Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 26 2014

• 
  • Nomination Victorian valves at Victoria Baths, Manchester. By User:RevDave --Nev1 23:18, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Interesting shot! --Hubertl 00:55, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Columns in the cloister of the Monastery San Jeronimo, Granada, Andalusia, Spain.--Jebulon 20:14, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. No doubt. Maybe more! --Hubertl 21:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Signage of footpath branching in Swaledale --Kreuzschnabel 19:58, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 02:09, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stone cross, church ruin St. Michael, Michlsberg, Münnerstadt-Burghausen, district Bad Kissingen, Bavaria, Germany --DKrieger 19:45, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 20:04, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Train station Stettiner Bahnhof (Berlin) at dusk. --Code 19:41, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 20:04, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Großes Ochsenauge - Maniola jurtina, Weibchen (female) --Hockei 18:04, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 21:03, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Großes Ochsenauge - Maniola jurtina, Weibchen (female) --Hockei 18:04, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 21:03, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Großes Ochsenauge - Maniola jurtina, Weibchen (female) --Hockei 18:04, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 21:03, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mushrooms in decline. Location, The Famberhorst. Shaggy parasol (Chlorophyllum rhacodes, synonym: Macrolepiota rhacodes).
    Famberhorst 16:21, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:21, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lake Viitina Alajärv (by Vaido Otsar). Kruusamägi 13:32, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion A bit too much contrast, but ok --Poco a poco 17:21, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ahja river (by Vaido Otsar). Kruusamägi 13:32, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Tempts me to look for some fish. –Be..anyone 02:48, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ahja river (by Vaido Otsar). Kruusamägi 13:32, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:30, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Valgesoo ("white bog") in winter (by Vaido Otsar). Kruusamägi 13:32, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good picture. --Hockei 18:22, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cliffs of Heimaey, Westman Islands, Suðurland, Iceland. By User:Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 12:35, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 14:14, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cliffs of Heimaey, Westman Islands, Suðurland, Iceland. By User:Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 12:35, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:01, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cliffs of Heimaey, Westman Islands, Suðurland, Iceland. By User:Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 12:35, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:01, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cliffs of Heimaey, Westman Islands, Suðurland, Iceland. By User:Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 12:35, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 02:17, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A trail in the Domaine départemental de Restinclières.Prades-le-Lez, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 12:35, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:30, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eteläsatama, Helsinki --Ralf Roletschek 12:05, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 02:17, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ganesh and other characters, folk art, Bharatiya Lok Kala Museum, Udaipur, India. --Yann 10:42, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:14, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The River Thames. Renominated because the previous discussion ended deadlocked. Mattbuck 09:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:52, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination DMUs at Cleethorpes. Mattbuck 09:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:52, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beckton DLR station. Mattbuck 09:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:52, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rectory in Mielec 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:39, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:48, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rectory in Mielec 5 --Jacek Halicki 09:39, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion good quality --Cccefalon 10:04, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Small road in Torkilstöten, Ljungdalen. --ArildV 09:30, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:48, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yellow Tagetes erecta flower. --Joydeep 09:09, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ArildV 09:41, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tagetes erecta flower. --Joydeep 09:09, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion good quality --Cccefalon 10:02, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arnarfell, Þingvellir National Park, Suðurland, Iceland --Poco a poco 08:24, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion good quality --Cccefalon 10:03, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cliffs of Heimaey, Westman Islands, Suðurland, Iceland --Poco a poco 08:24, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Joydeep 09:11, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Farm building near Hvolsvöllur, Suðurland, Iceland --Poco a poco 08:24, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ArildV 09:35, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Búlandshöfði, Vesturland, Iceland --Poco a poco 08:24, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Joydeep 09:11, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Elephant Rock, Heimaey, Westman Islands, Suðurland, Iceland --Poco a poco 08:24, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:48, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Da Nang, Vietnam: Fisher boats at the beaches east of Da Nang City --Cccefalon 06:19, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Joydeep 09:13, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lijiang, Yunnan, China: Naxi woman carrying the typical baskets of the region; scene from a public perfomance in Jade Dragon Snow Mountain Open Air Theatre. --Cccefalon 06:19, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:36, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Da Nang, Vietnam: "Coracles" or "ghe thùng chài", small baskets for fishing offshore the beaches of Da Nang City --Cccefalon 06:19, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:49, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dalian, Liaoning, China: Entrance to the Military Air Base of Chinese Air Force at Dalian International Airport --Cccefalon 06:19, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ArildV 09:35, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hanoi, Vietnam: Mausoleum of Ho Chi Minh --Cccefalon 06:19, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Joydeep 09:13, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vaaggegordelde gordijnzwam (Cortinarius anomalus). Location, Hortus (Haren, Groningen).
    Famberhorst 05:46, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Joydeep 09:14, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Krenkeltal Rothaarsteig in Sauerland, Overgrown roots.
    --Famberhorst 05:46, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:50, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Christmas market at the market square, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:42, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ArildV 09:41, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Point Loma Light, San Diego, California, USA --XRay 05:42, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:14, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tribune building, Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany --XRay 05:42, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok --Poco a poco 12:14, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Geum triflorum (Old Man's Whiskers) --Wsiegmund 05:35, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:05, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The beach. Gagra, Gagra District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 02:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Christian Ferrer 13:02, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pennsylvania Route 54. Jakec 01:00, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Joydeep 09:15, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Field in Anthony Township, Montour County, Pennsylvania. Jakec 01:00, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Christian Ferrer 12:59, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Attic window at Neue Burg, Hofburg, Vienna --Hubertl 00:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 10:09, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Figures at Neue Burg, Hofburg, Vienna --Hubertl 00:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:11, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View at the Looshaus, Vienna, Michaelerplatz. Lower part of the facade, lantern. --Hubertl 00:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 10:09, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bergkäse, Mountain cheese, unknown origin, Label Milfina --Hubertl 00:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 10:09, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wedding, folk art, Bharatiya Lok Kala Museum, Udaipur, India. --Yann 00:21, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:14, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Danses Apsaras au Temple d' Angkor Wat--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 23:11, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:43, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rostfarbiger Dickkopffalter - Ochlodes sylvanus, Weibchen (female) --Hockei 21:22, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:17, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rostfarbiger Dickkopffalter - Ochlodes sylvanus, Weibchen (female) --Hockei 21:22, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:43, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kanonerskaya Street in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 18:26, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Joydeep 09:16, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Krasutskogo Street in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 18:26, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Joydeep 09:16, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination la Terrasse des éléphants site d'Angkor Thom--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:25, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 10:24, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "Heavenly fire" (red sky/"Feuerhimmel"), Graz, Austria. --Dnalor 01 16:18, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Weak pro --Hubertl 09:43, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beer garden in Marburg. --Hydro 08:49, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:43, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pine Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania. Jakec 02:03, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:43, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Demonstration against the "Gag Law" in Madrid, 20th December 2014. Banner says "The voice of the people is not illegal" --Kadellar 14:06, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. For me QI. --Steindy 18:38, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gorce mountains in the evening --Pudelek 12:36, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion A gorgeous sunset. The fine mist completes the good image from yet. --Steindy 18:38, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portrait of a young girl (re-nomination of an old photo after improvement) -- Alvesgaspar 11:45, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Well categorized, nice details on the face but overexposed background --Christian Ferrer 20:56, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
    I tested 1700×1479 at 127 for less background and centered. Do you still have one pixel at the top for 1700×1480 or even 1700×1500? –Be..anyone 22:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC) -- I really don't see the need for correcting or hiding the background. Many portraits of people (or objects) have pure white backgrounds. Alvesgaspar 11:44, 22 December 2014 (UTC)QI(nès) for me as it is.--Jebulon 19:06, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Benton Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania. Jakec 02:48, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:54, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Le Palais Rihour, Lille.- Nord (département français)--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 23:14, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Weak  Support Good quality. DoF could be better. --XRay 10:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Helsinki, Detail of estonian ferry Baltic Princess --Ralf Roletschek 21:46, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Helsinki, Haus auf Katajanokka, Kauppiaankatu --Ralf Roletschek 21:46, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Weak  Support Good quality. (The part of the window at the left is a little bit disturbing.) --XRay 10:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Agieriniotikos stream near its estuary in Sougia, Crete.--C messier 16:45, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:41, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Helsinki, Hotel Sokos --Ralf Roletschek 18:31, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Please add a correct categorization. "Helsinki/unsortiert" is not complying with commons category system. --Cccefalon 20:25, 17 December 2014 (UTC) This user is well known for that. He usually don't care with all that ridiculous stuff like categorization, perspective correction, file description etc... He does not understand what "Commons" is, and, again, he doesn't care. Since years. "Here we judge only photos" is his mantra. Nothing to do...--Jebulon 21:21, 17 December 2014 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 19:52, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
    Dark, perspective issues. Mattbuck 10:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Helsinki --Ralf Roletschek 18:31, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Please add a correct categorization. "Helsinki/unsortiert" is not complying with commons category system. --Cccefalon 20:25, 17 December 2014 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 19:52, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
    OK. Mattbuck 10:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: This is a table I made that shows the acceleration over time of 1G(9.8M/S/S) in kilometres an hour. --Medium69 12:05, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Fields Medal --Medium69 12:04, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Review derivative work of a copyrighted object ?--~~~~
• 
  • Nomination Matchless G80S. MC museum of Hedemora, Sweden --V-wolf 11:16, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 10:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 92214 at grosmont. Mattbuck 07:55, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn Perspectives, shadows too dark, the right is a bit unsharp --Christian Ferrer 17:37, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
     Not done Mattbuck 11:13, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination King Yu the Great of Xia as imagined by by Song Dynasty painter Ma Lin, National Palace Museum, Taipei --benaz99 03:29, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Support Good quality. --benaz99 16:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC) Striking off vandalism. Jkadavoor 16:43, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
    Does this qualify as own work? (No EXIF data). Yann 08:44, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
    As far as I can see this is not the work of a Commons user. Mattbuck 10:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fonyód ship, Balatonföldvár, Hungary --Pudelek 13:02, 16 December 2014 (UTC)*  Comment please check the white balance. Its just blue. There are also some vignettings.--Hubertl 13:17, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality because of no WB. Even because of no reaction. --Hubertl 09:55, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bath “Aquarell”, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:30, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good, but yet slightly tilted ccw. --Cccefalon 08:25, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
     Fixed It's fixed. Thanks for your advice.--XRay 10:29, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
    Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:08, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Helsinki, Suomenlinna --Ralf Roletschek 15:59, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Please apply perspective correction. --Cccefalon 06:15, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
    And please add a correct categorization. "Helsinki/unsortiert3" is not complying with commons category system. --Cccefalon 21:51, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
     Not done Mattbuck 10:12, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Helsinki, Esplanadi --Ralf Roletschek 15:58, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline please add a correct categorization. "Helsinki/unsortiert3" is not complying with commons category system. --Cccefalon 21:51, 17 December 2014 (UTC) Done --Ralf Roletschek 20:03, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
    Very dark, nothing sharp. Mattbuck 10:12, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Helsinki, market hall at night --Ralf Roletschek 15:58, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline please add a correct categorization. "Helsinki/unsortiert3" is not complying with commons category system. --Cccefalon 21:51, 17 December 2014 (UTC) Done --Ralf Roletschek 20:03, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
    Very dark, nothing sharp. Mattbuck 10:12, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Patagonian mara (Dolichotis patagonum), Tierpark Hellabrunn, Munich, Germany. By User:Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 05:37, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 10:12, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  ]]) –Be..anyone 04:44, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Decline Inappropriate description. Disturbances and dust spots in the sky, see notes. Perspective not done. --Cccefalon 07:01, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
    It truly amazes me how all these wiki loves competitions have so little quality control, even when for instance the WLM Ukraine jury was made up half of QI regulars!  Not done Mattbuck 10:12, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  ]]) –Be..anyone 04:44, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Decline Wonderful motif, but inappropriate description. Several dustspots ( I marked some of them). The sky is too granular for ISO 100; seems to be oversharpened a little bit. --Cccefalon 06:54, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
     Not done Mattbuck 10:12, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A passenger bus belonging to Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, India. Nikhil 02:15, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Info Insufficient categorization (I made no photographic review) --Cccefalon 07:11, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
    OK, though a bit noisy. Mattbuck 10:12, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination German Navy ships in London. Mattbuck 14:12, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Need a little more of contrast --Christian Ferrer 04:05, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
     Done Mattbuck 10:05, 23 December 2014 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 17:09, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Lille quai du Wault (1).jpg

• Nomination Le quai du Wault, Lille.- Nord (département français)----PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 23:32, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 00:44, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Partly overexposed sky, noise, lack of fine detail, sorry, but this not a QI for me. --Iifar 18:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose As above. With this type od camera, miracles are rare! Alvesgaspar 12:42, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Thank you for your observtions. Maybe my next pictures taken with my recent Sony α NEX-F3. will have more success. Best Regards-- Pierre André (talk) 20:47, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --C messier 23:07, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Lille place du lion d' Or.jpg

• Nomination La Place du lion d'Or, Lille.- Nord (département français)--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 23:29, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 00:44, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposed sky. --Iifar 18:55, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very poor quality: crop, detail, overexposure. Alvesgaspar 12:45, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

 Comment Thank you for your observtions. Maybe my next pictures taken with my recent Sony α NEX-F3. will have more success. Best Regards--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:00, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --C messier 23:06, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Lille 60 rue du Curé de St Etienne (PA00107714).JPG

• Nomination Maison sise 60 rue du Curé de St. Etienne, à Lille.-Nord (département français)--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 23:25, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Comment please repair the tilted areas, left and right --Hubertl 00:44, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded;--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:51, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Its just a weak PRO, for the composition, not so much for the quality itself. Maybe someone will discuss it. Second opinion appreciated. --Hubertl 16:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposed sky, CA, perspective distortion, noise...sorry, but this not a QI for me. --Iifar 18:54, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose As above. we can't expect to produce a QI with this type of camera, sorry. Alvesgaspar 12:48, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Thank you for your observtions. Maybe my next pictures taken with my recent Sony α NEX-F3. will have more success. Best Regards.- -- Pierre André (talk) 20:47, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Strong oppose per others. Just look at it in full view. Overexposed, unsharp and heavily overprocessed (noise reduction), no detail at all. Far below QI threshold as of today. --Kreuzschnabel 07:37, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --C messier 23:04, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

File:14-08-13-Helsinki-Kanu-RalfR-N3S_1133-094.jpg

• Nomination Helsinki, Kalliosaari --Ralf Roletschek 09:21, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion Not a valid categorization. Obviously not willing to contribute to Commons categorization standards. --Cccefalon 11:08, 18 December 2014 (UTC) Done --Ralf Roletschek 19:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support OK now. --Yann 08:52, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:10, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Steindy 00:37, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Köln,_Hohenzollernbrücke_und_Dom_--_2014_--_1866.jpg

• Nomination Hohenzollernbrücke, Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:35, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion This image does not depict the subject well because the near end of the bridge is not visible. It isn't apparent how much of the bridge is depicted in the photograph. The left third of the image does not seem to contribute to the illustration of the bridge. Focus and exposure are good. The shadows are somewhat harsh, especially on the piers supporting the bridge, but would not prevent promotion, in my opinion. --Wsiegmund 18:10, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
   Support Personally, I see no problem with this. The technical quality is very good. Furthermore, it could be impossible to depict the underside of the bridge if one were standing at one end of the bridge. Jakec 20:03, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
  {{Oppose}}. Too many free space on the left and on the bottom. The photo need a crop, I think. --Brateevsky 19:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

* Oppose Agree with Brateevsky. I've suggested a crop, please see note. The foreground is useless, and... ugly (IMO)--Jebulon 11:00, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Fixed @Brateevsky and Jebulon: I've choosen another crop. Hopefully it's better now.--XRay 12:09, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

• Now it's better. The photo can be a QI. --Brateevsky 09:32, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
• Now it's better. I continue to agree with Brateevsky.--Jebulon 20:29, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 23:03, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Graffiti in Tartu 02.JPG

• Nomination Graffiti in Tartu. Kruusamägi 20:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
  
•  Support QI Poco a poco 22:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'd apreciate a wise advice about the copyright, please.--Jebulon 20:36, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
  
•  Support --Livioandronico2013 09:52, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roletschek 10:26, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • I'd apreciate a wise advice about the copyright, please.--Jebulon 10:55, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
    • I think that the way to do it is starting a DR. I didn't think of that when promote, to be honest. Poco a poco 18:22, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
      • There is nothing copyrighted. --Ralf Roletschek 11:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
        • Mantra.--Jebulon 18:56, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Steindy 00:39, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Mielec,_ul._Rochowska,_kaplica_Boguszów,_02.JPG

• Nomination Boguszów Chapel in Mielec 1 --Jacek Halicki 10:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Bgag 15:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose should be discussed IMO. The facade is in shadow, and the crop is too tight, especially above.--Jebulon 20:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
  
•  Support I have no doubt that this is QI. Very good quality. --Code 09:47, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support per Code --Kreuzschnabel 21:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment good however two things to clone out in the sky (see notes) --Christian Ferrer 07:59, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

   Done--Jacek Halicki 20:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 23:01, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Tragopogon_pratensis_Mitterbach_01.JPG

• Nomination Meadow Salsify (Tragopogon pratensis), found near Mitterbach am Erlaufsee, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 07:04, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion  Comment Not sharp in large view; yellow seems overexposed. Jkadavoor 07:41, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
   Question DOF is small as in all macro shots, but to me sharpness is on the level that is usually accepted here. Do you see any area where yellow is burned out? --Uoaei1 13:32, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
  DOF is not the issue here; nowhere I see satisfying details. I noticed ISO 800 which may be reason. Feel free to change to "discuss" for other opinions. Jkadavoor 05:57, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
  In the original file, about 1.5 million pixels, mostly in the lower petals, are saturated in the red channel (value equal to 255). That is more than 7% and is high for a successful QIC. File:Eristalis tenax auf Tragopogon pratensis 01.JPG, another current QIC by the same photographer, has a similar number of saturated pixels. I think f/11 to f/16 is a good range for macro images. Diffraction reduces resolution substantially for slower f-ratios. ISO800 should not degrade quality significantly for a D7100. The flower heads are 5 cm wide according to en:Tragopogon pratensis so the subject is not highly magnified.--Wsiegmund 01:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Info How have you evaluated this? In the new version with reduced brightness which I uploaded yesterday, there is no saturation at all - at least according to the information shown in Lightroom. --Uoaei1 08:32, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

• I used Photoshop Elements 11. The numbers I quote are for the first version (original?). To evaluate whether information has been irretrievably lost, it is easiest to look at the original version. In both versions, if I use the levels tool to set the output levels of the green and blue channels to zero, then stretch the upper end of the red channel, I see no detail in most of several lower petals and in portions of other parts of the flower. Yellow and red flowers have such intense colors that it is difficult to avoid clipping in the red channel. --Wsiegmund 17:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Support I find it is an excellent picture and therefore QI. --Steindy 12:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI. No doubt to me.--Hubertl 17:52, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good for me. --Hockei 18:40, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 22:47, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Girl_of_Isla_Margarita.jpg

• Nomination Girl of Isla Margarita --The Photographer 12:03, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
• Decline  Support I like the image. The crop is small and there is a little bit noise (in the background) but OK for QI. --XRay 17:07, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  I think it may be a bit noisy, and the composition is iffy - it looks a bit too severed head for my taste.  Weak oppose. --Mattbuck 23:49, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Wrong choice of focal length which distorts the face. Jkadavoor 16:31, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Jkadavoor. Distance too short, distorting the face (giant nose vs. tiny ears). --Kreuzschnabel 21:03, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --C messier 23:00, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Nowy_Aton,_Historyczny_szlak_w_kanionie_rzeki_Psyrccha_(14).jpg

• Nomination History trail in the Psyrtskha river gorge. New Athos, Gudauta District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 13:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
• Decline  Oppose overexposed and blurred --Christian Ferrer 16:41, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
   Comment Sorry, but I do not agree. We need more opinions. --Halavar 17:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
   Weak support There are a few overexposed spots, but I know from experience how difficult it is to take a picture of a creek on a sunny day without getting burned areas. Personally, I find the blur attractive. Jakec 01:39, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
• Of course when I talk about blur, I talk about the vegetation and about the river banks, not about the motion blur of the water that is nice. --Christian Ferrer 06:04, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Christian Ferrer. Ram-Man 13:38, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

  Is that fixable? I gave up after one (failed) attempt, and stick to BG-1 on my user page. –Be..anyone 03:41, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --C messier 22:59, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

File:14-08-13-helsinki-RalfR-N3S_1312-071.jpg

• Nomination Helsinki, Tallink ferry --Ralf Roletschek 06:31, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support Good quality. --JLPC 15:14, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
  I disagree as long as there is not a correct categorization. "Helsinki/unsortiert" is not complying with commons category system. --Cccefalon 05:57, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
  Fixed categories --Msaynevirta 17:06, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Thank you, my objections are void now. --Cccefalon 10:32, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 22:45, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Ранкова палітра.jpg

• Nomination 8th price on Wiki Loves Earth 2014 (by Башкатов Віталій) –Be..anyone 04:44, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Very pretty, but very overprocessed. Mattbuck 08:01, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support for me, regardless of processing. Is it quality? It is sharp, properly exposed (no overly dark or light areas, no clipping), no noise of note, no CAs of note, no obvious stitching errors, looks good at 100%, has great composition. It's got high value; I can see this being used by a lot of people. Is it saturated? Yes. For me this is the only potential defect. And I'd only oppose if the level of saturation bothered my overall impression (it obviously does for others) or I thought it would make it have low value. -- Ram-Man 21:21, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose I really don´t like these coloured, overprocessed things. --Hubertl 20:06, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose it's time for juries to follow the guidelines. Overprocessed.--Jebulon 21:08, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
•  weak support Yes, it looks overprocessed (that is over-denoised) at full view, partly like a waterpainting. But then, we are looking at a 34 mpix image. All in all it’s not that overprocessed, and thank God it’s not oversharpened. --Kreuzschnabel 08:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment the only issues I see are a little lack of contrast and an oversaturation, both fixable IMO --Christian Ferrer 18:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Oversaturated. Not an example of photographic quality for sure. Alvesgaspar 12:51, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --C messier 22:48, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Bastioni_Wrede.jpg

• Nomination Bastion Wrede, Suomenlinna, Finland. --Óðinn 01:25, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
• Decline  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:57, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
   Oppose Backlighting leads to overexposure (color shifts) in the sky. Ram-Man 14:11, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposed on the left side. --Steindy 11:55, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose I follow Steindy.--Jebulon 10:27, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment - uploaded new version, please have another look. --Óðinn 18:43, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Steindy 00:30, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

File:14-08-13-helsinki-RalfR-10.jpg

• Nomination Helsinki, market hall --Ralf Roletschek 06:31, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion Good quality. Would you PLEASE ;-) so kind and categorize it? --Hubertl 22:43, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
  Please add a correct categorization. "Helsinki/unsortiert" is not complying with commons category system. --Cccefalon 20:25, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
   Support --Msaynevirta 17:13, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

* Oppose Perspective at left to be corrected.--Jebulon 21:05, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment Needs small perspective corrections. --Steindy 12:02, 20 December 2014 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 11:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Now okay for me. --Steindy 14:17, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Correction could have been more carefully done, but ok now.--Jebulon 20:24, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 22:44, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

File:TempleTank.jpg

• Nomination A water tank in a temple in Hyderabad, India -- Nikhil 03:00, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
• Promotion Please remove the magenta CA (see note). --Cccefalon 06:22, 4 December 2014 (UTC) @Cccefalon Sorry for the late reply. I don't know how to correct the CAs. If you find time, can you please go ahead and do it. Thanks in advance. --Nikhil 03:20, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
   Comment I don't see any CA, but it does look a bit posterised. Mattbuck 21:57, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
   Support This is fine for me. Ram-Man 16:23, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
   Comment Is the "aberration" a building in the background mostly hidden by the tree? –Be..anyone 04:19, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

• Be..anyone, you are right. The light seemingly hidden in the trees (annotated part) is part of a temple in the background. Mattbuck, I only sharpened the image slightly and no manipulation was done. Thanks and cheers! Nikhil 07:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Support --Steindy 11:46, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 11:06, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Shearer's_Covered_Bridge_Window_3008px.jpg

• Nomination: Covered Bridge Window --Ram-Man 13:55, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
• Review
•  Oppose Overexposed background. --Steindy 20:06, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

  Covered bridges are naturally lit and it's like taking a picture in a room of a house with only the light from windows. Some overexposure is expected (See a, b, c [QI], d, e). Another opinion please. Ram-Man 15:06, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

   Comment The above examples are just bad examples of good photos and are at most as examples what to look for in order to avoid such kind of mistake. --Steindy 10:54, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Subject clearly clean and sharp, background indifferent.--Livioandronico2013 15:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Background essential. Per Steindy.--Jebulon 21:02, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Neutral Good technical quality but I don't understand the composition to be honest. --Code 09:53, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support A good composition and good enough quality. Yes, it could be better with more favourable light conditions. Alvesgaspar 12:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Livioandronico2013 11:05, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Зимовий Кукуль.JPG

• Nomination: 11th place in Wiki Loves Earth 2014 (by Хіраш Володимир) –Be..anyone 02:30, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
• Review Very good. --Óðinn 03:43, 16 December 2014 (UTC)  Oppose It does indeed need perspective correction --Óðinn 15:31, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
  Inappropriate QIC description.  Oppose WB not done / too much magenta in the trees, perspective not done. --Cccefalon 06:01, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support. I think that it is true light making the color of the trees. -- Spurzem 23:01, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support QI for me. Ram-Man 12:53, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Msaynevirta 22:22, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Poor quality per Cccefalon --Livioandronico2013 14:15, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Livioandronico2013 11:04, 25 December 2014 (UTC)