Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 17 2020
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Tidal River, Wilsons Promontory National Park, Victoria, Australia --XRay 04:23, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tidal River, Wilsons Promontory National Park, Victoria, Australia --XRay 04:23, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sand dune “Big Drift” in Wilsons Promontory National Park, Victoria, Australia --XRay 04:23, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tidal River, Wilsons Promontory National Park, Victoria, Australia --XRay 04:23, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gaisrückenstraße «Am Kåte» in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:24, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pear tree avenue «Am Kåte» on Gaisrückenstrasse in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:24, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine on Gaisrückenstrasse in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:24, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gaisrückenstraße «Am Kåte» in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gaisrückenstraße «Am Kåte» in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Antipia and Lazarevskaya Church - Suzdal. --Dmitry Makeev 01:20, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Suzdal. Ascension Church of the Alexandrovsky Monastery. --Dmitry Makeev 01:20, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kideksha. Saints Boris and Gleb Church. --Dmitry Makeev 01:17, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Memorial to dirty war in Argentina between 1976-1983, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 22:20, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:27, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ikarus articulated bus in Technik-Museum Pütnitz --MB-one 21:35, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:23, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alpine pasqueflower (Pulsatilla alpina subsp. alba) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:15, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:48, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A White-bellied Male Monkey at the Porto-Novo Plant Garden in Benin (Cercopithecus mona)(par Richmond Dakpogan) --Adoscam 19:14, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Missing tail, unfortunate crop --Poco a poco 19:33, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A White-bellied Male Monkey at the Porto-Novo Plant Garden in Benin (Cercopithecus mona) (par Okouneva olga) --Adoscam 19:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Bad bottom crop --Poco a poco 19:33, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 10 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Frankfurt (Oder) (1921). --Palauenc05 18:23, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Tobias ToMar Maier 18:28, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Basic lingerie that may be partly visible in public. Only sleveless dress and shoes are missing. Image taken with available light. --Tobias ToMar Maier 18:16, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wolford Cosmopolitan top and tights in relaxed pose. Image taken with available light. --Tobias ToMar Maier 18:13, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wolford Cosmopolitan bodysuit and tights with a wrap skirt - an exercise in leading lines 2 --Tobias ToMar Maier 18:13, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wolford Cosmopolitan bodysuit and tights with a wrap skirt - an exercise in leading lines 1 --Tobias ToMar Maier 18:13, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Open wing Basking of Papilio epycides Hewitson, 1862 – Lesser Mime (by Sandipoutsider) --Atudu 15:43, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Insufficient quality. --Ermell 16:17, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Close wing posture Mudpuddle activity of Matapa cresta (Evans, 1949) – Fringed Branded Redeye (by Sandipoutsider) --Atudu 15:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:19, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Close wing position Basking of Scobura isota (Swinhoe, 1893) – Khasi Forest Bob. (by Sandipoutsider) --Atudu 13:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Too noisy/posterization, not a QI to me, sorry --Poco a poco 19:36, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Light-tipped demon (Indothemis carnatica) male --Charlesjsharp 12:53, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:17, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Paddyfield parasol (Neurothemis intermedia) female --Charlesjsharp 12:53, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ruddy marsh skimmer (Crocothemis servilia) female --Charlesjsharp 12:53, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ruddy marsh skimmer (Crocothemis servilia) male --Charlesjsharp 12:53, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A door in Oberkotzau, Bavaria, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 09:14, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:21, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ferrari 400 GTA 1979 at the 5th International Oldtimer and Classic Rallye Rudolf Caracciola 2019 in Bamberg --Ermell 08:54, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:37, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Würgau Bergrennen Lancia Stratos HF at the Würgauer mountain race 2019 --Ermell 08:54, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Tobias ToMar Maier 18:18, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lancia Fulvia Sport Zagato 1972 at the 5th International Oldtimer and Classic Rallye Rudolf Caracciola 2019 in Bamberg --Ermell 08:54, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:37, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Porsche 356 1957 at the 5th International Oldtimer and Classic Rallye Rudolf Caracciola 2019 in Bamberg --Ermell 08:54, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 13:04, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ford Model T, 1927 --Berthold Werner 07:51, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:29, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A sheep at rest --Adoscam 07:45, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Same remark here: I think the photo is good enough to promote, but I believe we need geographic coordinates, or at least approximate ones. -- Ikan Kekek 09:52, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Support - Done. Good quality to me. -- Ikan Kekek 18:50, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Delleboersterheide, nature reserve of the It Fryske Gea. Group of oaks Quercus.
--Famberhorst 07:04, 14 January 2020 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:42, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Delleboersterheide, nature reserve of the It Fryske Gea. Group of oaks Quercus.
-
- Nomination Shell of a hoof snail, Cheilea tortilis --Llez 06:41, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:02, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Delleboersterheide, nature reserve of the It Fryske Gea. Detached birch ( Betulaceae ).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 14 January 2020 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Delleboersterheide, nature reserve of the It Fryske Gea. Detached birch ( Betulaceae ).
-
- Nomination Mountain tour in the vicinity of mountain village S-charl. Schmelzra S-charl Museum.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 14 January 2020 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain tour in the vicinity of mountain village S-charl. Schmelzra S-charl Museum.
-
- Nomination Mountain tour in the vicinity of mountain village S-charl. Window in residential house in S-charl.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 14 January 2020 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain tour in the vicinity of mountain village S-charl. Window in residential house in S-charl.
-
- Nomination Tidal River, Wilsons Promontory National Park, Victoria, Australia --XRay 04:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Sehr schöne Serie! Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:21, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tidal River, Wilsons Promontory National Park, Victoria, Australia --XRay 04:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:21, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Norman Beach/Norman Bay in Wilsons Promontory National Park, Victoria, Australia --XRay 04:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Squeaky Beach in Wilsons Promontory National Park, Victoria, Australia --XRay 04:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gaisrückenstraße «Am Kåte» in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:03, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gaisrückenstraße «Am Kåte» in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:03, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Camera FKD 13x18. Camera cassette. --Dmitry Makeev 00:57, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. EXIF data would be nice. --XRay 05:06, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Suzdal. Church of the Resurrection of Christ. --Dmitry Makeev 00:30, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Please fix the very large dust spot in the sky. When you do, this will be a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 06:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Done Fixed. Thanks you. --Dmitry Makeev 21:15, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Support - Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek 23:41, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Faith Abbey Church of Conques, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 00:14, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Resolution could be better. --XRay 05:04, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle of Brousse-le-Château, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 00:14, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trupial eating cactus fruit. By User:Atsme --Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:08, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion The other nominee has one too many categories; why does this one have only one? Once the categories make sense, this photo should be promoted. -- Ikan Kekek 00:50, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Done --Andrew J.Kurbiko 09:33, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Support - Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek 09:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sanctuary of Las Lajas, Ipiales, Colombia --Poco a poco 19:02, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 09:48, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Padrão dos Descobrimentos --Rodrigo.Argenton 17:59, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall tower, Kiel, Germany --Poco a poco 21:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cvmontuy 16:38, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tæ 10:13, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Varese beach on Summer 2020 --Ezarate 21:16, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Panoramic view of the Agontinkon district in Cotonou, Benin --Adoscam 17:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ming Dingling mausoleum, where the Wanli emperor was buried. --Charlie fong 16:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Samsung LTM220MT05 - controller by User:Raymond --undefined 14:35, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Building Maral 20, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 12:51, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Boulevard Marítimo Peralta Ramos near Varese beach, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 12:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ukrainian Carpathians. By User:Swift11 --Anntinomy 12:20, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Review
So heavily downsized that it's hard to judge --Podzemnik 18:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Panorama on the Forez plain seen from the Montsupt peak. --MirandaAdramin 09:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Meir Ouziel. By User:Arielinson --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Gamla. By User:Staselnik --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Building at 5 Place Champollion in Figeac, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 07:57, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Door of the church of Le Grand Mas, commune of Mouret, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 18:55, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Good quality, but it is leaning a bit to the left--Michielverbeek 23:00, 6 January 2020 (UTC) No action within a week --Michielverbeek 22:30, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Trois-Épis from the Corbeau rock (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 14:01, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Question What is the subject here? If it is mostly the forest, then I think the exposure is too dark. If it is the city, then I think the picture should be cropped. --Domob 12:26, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Not done In over a week. --Domob 13:21, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Recumbent of church Notre-Dame-de-l'Annonciation (Trois-Épis, Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 14:01, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion It needs a perspective correction. Left part is hanging to the left and right part is leaning to the right. --Michielverbeek 18:45, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Done It should be little better, Gzen92 11:15, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Good now --PantheraLeo1359531 16:45, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Close_wing_nectaring_of_Female_Tirumala_limniace_Cramer,_1775_–_Blue_Tiger_on_Cosmos_sulphureus_WLB_IMG_4581.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Close wing position of Female Tirumala limniace Cramer, 1775 – Blue Tiger. (by Souvick Mukherjee) --Atudu 06:35, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:09, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
it is, but too tightly cropped --Charlesjsharp 12:32, 5 January 2020 (UTC) Support Charles, if you oppose, please indicate that in a vote. For my part, I think that with a little more room on the left side, this might be a viable FP nominee, but it's a very high-quality, artistic photo, so a narrow crop on the left doesn't make it not a QI to me. -- Ikan Kekek 06:07, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Comment I didn't oppose, just made a comment. It seems strange that the system then sends the image to CR. Charlesjsharp 09:31, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Comment - I hope it's not doing that as a rule, because that will create a lot of unnecessary work. -- Ikan Kekek 07:50, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Support Seven Pandas 23:30, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →
Promoted --Seven Pandas 02:15, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:New_Holland_TS110A_in_Tägerwilen.jpg
[edit]- Nomination New Holland TS110A --JoachimKohler-HB 14:29, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Good quality, but left crop is not well done. Smaller zoom and/or more distance and it would have been a QI --Michielverbeek 14:48, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Support I see no mistake in the composition of the image. The tractor with its trailer fills almost the entire room, forms a diagonal and works very well for me. Of course, we could have different opinions whether there should be seen more from the background. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 21:36, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Support Per Spurzem. The background is a bit disturbing, but I think the farm or yard belongs to the natural habitat of the tractor. --Smial 10:37, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →
Promoted --Seven Pandas 02:15, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:Toque_macaque_(Macaca_sinica)_05.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Toque macaque (Macaca sinica) at Katagamuwa Sanctuary - Sri Lanka. By User:Senthiaathavan --Tomer T 13:24, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 14:10, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Oppose foreground intrudes --Charlesjsharp 14:24, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Oppose monkey too far left and foreground issue. Seven Pandas 23:26, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →
Declined --Seven Pandas 02:16, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Stegna_Στεγνά_Rhodes_Ρόδος_2019-11-26_31_cat.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Curious cat in Stegna, Rhodes --Tsui 01:22, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Support The essential black cat. --PtrQs 01:42, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- For me the focus of this image is on the face of the cat. In the eyes and the whiskers you see so many shades of black and a sharpness so far ahead of most animal portraits that technically I would rate this picture high above QI standards. The only thing that could disturb me is the window behind the ears, fortunately this rather disappears by haziness in full resolution. For the remarks about the crop: As the body raises from the lower rim of the picture it is more like a portrait than a full body display.
- And the very fascinating thing about a black cat is that even if you can clearly see the eyes, there is always something hidden in the blackness, you can't ever see it in full definition. For me this black-catness is perfectly realised with this picture. --PtrQs (talk) 23:52, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Oppose bottom crop --Charlesjsharp 14:22, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Oppose unfavorable bottom crop and lighting situation on the cat´s right side. Image description little fitting. --Milseburg 09:26, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Oppose - Much of the cat is pitch black with no definition in its fur. Unfortunate lighting situation, as Milseburg says. -- Ikan Kekek 08:24, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- So let's hope nobody will ever present a picture of Vanta Black to QIC ;-)). Sticking to your rule about black will cause a paradox, as the more accurate the picture the stronger the violation of the rule. --PtrQs 00:47, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- That's different: It's a single material. Cats have fur, not a single, undifferentiated black material. Would you consider a closeup of a black cat's fur that is totally pitch black and featureless a QI? Then why is a photo in which a large part of it is featureless and pitch black? -- Ikan Kekek 12:43, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Well, I think you got my point about variations of black. We are just differing in the opinion about what sort of black a black cat's fur can be. The real rule about no black should be: No black acceptable if it's the result of losing visual information. But in cases, when there originally is no information to be lost by low light and/or wrong shutter speed, then black should be OK for QI standards (Vanta black, astronomy, flockings, pitch black pitches). And in physical terms Vanta black surfaces, flock coatings and fluffy black fur all try to absorb most of the light, just on different scales of it's design. So for me a fluffy black cat's fur can look black - even if there are brilliant glittering hairs seen among it - and therefore should be allowed to be presented black. But I realize, that these subtleties about black may end in hairsplitting and not many share my point of view. So have many thanks for this discussion. --PtrQs 01:42, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Certainly. I should say clearly that a photo of Vantablack can certainly be a QI. It would help for anyone nominating such a photo to note that it's the blackest material known to mankind, though. -- Ikan Kekek 06:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- So let's hope nobody will ever present a picture of Vanta Black to QIC ;-)). Sticking to your rule about black will cause a paradox, as the more accurate the picture the stronger the violation of the rule. --PtrQs 00:47, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →
Declined --Seven Pandas 02:17, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)