Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 07 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Cadilliac_Eldorado_Convertible_Oldtimertreffen_Ebern_2019_6200097.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Cadilliac Eldorado Convertible BJ. 1970 at the Oldtimer Meeting Ebern --Ermell 07:51, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Motion unsharpness --Jacek79 19:59, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
    I disagree. --Ermell 05:50, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Where should be the motion blur? I would have even photographed with a longer exposure time to make the movement visible in the background. Nevertheless, I think the photo is okay. -- Spurzem 11:10, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok for me. --Milseburg 12:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Some motion blur visible, but not a problem, it is a driving car. --Smial 12:58, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support ok. --Ralf Roletschek 13:17, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support per Smial. Not that much motion blur, either. -- Ikan Kekek 18:15, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 22:27, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Φορτέτσα_3110-1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Fortezza castle, Rethymno. --C messier 09:41, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Oppose Framing is well done but the image needs some dynamic contrast and color enhancement. -- Atsme 23:28, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
    The light just after sunset is flat. --C messier 12:43, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support I do agree with C messier, so, good quality IMO --PJDespa 18:04, 29 june 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support The ladies arm at the left side should be cropped or cloned out. Otherwise o.k.--Ermell 20:33, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment - Yes, do crop out the part of a person. Then I'll support. -- Ikan Kekek 04:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose until the crop/clone is done.--Peulle 17:04, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Seven Pandas 01:02, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Διδακτήριο_Άνω_Αρχανών_2600_-_2601.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Archanes old school. --C messier 18:14, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 01:51, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lots of CA, the colours are kind of dull --Podzemnik 02:09, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Ich finde die Stimmung (offenbar kurz nach einem Regen) sehr gut, daher good qualit for me. --Manfred Kuzel 07:47, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The colourfringes around the trees should be corrected. --Dirtsc 10:59, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 07:46, 6 July 2019 (UTC)