Commons:Photography critiques/July 2019
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Optimum WikiC image resolution for current 2019 DSLRs
[edit]There was no response on these questions for 5 days and I began to see that they might not be appropriate for photography critiques. Have moved the questions over to the Village Pump/Technical.
Best,
--GRDN711 (talk) 17:37, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Another Batch of Images?
[edit]I recently got some images from Brazilian Federal Highway Police Flickr stream, in which I am (again) impressed by the following two images:
-
Quite good contrast in my opinion?
Are they in FP level?廣九直通車 (talk) 08:19, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- @廣九直通車 To me, the first photo is interesting but not quite my taste. I feel like the light trails don't add much to the composition. The second photo looks quite ordinary with a very tight crop on the left and at the bottom - not passable. Regards, --Podzemnik (talk) 04:31, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- Yuh, sorry for another silly nomination... Or perhaps my taste is too bad?廣九直通車 (talk) 04:53, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. 廣九直通車 (talk) 04:53, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Is it in FP level?
[edit]Thank you!--SCP-2000 (talk) 04:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- @SCP-2000 It's an interesting motif and I'd say that there is a FP potential. However, my opinion is that the glass reflection and the technical quality of this particular photo don't reach FP level. Regards, --Podzemnik (talk) 04:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks your comment!--SCP-2000 (talk) 14:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- @SCP-2000 It's an interesting motif and I'd say that there is a FP potential. However, my opinion is that the glass reflection and the technical quality of this particular photo don't reach FP level. Regards, --Podzemnik (talk) 04:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)