color used on the website, there's no reason to not assume it won't be in 2031; b) missed my point with the interchange, that only the important ones are marked; c) you are the one speculating that it won't be the case in 2031; d) you are the one who is fearmongering by claiming "point A to point B could make a long unnecessary detour while taking inspiration from this map", you are the one who is opposing based on non-existent reasoning such as "Perhaps more connections are missing too, if we check carefully.", you are the one who seems to have missed the word "important" in my other reply. There are valid reasons to oppose, but the reasons you give are not one of them. --SHB2000 03:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Please don't focus on the participants, even if you disagree or are upset. Why does the official transportation website mention two more interchange stations if "they are not important", according to your own subjective point of view? Lambda traveler who wants to change at Tramway Avenue, for example, will figure out there is no possibility according to this plan. That's why the trip may be unnecessary extended. -- Basile Morin 04:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's perfectly fine for me to focus on your behavior based on your comments (and again, I'm focusing on your behavior, not you as a person). But, at the risk of repeating myself for the umptillionth time... I don't think you seem to grasp what an "interchange" means. No one is denying that you can technically do so, but interchanging at either stations would lengthen a trip when you can do so at Sandown Avenue (via a 100-meter walk, which is faster than the tram) – you have no reason to do so at Tramway Avenue or Robin Thomas, which is why marking them as interchange stations is misleading and could lengthen a trip. --SHB2000 06:55, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Just no. It's not "perfectly fine". -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Nice deflection; completely missed the point. --SHB2000 08:35, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- 🛑 Stop this thread now, per COM:CIVIL#Avoiding incivility See "Avoid condescension". Bye -- Basile Morin 08:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- If that means an end for you using fear and misinformation, I'm all for it. Goodbye, I'm sure there are plenty of more constructive users who will give much more constructive feedback than you did. --SHB2000 12:20, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Nice deflection; completely missed the point. --SHB2000 08:35, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's perfectly fine for me to focus on your behavior based on your comments (and again, I'm focusing on your behavior, not you as a person). But, at the risk of repeating myself for the umptillionth time... I don't think you seem to grasp what an "interchange" means. No one is denying that you can technically do so, but interchanging at either stations would lengthen a trip when you can do so at Sandown Avenue (via a 100-meter walk, which is faster than the tram) – you have no reason to do so at Tramway Avenue or Robin Thomas, which is why marking them as interchange stations is misleading and could lengthen a trip. --SHB2000 06:55, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- a) if it's the color used on the website, there's no reason to not assume it won't be in 2031; b) missed my point with the interchange, that only the important ones are marked; c) you are the one speculating that it won't be the case in 2031; d) you are the one who is fearmongering by claiming "point A to point B could make a long unnecessary detour while taking inspiration from this map", you are the one who is opposing based on non-existent reasoning such as "Perhaps more connections are missing too, if we check carefully.", you are the one who seems to have missed the word "important" in my other reply. There are valid reasons to oppose, but the reasons you give are not one of them. --SHB2000 03:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- "and perhaps never will exist" – not true, construction has already started. There will be an L5 line, logo is not misleading when this is a stock-standard TfNSW logo with the color directly taken from the website. If you don't know about something, don't comment on it instead of accusing someone who does know what they're doing of promoting "wrong facts and labels". --SHB2000 22:53, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- COM:Evidence-based mapping. The file makes it appear that there is an L5 line, with misleading logos, when this line was never called L5, does not yet exist, and perhaps never will exist. -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- This isn't Wikipedia. See my comment above. --SHB2000 13:07, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- ♿ Disabled people: Please rename the file as "unofficial", "speculative map" or "project". It is very unwise to spread on the internet such a file called "L5 Sydney Light Rail diagram" showing a disability icon with the text "All stops on the L5 are accessible" (as if the line was welcoming). Maybe "will be accessible", in a far future. If finished, the line will not operate before 2031. Very confusing for people with disabilities, who might believe that they will be able to access the entrance of a specific station. Note that they might meet this map anywhere, not only on Wikipedia, but also on Twitter, Facebook or else. Eventually people not from Sydney searching for a reliable itinerary. Regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment For someone outside your argument it is really hard to follow. I would like to respond technically. I think this map should be provided as vector graphic like many other maps to be scalable. Why isn't it? --Augustgeyler 18:50, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- The problem lies with Inkscape as Inkscape SVGs contain SVG errors – it's a well-known problem that doesn't have many feasible solutions, so the best that can be done is exporting it to a high-resolution PNG file ([https://alpha.inkscape.org/vectors/www.inkscapeforum.com/viewtopic0f98-2.html?t=551] [https://alpha.inkscape.org/vectors/www.inkscapeforum.com/viewtopic13f4.html?t=21250] [https://inkscape.org/forums/beyond/inkscape-wont-open-svg-file-will-open-another-similar-one/]). I do agree it's less than ideal. --SHB2000 20:54, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment I can not see why this should prevent creators from using svg. So many maps here are avoiding these issue by not using these kinds of shadows or transitions. I just took the first two examples I could find, some very intensively used and updated transport maps:
SVG – Transit map of Leipzig area
and SVG – Transit map of Berlin
Both are using Inkscape made vector graphics and provide them as SVG. --August Geyler (talk) 07:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure how exactly this can be done without converting the texts into a paths (which would make it very difficult to update later if the need ever arises). --SHB2000 10:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The other maps I could find are doing exactly this. Text is exported as path. Fonts are given in the description and are under Creative Commons licence, so everybody can make updates. That's why I think you should try to publish a new version as SVG and nominate this instead for QI. --Augustgeyler 17:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- The problem lies with Inkscape as Inkscape SVGs contain SVG errors – it's a well-known problem that doesn't have many feasible solutions, so the best that can be done is exporting it to a high-resolution PNG file ([https://alpha.inkscape.org/vectors/www.inkscapeforum.com/viewtopic0f98-2.html?t=551] [https://alpha.inkscape.org/vectors/www.inkscapeforum.com/viewtopic13f4.html?t=21250] [https://inkscape.org/forums/beyond/inkscape-wont-open-svg-file-will-open-another-similar-one/]). I do agree it's less than ideal. --SHB2000 20:54, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →
Declined --Augustgeyler 18:43, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Minor_masjidi_10.jpg
[edit]- Nomination: Minor Mosque (exterior details), Tashkent, Uzbekistan. By User:Humoyun Mehridinov --Екатерина Борисова 03:10, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Oppose Sorry, but this is somehow overprocessed and not really sharp. Maybe it can be at least improved with better raw conversion. --Plozessor 03:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Good enough for a decent A4 size print. --Smial 09:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Good enough. Красный 10:19, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Not sharp at all. Very low quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:52, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose The image lost to much detail due to over-processing or it suffered from camera shake. --August Geyler (talk) 10:58, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Quality is too low. --Zinnmann 09:46, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment It was my mistake to nominate this image, quality is really not good here, sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова 22:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Support enough for QI I reckon. --SHB2000 07:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →
Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Augustgeyler 18:42, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7d/OOjs_UI_icon_clock-warning.svg/20px-OOjs_UI_icon_clock-warning.svg.png)