Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 07 2021
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Bellows weir bij Ramspol
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 5 April 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Bellows weir bij Ramspol
-
- Nomination Work shed on the Boshuisweg. Location: Kroondomein Het Loo.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 5 April 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Work shed on the Boshuisweg. Location: Kroondomein Het Loo.
-
- Nomination Castle ruin Glanegg in Mautbrücken, Glanegg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:48, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shed on Flatschacher Straße in Friedlach, Glanegg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:48, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Salix caprea on Flatschacher Straße in Friedlach, Glanegg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:48, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:48, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Petzen, seen from Metschach, Glanegg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:48, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Intersection in Maria-Feicht-Gegend, Glanegg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:48, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:49, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Figure découpée (1965) by Pablo Picasso (designer) and Carl Nesjar in Vondelpark, Amsterdam --Trougnouf 22:35, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, nice statue. -- Ikan Kekek 04:47, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Undercarriage of an Airbus A400M at ILA 2018 --MB-one 20:20, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 21:00, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Renault Captur in supermarket Coto, Carilo, Argentina --Ezarate 19:57, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:04, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oisterwijk-NL, church: the Sint-Petrus'-Bandenkerk --Michielverbeek 19:22, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:51, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Esch-NL, church: the Sint-Willibrorduskerk --Michielverbeek 19:22, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:53, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Boxtel-NL, churchtower: the Sint-Petrusbasiliek --Michielverbeek 19:22, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:55, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Russian Orthodox church of the Icon of Our Lady Zhivonosny Istochnik in Bibirevo --LexKurochkin 19:07, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:57, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Weißstorch beim Nestbau, Naturschutzgebiet Lochbusch-Königswiesen, Neustadt - Geinsheim, Rheinland-Pfalz. --Fischer.H 16:44, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 18:30, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winery Loblocher Schlössel
--F. Riedelio 11:55, 4 April 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:12, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 19:47, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Winery Loblocher Schlössel
-
- Nomination Monument aux Morts and Palais Rihour in Lille, France --Trougnouf 09:28, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:02, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Main portal of Cathedral Saint-Just-et-Saint-Pasteur in Narbonne. --Palauenc05 08:29, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality, Tournasol7 09:16, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entrance of the Duisburg Staatsanwaltschaft government building --Carschten 08:08, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality, Tournasol7 09:16, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of the Catholic Filial Church of St. Mary Magdalene in Handthal --Ermell 07:28, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Nice photo. Thanks! --LexKurochkin 07:56, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Organ loft in the church of St.Georg in Höchstadt an der Aisch --Ermell 07:28, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality, Tournasol7 07:55, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Altar in the Catholic monastery church Mariae Geburt in the monastery village in Scheinfeld --Ermell 07:28, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality, Tournasol7 07:55, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Altar in the Catholic monastery church Mariae Geburt in the monastery village in Scheinfeld --Ermell 07:28, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:36, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Altar in the Catholic monastery church Mariae Geburt in the monastery village in Scheinfeld --Ermell 07:28, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Very beatiful. Thanks! --LexKurochkin 08:00, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Facade of the Bains Lillois, in Lille, France --Velvet 07:16, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support the very top of the building is slightly blurred, but OK. --LexKurochkin 08:01, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gallery, Chapel on the Michaelsberg, Untergrombach, Germany --Llez 05:59, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:08, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 14:50, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Snowdrops in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:54, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good composition but shallow DoF. Did you use a flash? Remarkable color noise (?) is visible. Nonetheless QI for me. --Tuxyso 06:03, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Done Thank you. No, I didn't used a flash. And I reduced the noise a little bit. The aperture is always a compromise. A closer aperture is better for DoF, but worse for sharpness. The aim was also to make the background sufficiently blurred. --XRay 07:30, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bicycle stand at Vischering Castle in Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:54, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:17, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 14:50, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Manhole cover with symbol of the Way of St. James on Lambertikirchplatz in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:54, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:07, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dipsacus fullonum in Jardin des 5 sens in Yvoire, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:46, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:55, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the castle of Yvoire from Jardin des Cinq Sens, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:46, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:55, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former priory of Saint-Hippolyte in Crémieu, Isere, France. --Tournasol7 05:46, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:55, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at 141 rue Auguste Ravier in Morestel, Isere, France. --Tournasol7 05:46, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:57, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lac des Plagnes in commune of Abondance, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:46, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:57, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dairy farm kattewaardweg 2 Kampen near the Eilandbrug.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 4 April 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality, Tournasol7 05:48, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Dairy farm kattewaardweg 2 Kampen near the Eilandbrug.
-
- Nomination Eilandbrug (Type Tuibrug) in Overijssel. Bridge in the N50 over the IJssel.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 4 April 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:40, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Eilandbrug (Type Tuibrug) in Overijssel. Bridge in the N50 over the IJssel.
-
- Nomination Jardins de la Fontaine in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 03:55, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:57, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bridge over the canal in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 03:55, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:58, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 03:55, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:45, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Risalit of the Duisburg Staatsanwaltschaft government building --Carschten 22:53, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Impressively shows the great quality of the 10 years old sensor of the D7000 (in terms of detail quality and dynamic range) - the D7000 was a game changer in DX. --Tuxyso 05:57, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rose 'Double Delight' --LexKurochkin 20:48, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:52, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rose 'Aloha' (1989) --LexKurochkin 13:34, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:52, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ceiling in the Town Hall Hall in Bruges --Ermell 08:19, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:15, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alchemilla alpina in Jardin des 5 sens in Yvoire, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:21, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose For a bit confusing motif like this not sharp enough, especially at the top and at the right corner. --Ermell 19:15, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chital (Axis axis) stags, Mudumalai National Park, India. --Tagooty 02:19, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
The crop at the bottom is too close. Fixable? --XRay 04:07, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
No, bottom and right are at the edge of the frame. I could crop top and left so the deer are more centred. Would that be worthwhile? --Tagooty 09:27, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Oppose no detail - high ISO --Charlesjsharp 21:21, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
To me this image shows the stags blending into the background as they walk past. Backlit by diffuse golden sunlight. --Tagooty 05:28, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
@Tagooty: More cropping is not a solution. The whole animal should be visible - with the hooves. --XRay 07:33, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chital (Axis axis) doe, side view, Bokkapuram, Nilgiris, India --Tagooty 02:19, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose you are too far away to get a decent shot. no definition --Charlesjsharp 21:24, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Taken with a 600mm lens at 30m distance, near enough to avoid scaring the wildlife. The cropped image is 15 MP. --Tagooty 05:28, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Old TRA Taichung station in East District, Taichung. --Tiouraren 15:29, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Slightly noisy for a photo taken in such nice day, but OK. --LexKurochkin 08:22, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Krapuoja river valley in Vantaa, Finland --Ximonic 00:30, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Question Nice photo, but needs perspective correction. Please pay attention to buildings far from the camera. Is it possible to fix? --LexKurochkin 07:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
It's tricky on aerial photographs pointing downwards but I can try. --Ximonic 12:25, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Done Tried some p correction procedures. --Ximonic 14:05, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Support Yes, much better now and aesthetically very impressive. Thank you! --LexKurochkin 19:26, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at Markt 4 in Pulsnitz, Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:40, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support The very top of the building is slightly blurred, but OK. --LexKurochkin 08:36, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sandstone sculpture of Pope Pius V
--F. Riedelio 08:02, 30 March 2021 (UTC) - Decline
Oppose Interesting subject, but significant parts of the statue are not sharp enough (the right arm and the right shoulder for example). Sorry. --LexKurochkin 07:32, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --F. Riedelio 11:58, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Sandstone sculpture of Pope Pius V
-
- Nomination Dreumel-NL, church: the Sint Barbarakerk --Michielverbeek 06:17, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Perspective should be corrected. --Ermell 07:53, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Done Small perspective improvement --Michielverbeek 20:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:17, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Lake Constance in Friedrichshafen --MB-one 21:26, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
MB-one Can you remove the dust spot? Thanks --Commonists 21:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Lake Constance in Friedrichshafen --MB-one 21:26, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Paris - Arc de Triomphe du Carrousel - PA00085992 (by Thesupermat) --Sebring12Hrs 14:30, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Review
The original relief is not a flat rectangle, as it is part of the arch's ceiling. See the other image. I think such an image manipulation "against reality" should be stated very clearly in the description. (I do admit that there will be occasions when having the "manipulated" photo will be convenient. So, this is not a general objection.) -- Martinus KE 19:53, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Paris - Arc de Triomphe du Carrousel - PA00085992 (by Thesupermat) --Sebring12Hrs 14:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Review
The description text could be more informative (location of the relief on the building, goddess Victoria with a trophy, ...), but I like the photo. -- Martinus KE 19:53, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Lily Pond, Balboa Park, San Diego, California --Matthew T Rader 02:45, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Review It needs a perspective correction --Michielverbeek 05:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lonely trees and Sasso Padella in Val Canali, Primiero, Italy. --Lion-hearted85 23:37, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry: bluish cast, blurred at left and right edges. --F. Riedelio 07:46, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bust of Caracalla at The Feodor Dostoevsky restaurant in Saint Petersburg, Vladimirskiy prospekt 9I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Reda Kerbouche 21:09, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 07:37, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination view from summit of Pizzo della Croce in Italy.--Mænsard vokser 09:42, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry: blurred, foreground cut off. --F. Riedelio 07:27, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Two churches in Mesaria, Santorini. --C messier 21:50, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 07:12, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spinnenläufer in einem Weinkeller an der Deutschen Weinstrasse. --Fischer.H 15:22, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Comment Your file description is inaccurate. This is a picture of a house centipede, not cobwebs. So please fix that. I think I'll let someone else judge whether the penumbra around the antennae (motion blur, I imagine) and the cutoff of parts of the animal are OK for QI. These creatures run fast, but they do stand still at times, so it's possible to get sharp pictures of them. -- Ikan Kekek 17:08, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
The description is not good --Túllio F 19:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Fischer.H 16:29, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment Set nomination status "Withdrawn" per nominator's comment --LexKurochkin 14:33, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Base of the monument to Vittorio Emanuele II in Naples, Italy. --Lion-hearted85 23:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
IMO the right side should be cropped and the face of the scooter driver should be made unrecognizable. --F. Riedelio 07:39, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
New version Thank you for your suggestion. I have gently blurred the face of the scooter driver and cropped out the right side. I've looked for a good compromise to include a portion of the building facade (to keep the context of the square recognizable) without cutting in half the windows and the front door. I have also refined the upper crop and the left crop to gain some extra room. --Lion-hearted85 00:17, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Support Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 07:01, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stainless steel wine-tanks
--F. Riedelio 15:55, 25 March 2021 (UTC) - Withdrawn
Oppose Sorry, IMHO too much of the picture is unsharp (like most of the tanks on the background, which are an important part of the scene). --Domob 16:18, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --F. Riedelio 06:58, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment Set nomination status "Withdrawn" per nominator's comment --LexKurochkin 14:36, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Stainless steel wine-tanks
-
- Nomination: Church in Emporio, Santorini. --C messier 18:39, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Blurred foreground, bell tower tilt to the left. --F. Riedelio 14:23, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Tiger_Yawning_Mudumalai_Mar21_DSC01305.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Tiger (m) (Panthera tigris tigris) yawning, Mudumalai National Park, India --Tagooty 15:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Horst J. Meuter 16:59, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I think, it's to unsharp sorry --Geoprofi Lars 18:20, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree; grainy and not too sharp. --Peulle 12:38, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Disturbing object top left. --F. Riedelio 07:06, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Altmannshausen_Kirche_Altar_HDR-20210314-RM-170919.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Catholic Filial Church of St. Jacobus maior in Altmannshausen, main altar. --Ermell 06:28, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Sorry, but white objects in the center of image have nearly no details in lights.--LexKurochkin 12:48, 28 March 2021 (UTC)- Info Whites reduced a bit and some more structure added.--Ermell 08:51, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, now it is better. Thank you! Please do not count my objection for the new version. --LexKurochkin 07:11, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Info Whites reduced a bit and some more structure added.--Ermell 08:51, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I disagree. --Ermell 16:47, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support There are some burnt highlights, but most are tiny reflections. Also the window has clipping, but no unnatural colour shift, acceptable for me, as it is the lighting source. All in all, the image is not perfect, but well-balanced. --Smial 09:48, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support Per Smial, not perfect, but good enough. Apart from the lights on the statues, the details are well readable. —Nefronus 19:38, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I'd be OK with the "white objects", but what is it with the faces of the altar sculptures (angels, Christ, the Father)? To me, they look blurred (although they can hardly be out of focus, considering sharp details right next to them). Is it an issue with the photo, or with the sculptures themselves? -- Martinus KE 22:33, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The visually perceived impression of sharpness is very strongly dependent on the local contrast. Just by the way of lighting you can make one and the same object, photographed with the same camera and the same lens and the same settings, look once sharper and once blurrier. Sharpening algorithms work on a similar principle by enhancing local contrasts. Anyone who has ever developed black-and-white film with Agfa Rodinal (or comparable developers from Ilford, Kodak, or other manufacturers) has known this effect for decades. In the picture above, the brightness of the white figurines is close to the overexposure limit and, depending on the "development algorithm", the low contrast may have been compressed (keyword: "s-curving"), so that they have less visual sharpness than their surroundings. --Smial 09:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
- Support Good enough for me --Moroder 19:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good. --Aristeas 09:17, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Hampi,_India,_Community_hall_(sabha_mandapa)_of_Vijaya_Vitthala_Temple.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Community hall of Vijaya Vitthala Temple, Hampi, Karnataka, India. --Argenberg 11:14, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 12:30, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose for now -- please fix chromatic aberrations, correct perspective, and stop over-categorizing. --A.Savin 13:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose still not fixed, and even so, not enough detail or crisp enough for a day time shot like this.--Peulle 12:34, 3 April 2021 (UTC)