Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 20 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Vishnu_Pandal_Garhi_Padhavali_004.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Panels in Vishnu Pandal Garhi PadhavaliI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2021. --Suyash.dwivedi 10:04, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 20:33, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It is lacking sharpness and composition. It was taken from a slightly off angle and is tilted. --Augustgeyler 19:06, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Augustgeyler, could be fixed though. --Plozessor 04:34, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 22:58, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

File:M017F004_Schloss_Wilhelmsburg_und_Kirche_St._Georg_in_Schmalkalden.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination View through the west portal of Wilhelmsburg Castle onto the old town of Schmalkalden. --Augustgeyler 20:04, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry:  Level of detail too low, blurred, too low sharpness for QI. --F. Riedelio 14:40, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think the image is sharp enough and hand as a normal level of detail. Looking for more opinions.--Augustgeyler 19:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think this one is too fuzzy, yes.--Peulle 08:56, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Is the first review perhaps a bit of a retaliation? A bit more sharpness would be desirable and the foreground could be brighter. But the image composition is very nice, I like it. -- Spurzem 10:13, 16 August 2024 (UTC)~
  •  Oppose Sorry, yes, the composition is really great, but IMO it's too blurry and grainy for QI. However, there is also a disturbing scratch (?) right to the towers (above the clock tower in background, I guess this photo was digitized from an analog photo). That could be retouched I guess. --Plozessor 04:38, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 22:57, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Niasviž_Benedictine_Sisters_Convent_Tower_2023-07-02_6087.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Benedictine sisters convent tower, Niasviž, Belarus‎. --Mike1979 Russia 06:00, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Intense PC let to distortion. --Augustgeyler 08:57, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment I don't agree with you. The foto taken with 45mm focus on crop. The tower has the realistic proportions. --Mike1979 Russia 09:32, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good picture. I can't see any perspective distortion at all. ReneeWrites 22:30, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Yes, there is no perspective distortion anymore. But the intense correction let to wrong proportions. See the buildings in the back for example. --Augustgeyler 05:05, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
  • You are very wrong. See the original file before corrections. The PC was minimal. And see other fotos of this object in the category. --Mike1979 Russia 05:35, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Neutral I am sorry. I miss interpreted your nomination. Thanks for clarifying. --August (talk) 05:51, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 22:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Selección_de_Voley_Argentina_previo_a_Paris_2024_-_BugWarp_(52).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Argentina men's national volleyball team during their last training in Argentina before the start of the 2024 Summer Olympics. By User:BugWarp --MB-one 11:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:14, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose cut off hands. --Augustgeyler 04:53, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Augustgeyler. --Sebring12Hrs 23:24, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per above. --XtraJovial 10:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The person being photographed has obviously positioned themselves for the photo, so it's not an action shot, where I'm normally quite tolerant in my judgement. If there was enough time for this, there would also have been enough time to choose a suitable focal length that doesn't look cartoonish and, above all, to make sure that the entire sports hall lighting isn't reflected in the glasses. The unfortunate cropping of the hands, on the other hand, is a minor detail. --Smial 12:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Augustgeyler and Smial. --Plozessor 04:47, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 22:53, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Tesla_Model_S_Plaid_Autofrühling_Ulm_IMG_9278_(cropped).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Tesla Model S Plaid at Autofrühling Ulm 2024 --Alexander-93 07:29, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Well composed. But DoF is too small. Only the very front of the car is in focus. --Augustgeyler 08:18, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think sharpness and contrast can be improved and the crop should not be so tight. Therefore I ask to discuss. -- Spurzem 14:17, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok for me. Sharp enough overall, and no disturbing background. --Plozessor 16:53, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks OK to me. Thanks. Mike Peel 16:03, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 22:52, 19 August 2024 (UTC)