Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 03 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Group_of_flying_flamingo_birds_(2).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Group of flying flamingo birds above sebkha halk el menzel (2)I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Bill.pix 21:15, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Was nominated already on May 22 2024 --Екатерина Борисова 03:07, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment It is not forbidden to renominate unassessed QI candidates. It just means that nobody reviewed this nomination in the first place. This nomination was never rejected or even reviewed. --Augustgeyler 07:54, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment It seems useful to me to have a clear rule that allows or prohibits nominating unassessed photos again and again. Yes, some good photos unfortunately turn into unassessed ones just because no one had time to review it. We all have such photos, so the rule is necessary. It's not about our personal score of QI's but much more about feedback. Could we nominate unassessful pictures again? How many times? How many pictures? Should there be some time interval before new nominating? I really want to have answers. -- Екатерина Борисова 14:59, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Not sure if we need that or if the "5 nominations per day" rule is enough. As for me, I have enough fresh pictures to nominate and wouldn't waste my 5 chances with repeating previous nominations. So far I've seen a few cases where someone nominated pictures two times, but not aware of a case where same nominations were repeated "again and again". --Plozessor 03:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blurry. --Plozessor 08:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 21:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Group_of_flying_flamingo_birds.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Group of flying flamingo birds above sebkha halk el menzelI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Bill.pix 21:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Was nominated already on May 22 2024 --Екатерина Борисова 03:06, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment It is not forbidden to renominate unassessed QI candidates. It just means that nobody reviewed this nomination in the first place. This nomination was never rejected or even reviewed. --Augustgeyler 07:54, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blurry. --Plozessor 08:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 21:22, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Morena_de_cabeza_negra_(Gymnothorax_thyrsoideus),_Anilao,_Filipinas,_2023-08-25,_DD_136.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Greyface moray eel (Gymnothorax thyrsoideus), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 09:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Looks good, but is there any way you can reduce the noise (particularly colour noise)? --Mike Peel 12:24, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 08:41, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose I know this kind of photography is hard. And I do like the overall dark scene, it is well composed. But it still looks a little bit  Underexposed . Additionally the focus is not on the eyes but at the mouth. Looking for more opinions. --Augustgeyler 08:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment I've brigthened it a bit --Poco a poco 15:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Neutral I did improve.  Thank you. --Augustgeyler 12:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support I think the brightened version is an improvement. ReneeWrites 11:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nothing is in focus. --Kallerna 16:45, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 21:13, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Peces_anémona_ensillado_(Amphiprion_polymnus)_en_una_anémona_alfombra_de_Mertens_(Stichodactyla_mertensii),_Anilao,_Filipinas,_2023-08-23,_DD_104.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Saddleback clownfish (Amphiprion polymnus), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 07:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Only a very little area of the picture is in focus. Feel free to discuss. --Sebring12Hrs 11:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Ok, let's talk, there is a new version --Poco a poco 18:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Given the high resolution, the picture seems acceptable. At 3 MP it is almost perfect. --Plozessor 03:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. ReneeWrites 23:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --August Geyler (talk) 07:01, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Scleranthus_perennis_3_RF.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Perennial knawel (Scleranthus perennis) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:03, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Blurred and not sharp enough. --Sebring12Hrs 22:13, 18 June 2024 (UTC)}
  •  Comment Thanks for the review. I replaced the file by a slightly denoised and sharpened version. Please also consider that the perianth has usually a length of about 2.5 to 3.5 mm. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 07:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Current version is QI for me. --C messier 17:10, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Per C messier. ReneeWrites 23:50, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --August Geyler (talk) 07:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)