Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 05 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Olympus_National_Park_19.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Peaks of Mount Olympus seen from the blue route, Olympus National Park. --Kallerna 16:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 19:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Right side is leaning out (fixable). --Tournasol7 04:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support good quality now. Thanks for your correction. --Tournasol7 19:21, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Agree with Tournasol7, however, the buildings are a really small and unimportant part of the image which is otherwise very good. --Plozessor 15:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support now. --Plozessor 18:52, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Very good image with very minor perspective issues at the little buildings. --Augustgeyler 18:24, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Okay and QI in my eyes. Issues are marginal.--Milseburg 14:10, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Perspective tweaked. --Kallerna 16:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 18:19, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Sts_Peter_&_Paul_church_in_Baja_(10).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Sts Peter and Paul church in Baja, Bács-Kiskun County, Hungary. --Tournasol7 04:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:29, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unfortunately due to camera angle and perspective correction the church looks too distorted. --Augustgeyler 07:58, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Still acceptable to me. --Sebring12Hrs 07:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Sebring12Hrs ReneeWrites 18:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Underexposed and extreme perspective correction. --Kallerna 16:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Underexposed.--Ermell 10:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
    •  Comment Sorry, a bit late.--Ermell 07:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
    Kallerna, Ermell; I brightned the image a bit. It's better? --Tournasol7 18:42, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 18:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

File:At_Royal_Botanic_Gardens,_Kew_2024_064.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Monkey Puzzle (Araucaria araucana) at Kew Gardens --Mike Peel 08:36, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Too much noise to me. --Sebring12Hrs 20:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Noise reduced, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 00:39, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment The original version had more contrast and sharpness. I can not really see the benefit of this edit. Other opinions here? --Augustgeyler 08:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment I agree, I think the first version is better than the last version. --Sebring12Hrs 09:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
  • @Augustgeyler and Sebring12Hrs: Thanks for the feedback, I've reverted it to the first version. I'm on a laptop at the moment, rather than my usual screen, so it's tricky for me to do fine work like this. I can follow up next week if that's useful. Thanks. Mike Peel 12:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Neutral OK I stay with neutral as long as it could not be improved. --August Geyler (talk) 16:48, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Back on a bigger screen, I've uploaded a tweaked version, but I think there's not much more I can do due to the lighting here. Thanks. Mike Peel 20:55, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Thank you. Noise is OK. But I still can not see if it is QI now. Looking for more reviews. --Augustgeyler 08:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too dark shadows and lack of sharpness. --Plozessor 04:54, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 18:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)